Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply

Next JS2 wave(s) will be...

Monday 3/27
2
2%
Tuesday 3/28
18
17%
Wednesday 3/29
35
32%
Thursday 3/30
13
12%
Friday 3/31
30
28%
Saturday 4/1
10
9%
 
Total votes: 108

User avatar
Smc1994

Silver
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Smc1994 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:20 pm

dddddd90 wrote:
Smc1994 wrote:
dddddd90 wrote:
Smc1994 wrote:
Rigo wrote: If you're genuinely curious, I can ask a partner about it.
I can ask my friends there too, but no, I'm not genuinely curious enough for you to reach out for me.
W&C is not in the cards for me.
I'll reach out to RBJ tomorrow and get her take on it. Anyone want me to put in a good word for a clerkship in 4 years? (She told me last week she's staying over coffee)
Ah yes, the Frankenstein-esque amalgam of LBJ and RBG. How is (s)he doing?
Mx. Johnson is holding up well, but ze has grown greater and more terrible than hir creators ever imagined.
I don't understand a single one of those pronouns.

User avatar
dddddd90

Bronze
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 3:55 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by dddddd90 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:21 pm

Smc1994 wrote:
dddddd90 wrote:
Smc1994 wrote:
dddddd90 wrote:
Smc1994 wrote:
Rigo wrote: If you're genuinely curious, I can ask a partner about it.
I can ask my friends there too, but no, I'm not genuinely curious enough for you to reach out for me.
W&C is not in the cards for me.
I'll reach out to RBJ tomorrow and get her take on it. Anyone want me to put in a good word for a clerkship in 4 years? (She told me last week she's staying over coffee)
Ah yes, the Frankenstein-esque amalgam of LBJ and RBG. How is (s)he doing?
Mx. Johnson is holding up well, but ze has grown greater and more terrible than hir creators ever imagined.
I don't understand a single one of those pronouns.
That's the point.
Last edited by dddddd90 on Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:26 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash

Silver
Posts: 1296
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:21 pm

Monday wrote:
R. Jeeves wrote:
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:
Rigo wrote:
unpetitpacifiste wrote:I would choose HLS over any other school with any scholly in a heartbeat. The fact is just that you can pay off your debt in two years anyway if you work in BigLaw.
lolwut
You could almost definitely pay off sticker h in two years. No one does it but with starting big law salary at 180 you could live on 60k a year and get really close if not done in two. If you were willing to live on even less that would get faster still.
That requires you to work like you're in big law and live like you never went to law school, but it's doable if you really want your debt gone asap
are you accounting for taxes and COL while working?
His or her avatar is Ben Wyatt. Funny.
Accountants fuck up quick math too sometimes :cry:

Nah but y'all are right 2 years probably isn't doable

Rigo

Diamond
Posts: 16639
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Rigo » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:22 pm

Smc1994 wrote:
Rigo wrote:
Smc1994 wrote:
Rigo wrote:I want PI/gov but it's fun to backseat drive.
I prefer to think of corporate representation as a form of serving the public's interest.
How very Cory Booker of you.
Let's not forget that Mitt's got a JD/MBA from H.
It was moreso a dig at Cory Booker claiming to be some great public interest politician while jerking off Wall Street more than anybody, but that's neither here nor there.

User avatar
Leliana

Bronze
Posts: 464
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 12:23 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Leliana » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:22 pm

Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:180 is not 115 after taxes
It very much is in NYC, lol.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Smc1994

Silver
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Smc1994 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:22 pm

dddddd90 wrote:
Smc1994 wrote:
dddddd90 wrote:
Smc1994 wrote:
dddddd90 wrote:
Smc1994 wrote:
Rigo wrote: If you're genuinely curious, I can ask a partner about it.
I can ask my friends there too, but no, I'm not genuinely curious enough for you to reach out for me.
W&C is not in the cards for me.
I'll reach out to RBJ tomorrow and get her take on it. Anyone want me to put in a good word for a clerkship in 4 years? (She told me last week she's staying over coffee)
Ah yes, the Frankenstein-esque amalgam of LBJ and RBG. How is (s)he doing?
Mx. Johnson is holding up well, but ze has grown greater and more terrible than hir creators ever imagined.
I don't understand a single one of those pronouns.
That's the point.
http://totalfratmove.com/personal-prono ... ns-campus/

