Michigan Law School C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-16) Forum

benwyatt · Post by **benwyatt** » Sat Sep 26, 2015 2:15 pm

Post removed.

zty · Post by **zty** » Mon Sep 28, 2015 6:52 am

Today I saw a man wearing Michigan T-shirt in Shanghai downtown. I was so thrilled that I wanted to say hi to him, but I did not, for the fear of being treated as a psycho

jumbocolumbo · Post by **jumbocolumbo** » Tue Sep 29, 2015 9:39 am

Michigan has a funny thing for recommenders. Did anyone provide the full 3? This is what it says on the app page:

"List the names of your proposed recommenders. We require only one letter of recommendation, but encourage you to submit three."

It seems like normally the wording is "up to X", but they actually say "we encourage you to submit three" which seems a bit stronger.

TheodoreKGB · Post by **TheodoreKGB** » Tue Sep 29, 2015 9:44 am

jumbocolumbo · Post by **jumbocolumbo** » Tue Sep 29, 2015 9:49 am

TheodoreKGB wrote:If you have three, cool. As long as you have two, you should be fine. I wouldn't sweat it. And really, if you have three it might be better to save one for a LOCI in case you need it (because submitting less than three letters won't be the reason you're WL'ed/denied).

Cool thanks, I'll keep the third in the wings. Its a work LOR so it would kind of have weird function in my app anyway. I'm not above using it as a last ditch effort if I feel the need to send an LOCI

urbanist11 · Post by **urbanist11** » Tue Sep 29, 2015 10:09 am

Post removed.

basedvulpes · Post by **basedvulpes** » Tue Sep 29, 2015 11:35 am

Post removed.

slippin_jimmy · Post by **slippin_jimmy** » Tue Sep 29, 2015 11:37 am

Post removed.

gobears!! · Post by **gobears!!** » Tue Sep 29, 2015 11:40 am

Post removed.

basedvulpes · Post by **basedvulpes** » Tue Sep 29, 2015 11:45 am

Post removed.

benwyatt · Post by **benwyatt** » Tue Sep 29, 2015 11:49 am

Post removed.

basedvulpes · Post by **basedvulpes** » Wed Sep 30, 2015 10:33 am

Post removed.

urbanist11 · Post by **urbanist11** » Wed Sep 30, 2015 10:50 am

Post removed.

benwyatt · Post by **benwyatt** » Wed Sep 30, 2015 10:53 am

Post removed.

slippin_jimmy · Post by **slippin_jimmy** » Wed Sep 30, 2015 10:54 am

Post removed.

benwyatt · Post by **benwyatt** » Wed Sep 30, 2015 10:58 am

Post removed.

urbanist11 · Post by **urbanist11** » Wed Sep 30, 2015 10:58 am

Post removed.

basedvulpes · Post by **basedvulpes** » Wed Sep 30, 2015 11:01 am

Post removed.

WhiteHouse · Post by **WhiteHouse** » Wed Sep 30, 2015 11:03 am

basedvulpes wrote:so far not so exciting.

I agree. Not having the "under review" option is a bummer.

benwyatt · Post by **benwyatt** » Wed Sep 30, 2015 11:06 am

Post removed.

urbanist11 · Post by **urbanist11** » Wed Sep 30, 2015 11:07 am

Post removed.

basedvulpes · Post by **basedvulpes** » Wed Sep 30, 2015 11:08 am

Post removed.

benwyatt · Post by **benwyatt** » Wed Sep 30, 2015 11:10 am

Post removed.

basedvulpes · Post by **basedvulpes** » Wed Sep 30, 2015 11:13 am

Post removed.

benwyatt · Post by **benwyatt** » Wed Sep 30, 2015 11:16 am

Post removed.