Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017) Forum
-
canafsa

- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by canafsa on Sat Apr 15, 2017 4:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I think this is just a function of H's nontraditional grading. It's impossible to determine who is the lowest in H class unless they actually straight up failed.jjcorvino wrote:I also don't really have data to back this up, but I would bet a fair amount of money that the lowest in the class at Harvard has a better chance of success than the lowest in the class at NYU.
e: scooped
-
curry1

- Posts: 884
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:41 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
It's been almost a month since the last JS2s. Can we get back to speculation about JS2s?
-
canafsa

- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by canafsa on Sat Apr 15, 2017 4:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
And tbf HYSB grading hurts a decent chunk of the class.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Oh I forgot H has 8% "low pass"
Gotta avoid that.
Gotta avoid that.
-
minkbrigade

- Posts: 49
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 12:13 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Hm, well the equation changes a bit if you're relying on LRAP/LIPP. I didn't apply to UVA so don't know anything about their LRAP, but there are situations where even a full tuition scholarship wouldn't be enough to sway me from a school with a stronger LRAP. If I assume a median PI outcome/salary, chances are I'd end up paying more to cover the COA loans without good LRAP support than I would to pay tuition and COA loans at the school with a strong LRAP.Rigo wrote:How does more debt better lift your family out of poverty? Your logic here is fishy.OnlyHumean wrote: I think even at sticker, HLS is an objectively good choice, and one that would help lift my family out of poverty, even if Dillard or RYK might be better ones for some people.
Obviously it's not a black-and-white thing--i.e., even though NYU's LRAP isn't as strong as Harvard's, I'd take RTK in a heartbeat.
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
For many people, NYU LRAP would be better than H LIPP in that you pay way more out of pocket monthly under H's program than NYU's.*minkbrigade wrote:Hm, well the equation changes a bit if you're relying on LRAP/LIPP. I didn't apply to UVA so don't know anything about their LRAP, but there are situations where even a full tuition scholarship wouldn't be enough to sway me from a school with a stronger LRAP. If I assume a median PI outcome/salary, chances are I'd end up paying more to cover the COA loans without good LRAP support than I would to pay tuition and COA loans at the school with a strong LRAP.Rigo wrote:How does more debt better lift your family out of poverty? Your logic here is fishy.OnlyHumean wrote: I think even at sticker, HLS is an objectively good choice, and one that would help lift my family out of poverty, even if Dillard or RYK might be better ones for some people.
Obviously it's not a black-and-white thing--i.e., even though NYU's LRAP isn't as strong as Harvard's, I'd take RTK in a heartbeat.
Columbia (somewhat surprisingly) has the best LRAP program of any law school.**
*NYU expects no contribution is you make less than $80k. H expects a contribution if you make over $46k
**No contribution if you make less than $100k
- dddddd90

- Posts: 142
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 3:55 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Not to focus on the negative, but when do they typically start sending out rejection and WL waves? LSN has shown 8 rejections and 1 WL for quite some time. Also, do you have to JS1 to be WL?
-
dinan15

- Posts: 32
- Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2017 11:13 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Yeah, I feel like that is what I'm leaning towards... Idk yet thoughbloomsday wrote:I'm still waiting on HY, but I'm almost certainly taking the Ruby regardless. I've internally debated this ad nauseum, but I think whatever advantages HYS might have, even for my goals, they're not worth being that indebted through my 30s.anonperson2017 wrote:Well to me, ruby at chicago over hls is even easier than rtk or dillard over hls. That's the true golden ticket.dinan15 wrote:What about the ruby at Chicago? I just found out yesterday and it's making me question everything
-
minkbrigade

- Posts: 49
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 12:13 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
NYU has lower monthly costs in the PSLF-integrated plan, but I don't necessarily think that means its's better. Maybe it's a matter of preference, but there are several things that make me feel more comfortable with H's plan, including: 1. no threat of negative amortization; 2. it covers some undergrad debt; 3. no income cap (NYU's non-integrated plan has an income cap, and as far as I can tell the negative amortization protection would as well, as it resets your debt to where it would be under the non-integrated plan). Obviously, if I had a full or nearly-full scholarship at NYU, that would change things since the amount of debt to service would be so much lower and so the risks of NYU's plan would decrease.Rigo wrote:For many people, NYU LRAP would be better than H LIPP in that you pay way more out of pocket monthly under H's program than NYU's.*minkbrigade wrote:Hm, well the equation changes a bit if you're relying on LRAP/LIPP. I didn't apply to UVA so don't know anything about their LRAP, but there are situations where even a full tuition scholarship wouldn't be enough to sway me from a school with a stronger LRAP. If I assume a median PI outcome/salary, chances are I'd end up paying more to cover the COA loans without good LRAP support than I would to pay tuition and COA loans at the school with a strong LRAP.Rigo wrote:How does more debt better lift your family out of poverty? Your logic here is fishy.OnlyHumean wrote: I think even at sticker, HLS is an objectively good choice, and one that would help lift my family out of poverty, even if Dillard or RYK might be better ones for some people.
Obviously it's not a black-and-white thing--i.e., even though NYU's LRAP isn't as strong as Harvard's, I'd take RTK in a heartbeat.
Columbia (somewhat surprisingly) has the best LRAP program of any law school.**
*NYU expects no contribution is you make less than $80k. H expects a contribution if you make over $46k
**No contribution if you make less than $100k
But agree with you 100% on Columbia.
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
^yeah I was working with the assumption of NYU fully and just taking out COL loans.
If NYU sticker vs. H sticker then H obviously because negative amortization.
If NYU sticker vs. H sticker then H obviously because negative amortization.
-
minkbrigade

