Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
luckystar84

Bronze
Posts: 189
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2013 7:00 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by luckystar84 » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:25 pm

deleted
Last edited by luckystar84 on Sat Nov 30, 2013 5:57 am, edited 1 time in total.

luckystar84

Bronze
Posts: 189
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2013 7:00 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by luckystar84 » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:26 pm

deleted
Last edited by luckystar84 on Sat Nov 30, 2013 5:57 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
lastsamurai

Silver
Posts: 978
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 11:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by lastsamurai » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:51 pm

luckystar84 wrote:also, does anyone know how long it takes to get an interview invite after going complete? I got a JS1 1-3 days after going complete, and if I can I'd do a Chi interview the day after the invite so I can have it before my JS1.
Why don't you call Chicago and tell them that? I'm sure they'll be happy to help out

NapoleonXV

Bronze
Posts: 217
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 8:29 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by NapoleonXV » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:54 pm

.

User avatar
Sourrudedude

Bronze
Posts: 415
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:34 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by Sourrudedude » Mon Nov 18, 2013 1:36 pm

lastsamurai wrote:
luckystar84 wrote:also, does anyone know how long it takes to get an interview invite after going complete? I got a JS1 1-3 days after going complete, and if I can I'd do a Chi interview the day after the invite so I can have it before my JS1.
Why don't you call Chicago and tell them that? I'm sure they'll be happy to help out
I have this crazy theory in my head that you two are the same person and you're just trolling us all.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
lastsamurai

Silver
Posts: 978
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 11:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by lastsamurai » Mon Nov 18, 2013 1:42 pm

Sourrudedude wrote:
lastsamurai wrote:
luckystar84 wrote:also, does anyone know how long it takes to get an interview invite after going complete? I got a JS1 1-3 days after going complete, and if I can I'd do a Chi interview the day after the invite so I can have it before my JS1.
Why don't you call Chicago and tell them that? I'm sure they'll be happy to help out
I have this crazy theory in my head that you two are the same person and you're just trolling us all.
I wish I had thought of that! The things lucky asks though are just too far beyond the realm of sanity for me to concoct.

User avatar
2014

Platinum
Posts: 6028
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by 2014 » Mon Nov 18, 2013 2:52 pm

luckystar84 wrote:is UChi's representation in the V5/V10 just normal year to year variation, or is there a reason for it going up every year for the last few years?

Also, do the stats break it down further? Like are these NYC V5 offices, or everything? V3-5 have offices everywhere, so if UChi places well into DPW secondary market but not NYC, that may be relevant
There is no particular reason that I can think of for the uptick but you won't hear any complaints. Most are NYC, though we place a ton into Kirkland Chicago too which is probably like 1/5 of our V10 numbers.

C/O 2015 is going to have a higher percentage than c/o 2014's 27% in the V10 fyi.

User avatar
iamgeorgebush

Silver
Posts: 911
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:57 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by iamgeorgebush » Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:10 pm

LSATSCORES2012 wrote:If a school known for its conservatism were to try to censor its students from making data that should be readily accessible anyway more easily accessible, you know it'd end up on ATL.

As I've already expressed to Regulus, I don't get why UChicago isn't more open, anyway. The data in the above post, for example... I didn't make the anonymous post I quoted, but if you look at it, you'll see that it's really good.

1/4 students in V10 firms
Half in the V30
Nearly 2/3rds in V50 firms
and only 1/4 of the student body doesn't end up at a V100 firm.

More students end up in V10 firms than don't get the V100 at all. I bet that a large portion of those one out of four students who don't end up in the V100 didn't want biglaw at all, since it seems like about half of the 1L class wants PI or government work. I'm not sure why the school doesn't just share this themselves. Could be some sort of general policy across many schools, since I don't think anyone does share it, I guess.
The way you've interpreted these numbers can't be right, since 75% of UChicago grads don't do BigLaw. According to LST, it's 56.3%: http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=chicago

I'm guessing the numbers instead apply only to those who are employed in private practice. Impressive nonetheless, but not as impressive as your analysis suggests.

sasquatchsam

Bronze
Posts: 189
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 7:51 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by sasquatchsam » Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:26 pm

Correct me if I am wrong, but perhaps the discrepancy can be attributed to the fact that the numbers cited are for 2L summer employment and the numbers on LST are for employment 9 months after graduation.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
DrStudMuffin

Bronze
Posts: 236
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:54 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by DrStudMuffin » Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:29 pm

iamgeorgebush wrote:
LSATSCORES2012 wrote:If a school known for its conservatism were to try to censor its students from making data that should be readily accessible anyway more easily accessible, you know it'd end up on ATL.

As I've already expressed to Regulus, I don't get why UChicago isn't more open, anyway. The data in the above post, for example... I didn't make the anonymous post I quoted, but if you look at it, you'll see that it's really good.

1/4 students in V10 firms
Half in the V30
Nearly 2/3rds in V50 firms
and only 1/4 of the student body doesn't end up at a V100 firm.

