I know.I'll see how the cycle plays out but I'm prepared to reapply next cycle if I must. Thanks for the encouragement. Best of luck to you.Micdiddy wrote:Yeah man. I was there for a long time after Duke held me and no other school would give me the time of day. For literally 4 weeks or so it was total silence and then I got two acceptances before this ding so it's prob not as hard on me. Don't worry your acceptances are coming!mac35352 wrote:UR 1/25 as well...at least it was quick. This was the last app I submitted and the first one I hear from so it makes it harder to stand the silence from the rest of the schools I applied to.Micdiddy wrote:First ding of the cycle. Kind if expecting it though. Still, would have been nice. UR 1/25.
Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle) Forum
- mac35352

- Posts: 371
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 12:17 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
- venus

- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Sorry to hear about the dings! The LSN graph looks horrible
Good luck with the rest of your applications!
- djwjddl

- Posts: 478
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:50 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
.
Last edited by djwjddl on Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- simplycatalina

- Posts: 935
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:41 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
+1.Hyee wrote:ding'd from the school I just graduated from, bummers.
- Omnivalc

- Posts: 75
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:32 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Any idea when Berk will start talking $$$?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
MacB

- Posts: 341
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
If I recall correctly, when I submitted my supplemental app, they indicated that the first batch should go out in the first week of March. Pretty standard.
- risa

- Posts: 466
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Anyone know how soon before the 'deadline' for notifying FR1 folks (I think that was 2/15?) the lucky ones started getting admit calls? I'm FR2 and we were told we'll find out on or around March 8th... Just uselessly trying to predict when FR2s might start getting calls...
- gobo

- Posts: 22
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 8:22 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
FWIW and according to this thread, FR1 people got acceptances as early as Feb. 8th (a week before the deadline of 2/15). However, in that same Texas1990 post, it said most people were going to hear back the week of the deadline. After researching, I discovered that was indeed the case. GL!risa wrote:Anyone know how soon before the 'deadline' for notifying FR1 folks (I think that was 2/15?) the lucky ones started getting admit calls? I'm FR2 and we were told we'll find out on or around March 8th... Just uselessly trying to predict when FR2s might start getting calls...
-
az21833

- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
when is matching coming
- moneyball026

- Posts: 208
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:07 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Read before asking in every thread. Search tool.az21833 wrote:when is matching coming
ETA: My use of the search tool confirms you have asked this already.
Last edited by moneyball026 on Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- twinkletoes16

- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
az21833 wrote:when is matching coming
would like to know this too.
from what i remember reading last year's thread it came LATE though. like ASW late.
- sinfiery

- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Your eta confirms you, too, post before you search. Confirmed hypocrite.moneyball026 wrote:Read before asking in every thread. Search tool.az21833 wrote:when is matching coming
ETA: My use of the search tool confirms you have asked this already.
- moneyball026

- Posts: 208
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:07 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Haha, touche.sinfiery wrote:Your eta confirms you, too, post before you search. Confirmed hypocrite.moneyball026 wrote:Read before asking in every thread. Search tool.az21833 wrote:when is matching coming
ETA: My use of the search tool confirms you have asked this already.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I find this question to be particularly cruel and aspie in the middle of a bloodbath. Give it a day.az21833 wrote:when is matching coming
Or use the search function.
- jbagelboy

- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
have you all already submitted your matching scholarship forms? I'm still waiting for other offers to finalize to do somoneyball026 wrote:Read before asking in every thread. Search tool.az21833 wrote:when is matching coming
ETA: My use of the search tool confirms you have asked this already.
- twinkletoes16

- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
BigZuck wrote:I find this question to be particularly cruel and aspie in the middle of a bloodbath. Give it a day.az21833 wrote:when is matching coming
Or use the search function.
wait, berk hasn't handed out any dings today...? right?
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
My bad, say the thread getting bumptity bumped up and up and saw people complaining about dings at the top so assumed it was all today. You're right, that was Friday. Using the search function is still a great call IMO.twinkletoes16 wrote:BigZuck wrote:I find this question to be particularly cruel and aspie in the middle of a bloodbath. Give it a day.az21833 wrote:when is matching coming
Or use the search function.
wait, berk hasn't handed out any dings today...? right?
Btw wasn't criticizing you twinkle because I know how bad you want Berk so the question is very pertinent for you.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- twinkletoes16

- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
BigZuck wrote:My bad, say the thread getting bumptity bumped up and up and saw people complaining about dings at the top so assumed it was all today. You're right, that was Friday. Using the search function is still a great call IMO.twinkletoes16 wrote:BigZuck wrote:I find this question to be particularly cruel and aspie in the middle of a bloodbath. Give it a day.az21833 wrote:when is matching coming
Or use the search function.
wait, berk hasn't handed out any dings today...? right?
Btw wasn't criticizing you twinkle because I know how bad you want Berk so the question is very pertinent for you.
no worries
-
az21833

- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
it was more just an expression of frustration than anything, don't see why its a giant deal
- ManOfTheMinute

- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Cuz its the internet.az21833 wrote:it was more just an expression of frustration than anything, don't see why its a giant deal
-
Hopefullyfuturelaw

- Posts: 28
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 5:24 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Should I just expect a ding? Berkeley was one of my top choices, but haven't heard anything. UR 1/7 and never got FR. 169 3.9x non-URM. Wrote a Why Berk also.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Don't mean to be cruel but probably. For the most part Berk seems to look for higher numbers if non-URM. How bad you want Berk doesn't seem to matter to them.Hopefullyfuturelaw wrote:Should I just expect a ding? Berkeley was one of my top choices, but haven't heard anything. UR 1/7 and never got FR. 169 3.9x non-URM. Wrote a Why Berk also.
-
Hopefullyfuturelaw

- Posts: 28
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 5:24 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
No problem. Thanks for the info. Kind of realized that myself, but just wondering why they haven't told me already.BigZuck wrote:Don't mean to be cruel but probably. For the most part Berk seems to look for higher numbers if non-URM. How bad you want Berk doesn't seem to matter to them.Hopefullyfuturelaw wrote:Should I just expect a ding? Berkeley was one of my top choices, but haven't heard anything. UR 1/7 and never got FR. 169 3.9x non-URM. Wrote a Why Berk also.
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Hopefullyfuturelaw wrote:No problem. Thanks for the info. Kind of realized that myself, but just wondering why they haven't told me already.BigZuck wrote:Don't mean to be cruel but probably. For the most part Berk seems to look for higher numbers if non-URM. How bad you want Berk doesn't seem to matter to them.Hopefullyfuturelaw wrote:Should I just expect a ding? Berkeley was one of my top choices, but haven't heard anything. UR 1/7 and never got FR. 169 3.9x non-URM. Wrote a Why Berk also.
They left me hanging for almost half a year before giving me the D.
Berk's gonna Berk.
-
coriander

- Posts: 24
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 7:19 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
BigZuck wrote:Don't mean to be cruel but probably. For the most part Berk seems to look for higher numbers if non-URM. How bad you want Berk doesn't seem to matter to them.Hopefullyfuturelaw wrote:Should I just expect a ding? Berkeley was one of my top choices, but haven't heard anything. UR 1/7 and never got FR. 169 3.9x non-URM. Wrote a Why Berk also.
I don't think that's true. A 169/3.9 puts you in a solidly green/yellow zone on the LSN graph. Congrats on the high GPA. I don't see any reason why you wouldn't be a good fit for Berkeley, and you're not rejected until you're rejected. Good luck.
http://berkeley.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login