Columbia 2010 Forum

picaresco · Post by **picaresco** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:01 pm

So, after getting a request for Fall grades and not sending a transcript (one grade still pending) but providing an e-mail, I got in today with a Hamilton.

CardinalRules · Post by **CardinalRules** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:02 pm

picaresco wrote:So, after getting a request for Fall grades and not sending a transcript (one grade still pending) but providing an e-mail, I got in today with a Hamilton.

It must be a great feeling!

picaresco · Post by **picaresco** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:03 pm

managamy wrote:
picaresco wrote:So, after getting a request for Fall grades and not sending a transcript (one grade still pending) but providing an e-mail, I got in today with a Hamilton.
It must be a great feeling!

Haha, I can't complain. Now I'm just sad that my undergrad screwed up sending the Stanford dean's cert so I went complete in January instead of in Oct/Nov.

CardinalRules · Post by **CardinalRules** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:05 pm

I got a urine-colored envelope in the mail.

JohnYuu · Post by **JohnYuu** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:10 pm

What is in the envelope? Anything special?

booby87 · Post by **booby87** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:13 pm

crackberry · Post by **crackberry** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:18 pm

managamy wrote:I got a urine-colored envelope in the mail.

No Hamilton or Butler?!

CardinalRules · Post by **CardinalRules** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:19 pm

JohnYuu wrote:What is in the envelope? Anything special?

No, nothing really interesting. Just an acceptance letter.

(I assume so anyway. To be honest, I haven't gotten around to opening it yet.)

CardinalRules · Post by **CardinalRules** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:20 pm

crackberry wrote:
managamy wrote:I got a urine-colored envelope in the mail.
No Hamilton or Butler?!

I haven't opened it yet; the acceptance feels especially good, though, since I applied ED to their undergrad program and they dinged me outright. Fools.

SR86 · Post by **SR86** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:21 pm

In today too, Bay Area.

CardinalRules · Post by **CardinalRules** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:24 pm

SR86 wrote:In today too, Bay Area.

Congrats! It's a great day for the California applicants to Columbia.

crackberry · Post by **crackberry** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:25 pm

managamy wrote:
SR86 wrote:In today too, Bay Area.
Congrats! It's a great day for the California applicants to Columbia.

Not me. Blah, well maybe since my mail comes so early it'll be here tomorrow. If not, well, so be it.

CardinalRules · Post by **CardinalRules** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:26 pm

crackberry wrote:
managamy wrote:
SR86 wrote:In today too, Bay Area.
Congrats! It's a great day for the California applicants to Columbia.
Not me. Blah, well maybe since my mail comes so early it'll be here tomorrow. If not, well, so be it.

Um, Stanford?

crackberry · Post by **crackberry** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:26 pm

managamy wrote:
crackberry wrote:
managamy wrote:
SR86 wrote:In today too, Bay Area.
Congrats! It's a great day for the California applicants to Columbia.
Not me. Blah, well maybe since my mail comes so early it'll be here tomorrow. If not, well, so be it.
Um, Stanford?

Right. I'll live.

forza · Post by **forza** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:28 pm

In!

Submitted: 10/28
Complete: 11/12
In mailbox: 1/25!

Core · Post by **Core** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:29 pm

crackberry wrote:
managamy wrote:
SR86 wrote:In today too, Bay Area.
Congrats! It's a great day for the California applicants to Columbia.
Not me. Blah, well maybe since my mail comes so early it'll be here tomorrow. If not, well, so be it.

You're going to get in. No worries.

SR86 · Post by **SR86** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:34 pm

crackberry wrote:
managamy wrote:
SR86 wrote:In today too, Bay Area.
Congrats! It's a great day for the California applicants to Columbia.
Not me. Blah, well maybe since my mail comes so early it'll be here tomorrow. If not, well, so be it.

SLS >> CLS imo. I'll probably be withdrawing from CLS soon as I can't see myself taking it over Harvard (or Stanford if they ever stop ignoring me... heh). Hopefully someone else on here gets my spot!

crackberry · Post by **crackberry** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:36 pm

forza wrote:In!

