cotiger wrote:The spreadsheet indictates that the average wait between complete and interview request is 13.3 days.La.Chocolate wrote:I did but I only saw applied date and accepted date...I'm assuming JS1 must be close to the accepted date...but wanted to get a clearer idea of when JS1 usually occurs if you applied in early Dec.lawschool22 wrote:Check the spreadsheet on page 1 of this thread.La.Chocolate wrote:If I applied in early December, what can I expect to be the average hear-back time (JS1 or reject)?
Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014) Forum
- barrelofmonkeys

- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
There's still a pretty wide variance. If you plot the data it's fairly scattered.barrelofmonkeys wrote:cotiger wrote:
The spreadsheet indictates that the average wait between complete and interview request is 13.3 days.
- barrelofmonkeys

- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
you're fairly scattered!lawschool22 wrote:There's still a pretty wide variance. If you plot the data it's fairly scattered.barrelofmonkeys wrote:cotiger wrote:
The spreadsheet indictates that the average wait between complete and interview request is 13.3 days.
- barrelofmonkeys

- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Boom! I was trying to make you feel betterbarrelofmonkeys wrote:you're fairly scattered!lawschool22 wrote:There's still a pretty wide variance. If you plot the data it's fairly scattered.barrelofmonkeys wrote:cotiger wrote:
The spreadsheet indictates that the average wait between complete and interview request is 13.3 days.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- barrelofmonkeys

- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
It's okay. I feel better.lawschool22 wrote:
Boom! I was trying to make you feel better
(1700)
- wtrc

- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
barrelofmonkeys wrote:It's okay. I feel better.lawschool22 wrote:
Boom! I was trying to make you feel better
(1700)
- wtrc

- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Sitting at a diner, having eggs and potatoes, working on a memo for work, waiting for exciting news.
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Placing lunch order at work, sitting in a conference room, working on a memo, waiting for exciting news.wtrc wrote:Sitting at a diner, having eggs and potatoes, working on a memo for work, waiting for exciting news.
- ShrimpToastMasters

- Posts: 411
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Trying to decide if I should eat leftover General Tso's chicken, sitting at my desk, making a binder, hoping for exciting news.lawschool22 wrote:Placing lunch order at work, sitting in a conference room, working on a memo, waiting for exciting news.wtrc wrote:Sitting at a diner, having eggs and potatoes, working on a memo for work, waiting for exciting news.
- wtrc

- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
"Hoping" is more credited than the waiting, good call.ShrimpToastMasters wrote:Trying to decide if I should eat leftover General Tso's chicken, sitting at my desk, making a binder, hoping for exciting news.lawschool22 wrote:Placing lunch order at work, sitting in a conference room, working on a memo, waiting for exciting news.wtrc wrote:Sitting at a diner, having eggs and potatoes, working on a memo for work, waiting for exciting news.
- barrelofmonkeys

- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Disappointed in you. There is only one credited response.wtrc wrote: "Hoping" is more credited than the waiting, good call.
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
+1wtrc wrote:"Hoping" is more credited than the waiting, good call.ShrimpToastMasters wrote:Trying to decide if I should eat leftover General Tso's chicken, sitting at my desk, making a binder, hoping for exciting news.lawschool22 wrote:Placing lunch order at work, sitting in a conference room, working on a memo, waiting for exciting news.wtrc wrote:Sitting at a diner, having eggs and potatoes, working on a memo for work, waiting for exciting news.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ShrimpToastMasters

- Posts: 411
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
wtrc wrote:"Hoping" is more credited than the waiting, good call.ShrimpToastMasters wrote:Trying to decide if I should eat leftover General Tso's chicken, sitting at my desk, making a binder, hoping for exciting news.lawschool22 wrote:Placing lunch order at work, sitting in a conference room, working on a memo, waiting for exciting news.wtrc wrote:Sitting at a diner, having eggs and potatoes, working on a memo for work, waiting for exciting news.
- Gary

- Posts: 338
- Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 8:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Random q, does anyone know the percentage of js1s to js2s back when Harvard did phone interviews? I was talking to a 3L there and he said a js1 was just a formality.
- wtrc

- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I've heard similarly. It wasn't JS, though, it was JR (Josh Rubenstein was the Dean of Admissions, I believe).Gary wrote:Random q, does anyone know the percentage of js1s to js2s back when Harvard did phone interviews? I was talking to a 3L there and he said a js1 was just a formality.
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
They have definitely increased the number of interviews since introducing Skype, but even when they did phone interviews, they interviewed around 1,000 people (http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2012/ ... ool-Skype/), so at least recently it was more than just a formality.Gary wrote:Random q, does anyone know the percentage of js1s to js2s back when Harvard did phone interviews? I was talking to a 3L there and he said a js1 was just a formality.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- everett2014

- Posts: 64
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:10 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Yeah, I remember when my ex was applying to law schools two cycles ago, she was actually far more excited about her KB1 than her KB2. Apparently prevailing wisdom at that time was that the KB1 was just to "weed out the crazies." (although I'm sure that's an extremely simplistic analysis of the interview process)Gary wrote:Random q, does anyone know the percentage of js1s to js2s back when Harvard did phone interviews? I was talking to a 3L there and he said a js1 was just a formality.
Edited for anachronism
- barrelofmonkeys

- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
What's the percentage now, of JS1-->JS2?
- wtrc

- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Last year they conducted just over 1,200 interviews, iirc, and ~850 people were admitted. So just over 70%. More than a formality, but chances were pretty good once a JS1 was offered (considering acceptance rate is like 13% beforehand).barrelofmonkeys wrote:What's the percentage now, of JS1-->JS2?
- koalacity

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
.
Last edited by koalacity on Thu Dec 19, 2013 12:26 am, edited 2 times in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
edwardt1988

- Posts: 378
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I wonder if there's two groups: People on the bubble that have to kind of prove it during the interview, and people that are basically in, except they have to prove they're not crazy. The js1-js2 rates would be very different among the two obviously.everett2014 wrote:Yeah, I remember when my ex was applying to law schools two cycles ago, she was actually far more excited about her KB1 than her KB2. Apparently prevailing wisdom at that time was that the KB1 was just to "weed out the crazies." (although I'm sure that's an extremely simplistic analysis of the interview process)Gary wrote:Random q, does anyone know the percentage of js1s to js2s back when Harvard did phone interviews? I was talking to a 3L there and he said a js1 was just a formality.
Edited for anachronism
I think it's more likely that anyone who gets an interview they'd grant a spot to, if they had enough spots. I'm sure a % of those js1 - no js2 just screw themselves out of a spot by having a terrible interview, and the rest of js1- no js2 are probably just unlucky that someone with similar numbers had a slightly better interview
- Gary

- Posts: 338
- Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 8:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Before my js1 I had harvard successfully out of my mind and never checked this thread.... After it, I already finished every page 
-
edwardt1988

- Posts: 378
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Also, I don't know if the rate of 70% is going to be the same this year(I hope so, or higher!), but it's an excellent success rate for an interview, and not everyone gets js1s so if you get one, you should be pretty happy with yourself regardless of what happens next
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
edwardt1988 wrote:I wonder if there's two groups: People on the bubble that have to kind of prove it during the interview, and people that are basically in, except they have to prove they're not crazy. The js1-js2 rates would be very different among the two obviously.everett2014 wrote:Yeah, I remember when my ex was applying to law schools two cycles ago, she was actually far more excited about her KB1 than her KB2. Apparently prevailing wisdom at that time was that the KB1 was just to "weed out the crazies." (although I'm sure that's an extremely simplistic analysis of the interview process)Gary wrote:Random q, does anyone know the percentage of js1s to js2s back when Harvard did phone interviews? I was talking to a 3L there and he said a js1 was just a formality.
Edited for anachronism
I think it's more likely that anyone who gets an interview they'd grant a spot to, if they had enough spots. I'm sure a % of those js1 - no js2 just screw themselves out of a spot by having a terrible interview, and the rest of js1- no js2 are probably just unlucky that someone with similar numbers had a slightly better interview
Yeah I am sure the chances are not 70% across the board. There are certain people with JS1's who have a 99% chance of a JS2 (based on their numbers) and another portion of people who probably have less than 20% chance (based on their numbers), and obviously some who are on the bubble where the interview could make the difference between an admit/WL/deny.
It would be really interesting to get the data on this, but unfortunately that will probably never happen.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login