- Posts: 49
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 12:13 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Oh yeah, sorry--that totally makes sense.Rigo wrote:^yeah I was working with the assumption of NYU fully and just taking out COL loans.
If NYU sticker vs. H sticker then H obviously because negative amortization.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
jjjman

- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:25 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Are there any JS1s scheduled for today or tomorrow? Normally JS2s come out on or around the day JS1s resume following an 11-15 day break (it's been 13 days)
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
There are a lot more personal variables that factor into comparing LRAP's, but I think it's a mistake to outright say H's is better than NYU's for everyone.
The fact of the matter is you will be paying more of your income monthly towards debt if on LIPP, but you will have more flexibility if you wanted to dip out before the 10 years since your debt will be decreasing each year instead of potentially growing because of interest.
The fact of the matter is you will be paying more of your income monthly towards debt if on LIPP, but you will have more flexibility if you wanted to dip out before the 10 years since your debt will be decreasing each year instead of potentially growing because of interest.
- dddddd90

- Posts: 142
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 3:55 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Would you all take a low six figure offer at UVA over sticker at HLS if you want to go into BigLaw then teach, join the judiciary, or run for office or some shit? Asking for a friend.
-
canafsa

- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by canafsa on Sat Apr 15, 2017 4:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- OnlyHumean

- Posts: 68
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2016 10:06 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I think you're misreading me, I never claimed that HLS was a better choice - in fact, I explicitly stated that Dillard and RTK may be better choices. I claimed that HLS is still an objectively good choice, because it still will help me lift my family out of poverty even if there might be other faster ways to do so.nimbus cloud wrote:+1. If the intention is to lift your family out of poverty, then a full ride would be a better choice. Otherwise the family will be waiting for a long time for you to pay off your loans before you can help them.Rigo wrote:How does more debt better lift your family out of poverty? Your logic here is fishy.OnlyHumean wrote: I think even at sticker, HLS is an objectively good choice, and one that would help lift my family out of poverty, even if Dillard or RYK might be better ones for some people.
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
What would COA at UVA be?dddddd90 wrote:Would you all take a low six figure offer at UVA over sticker at HLS if you want to go into BigLaw then teach, join the judiciary, or run for office or some shit? Asking for a friend.
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I mean I'd go to H if I got in but Im not im the running for any significant CCN scholly.canafsa wrote:Judging from the chatter in this thread it seems a miracle that ANYONE deigns to settle for HLS
- unpetitpacifiste

- Posts: 41
- Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 2:10 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I would choose HLS over any other school with any scholly in a heartbeat. The fact is just that you can pay off your debt in two years anyway if you work in BigLaw. Besides, while employment stats might be similar, the people you meet and the alumni network you can tap into will make a world of difference for your long-term career development, esp. if you are thinking about entering policy making further down the road.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
lolwutunpetitpacifiste wrote:I would choose HLS over any other school with any scholly in a heartbeat. The fact is just that you can pay off your debt in two years anyway if you work in BigLaw.
- OnlyHumean

- Posts: 68
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2016 10:06 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Essentially this. I think HYS at sticker are worth it / objectively good choices, even if they aren't perfectly optimal choices.bloomsday wrote:Completely agreed. I'm not even especially debt-averse, and I would have been fine with paying sticker at HYSCCN. But having the option to go to one of those, or to another great school, for free makes that decision way iffier.jjcorvino wrote:This is where I stand, HYS at sticker are all well worth it. I would even argue that CCN at sticker are worth it. Of course, worth it vs. best option is a different argument. I think full ride at CCN is probably a better deal than HYS at sticker unless you have very specific goals that can only be achieved at HYS.OnlyHumean wrote:I think I'm likely to get a decent financial aid package from HLS (I'm from a low-income family and qualified for an LSAC wavier) so I think it would be HLS for me.anonperson2017 wrote:while we all anxiously await JS1s/JS2s, what are people's thoughts on this: who here would pick a UVA Dillard or NYU RTK if offered over HLS?
That said, I'm not very averse to debt (some people here seem to treat debt hanging over their head as if it was the sword of Damocles). I think even at sticker, HLS is an objectively good choice, and one that would help lift my family out of poverty, even if Dillard or RYK might be better ones for some people.
HLS has programs that specifically appeal to my area of interest, and quite a generous loan repayment program, so I think I'd still choose it even at sticker.
-
canafsa

- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by canafsa on Sat Apr 15, 2017 4:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- R. Jeeves

- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
how would you pay off a 200k+ loan in two years on a biglaw salary? What do you estimate your takehome and yearly expenses to be?unpetitpacifiste wrote:I would choose HLS over any other school with any scholly in a heartbeat. The fact is just that you can pay off your debt in two years anyway if you work in BigLaw.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login