Lowercase email is in itself good newsssanonymous wrote:Soooo no lowercase emails reported = no good news tomorrow.
Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread Forum
- sinfiery

- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
-
one_by_one

- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
.
Last edited by one_by_one on Fri Jul 17, 2015 12:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
04102014

- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
- sinfiery

- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Last school I'm waiting on ofc has to be my far and away #1..sigh. gonna be a painful rejection
- uconjak

- Posts: 357
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:20 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Good luck to both of you, maybe we will hear by May 1st? I hope quicker than that the stress was getting me down. So I decided that I am going to withdraw from everywhere but my two dream schools and if it happens, OK its karma. if not, I had a good ride!chickpea wrote:I went through the exact same process. TLS can be supportive but it can also make you feel irrationally terrible about yourself.jbagelboy wrote:yes -- this is something to always keep in mind. nearly all the schools we discuss are actually very prestigious, elite institutions to be proud of and happy to go to. TLS debt-mongering nearly caused me to second guess attending at all last week until I talked with some family and alumns over the weekend who straightened me outchickpea wrote:Thanks guys. I wish you the best of luck with the rest of your cycles as well. I'm 99.9% sure I'll be at NYU next fall and am really excited about it. I haven't been on TLS much these past couple of months. You wouldn't believe how much better I feel about attending NYU after having spent that period of time among normal folk (as opposed to TLS superhumans).
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
04102014

- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Same, although I'm also still waiting on H. But I would take S in a heartbeat.sinfiery wrote:Last school I'm waiting on ofc has to be my far and away #1..sigh. gonna be a painful rejection
-
swordking90

- Posts: 186
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:20 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
So you withdrew from everywhere except for Columbia and Stanford?uconjak wrote:
Good luck to both of you, maybe we will hear by May 1st? I hope quicker than that the stress was getting me down. So I decided that I am going to withdraw from everywhere but my two dream schools and if it happens, OK its karma. if not, I had a good ride!
- HankBashir

- Posts: 536
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:01 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
I'd give up my first born child to get into SLS.
The child would probably be better of in Stanford's hands anyway.
The child would probably be better of in Stanford's hands anyway.
- helix23

- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Looking at LSN, it looks like last year the big spike of admits in early to mid april were URMs or non-traditional apps (with colossal stats). After that WLs and Rejects galore.
-
04102014

- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Take your realism elsewhere.helix23 wrote:Looking at LSN, it looks like last year the big spike of admits in early to mid april were URMs or non-traditional apps (with colossal stats). After that WLs and Rejects galore.
- helix23

- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
You found my weakness! It's small knives!ohpobrecito wrote:Take your realism elsewhere.helix23 wrote:Looking at LSN, it looks like last year the big spike of admits in early to mid april were URMs or non-traditional apps (with colossal stats). After that WLs and Rejects galore.
-
pn40

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:17 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Hi guys, a random question:
I've changed my phone number since submitting my app. The status checker shows my old phone number and there doesn't seem to be a way for me to change my contact details.
Should I bother getting this changed? If yes, how would you do it? (I assume email the admissions office, but would there be a quicker way?)
I've changed my phone number since submitting my app. The status checker shows my old phone number and there doesn't seem to be a way for me to change my contact details.
Should I bother getting this changed? If yes, how would you do it? (I assume email the admissions office, but would there be a quicker way?)
- sinfiery

- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Gonna pretend I didn't read thishelix23 wrote:Looking at LSN, it looks like last year the big spike of admits in early to mid april were URMs or non-traditional apps (with colossal stats). After that WLs and Rejects galore.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- txdude45

- Posts: 913
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 6:25 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
You should definitely get it changed. They admit people via phone call, so you'd miss it it you don't. You'll still get the followup email, but the phone call seems like the most fun part. Since it's really just another application update, I'd email the office.pn40 wrote:Hi guys, a random question:
I've changed my phone number since submitting my app. The status checker shows my old phone number and there doesn't seem to be a way for me to change my contact details.
Should I bother getting this changed? If yes, how would you do it? (I assume email the admissions office, but would there be a quicker way?)
- carboncopyx

- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Yeahhhhh, I'm gonna ready up my Ding Bar post now...helix23 wrote:Looking at LSN, it looks like last year the big spike of admits in early to mid april were URMs or non-traditional apps (with colossal stats). After that WLs and Rejects galore.
- TripTrip

- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
If you miss the phone call, you don't get in. They call the next number on the list and admit them.txdude45 wrote:You should definitely get it changed. They admit people via phone call, so you'd miss it it you don't. You'll still get the followup email, but the phone call seems like the most fun part. Since it's really just another application update, I'd email the office.
Are you just saying that because every time you've been pessimistic about getting into a school, you've gotten in?carboncopyx wrote:Yeahhhhh, I'm gonna ready up my Ding Bar post now...helix23 wrote:Looking at LSN, it looks like last year the big spike of admits in early to mid april were URMs or non-traditional apps (with colossal stats). After that WLs and Rejects galore.
-
amonthofsundays

- Posts: 180
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:36 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
I'll be in here the rest of April to do some cheerleading. Anyone want to retain me as their representative? FWIW I was in at S after a good 2/3 weeks of no admits so maybe I can defibrillate the admissions process on someone else's behalf this time.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- ManOfTheMinute

- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Yeah it's not like you have had any practice in the area!carboncopyx wrote:Yeahhhhh, I'm gonna ready up my Ding Bar post now...helix23 wrote:Looking at LSN, it looks like last year the big spike of admits in early to mid april were URMs or non-traditional apps (with colossal stats). After that WLs and Rejects galore.
-
04102014

- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Me please. I need all of the help I can get.amonthofsundays wrote:I'll be in here the rest of April to do some cheerleading. Anyone want to retain me as their representative? FWIW I was in at S after a good 2/3 weeks of no admits so maybe I can defibrillate the admissions process on someone else's behalf this time.
- ssanonymous

- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
hmmm, of the 7 accepted between early April and April 15th, 2 were traditional applicants, 3 were URMs, and 2 were non-traditional. Seems like a healthy mix of applicants.
- sinfiery

- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
The URM wave was in April last year but this year it was In early March. So the question is does the wave go away/become smaller or is it supplemented by other types of applicants?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- helix23

- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Between 4/1 and 4/15 I see 9 acceptances. 5 URMs, 2 non-traditionals and 2 traditional.ssanonymous wrote:hmmm, of the 7 accepted between early April and April 15th, 2 were traditional applicants, 3 were URMs, and 2 were non-traditional. Seems like a healthy mix of applicants.
- jbagelboy

- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
remember there were also probably another 30 that didn't use this website and there's no reason to believe they would follow a trend with a sample size of 9helix23 wrote:Between 4/1 and 4/15 I see 9 acceptances. 5 URMs, 2 non-traditionals and 2 traditional.ssanonymous wrote:hmmm, of the 7 accepted between early April and April 15th, 2 were traditional applicants, 3 were URMs, and 2 were non-traditional. Seems like a healthy mix of applicants.
- helix23

- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
don't taze me, brojbagelboy wrote:remember there were also probably another 30 that didn't use this website and there's no reason to believe they would follow a trend with a sample size of 9helix23 wrote:Between 4/1 and 4/15 I see 9 acceptances. 5 URMs, 2 non-traditionals and 2 traditional.ssanonymous wrote:hmmm, of the 7 accepted between early April and April 15th, 2 were traditional applicants, 3 were URMs, and 2 were non-traditional. Seems like a healthy mix of applicants.
- sinfiery

- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Last year there were zero URM acceptances in march or close to it.
I doubt there will be any more mainly URM waves, but now I am also not sure how big of a wave is coming.
I doubt there will be any more mainly URM waves, but now I am also not sure how big of a wave is coming.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login