Submitted: 10/28
Complete: 11/12
In mailbox: 1/25!

Forza, I asked you this somewhere else, but didn't you/don't you go to Alabama? What's with the horrifying 'tar?

crackberry · Post by **crackberry** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:36 pm

Core wrote:
crackberry wrote:
managamy wrote:
SR86 wrote:In today too, Bay Area.
Congrats! It's a great day for the California applicants to Columbia.
Not me. Blah, well maybe since my mail comes so early it'll be here tomorrow. If not, well, so be it.
You're going to get in. No worries.

Haha well I appreciate the optimism Core. Did you apply to CLS? You didn't hear anything today did you?

forza · Post by **forza** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:37 pm

crackberry wrote:
forza wrote:In!

Submitted: 10/28
Complete: 11/12
In mailbox: 1/25!
Forza, I asked you this somewhere else, but didn't you/don't you go to Alabama? What's with the horrifying 'tar?

It was part of the stipulations when I traded NancyBotwin for NYgrrrl in the DIBS thread. And yes, Alabama boy here.

Horrifying...

crackberry · Post by **crackberry** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:38 pm

SR86 wrote:
crackberry wrote:
managamy wrote:
SR86 wrote:In today too, Bay Area.
Congrats! It's a great day for the California applicants to Columbia.
Not me. Blah, well maybe since my mail comes so early it'll be here tomorrow. If not, well, so be it.
SLS >> CLS imo. I'll probably be withdrawing from CLS soon as I can't see myself taking it over Harvard (or Stanford if they ever stop ignoring me... heh). Hopefully someone else on here gets my spot!

Yeah I mean I agree. I'm actually not sure why I care about CLS. My parents have very strong connections to Columbia (not the law school), and my mom definitely wants me to go, so maybe that's why I still care. I dunno.

crackberry · Post by **crackberry** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:39 pm

forza wrote:
crackberry wrote:
forza wrote:In!

Submitted: 10/28
Complete: 11/12
In mailbox: 1/25!
Forza, I asked you this somewhere else, but didn't you/don't you go to Alabama? What's with the horrifying 'tar?
It was part of the stipulations when I traded NancyBotwin for NYgrrrl in the DIBS thread. And yes, Alabama boy here.

Horrifying...

Haha well I have no idea what you're talking about w/r/t that trade, but I'm sure it is difficult for you to look at your own 'tar.

Core · Post by **Core** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:43 pm

crackberry wrote:
crackberry wrote:
managamy wrote:
SR86 wrote:In today too, Bay Area.
Congrats! It's a great day for the California applicants to Columbia.
Not me. Blah, well maybe since my mail comes so early it'll be here tomorrow. If not, well, so be it.
Haha well I appreciate the optimism Core. Did you apply to CLS? You didn't hear anything today did you?

I think I'm being realistic. Stanford took you early on and you got a JR1, so I don't see Columbia not biting.
I applied and have heard nothing. I go to a TTT UG, have a pair of cake majors, and have a relatively low LSAT for CLS, so I'm not expecting anything (but I hope, of course).

crackberry · Post by **crackberry** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:47 pm

Core wrote:I think I'm being realistic. Stanford took you early on and you got a JR1, so I don't see Columbia not biting.
I applied and have heard nothing. I go to a TTT UG, have a pair of cake majors, and have a relatively low LSAT for CLS, so I'm not expecting anything (but I hope, of course).

To play devil's advocate: my LSAT is only one point higher than yours (and my average is three points lower than your highest), I also had a "cake" major (but only one) and you got an early JR1 as well. The only difference between us is Stanford UG and SLS, which I think are connected, and the fact that YOU are a URM.

Dtackpat75 · Post by **Dtackpat75** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:48 pm

In today!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Central Jersey. Went complete forever ago.

Columbia 2010 Forum

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010

Re: Columbia 2010