Bummer. Debating between Chicago and Columbia and am leaning Columbia. This won't change anything for me, but still would have been nice to see them at least stay 4!TudoBem wrote:New 2018 ranking:
http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/2017-u ... re-here-2/
Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017) Forum
- unrelated
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2016 1:05 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
-
- Posts: 203
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 5:52 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
You'll be there for 3 years, and it will likely swap back and forth a few times from now until then. Look at employment outcomes for what you're interested in doing, and if the differences are negligible, go with where you feel comfortable between two objectively elite schools.unrelated wrote:Bummer. Debating between Chicago and Columbia and am leaning Columbia. This won't change anything for me, but still would have been nice to see them at least stay 4!TudoBem wrote:New 2018 ranking:
http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/2017-u ... re-here-2/

-
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:42 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
Just wondering if this is actually a serious comment? I'm terrible at picking up sarcasm.unrelated wrote:Bummer. Debating between Chicago and Columbia and am leaning Columbia. This won't change anything for me, but still would have been nice to see them at least stay 4!TudoBem wrote:New 2018 ranking:
http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/2017-u ... re-here-2/
- TudoBem
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
I do think it's a serious comment. It's very legit to be between U Chicago & Columbia...two very prestigious schools.Npret wrote:Just wondering if this is actually a serious comment? I'm terrible at picking up sarcasm.unrelated wrote:Bummer. Debating between Chicago and Columbia and am leaning Columbia. This won't change anything for me, but still would have been nice to see them at least stay 4!TudoBem wrote:New 2018 ranking:
http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/2017-u ... re-here-2/
-
- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by canafsa on Sat Apr 15, 2017 5:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:42 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
What are the rumorscanafsa wrote:Damn. This is a pretty big upset for Columbia. I guess the rumors about them were true. Hopefully the can begin to staunch the bleeding. Good for Chicago, though! What they have accomplished in the last decade is really astounding.
- unrelated
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2016 1:05 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
I much prefer NYC and really like Columbia's LRAP. Very serious. Still have to check out Chicago's ASW though!Npret wrote:Just wondering if this is actually a serious comment? I'm terrible at picking up sarcasm.unrelated wrote:Bummer. Debating between Chicago and Columbia and am leaning Columbia. This won't change anything for me, but still would have been nice to see them at least stay 4!TudoBem wrote:New 2018 ranking:
http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/2017-u ... re-here-2/
-
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:42 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
I meant the part about Columbia being 4 in USNews being relevant to any decision making.TudoBem wrote:I do think it's a serious comment. It's very legit to be between U Chicago & Columbia...two very prestigious schools.Npret wrote:Just wondering if this is actually a serious comment? I'm terrible at picking up sarcasm.unrelated wrote:Bummer. Debating between Chicago and Columbia and am leaning Columbia. This won't change anything for me, but still would have been nice to see them at least stay 4!TudoBem wrote:New 2018 ranking:
http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/2017-u ... re-here-2/
-
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:42 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
Probably the same as Harvard which also dropped a spot to Stanford.dyebri wrote:What are the rumorscanafsa wrote:Damn. This is a pretty big upset for Columbia. I guess the rumors about them were true. Hopefully the can begin to staunch the bleeding. Good for Chicago, though! What they have accomplished in the last decade is really astounding.
- unrelated
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2016 1:05 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
I didn't say it was? In fact I said it wouldn't change anything...Npret wrote:I meant the part about Columbia being 4 in USNews being relevant to any decision making.TudoBem wrote:I do think it's a serious comment. It's very legit to be between U Chicago & Columbia...two very prestigious schools.Npret wrote:Just wondering if this is actually a serious comment? I'm terrible at picking up sarcasm.unrelated wrote:Bummer. Debating between Chicago and Columbia and am leaning Columbia. This won't change anything for me, but still would have been nice to see them at least stay 4!TudoBem wrote:New 2018 ranking:
http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/2017-u ... re-here-2/
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2015 11:28 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
sure but what are they though? lolNpret wrote:Probably the same as Harvard which also dropped a spot to Stanford.dyebri wrote:What are the rumorscanafsa wrote:Damn. This is a pretty big upset for Columbia. I guess the rumors about them were true. Hopefully the can begin to staunch the bleeding. Good for Chicago, though! What they have accomplished in the last decade is really astounding.
- TudoBem
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
Good for u Chicago for sure! Major accomplishment to stay at #4. Columbia is and it will always be a very prestigious law school though!Susurrus wrote:Npret wrote:dyebri wrote:canafsa wrote:Damn. This is a pretty big upset for Columbia. I guess the rumors about them were true. Hopefully the can begin to staunch the bleeding. Good for Chicago, though! What they have accomplished in the last decade is really astounding.
