Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014) Forum
-
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2013 7:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
deleted
Last edited by luckystar84 on Sat Nov 30, 2013 5:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2013 7:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
deleted
Last edited by luckystar84 on Sat Nov 30, 2013 5:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
- lastsamurai
- Posts: 978
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 11:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Why don't you call Chicago and tell them that? I'm sure they'll be happy to help outluckystar84 wrote:also, does anyone know how long it takes to get an interview invite after going complete? I got a JS1 1-3 days after going complete, and if I can I'd do a Chi interview the day after the invite so I can have it before my JS1.
-
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 8:29 am
- Sourrudedude
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:34 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I have this crazy theory in my head that you two are the same person and you're just trolling us all.lastsamurai wrote:Why don't you call Chicago and tell them that? I'm sure they'll be happy to help outluckystar84 wrote:also, does anyone know how long it takes to get an interview invite after going complete? I got a JS1 1-3 days after going complete, and if I can I'd do a Chi interview the day after the invite so I can have it before my JS1.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- lastsamurai
- Posts: 978
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 11:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I wish I had thought of that! The things lucky asks though are just too far beyond the realm of sanity for me to concoct.Sourrudedude wrote:I have this crazy theory in my head that you two are the same person and you're just trolling us all.lastsamurai wrote:Why don't you call Chicago and tell them that? I'm sure they'll be happy to help outluckystar84 wrote:also, does anyone know how long it takes to get an interview invite after going complete? I got a JS1 1-3 days after going complete, and if I can I'd do a Chi interview the day after the invite so I can have it before my JS1.
- 2014
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
There is no particular reason that I can think of for the uptick but you won't hear any complaints. Most are NYC, though we place a ton into Kirkland Chicago too which is probably like 1/5 of our V10 numbers.luckystar84 wrote:is UChi's representation in the V5/V10 just normal year to year variation, or is there a reason for it going up every year for the last few years?
Also, do the stats break it down further? Like are these NYC V5 offices, or everything? V3-5 have offices everywhere, so if UChi places well into DPW secondary market but not NYC, that may be relevant
C/O 2015 is going to have a higher percentage than c/o 2014's 27% in the V10 fyi.
- iamgeorgebush
- Posts: 911
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
The way you've interpreted these numbers can't be right, since 75% of UChicago grads don't do BigLaw. According to LST, it's 56.3%: http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=chicagoLSATSCORES2012 wrote:If a school known for its conservatism were to try to censor its students from making data that should be readily accessible anyway more easily accessible, you know it'd end up on ATL.
As I've already expressed to Regulus, I don't get why UChicago isn't more open, anyway. The data in the above post, for example... I didn't make the anonymous post I quoted, but if you look at it, you'll see that it's really good.
1/4 students in V10 firms
Half in the V30
Nearly 2/3rds in V50 firms
and only 1/4 of the student body doesn't end up at a V100 firm.
More students end up in V10 firms than don't get the V100 at all. I bet that a large portion of those one out of four students who don't end up in the V100 didn't want biglaw at all, since it seems like about half of the 1L class wants PI or government work. I'm not sure why the school doesn't just share this themselves. Could be some sort of general policy across many schools, since I don't think anyone does share it, I guess.
I'm guessing the numbers instead apply only to those who are employed in private practice. Impressive nonetheless, but not as impressive as your analysis suggests.
-
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 7:51 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Correct me if I am wrong, but perhaps the discrepancy can be attributed to the fact that the numbers cited are for 2L summer employment and the numbers on LST are for employment 9 months after graduation.
- DrStudMuffin
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
You're missing two key points here george.iamgeorgebush wrote:The way you've interpreted these numbers can't be right, since 75% of UChicago grads don't do BigLaw. According to LST, it's 56.3%: http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=chicagoLSATSCORES2012 wrote:If a school known for its conservatism were to try to censor its students from making data that should be readily accessible anyway more easily accessible, you know it'd end up on ATL.
