Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle) Forum
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 7:24 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Has anyone sent a competing merit scholarship letter to Penn (and had success with garnering merit aid from them) yet? If so, did you write an accompanying essay of sorts, or just a really brief email, sent to the address listed on their site?
Additionally, does anyone know whether Penn expects you to send in just one merit offer? Or should you attach multiple offers you have received? The language and tenses they use on that page seem vague to me. Thanks.
Additionally, does anyone know whether Penn expects you to send in just one merit offer? Or should you attach multiple offers you have received? The language and tenses they use on that page seem vague to me. Thanks.
- Lighthouseman
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:20 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
UR1 3/6, UR2 3/27. Hoping this means I hear something soon!
Last edited by Lighthouseman on Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Ned Racine
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:54 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Just got a status date update today, but still Under Committee Review..
Decision soon?
Decision soon?
- Snowboarder1588
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 1:55 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Lighthouseman wrote:UR1 3/6, UR2 3/27. Hoping this means I heard something soon!
+1..my file has not made it to the shredder yet.

- jvincent11
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
I find it hard to believe they are giving anything more than a handful, if that, of acceptances from the WL already.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:06 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
.
Last edited by cgw on Sat Apr 06, 2013 7:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 4:45 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
I'm curious as to what the purpose of being "held" is at this point. If people are getting in off the waitlist already, I don't see the point of being held anymore since it seems like WL is pretty much the same thing as of now (i thought WL meant acceptances came after all the apps are reviewed vs. for held it doesn't matter... but i guess not? ). I'm not bitter or saying I'm entitled to a decision or anything .. im genuinely curious. Can somebody clear this up for me?
Been waiting since Oct so a decision soon would be great. But if more waiting means an acceptance, Penn can take its sweet time
Been waiting since Oct so a decision soon would be great. But if more waiting means an acceptance, Penn can take its sweet time

-
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:34 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
I have yet to see proof of anyone getting accepted off the waitlist already.
- Rory19
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 3:14 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
fallingup wrote:I have yet to see proof of anyone getting accepted off the waitlist already.
- intlsplitr
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 9:00 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
IN!!!!!! Via email (as I am overseas). Numbers in profile.
Complete 1/18
UR1 2/7
UR2 3/14
So, so excited about this.
Complete 1/18
UR1 2/7
UR2 3/14
So, so excited about this.
- Cobretti
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
NICE! congrats!intlsplitr wrote:IN!!!!!! Via email (as I am overseas). Numbers in profile.
Complete 1/18
UR1 2/7
UR2 3/14
So, so excited about this.
god I hope that's good news for me too, same UR1 and UR2 dates, +splitter
- intlsplitr
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 9:00 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Thanks! And good luck. There is movement happening today; have your phone on!mrizza wrote:NICE! congrats!intlsplitr wrote:IN!!!!!! Via email (as I am overseas). Numbers in profile.
Complete 1/18
UR1 2/7
UR2 3/14
So, so excited about this.
god I hope that's good news for me too, same UR1 and UR2 dates, +splitter
-
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:34 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
OMG!!! That gives me sooo much hope, intlspltr! Our cycles have been pretty much the same so far so let's hope I get in too




Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- intlsplitr
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 9:00 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
fallingup wrote:OMG!!! That gives me sooo much hope, intlspltr! Our cycles have been pretty much the same so far so let's hope I get in too![]()
![]()

- Rlabo
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 4:18 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Anyone else stuck at 3/6 ur1 date?
- HawkeyeGirl
- Posts: 459
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Me!Rlabo wrote:Anyone else stuck at 3/6 ur1 date?
- fairlylegal22
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:01 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Me three!HawkeyeGirl wrote:Me!Rlabo wrote:Anyone else stuck at 3/6 ur1 date?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 7:55 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Me alsofairlylegal22 wrote: Me three!
- GW1010
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:07 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Currently a Penn senior and I got waitlisted today (info in profile)
Last edited by GW1010 on Wed Mar 27, 2013 9:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- WokeUpInACar
- Posts: 5542
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:11 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Yepyepyeptotoro wrote:Me alsofairlylegal22 wrote: Me three!
- Save_Ferris
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 10:04 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Me too!WokeUpInACar wrote:Yepyepyeptotoro wrote:Me alsofairlylegal22 wrote: Me three!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- medievahe
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 8:11 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
senorhosh wrote:Wow. So let me get this straight... He was WLed by Penn earlier and got off the WL already?Nickg415 wrote:Not sure on the particulars. I am pretty sure his numbers were competitive but nothing crazy. He applied later in the cycle, has been sitting on the WL for a while until today. Super stoked he got in.senorhosh wrote:Thanks. Do you have any info on his app? Numbers and such?Nickg415 wrote:A friend of mine just got the call today. IDK if he's going to post in here but just wanted to give you guys a reference for what they are doing.
Edit: Just to be clear...he was accepted
Congrats to him btw!
^^^
This was me. To clarify, I was not on the waitlist. I was UR1 2/7 and UR2 2/22. I received the call yesterday and I am beyond excited! 169, 3.7 if that helps.
- Rlabo
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 4:18 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Deleted
Last edited by Rlabo on Wed Mar 27, 2013 11:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:34 pm
- Rlabo
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 4:18 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Sorry didn't mean it like that at all honestly, just in a similar numbers boat and didn't think I had a shot whatsoever so I'm happy to see a glimmer of hope is all. His numbers obviously make him an extremely strong candidate and I can imagine him having an amazing package when it comes to softs and that what I mean by "did they love you," as in he wowed them with the whole package. On the other hand, URMs do gain admission easier than other candidates so I was just trying to see how similar of a candidate we actually were. I truly meant no disrespect by my comment and apologize to any1 who was offended by it.fallingup wrote:^rude...
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login