Haha me toohohenheim wrote:Hmm, I just went UR3. So who really knows what's going on...hohenheim wrote:My guess is that the UR3 3/28 non-interview people are either directly admitted or get interview invites tomorrow. I've looked at their profiles and everyone is pretty solid.
The UR2 3/27 non-interview people that didn't update today seem to all be splitters, so I bet we're getting the WL :/
Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
KingFish

- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:34 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- hohenheim

- Posts: 180
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 8:30 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Until they start sending emails saying "What the what?" they haven't reached michigan statushinakas wrote: Maybe it's turning into Michigan and is going to start updating status checkers everyday so that our speculating is rendered useless.
- ManOfTheMinute

- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
For these people who have been saying that you went UR3 - did this just happen or could it have happened this morning when it happened to me and several others?
-
KingFish

- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:34 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No, I checked like an hour ago or something and no update.ManOfTheMinute wrote:For these people who have been saying that you went UR3 - did this just happen or could it have happened this morning when it happened to me and several others?
- you'rethemannowdawg

- Posts: 211
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:36 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So what should I be obsessively checking tomorrow? Email or mailbox?
-
KingFish

- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:34 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
UR3 today?you'rethemannowdawg wrote:So what should I be obsessively checking tomorrow? Email or mailbox?
-
chadbrochill

- Posts: 394
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:19 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by chadbrochill on Fri Apr 05, 2013 7:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- you'rethemannowdawg

- Posts: 211
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:36 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You know it, brah.KingFish wrote:UR3 today?you'rethemannowdawg wrote:So what should I be obsessively checking tomorrow? Email or mailbox?
- davee817

- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just received an email from [email protected].... I flipped the f**king table 
Last edited by davee817 on Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
KingFish

- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:34 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Quit flipping tables and go to Stanford.davee817 wrote:Just received an email from [email protected].... I flipped the f**king table.
- davee817

- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I like Chicago though. Kanye West is my idol.KingFish wrote:Quit flipping tables and go to Stanford.davee817 wrote:Just received an email from [email protected].... I flipped the f**king table.
- cws277

- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:11 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Is he a clinical faculty member there?davee817 wrote:I like Chicago though. Kanye West is my idol.KingFish wrote:Quit flipping tables and go to Stanford.davee817 wrote:Just received an email from [email protected].... I flipped the f**king table.
- davee817

- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yeah, but at the school of Public Policy.cws277 wrote:Is he a clinical faculty member there?davee817 wrote:I like Chicago though. Kanye West is my idol.KingFish wrote:Quit flipping tables and go to Stanford.davee817 wrote:Just received an email from [email protected].... I flipped the f**king table.
- cws277

- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:11 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So after posting earlier about my no date change, my date just moved to today within the last hour or so. Interviewed in the last two weeks. UR 3/1.
- davee817

- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
They're staying at the office later than usual. Hmm...cws277 wrote:So after posting earlier about my no date change, my date just moved to today within the last hour or so. Interviewed in the last two weeks. UR 3/1.
- Audeamus

- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
they're on central time, so it's not really that late.davee817 wrote:They're staying at the office later than usual. Hmm...cws277 wrote:So after posting earlier about my no date change, my date just moved to today within the last hour or so. Interviewed in the last two weeks. UR 3/1.
- cws277

- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:11 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
After last night's Bulls game, I am 100% sold on Chicago. No way I'd even pick Harvard or Stanford if they let me in: Bulls > Warriors > Celts.davee817 wrote:They're staying at the office later than usual. Hmm...cws277 wrote:So after posting earlier about my no date change, my date just moved to today within the last hour or so. Interviewed in the last two weeks. UR 3/1.
- jbagelboy

- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
by this metric, i would stay in LA or move to miamicws277 wrote:After last night's Bulls game, I am 100% sold on Chicago. No way I'd even pick Harvard or Stanford if they let me in: Bulls > Warriors > Celts.davee817 wrote:They're staying at the office later than usual. Hmm...cws277 wrote:So after posting earlier about my no date change, my date just moved to today within the last hour or so. Interviewed in the last two weeks. UR 3/1.
- Crowing

- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No city has a higher percentage of fair-weather sports fans than LA.jbagelboy wrote:by this metric, i would stay in LA or move to miamicws277 wrote:After last night's Bulls game, I am 100% sold on Chicago. No way I'd even pick Harvard or Stanford if they let me in: Bulls > Warriors > Celts.davee817 wrote:They're staying at the office later than usual. Hmm...cws277 wrote:So after posting earlier about my no date change, my date just moved to today within the last hour or so. Interviewed in the last two weeks. UR 3/1.
- cws277

- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:11 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
It truly is the great tragedy of the legal market that there are no T14 schools in Miami.jbagelboy wrote:by this metric, i would stay in LA or move to miamicws277 wrote:After last night's Bulls game, I am 100% sold on Chicago. No way I'd even pick Harvard or Stanford if they let me in: Bulls > Warriors > Celts.davee817 wrote:They're staying at the office later than usual. Hmm...cws277 wrote:So after posting earlier about my no date change, my date just moved to today within the last hour or so. Interviewed in the last two weeks. UR 3/1.
- you'rethemannowdawg

- Posts: 211
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:36 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Does Chicago notify by email?
-
edamame

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:25 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yesyou'rethemannowdawg wrote:Does Chicago notify by email?
- TripTrip

- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Or Hawaii.cws277 wrote:It truly is the great tragedy of the legal market that there are no T14 schools in Miami.
We need to think seriously about sending all the top-indexed TLSers to schools in warmer climates to artificially boost their USNWR rankings. I bet we could help UCLA jump GULC.
- cws277

- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:11 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Absolutely. Problem is that would require some temporary self-sacrifice for the greater good on the part of those TLSers. From my limited time here, that seems unlikely.TripTrip wrote:Or Hawaii.cws277 wrote:It truly is the great tragedy of the legal market that there are no T14 schools in Miami.
We need to think seriously about sending all the top-indexed TLSers to schools in warmer climates to artificially boost their USNWR rankings. I bet we could help UCLA jump GULC.
- TripTrip

- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
"Will you, mighty TLSer with great future potential, forgo your hopes and dreams so that future high scorers on the LSAT might have a better opportunity to spend three years in a warm climate?"cws277 wrote:Absolutely. Problem is that would require some temporary self-sacrifice for the greater good on the part of those TLSers. From my limited time here, that seems unlikely.