More students end up in V10 firms than don't get the V100 at all. I bet that a large portion of those one out of four students who don't end up in the V100 didn't want biglaw at all, since it seems like about half of the 1L class wants PI or government work. I'm not sure why the school doesn't just share this themselves. Could be some sort of general policy across many schools, since I don't think anyone does share it, I guess.
The way you've interpreted these numbers can't be right, since 75% of UChicago grads don't do BigLaw. According to LST, it's 56.3%: http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=chicago

I'm guessing the numbers instead apply only to those who are employed in private practice. Impressive nonetheless, but not as impressive as your analysis suggests.
You're missing two key points here george.

1. This is data for c/o 2014 - the LST numbers are for 2012. Presumably things have improved since then. (c/o 2012's summer #s indicate 69 percent were in the V100/NLJ250)

2. More importantly, this is for summer positions, and not full-time post-grad employment 9 months out. Thus, some portion of the ~15% of students who go on to clerk are included in this number. It is also possible that the summer associate biglaw % is higher because of a few no-offers, but I don't know the figures on that part.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but this is how I interpreted the data.

edit: kinda scooped

User avatar
iamgeorgebush

Silver
Posts: 911
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:57 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by iamgeorgebush » Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:47 pm

Oh, I missed that they were for 2L summer employment. That makes complete sense, then.

User avatar
lastsamurai

Silver
Posts: 978
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 11:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by lastsamurai » Mon Nov 18, 2013 4:10 pm

UR as of today btw...seems like things are picking up!! (complete about a month ago)

User avatar
neprep

Silver
Posts: 1066
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by neprep » Tue Nov 19, 2013 2:36 pm

Submitted!

Also, super jealous of all the URs!

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


BlueGiraffe

New
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 1:32 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by BlueGiraffe » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:14 pm

Is it too late to hope for a CRS-based waiver? I've always been on CRS, but didn't pay for LSDAS until a week ago.

User avatar
jingosaur

Gold
Posts: 3188
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by jingosaur » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:16 pm

BlueGiraffe wrote:Is it too late to hope for a CRS-based waiver? I've always been on CRS, but didn't pay for LSDAS until a week ago.
They sent out a wave of fee waivers on 10/31 and it specifically states on their site that they won't grant waiver requests, but there will probably be another wave sent out soon.

User avatar
longlivetheking

Bronze
Posts: 279
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 2:15 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by longlivetheking » Tue Nov 19, 2013 8:52 pm

how many non-ED folks have gone through interviews/received interview invites?

how long from submitted->completed->invite?

NapoleonXV

Bronze
Posts: 217
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 8:29 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by NapoleonXV » Tue Nov 19, 2013 9:41 pm

longlivetheking wrote:how many non-ED folks have gone through interviews/received interview invites?

how long from submitted->completed->invite?
Complete since 09/26 and complete silence since then.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


BlueGiraffe

New
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 1:32 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by BlueGiraffe » Tue Nov 19, 2013 10:02 pm

jingosaur wrote:
BlueGiraffe wrote:Is it too late to hope for a CRS-based waiver? I've always been on CRS, but didn't pay for LSDAS until a week ago.
They sent out a wave of fee waivers on 10/31 and it specifically states on their site that they won't grant waiver requests, but there will probably be another wave sent out soon.
Hm, do you think it'll be soon enough to be worth waiting for? (above both medians)

User avatar
Happy Gilmore

Bronze
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 4:24 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by Happy Gilmore » Wed Nov 20, 2013 3:30 am

Wait, had I waited I could have gotten a fee waiver from chicago? f

hernanmi

New
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 3:51 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by hernanmi » Wed Nov 20, 2013 2:13 pm

So when did ED applicants start being UR last cycle? Any 1L EDers care to chime in?

User avatar
The-Specs

Silver
Posts: 1039
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by The-Specs » Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:55 pm

Okay, I just added the Status Checker "Journey" to the OP. I still don't know about the Interviews and the final Decisions so if any of you know PM me with the info.

Scoobers, I hope you are happy. :)

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
thechancellor

Silver
Posts: 584
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:01 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by thechancellor » Sat Nov 23, 2013 11:40 pm

submitted 10/21, complete 10/24, under review as of yesterday! Fingers crossed for a positive outcome sometime soon...

Kimikho

Gold
Posts: 3971
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by Kimikho » Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:17 am

The-Specs wrote:Okay, I just added the Status Checker "Journey" to the OP. I still don't know about the Interviews and the final Decisions so if any of you know PM me with the info.

Scoobers, I hope you are happy. :)
i am!!!!! :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

User avatar
phillywc

Gold
Posts: 3448
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by phillywc » Mon Nov 25, 2013 4:27 pm

My UR date changed to the 23rd... Chicago putting in the hours on the weekend!

edit: wait i think i just went UR.

thats awesome :D

goldgirl786

Bronze
Posts: 200
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 4:09 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by goldgirl786 » Mon Nov 25, 2013 4:29 pm

phillywc wrote:My UR date changed to the 23rd... Chicago putting in the hours on the weekend!

edit: wait i think i just went UR.

thats awesome :D
when did you apply?

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”