Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- Dany
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
A bump to 3.87 would be HUGE. And depending on LSAT, it could either bump you from WL-> admit or from a decent scholarship offer to an incredible scholarship offer. Congrats on the change - definitely worth the effort to get it done!
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Indeed, congratulations! What is your LSAT score? This could give you an enormous boost.
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 8:55 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Thanks all! It was a huge mistake on their part; they put an F in a slot that didn't belong
When I tried to rectify it at the time, the person told me it would be fixed. It never was, and when I went through this whole month-long process, they just flat out denied me and called me a liar. I was pretty upset, but I figured I would let it slide, as I had a strong enough GPA as it was. I received an alumni survey phone call and I started thinking about getting it fixed. This time, I just went straight to the top and it was fixed right away. My transcript already reflects the change and I'm going to go in, today, to have a corrected transcript submitted.
I have a low LSAT score, at the moment (which is addendum-worthy), but I will be retaking in October. My last PT was a 172, so I'm just hoping to have a strong showing in October. I found out about the change this afternoon, after I got done studying from 7am, haha. It kind of felt like a nice reward for the hard work!
Here's to a score in the interquartile range!!!

I have a low LSAT score, at the moment (which is addendum-worthy), but I will be retaking in October. My last PT was a 172, so I'm just hoping to have a strong showing in October. I found out about the change this afternoon, after I got done studying from 7am, haha. It kind of felt like a nice reward for the hard work!
Here's to a score in the interquartile range!!!
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Wow, that's a bit ridiculous. Glad you were actually able to fix it.
Good luck on the Oct LSAT! Hope you're able to make it into Chicago
Good luck on the Oct LSAT! Hope you're able to make it into Chicago

-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 8:55 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Thanks man, I really appreciate it.
If we both get in, I'll bring an Alan Alda poster to orientation for you to hang in your apartment! Haha
If we both get in, I'll bring an Alan Alda poster to orientation for you to hang in your apartment! Haha
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
look back a few pages in this thread and you'll see what a tough time the 3.5 level splitter crowd had. I liked the school but I just don't think applying ed and giving up scholly money within the t14 is worth it.uchi15hopeful wrote:Me too!Tiago Splitter wrote:
In other news:
Dear Chicago,
Me gusta. Please let me in.
Sincerely,
Tiago
But do you really doubt this, Tiago? You aren't that bad of a splitter and they'll love your LSAT. Plus, I really want you to get in because they may need your LSAT points to make up for my score!!!
By the way, congrats on your gpa bump. Good luck on the retake!
- Perdevise
- Posts: 367
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:45 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Way to go; every little point helps, and it took very little effort.uchi15hopeful wrote:Your advice sort of strengthened my resolve and emboldened me to re-request a transcript review, at my undergrad institution. They had made a mistake on my transcript, but the head of records stonewalled me; he was completely unwilling to address the issue. I went over his head and e-mailed the director of the department, and they made the change within two days! Now I just need to re-send the corrected transcript and I'll get a .1 bump in my GPA.Hawkeye Pierce wrote:Well, I think it depends on multiple factors, including where the 0.1 GPA difference is, i.e., is it between a 3.9 and a 4.0? a 3.3 and a 3.4? Or as you said a 3.77 and a 3.87? Assuming the latter, a 3.77 is below their median, while a 3.87 is at their 75th percentile. So, in this case, I think it would make a large difference.uchi15hopeful wrote:I was wondering how significant a .1 GPA difference would be, all things equal (say a 3.77 vs 3.87)?
Thanks
Of course, it also depends on what your LSAT score is.
Thanks!
- icedflames
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 7:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
While going through the app. on the LSAC site I had a few questions?
What's the additional demographics section for?
Also, is anyone else having problems with the academic honors/awards in the education section?
There seems to be a character limit or something but the limit is very low, maybe 50 characters.
On law school interest, what's the proper way to list the schools you are applying to? I want to skip the question as it is optional, but that seems a bit risky to me.
What's the additional demographics section for?
Also, is anyone else having problems with the academic honors/awards in the education section?
There seems to be a character limit or something but the limit is very low, maybe 50 characters.
On law school interest, what's the proper way to list the schools you are applying to? I want to skip the question as it is optional, but that seems a bit risky to me.
-
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:46 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
If you scan back through this thread, you will see a few of us had trouble with the education section. You can actually fill the whole box on your screen. I thought it was a character limit too, but didn't see a ticker. It was actually an issue because I had certain symbols. It doesn't like parentheses and the like. Its a big fan of the comma. Once I took that out, it seemed to be fine with the content length.
ETA: On the law school interest, either answer it honestly and completely or skip it.
ETA: On the law school interest, either answer it honestly and completely or skip it.
Last edited by MumofCad on Mon Aug 29, 2011 2:51 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- Dany
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
They didn't have this question last year, but I guarantee you it's not a big deal. Answer it, don't answer it, whatever. They probably just want to see which schools they'll be recruiting against. Honestly I'd think an applicant was crazy if they had UChicago numbers and didn't apply to at least a few of HYSCN. In my opinion, they would NOT ask the question just to hold an answer against you.icedflames wrote:On law school interest, what's the proper way to list the schools you are applying to? I want to skip the question as it is optional, but that seems a bit risky to me.
If y'all are really that worried about it, I'd suggest calling admissions anonymously and asking point blank what they're looking for with that question.
For schools that had this problem with the application last year, I just listed my coolest-sounding awards on the application then had the full list on my resume.icedflames wrote:Also, is anyone else having problems with the academic honors/awards in the education section?
There seems to be a character limit or something but the limit is very low, maybe 50 characters.
-
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:46 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
If it fits into your PS and you have something to say about why Chicago would be a good fit, can you just tailor your PS to them specifically?
Two of my friends who out-performed their numbers last cycle made direct appeals to the law schools in their PS. One even did to Harvard (which on here everyone keeps saying is not a good idea). Curious if any of you admits have anything colloquial to add or noticed any of the Deans at the T-6 addressing this in their blogs?
Two of my friends who out-performed their numbers last cycle made direct appeals to the law schools in their PS. One even did to Harvard (which on here everyone keeps saying is not a good idea). Curious if any of you admits have anything colloquial to add or noticed any of the Deans at the T-6 addressing this in their blogs?
- Dany
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I tailored my PS to Chicago.
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
And you were extra rigorous by giving that PS a test-run, amirite?Dany wrote:I tailored my PS to Chicago.