As I've already expressed to Regulus, I don't get why UChicago isn't more open, anyway. The data in the above post, for example... I didn't make the anonymous post I quoted, but if you look at it, you'll see that it's really good.
1/4 students in V10 firms
Half in the V30
Nearly 2/3rds in V50 firms
and only 1/4 of the student body doesn't end up at a V100 firm.
More students end up in V10 firms than don't get the V100 at all. I bet that a large portion of those one out of four students who don't end up in the V100 didn't want biglaw at all, since it seems like about half of the 1L class wants PI or government work. I'm not sure why the school doesn't just share this themselves. Could be some sort of general policy across many schools, since I don't think anyone does share it, I guess.
I'm guessing the numbers instead apply only to those who are employed in private practice. Impressive nonetheless, but not as impressive as your analysis suggests.
1. This is data for c/o 2014 - the LST numbers are for 2012. Presumably things have improved since then. (c/o 2012's summer #s indicate 69 percent were in the V100/NLJ250)
2. More importantly, this is for summer positions, and not full-time post-grad employment 9 months out. Thus, some portion of the ~15% of students who go on to clerk are included in this number. It is also possible that the summer associate biglaw % is higher because of a few no-offers, but I don't know the figures on that part.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but this is how I interpreted the data.
edit: kinda scooped
- iamgeorgebush
- Posts: 911
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Oh, I missed that they were for 2L summer employment. That makes complete sense, then.
- lastsamurai
- Posts: 978
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 11:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
UR as of today btw...seems like things are picking up!! (complete about a month ago)
- neprep
- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Submitted!
Also, super jealous of all the URs!
Also, super jealous of all the URs!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 1:32 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Is it too late to hope for a CRS-based waiver? I've always been on CRS, but didn't pay for LSDAS until a week ago.
- jingosaur
- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
They sent out a wave of fee waivers on 10/31 and it specifically states on their site that they won't grant waiver requests, but there will probably be another wave sent out soon.BlueGiraffe wrote:Is it too late to hope for a CRS-based waiver? I've always been on CRS, but didn't pay for LSDAS until a week ago.
- longlivetheking
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 2:15 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
how many non-ED folks have gone through interviews/received interview invites?
how long from submitted->completed->invite?
how long from submitted->completed->invite?
-
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 8:29 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Complete since 09/26 and complete silence since then.longlivetheking wrote:how many non-ED folks have gone through interviews/received interview invites?
how long from submitted->completed->invite?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 1:32 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Hm, do you think it'll be soon enough to be worth waiting for? (above both medians)jingosaur wrote:They sent out a wave of fee waivers on 10/31 and it specifically states on their site that they won't grant waiver requests, but there will probably be another wave sent out soon.BlueGiraffe wrote:Is it too late to hope for a CRS-based waiver? I've always been on CRS, but didn't pay for LSDAS until a week ago.
- Happy Gilmore
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 4:24 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Wait, had I waited I could have gotten a fee waiver from chicago? f
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 3:51 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
So when did ED applicants start being UR last cycle? Any 1L EDers care to chime in?
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Okay, I just added the Status Checker "Journey" to the OP. I still don't know about the Interviews and the final Decisions so if any of you know PM me with the info.
Scoobers, I hope you are happy.
Scoobers, I hope you are happy.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- thechancellor
- Posts: 584
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:01 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
submitted 10/21, complete 10/24, under review as of yesterday! Fingers crossed for a positive outcome sometime soon...
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
i am!!!!!The-Specs wrote:Okay, I just added the Status Checker "Journey" to the OP. I still don't know about the Interviews and the final Decisions so if any of you know PM me with the info.
Scoobers, I hope you are happy.





- phillywc
- Posts: 3448
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
My UR date changed to the 23rd... Chicago putting in the hours on the weekend!
edit: wait i think i just went UR.
thats awesome
edit: wait i think i just went UR.
thats awesome

-
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 4:09 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
when did you apply?phillywc wrote:My UR date changed to the 23rd... Chicago putting in the hours on the weekend!
edit: wait i think i just went UR.
thats awesome
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login