What is a non-traditional student? I always thought that just meant someone was much older than average?helix23 wrote:Looking at LSN, it looks like last year the big spike of admits in early to mid april were URMs or non-traditional apps (with colossal stats). After that WLs and Rejects galore.
Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread Forum
-
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 8:18 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
A non-traditional student is someone who declares themselves non-traditional. HTH.katch wrote:What is a non-traditional student? I always thought that just meant someone was much older than average?helix23 wrote:Looking at LSN, it looks like last year the big spike of admits in early to mid april were URMs or non-traditional apps (with colossal stats). After that WLs and Rejects galore.
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Pretty much anyone who is not K-JD says they are non-trad.wert3813 wrote:A non-traditional student is someone who declares themselves non-traditional. HTH.
- helix23
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
I've gotten the feeling that movement lately has happened in the morning. But you'd have to look through the thread to confirm.anthony1027 wrote:Just found this site while neurotically looking for answers to the silence that is Stanford. Guess im not the only one going crazy. But does anyone know if there is a particular time they update the status checker? I feel like an addict needing to get my fix checking it every 20 minutes or so.
- ssanonymous
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Someone got DLS at 2pm EST yesterdayhelix23 wrote:I've gotten the feeling that movement lately has happened in the morning. But you'd have to look through the thread to confirm.anthony1027 wrote:Just found this site while neurotically looking for answers to the silence that is Stanford. Guess im not the only one going crazy. But does anyone know if there is a particular time they update the status checker? I feel like an addict needing to get my fix checking it every 20 minutes or so.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
really? hmm - your michigan offer is pretty stellar, if Cal matched it that would be a great option, I would take it over reapplyingssanonymous wrote:My fall semester grades got updated on LSAC which probably explains the SLS change. Anyway, I'm mentally checking out now. Unless I get into SLS, I'm retaking the LSAT and doing this all over again next year. Yay!
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
this is morning in CAssanonymous wrote:Someone got DLS at 2pm EST yesterdayhelix23 wrote:I've gotten the feeling that movement lately has happened in the morning. But you'd have to look through the thread to confirm.anthony1027 wrote:Just found this site while neurotically looking for answers to the silence that is Stanford. Guess im not the only one going crazy. But does anyone know if there is a particular time they update the status checker? I feel like an addict needing to get my fix checking it every 20 minutes or so.
- ssanonymous
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Ummm, idk. I'm still sorting out need-based aid from Cal, and I sent a match scholarship for 1/3 tuition from GTown PILS. I'd probably only consider it if I get both. Otherwise, HYS have better finaid. There's also a fair amount of outside scholarships that I'm looking at. The most important thing for me is that I go to a school that sets me up for govt, and only 8% of Cal's class do clerkships. Also, career services said getting a DOJ as a 1L is very difficult whereas it's the standard for HYS.jbagelboy wrote:really? hmm - your michigan offer is pretty stellar, if Cal matched it that would be a great option, I would take it over reapplyingssanonymous wrote:My fall semester grades got updated on LSAC which probably explains the SLS change. Anyway, I'm mentally checking out now. Unless I get into SLS, I'm retaking the LSAT and doing this all over again next year. Yay!
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
What are you guys talking about regarding lower and uppercase emails? Not that I need another thing to go crazy over
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Is it late enough in the cycle you feel comfortable sharing your stats?ssanonymous wrote:Ummm, idk. I'm still sorting out need-based aid from Cal, and I sent a match scholarship for 1/3 tuition from GTown PILS. I'd probably only consider it if I get both. Otherwise, HYS have better finaid. There's also a fair amount of outside scholarships that I'm looking at. The most important thing for me is that I go to a school that sets me up for govt, and only 8% of Cal's class do clerkships. Also, career services said getting a DOJ as a 1L is very difficult whereas it's the standard for HYS.jbagelboy wrote:really? hmm - your michigan offer is pretty stellar, if Cal matched it that would be a great option, I would take it over reapplyingssanonymous wrote:My fall semester grades got updated on LSAC which probably explains the SLS change. Anyway, I'm mentally checking out now. Unless I get into SLS, I'm retaking the LSAT and doing this all over again next year. Yay!