- hellohalo
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:53 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
I think it's always easier to run a smaller size of class. Right? You can be more selective. Not worried about filling the class. Easier to place graduates.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2322
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 2:35 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
I don't care if they went down one I still love them
-
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:42 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
I think I misunderstood. Sorry.unrelated wrote:I didn't say it was? In fact I said it wouldn't change anything...Npret wrote:I meant the part about Columbia being 4 in USNews being relevant to any decision making.TudoBem wrote:I do think it's a serious comment. It's very legit to be between U Chicago & Columbia...two very prestigious schools.Npret wrote:Just wondering if this is actually a serious comment? I'm terrible at picking up sarcasm.unrelated wrote:Bummer. Debating between Chicago and Columbia and am leaning Columbia. This won't change anything for me, but still would have been nice to see them at least stay 4!TudoBem wrote:New 2018 ranking:
http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/2017-u ... re-here-2/
- mtf612
- Posts: 246
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2016 1:56 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
Prestige hunters please go to Chicago so you free up seats at CLS for us held applicants. KTHX <3
-
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:07 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
+1mtf612 wrote:Prestige hunters please go to Chicago so you free up seats at CLS for us held applicants. KTHX <3
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 11:27 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
Oh wow... I just saw the rankings. I know this isn't really supposed to matter, but does anyone else feel like they won't be excited about telling someone they're going to Columbia now? When there were several ties, it seemed like they were all clustered together but "5" seems to have a different feel. Perhaps it's just an optics thing. Someone tell me I'm being crazy?
- dietcoke1
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 8:18 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
you're being crazy2017JDtobe wrote:Oh wow... I just saw the rankings. I know this isn't really supposed to matter, but does anyone else feel like they won't be excited about telling someone they're going to Columbia now? When there were several ties, it seemed like they were all clustered together but "5" seems to have a different feel. Perhaps it's just an optics thing. Someone tell me I'm being crazy?
-
- Posts: 599
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 5:35 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
RTdietcoke1 wrote:you're being crazy2017JDtobe wrote:Oh wow... I just saw the rankings. I know this isn't really supposed to matter, but does anyone else feel like they won't be excited about telling someone they're going to Columbia now? When there were several ties, it seemed like they were all clustered together but "5" seems to have a different feel. Perhaps it's just an optics thing. Someone tell me I'm being crazy?
- BoyJord
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 8:15 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
If this is serious, you're being crazy. BUT, I will gladly take your spot if you are reconsidering attending!2017JDtobe wrote:Oh wow... I just saw the rankings. I know this isn't really supposed to matter, but does anyone else feel like they won't be excited about telling someone they're going to Columbia now? When there were several ties, it seemed like they were all clustered together but "5" seems to have a different feel. Perhaps it's just an optics thing. Someone tell me I'm being crazy?

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 11:27 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
Thanks everyone, this has been helpful. It's just hard not to feel like I should definitely go to Chicago instead, since I got into both.BoyJord wrote:If this is serious, you're being crazy. BUT, I will gladly take your spot if you are reconsidering attending!2017JDtobe wrote:Oh wow... I just saw the rankings. I know this isn't really supposed to matter, but does anyone else feel like they won't be excited about telling someone they're going to Columbia now? When there were several ties, it seemed like they were all clustered together but "5" seems to have a different feel. Perhaps it's just an optics thing. Someone tell me I'm being crazy?
- forum_user
- Posts: 844
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:40 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
2017JDtobe wrote:Perhaps it's just an optics thing.
I don't think it's an "optics" thing. It could be an "appearances" thing.Google wrote:op·tics
ˈäptiks
noun
1.
the scientific study of sight and the behavior of light, or the properties of transmission and deflection of other forms of radiation.
-
- Posts: 599
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 5:35 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
because of a one place difference in the rankings? that's silly. you realize that most people outside of TLS have absolutely no idea what the current rankings are/care right? do you think big law employers suddenly think less of Columbia now?2017JDtobe wrote:Thanks everyone, this has been helpful. It's just hard not to feel like I should definitely go to Chicago instead, since I got into both.BoyJord wrote:If this is serious, you're being crazy. BUT, I will gladly take your spot if you are reconsidering attending!2017JDtobe wrote:Oh wow... I just saw the rankings. I know this isn't really supposed to matter, but does anyone else feel like they won't be excited about telling someone they're going to Columbia now? When there were several ties, it seemed like they were all clustered together but "5" seems to have a different feel. Perhaps it's just an optics thing. Someone tell me I'm being crazy?
- Thelaw23
- Posts: 794
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2015 8:23 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
Also, Columbia and Chicago will probably switch or be tied again next year.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login