Truly a winning pitch.TripTrip wrote:"Will you, mighty TLSer with great future potential, forgo your hopes and dreams so that future high scorers on the LSAT might have a better opportunity to spend three years in a warm climate?"cws277 wrote:Absolutely. Problem is that would require some temporary self-sacrifice for the greater good on the part of those TLSers. From my limited time here, that seems unlikely.
Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- cws277
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:11 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Today is the day. Good luck everyone.
- porch
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:43 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Why does my UR keep changing Chicago? What does it all mean Basil?
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:54 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Still sitting at complete since 1/16. Ready for that ding!
-
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:07 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
What time are decisions usually released?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 262
- Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:37 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I got mine at 7:00 pm ESTht2988 wrote:What time are decisions usually released?
Good luck everyone!
-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:58 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
UR2 today. UR1 on 3/1. No interview.
- porch
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:43 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'd like that as I am a UR3 3/28 noninterview personhohenheim wrote:My guess is that the UR3 3/28 non-interview people are either directly admitted or get interview invites tomorrow. I've looked at their profiles and everyone is pretty solid.
The UR2 3/27 non-interview people that didn't update today seem to all be splitters, so I bet we're getting the WL :/
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I feel like chicago has been playing games with us these past few days...
-
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:34 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Problem is that the splitters ended up getting UR3 later in the day, so the theory has been ruffled a bit.porch wrote:I'd like that as I am a UR3 3/28 noninterview personhohenheim wrote:My guess is that the UR3 3/28 non-interview people are either directly admitted or get interview invites tomorrow. I've looked at their profiles and everyone is pretty solid.
The UR2 3/27 non-interview people that didn't update today seem to all be splitters, so I bet we're getting the WL :/
- beepboopbeep
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:36 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
As someone who got the UR3 yesterday, I really hope the theory is true.KingFish wrote: Problem is that the splitters ended up getting UR3 later in the day, so the theory has been ruffled a bit.
As someone with a brain it just sounds like they are going through their pile and updating as individual apps cross different desks.
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Checking in to say I am UR3 as well from yesterday.
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No idea what to think now.
I'm an extreme splitter, so I started this cycle thinking there was virtually no shot at Chicago. Then I got the interview invite, saw the spreadsheet, and had a brief period of thinking that I was probably in. The huge number of uber qualified people without interview invitations these last few weeks have made me waver, and now I'm thinking probable WL.
I'm an extreme splitter, so I started this cycle thinking there was virtually no shot at Chicago. Then I got the interview invite, saw the spreadsheet, and had a brief period of thinking that I was probably in. The huge number of uber qualified people without interview invitations these last few weeks have made me waver, and now I'm thinking probable WL.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bananapudding88
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 4:11 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Hooray!! Finally UR!!!!! Was convinced they'd lost my app or decided not to read it




-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:54 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Same!
aiaea wrote:Hooray!! Finally UR!!!!! Was convinced they'd lost my app or decided not to read it![]()
![]()
- untar614
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:01 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
What's the changing UR status timetable been for those who interviewed? I did a few days ago and am still UR - I'm assuming these numbers actually appear in the status, otherwise i have no clue.
- beepboopbeep
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:36 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Haven't interviewed, but they don't change - it just changes the date.untar614 wrote:What's the changing UR status timetable been for those who interviewed? I did a few days ago and am still UR - I'm assuming these numbers actually appear in the status, otherwise i have no clue.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
the number doesn't change to "UR2, UR3", ect., I think thats just TLS talk for # of times your status date changeduntar614 wrote:What's the changing UR status timetable been for those who interviewed? I did a few days ago and am still UR - I'm assuming these numbers actually appear in the status, otherwise i have no clue.
- untar614
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:01 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
oh, well then... this is going to take another level of neuroticism then. I best step it up.beepboopbeep wrote:Haven't interviewed, but they don't change - it just changes the date.untar614 wrote:What's the changing UR status timetable been for those who interviewed? I did a few days ago and am still UR - I'm assuming these numbers actually appear in the status, otherwise i have no clue.
-
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 12:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Still not under review yet. I don't think I ever will be.
-
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Finally UR1 after being complete since early January!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- HawkeyeGirl
- Posts: 459
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
1/25 complete...nothing yet eitherCaptainLeela wrote:1/23 complete. Still nothing.framboozer wrote:Still not under review yet. I don't think I ever will be.
- Bowie_Nietzsche
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:57 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Checking in for first time.
Complete 2/1
UR1 3/17
UR2 3/27
UR3 3/28
At this point, any kind of closure almost sounds preferable to prolonging this process with an interview. Eh?
Complete 2/1
UR1 3/17
UR2 3/27
UR3 3/28
At this point, any kind of closure almost sounds preferable to prolonging this process with an interview. Eh?
-
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
-
Last edited by fivestarfolds on Wed Jul 15, 2015 4:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login