TLS c/o 2020 - In #Squad We Trust Forum

[Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash]

cornell is hunting ranks

Gonna be tough to make moves if you deny all but people who will get full rides at higher ranked schools anyway

[StopLawying]

Latest Spivey tweet:

Just got the most recent #lawschool data recorded through 1/6. Applicants are down -4.4, applications down -2.2. All LSAT bandwidths >160

[88234]

Latest Spivey tweet:

Just got the most recent #lawschool data recorded through 1/6. Applicants are down -4.4, applications down -2.2. All LSAT bandwidths >160

Hooray!

[Assasindowntheavenue]

Latest Spivey tweet:

Just got the most recent #lawschool data recorded through 1/6. Applicants are down -4.4, applications down -2.2. All LSAT bandwidths >160

Great news

[Pozzo]

Latest Spivey tweet:

Just got the most recent #lawschool data recorded through 1/6. Applicants are down -4.4, applications down -2.2. All LSAT bandwidths >160

Hooray!

Heart just skipped a beat. (I realize this probably doesn't include Dec scores still, so here's to hoping the trend continues.)

[govlife]

Latest Spivey tweet:

Just got the most recent #lawschool data recorded through 1/6. Applicants are down -4.4, applications down -2.2. All LSAT bandwidths >160

Assuming this includes a good number of Dec takers, maybe the schools will finally get rolling on some offers!

[88234]

Latest Spivey tweet:

Just got the most recent #lawschool data recorded through 1/6. Applicants are down -4.4, applications down -2.2. All LSAT bandwidths >160

Hooray!

Heart just skipped a beat. (I realize this probably doesn't include Dec scores still, so here's to hoping the trend continues.)

It might, given that it's recorded at 1/6. Question about his data: does it only include applicants when it determines % change in LSAT, or does it take the entire population (everyone who took the test)?

[Pozzo]

Latest Spivey tweet:

Just got the most recent #lawschool data recorded through 1/6. Applicants are down -4.4, applications down -2.2. All LSAT bandwidths >160

Hooray!

Heart just skipped a beat. (I realize this probably doesn't include Dec scores still, so here's to hoping the trend continues.)

It might, given that it's recorded at 1/6. Question about his data: does it only include applicants when it determines % change in LSAT, or does it take the entire population (everyone who took the test)?

I'm dumb. I was looking at my December calendar and saw the 6th was a Tuesday. You're right, this is even better.

[Alexandros]

cornell is hunting ranks

Gonna be tough to make moves if you deny all but people who will get full rides at higher ranked schools anyway

[proteinshake]

Latest Spivey tweet:

Just got the most recent #lawschool data recorded through 1/6. Applicants are down -4.4, applications down -2.2. All LSAT bandwidths >160

Assuming this includes a good number of Dec takers, maybe the schools will finally get rolling on some offers!

Spivey said he'd get data with Dec takers this week, so I'm assuming this is it.

[jjcorvino]

Latest Spivey tweet:

Just got the most recent #lawschool data recorded through 1/6. Applicants are down -4.4, applications down -2.2. All LSAT bandwidths >160

Great news!

[RParadela]

Latest Spivey tweet:

Just got the most recent #lawschool data recorded through 1/6. Applicants are down -4.4, applications down -2.2. All LSAT bandwidths >160

Someone forward this to Cornell admissions

[Gitaroo_Dude]

Latest Spivey tweet:

Just got the most recent #lawschool data recorded through 1/6. Applicants are down -4.4, applications down -2.2. All LSAT bandwidths >160

I'm really glad that sacrificing some firstborns to the LSAC gods has paid off.

[StopLawying]

Will this help/hurt reverse splitters?

[Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash]

Will this help/hurt reverse splitters?

I don't think we know anything about GPA, but I would imagine as LSAT floors fall they will take the highest GPA's at each band first, which would be helpful

[theboringest]

Seems like it would be good news for all. Praise be unto Spivey for showing us a light in the darkness.

[StopLawying]

Will this help/hurt reverse splitters?

I don't think we know anything about GPA, but I would imagine as LSAT floors fall they will take the highest GPA's at each band first, which would be helpful

Good point, I'm really excited. Why do you think there was a drop in scores? I know Sep test was hard, but June and December were pretty typical. Weird.

[88234]

Seems like it would be good news for all. Praise be unto Spivey for showing us a light in the darkness.

If he didn't already have an insanely profitable business, I'd totally contribute to his Patreon.

[theboringest]

Seems like it would be good news for all. Praise be unto Spivey for showing us a light in the darkness.

If he didn't already have an insanely profitable business, I'd totally contribute to his Patreon.

If I end up sitting this cycle out for whatever reason I'm totally hiring him next go around. Dude deserves the cash just for his posts here.

[theboringest]

Will this help/hurt reverse splitters?

I don't think we know anything about GPA, but I would imagine as LSAT floors fall they will take the highest GPA's at each band first, which would be helpful

Good point, I'm really excited. Why do you think there was a drop in scores? I know Sep test was hard, but June and December were pretty typical. Weird.

December had hard LG and some weird ass LR...I think we may be seeing people who in prior years would have gotten low 170s scoring in the mid high 160s and sitting out a cycle.

[dietcoke1]

new data

http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/untitled-4/

[brinicolec]

new data

http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/untitled-4/

High ranges are still down. I guess that's kinda good..???? lol

[Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash]

new data

http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/untitled-4/

Still seeing 170's propping up the entire band too

[dietcoke1]

new data

http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/untitled-4/

Still seeing 170's propping up the entire band too

can we assume schools with 169 medians will be gunning for 170? If so, they all wouldn't be able to raise to 170 would they?

[theboringest]

new data

http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/untitled-4/

Still seeing 170's propping up the entire band too

can we assume schools with 169 medians will be gunning for 170? If so, they all wouldn't be able to raise to 170 would they?

It won't likely work like that. HYSCCN will have to dig deeper into the 170 scorers to maintain, and Harvard Columbia and NYC have huge class sizes. It's going to destroy schools with 169 medians- seriously, half as many 169s as 170s? Jesus.