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
If your email goes lowercase it mean you have cancer.matt66dc wrote:What are you guys talking about regarding lower and uppercase emails? Not that I need another thing to go crazy over
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:25 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
LOL.wert3813 wrote:If your email goes lowercase it mean you have cancer.matt66dc wrote:What are you guys talking about regarding lower and uppercase emails? Not that I need another thing to go crazy over
- ssanonymous
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
I will as soon as I get my DLS from SLS. Essentially, my LSAT is keeping me out of the T-7. Only reason I'm being considered now is due to my softs.wert3813 wrote:Is it late enough in the cycle you feel comfortable sharing your stats?ssanonymous wrote:Ummm, idk. I'm still sorting out need-based aid from Cal, and I sent a match scholarship for 1/3 tuition from GTown PILS. I'd probably only consider it if I get both. Otherwise, HYS have better finaid. There's also a fair amount of outside scholarships that I'm looking at. The most important thing for me is that I go to a school that sets me up for govt, and only 8% of Cal's class do clerkships. Also, career services said getting a DOJ as a 1L is very difficult whereas it's the standard for HYS.jbagelboy wrote:really? hmm - your michigan offer is pretty stellar, if Cal matched it that would be a great option, I would take it over reapplyingssanonymous wrote:My fall semester grades got updated on LSAC which probably explains the SLS change. Anyway, I'm mentally checking out now. Unless I get into SLS, I'm retaking the LSAT and doing this all over again next year. Yay!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Yeah. I figured 165-168 range.ssanonymous wrote:I will as soon as I get my DLS from SLS. Essentially, my LSAT is keeping me out of the T-7. Only reason I'm being considered now is due to my softs.wert3813 wrote:Is it late enough in the cycle you feel comfortable sharing your stats?ssanonymous wrote: Ummm, idk. I'm still sorting out need-based aid from Cal, and I sent a match scholarship for 1/3 tuition from GTown PILS. I'd probably only consider it if I get both. Otherwise, HYS have better finaid. There's also a fair amount of outside scholarships that I'm looking at. The most important thing for me is that I go to a school that sets me up for govt, and only 8% of Cal's class do clerkships. Also, career services said getting a DOJ as a 1L is very difficult whereas it's the standard for HYS.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:50 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
I know the feeling. This whole soft cusp thing is horrible
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Thanks for the helpwert3813 wrote:If your email goes lowercase it mean you have cancer.matt66dc wrote:What are you guys talking about regarding lower and uppercase emails? Not that I need another thing to go crazy over
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:50 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
If your email goes lowercase it means you'll get a call the next day admitting you. Or at least that's what I've heard.matt66dc wrote:Thanks for the helpwert3813 wrote:If your email goes lowercase it mean you have cancer.matt66dc wrote:What are you guys talking about regarding lower and uppercase emails? Not that I need another thing to go crazy over
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- ssanonymous
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
FYI, a non-traditional student is an individual who is not a K-BA/BS. Essentially someone who is graduating college at a non-traditional age. An applicant who is older but a K-BA/BS just means they've had WE but they're not considered non-traditional students.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Awesome. Thanksanthony1027 wrote:If your email goes lowercase it means you'll get a call the next day admitting you. Or at least that's what I've heard.matt66dc wrote:Thanks for the helpwert3813 wrote:If your email goes lowercase it mean you have cancer.matt66dc wrote:What are you guys talking about regarding lower and uppercase emails? Not that I need another thing to go crazy over
- porch
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:43 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
I just got a call from staMford, cO on my phone. I was half paying attention and had my heart drop through my chest.
- dnptan
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 5:33 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
My heart dropped while reading thisporch wrote:I just got a call from staMford, cO on my phone. I was half paying attention and had my heart drop through my chest.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:50 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Does anyone know approximately how many spots people are predicting are left? Consistent with data from past cycles on LSN perhaps
-
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:36 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
There are 127 members on the (unofficial) FB group. I would imagine that represents a number higher than the TLS/LSN calculus because I am sure there are many people who just lurk TLS but joined the FB group.anthony1027 wrote:Does anyone know approximately how many spots people are predicting are left? Consistent with data from past cycles on LSN perhaps
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Officially living on this thread. Just got dinged off of a Harvard hold and Yale shot me down two days ago.
I'm a long shot but not letting up the dream!
I'm a long shot but not letting up the dream!
- moose90
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Stanford just taking their damn time or what? I applied to 15 schools, and all along ive been most anxious to hear from them. all 14 others have gotten back to me WEEKS ago.
When can we suspect a stanford call? any ideas? Im 169, 3.8 so im not exactly sure its going to be good news... but any news is better than none.
When can we suspect a stanford call? any ideas? Im 169, 3.8 so im not exactly sure its going to be good news... but any news is better than none.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login