User avatar
Smc1994

Silver
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Smc1994 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:23 pm

Rigo wrote:
Smc1994 wrote:
Rigo wrote:
Smc1994 wrote:
Rigo wrote:I want PI/gov but it's fun to backseat drive.
I prefer to think of corporate representation as a form of serving the public's interest.
How very Cory Booker of you.
Let's not forget that Mitt's got a JD/MBA from H.
It was moreso a dig at Cory Booker claiming to be some great public interest politician while jerking off Wall Street more than anybody, but that's neither here nor there.
That awkward moment when you think Cory Booker is too liberal...

bloomsday

Bronze
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 2:56 pm

.

Post by bloomsday » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:23 pm

.
Last edited by bloomsday on Mon Jun 12, 2017 3:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

curry1

Silver
Posts: 884
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:41 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by curry1 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:24 pm

Leliana wrote:
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:180 is not 115 after taxes
It very much is in NYC, lol.
and very close to that in CA/DC (i.e where a solid majority of the biglaw jobs are).

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
R. Jeeves

Gold
Posts: 1980
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by R. Jeeves » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:25 pm

canafsa wrote:Where are people pulling these 300,000+ numbers from? No one who graduates law school is in that much debt, even if they pay ticket and don't have a penny walking in. Hell, with summer work placements, most debts aren't much above 200,000, even in New York. Objective numbers? Bullshit.
i dont imagine it hitting 300k. HLS puts up a pretty high 9 month COL figure. you could live for an entire year on less. plus yeah, factor in your summer/other income during LS.

but still, with interest and yearly tuition increases i wouldnt be surprised if sticker meant graduating at least 240k in the hole. i havent crunched the numbers precisely, so if someone wants to throw a number at me that includes summers, then i'd be interested.

im not weighing in on the "worth it" debate btw - i just like putting numbers on thing.

Rigo

Diamond
Posts: 16639
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Rigo » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:25 pm

Smc1994 wrote: That awkward moment when you think Cory Booker is too liberal...
Hey I don't want him near the White House either.
Common ground!

User avatar
Smc1994

Silver
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Smc1994 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:25 pm

Rigo wrote:
Smc1994 wrote: That awkward moment when you think Cory Booker is too liberal...
Hey I don't want him near the White House either.
Common ground!
I'll take it. Consensus is consensus!

User avatar
OnlyHumean

New
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2016 10:06 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by OnlyHumean » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:25 pm

Rigo wrote:
OnlyHumean wrote:
Sarastro wrote:
Monday wrote:
Thelaw23 wrote:Can I chime in? Now, people might call me illogical/stupid/don't be a lawyer, but here is my take on it: We picked to become attorneys, right? We chose our career. We hope not to change it and we are going to school and paying a good amount of money, as well as spending time, on it. You have one life. Wouldn't you want to go to the best school possible? Even if at sticker? Your diploma will stick with you for the rest of your life. You will be spending the next 60 years of your life explaining to your employers/kids/friends that "Oh, I could've went into Harvard and got in, but I chose to go to University of Virginia as it was just cheaper and made more sense."

I don't know guys, it's just I feel like we have one shot at this for something that remains with us our whole career and life.
This concern would make sense only if lawyers stood around whipping out and comparing their diplomas rather than actual work product and business brought into the firm. Psst, they don't. So in the end, going after 300k debt is more of a personal preference ("I want to drop the H-bomb") and in that case, you do you but spare us the pretense of logic.
+1
Without being too specific, I know a soon-to-be-retired lawyer that reached the unequivocal top of her field and went to a TII "because it was cheaper." Pretty sure no one thinks less of her for it.

