YS? And I know its not YP (at least traditional YP) b/c then they would waitlist. I just don't understand what theyre doing.... My only theory is that they would really rather be ranked 10. or maybe even 11.kittenmittons wrote:Straight up reject isn't YP. It's YS.
michigan 2010 applicants Forum
-
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:27 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
- kittenmittons
- Posts: 1453
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
YS = You Suckjulesm2200 wrote:YS? And I know its not YP (at least traditional YP) b/c then they would waitlist. I just don't understand what theyre doing.... My only theory is that they would really rather be ranked 10. or maybe even 11.kittenmittons wrote:Straight up reject isn't YP. It's YS.
- calicocat
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:29 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
You seem to be lost. The BP thread is -----> that waykittenmittons wrote: YS = You Suck
- kittenmittons
- Posts: 1453
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Helm broke my heart. I can never go back.Oli wrote:You seem to be lost. The BP thread is -----> that waykittenmittons wrote: YS = You Suck
- calicocat
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:29 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Don't say that!!! It won't be the same without youkittenmittons wrote:Helm broke my heart. I can never go back.Oli wrote:You seem to be lost. The BP thread is -----> that waykittenmittons wrote: YS = You Suck

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- GobiasIndustries
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:56 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
I never really put a lot of stock in my 9% weak consider, so I'm not upset for myself, but I really feel for you guys that actually had a shot.
- los blancos
- Posts: 8397
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
I'm scared shitless now, my measly 68% on LSP looks like nothing now.
-
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:27 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
+1. Michigan is my true love and I'd consider going there no matter where else I got in (save Harvard). I wrote a Why Mich but it seems that many others who were not admitted did as well...boilercat wrote:I'm scared shitless now, my measly 68% on LSP looks like nothing now.
- bighead715
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 1:02 am
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
this cycle is all over the place
do you actually put stock into your own theory kitten
do you actually put stock into your own theory kitten
-
- Posts: 387
- Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 3:53 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
+1 63% here. No why Michigan essay, I was going to write one if I got WLed, but doesn't look like the WL's are coming...boilercat wrote:I'm scared shitless now, my measly 68% on LSP looks like nothing now.
-
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 2:49 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
+2. 78%, but I haven't heard back from anyone yet and Mich was one of only two schools I applied to that had me as an auto-admit. I might throw out extra apps at deadline if I haven't heard anything yet...Rawlsian wrote:+1 63% here. No why Michigan essay, I was going to write one if I got WLed, but doesn't look like the WL's are coming...boilercat wrote:I'm scared shitless now, my measly 68% on LSP looks like nothing now.
- Vegas_Rebel
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 11:18 am
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
It's not going much better the other way. 45% here, Why Mich, love shown via email and whatnot as well (quasi-LOCI), -really- strong statements that Mich was my #1 choice ... and apparently an incoming rejection.WhatUpKells wrote:+2. 78%, but I haven't heard back from anyone yet and Mich was one of only two schools I applied to that had me as an auto-admit. I might throw out extra apps at deadline if I haven't heard anything yet...Rawlsian wrote:+1 63% here. No why Michigan essay, I was going to write one if I got WLed, but doesn't look like the WL's are coming...boilercat wrote:I'm scared shitless now, my measly 68% on LSP looks like nothing now.
Too high seems to be YP/Reject, too low is reject, but I'm not sure where the sweet spot is. Maybe they're just using a dartboard approach.
-
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:42 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Did anyone who got the email saying that they were "not yet able to render a decision" get dinged yet?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bostonian
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 4:08 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
I'm a splitter and I got that email too, so I doubt it's for YP.village-idiot wrote:Hmm I also got the whole we've reviewed your file and will get back to you email. I'm above both 75th's by a decent margin, is the general consensus that this is a YP tactic? Michigan is actually one of my higher choices for personal reasons.
- calicocat
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:29 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Who else wishes they ED'd?
- Vegas_Rebel
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 11:18 am
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
I wish it was possible to ED for fall. I would have, and told them as much.Oli wrote:Who else wishes they ED'd?
- PapantlaFlyer
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 6:03 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Just looking at the graphs on LSN, it doesn't seem this cylce is THAT crazy. It actually looks like they're sticking with their medians and percentiles. I'm pretty sure every year there's a bunch of high numbers applicants that get rejected, there's just more of them this year because of the high number of applications.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:54 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
try to be more optimisic~!! you don't even have rejection letters...i had a 7% chance according to LSP and got in
-
- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:19 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Whoa, really? That makes me and my 35% feel just a bit better.boney09 wrote:try to be more optimisic~!! you don't even have rejection letters...i had a 7% chance according to LSP and got in
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
what were your stats??? if you don't mind telling us, or if you can PM me?boney09 wrote:try to be more optimisic~!! you don't even have rejection letters...i had a 7% chance according to LSP and got in
i have 7% chance as well according to LSP.
are you an URM?
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =9&t=92438finalaspects wrote:what were your stats??? if you don't mind telling us, or if you can PM me?boney09 wrote:try to be more optimisic~!! you don't even have rejection letters...i had a 7% chance according to LSP and got in
i have 7% chance as well according to LSP.
are you an URM?
lol
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
ok nm... im screwed.. i just like to burn cash...Helmholtz wrote:http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =9&t=92438finalaspects wrote:what were your stats??? if you don't mind telling us, or if you can PM me?boney09 wrote:try to be more optimisic~!! you don't even have rejection letters...i had a 7% chance according to LSP and got in
i have 7% chance as well according to LSP.
are you an URM?
lol
- robin600
- Posts: 1634
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 3:07 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Just got the mail, rejected!
- calicocat
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:29 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Sorry to hear that robin, mind sharing stats?robin600 wrote:Just got the mail, rejected!
- parker09
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:15 am
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
julesm2200 wrote:I think UofM might actually be trying to fall in the rankings....
Im rather confused as to why they already admitted many people below or at median and then straight up rejected many people above 75%. Do they not have enough confidence in themselves as a school to think that maybe, just maybe, someone with above a 170 would want to go there? and not just as a backup option?
/rant
when did everyone who just got dinged submit? i wonder if they just accepted too many "median" people early and then just didn't have very many seats left by january (like they anticipated an increase in apps, but not as big as actually happened)? pure speculation.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login