And yes, I'd recommend tailoring your PS to Chicago for its app if you can do it well (e.g. not just inserting two lines into your regular PS that are like "And that's why I want to attend your fine institution").
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:46 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Ok great - thanks! Just wanted to be sure it wouldn't be so out of place that they wondered if I had read the instructions. Now I just need to find the right phrasing. It will be at the end, but it will probably be an entire paragraph, making my PS 2.5 pages. I'm really interested in the Center for Comparative Constitutionalism. It fits pretty nicely with my work and academic experiences to date. My doctoral dissertation has a large section devoted to an analysis of the Iraqi constitution and the negotiations surrounding its implementation. Its a little muddled transitioning from my PS though directly because of how my PS ends. We'll see.
ETA: Does this mean that Chicago does not accept a Why Chicago statement?
ETA: Does this mean that Chicago does not accept a Why Chicago statement?
- LaCumparsita
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 11:54 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Help! I keep trying to type my awards and honors into the box for question 5 in the Education section, and every time I try to save it, it gives me "Error". What am I doing wrong?
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
They do, but Xifeng mentioned that it is best sent as a LOCIMumofCad wrote:Ok great - thanks! Just wanted to be sure it wouldn't be so out of place that they wondered if I had read the instructions. Now I just need to find the right phrasing. It will be at the end, but it will probably be an entire paragraph, making my PS 2.5 pages. I'm really interested in the Center for Comparative Constitutionalism. It fits pretty nicely with my work and academic experiences to date. My doctoral dissertation has a large section devoted to an analysis of the Iraqi constitution and the negotiations surrounding its implementation. Its a little muddled transitioning from my PS though directly because of how my PS ends. We'll see.
ETA: Does this mean that Chicago does not accept a Why Chicago statement?
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
According to other applicants, there's a very low character limit on that box. Try cutting down the length of what you're putting there and see if that fixes it.LaCumparsita wrote:Help! I keep trying to type my awards and honors into the box for question 5 in the Education section, and every time I try to save it, it gives me "Error". What am I doing wrong?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Blessedassurance
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Why are you answering the questions?LaCumparsita wrote:Help! I keep trying to type my awards and honors into the box for question 5 in the Education section, and every time I try to save it, it gives me "Error". What am I doing wrong?
- LaCumparsita
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 11:54 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Why would I not be answering the questions?
- Hopefully2012
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 5:22 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
It's also glitchy if you try to number the items or if you use symbols like $ / () --. I was having problems at first as well but after I removed all the symbols, it was fine.LaCumparsita wrote:Why would I not be answering the questions?
- Blessedassurance
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
It's an exercise in futility. Why don't you wait till Sepetember 1st or after? It's like showing up three hours early to an outdoor event on a day when there's an 85% chance of rain and thunderstorms.LaCumparsita wrote:Why would I not be answering the questions?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Hopefully2012
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 5:22 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Worth it, IMO, if it means front row for your favorite band.Blessedassurance wrote:It's an exercise in futility. Why don't you wait till Sepetember 1st or after? It's like showing up three hours early to an outdoor event on a day when there's an 85% chance of rain and thunderstorms.LaCumparsita wrote:Why would I not be answering the questions?
- Blessedassurance
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Not if the organizers have informed you, they're not going to show up. LSAC claims new applications will be available on September 1st and applications filled before that will probably be lost. They could be wrong but why expend energy hoping they're wrong when there's absolutely nothing to gain?Hopefully2012 wrote: Worth it, IMO, if it means front row for your favorite band.
Watch someone complain on Thursday about losing the data they already entered.
To each his/her own, I suppose.
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 8:55 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
LSAC updated my GPA, I'm all set. 3.88 GPA and my LSAT prep is going well; I'm starting to really learn how to attack the exam, instead of being led by it (straight into tarps!), haha.
What do I need? A 170 on the October? Man, it would be so incredible to study at Chicago - I think about it each and every day!
What do I need? A 170 on the October? Man, it would be so incredible to study at Chicago - I think about it each and every day!
- tmon
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:52 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
170 would give you a shot, but seems waitlist-y all the way through 174 really. Certainly a shot though.uchi15hopeful wrote:LSAC updated my GPA, I'm all set. 3.88 GPA and my LSAT prep is going well; I'm starting to really learn how to attack the exam, instead of being led by it (straight into tarps!), haha.
What do I need? A 170 on the October? Man, it would be so incredible to study at Chicago - I think about it each and every day!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login