Doesn't mean there aren't objective differences between statistical outcomes of TII vs. HLS-- Her point to me, though, was essentially if you have the option of being successful from a TII and being successful from HLS, the difference is basically 300k and years of crippling debt vs bragging rights. Whether you find that argument persuasive is one thing, but I just found it to be an interesting perspective from someone I respected.
Maybe I'm missing something, but how do you know if you "have the option of being successful from a TII" until you've done it? It sounds like she's essentially saying "If you know everything will work out amazing after going to a TII, then go to a TII because it will be cheaper"
Sure. But the problem is we don't know if everything will work out amazing. Which is why we assume median; and I'd much rather be median at HLS than at a TII.

I just don't understand what this is supposed to tell us in advance of actually knowing how things work out.
In reality, if you're getting Harvard you'll have significant T14/T20 money so it's not like you'll be damned to the second tier.
Sure. But that's not the situation we're talking about.

I'm just trying to understand how the partner's message in the anecdote was more than "if you can see the future, and it turns out you do well, don't worry, take TII over HLS"

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash

Silver
Posts: 1296
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:25 pm

Leliana wrote:
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:180 is not 115 after taxes
It very much is in NYC, lol.
Well I would love a citation because I'm getting 130 without itemizing

User avatar
dddddd90

Bronze
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 3:55 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by dddddd90 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:27 pm

Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:
Leliana wrote:
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:180 is not 115 after taxes
It very much is in NYC, lol.
Well I would love a citation because I'm getting 130 without itemizing
Sweet summer child

User avatar
Smc1994

Silver
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Smc1994 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:29 pm

Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:
Leliana wrote:
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:180 is not 115 after taxes
It very much is in NYC, lol.
Well I would love a citation because I'm getting 130 without itemizing
Did you do state+city??

User avatar
CHyde

Bronze
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 10:17 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by CHyde » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:30 pm

.
Last edited by CHyde on Thu Feb 23, 2017 12:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


curry1

Silver
Posts: 884
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:41 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by curry1 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:30 pm

Smc1994 wrote:
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:
Leliana wrote:
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:180 is not 115 after taxes
It very much is in NYC, lol.
Well I would love a citation because I'm getting 130 without itemizing
Did you do state+city??
don't forget the feds

curry1

Silver
Posts: 884
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:41 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by curry1 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:30 pm

CHyde wrote:JS1 and NYU acceptance in one day... :shock:

CONGRATS!

Pozzo

Gold
Posts: 1918
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Pozzo » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:31 pm

.
Last edited by Pozzo on Tue Mar 07, 2017 9:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
texteach

Bronze
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 11:49 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by texteach » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:33 pm

.
Last edited by texteach on Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Smc1994

Silver
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Smc1994 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:33 pm

curry1 wrote:
Smc1994 wrote:
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:
Leliana wrote:
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:180 is not 115 after taxes
It very much is in NYC, lol.
Well I would love a citation because I'm getting 130 without itemizing
Did you do state+city??
don't forget the feds
Sorry, I meant to suggest that he only calculated Federal tax.

Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash

Silver
Posts: 1296
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:36 pm

Smc1994 wrote:
curry1 wrote:
Smc1994 wrote:
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:
Leliana wrote:
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:180 is not 115 after taxes
It very much is in NYC, lol.
Well I would love a citation because I'm getting 130 without itemizing
Did you do state+city??
don't forget the feds
Sorry, I meant to suggest that he only calculated Federal tax.
It was FICA, but that's still 120 not 115 or 110 as others have cited. And we're still leaving 4k of interest payments alone off the table here.

Whatever I've conceded long ago that two years is impossible, these numbers just aren't as cut and dry as some here are pretending they are.

And that 300# is just crazy talk, no one should ever pay that much in coa
Last edited by Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash on Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Monday

Silver
Posts: 784
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:36 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Monday » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:36 pm

.
Last edited by Monday on Thu May 11, 2017 12:18 am, edited 2 times in total.

Monday

Silver
Posts: 784
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:36 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Monday » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:37 pm

.
Last edited by Monday on Thu May 11, 2017 12:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”