Maybe it's a way of keeping our future lawyers' big egos in check...aserr007 wrote:The exact same thing happened to me! Now I feel less specialSeoulless wrote:For all of us who had a date change on Thursday, has this happened before (a date change after the interview date change without a corresponding decision)?haha. These schools are driving me insane.
Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014) Forum
- Cocoblues

- Posts: 321
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 10:18 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
-
Howl

- Posts: 296
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:11 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Withdrew today. Good luck to all and any still waiting for a response!!
-
BillsFan9907

- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Take it easy and congrats on your awesome cycle.Howl wrote:Withdrew today. Good luck to all and any still waiting for a response!!
-
BA414

- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2013 6:01 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Any idea what such a long wait means? Also, anyone interview the week of March 17? I can only assume they're really hung up on the remaining applicants
-
BillsFan9907

- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Yup. I interviewed then. Did you get a status date change last week?BA414 wrote:Any idea what such a long wait means? Also, anyone interview the week of March 17? I can only assume they're really hung up on the remaining applicants
-
BA414

- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2013 6:01 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Yeah got one last week on 4/3. Don't know he the interview went, but it was mostly positive and probably my only chance to get in. Best of luck to you. I hope we all get in--seems like a great place to endure the misery of law school.
-
BillsFan9907

- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I agree. Thought my interview was pretty positive too, which is why I am really hoping to hear some good news. I wish someone would chime in as to why there was a status date change but no decisions. WTF?BA414 wrote:Yeah got one last week on 4/3. Don't know he the interview went, but it was mostly positive and probably my only chance to get in. Best of luck to you. I hope we all get in--seems like a great place to endure the misery of law school.
- SordidLSATHistory

- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 8:37 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Yeah, I also interviewed that week. And also thought it went pretty well. The wait since then seems like FOREVER though. I feel like it's really coming down to decision time, and I'd like to know whether Chicago will be one of my choices. I guess this is what I get for submitting kinda late (early jan). 
- Mack.Hambleton

- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
samesiesSordidLSATHistory wrote:Yeah, I also interviewed that week. And also thought it went pretty well. The wait since then seems like FOREVER though. I feel like it's really coming down to decision time, and I'd like to know whether Chicago will be one of my choices. I guess this is what I get for submitting kinda late (early jan).
-
BillsFan9907

- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
i submitted late January and am feeling the same as you. I shot a message out to 2014, the resident Chicago expert. Hopefully he has some insight.SordidLSATHistory wrote:Yeah, I also interviewed that week. And also thought it went pretty well. The wait since then seems like FOREVER though. I feel like it's really coming down to decision time, and I'd like to know whether Chicago will be one of my choices. I guess this is what I get for submitting kinda late (early jan).
- Cocoblues

- Posts: 321
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 10:18 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
The longer the wait the worse my interview replays become!james.bungles wrote:samesiesSordidLSATHistory wrote:Yeah, I also interviewed that week. And also thought it went pretty well. The wait since then seems like FOREVER though. I feel like it's really coming down to decision time, and I'd like to know whether Chicago will be one of my choices. I guess this is what I get for submitting kinda late (early jan).
- Mack.Hambleton

- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Sooooo..... tomorrow?
-
BillsFan9907

- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
No. I am going to be pissed as I will be on the bus for NYU asw though I held out for Chicago. It would be cruel for them to release decisions tomorrow (assuming of course they are positive).james.bungles wrote:Sooooo..... tomorrow?
- Crowing

- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
ASW starts tomorrow. I'd be surprised if there were any more decisions this week.
- Mack.Hambleton

- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
good point. I guess they're waiting until post-ASW and for people to withdraw to finish up with decisions. Goddammit I don't want to double deposit hurry up chicagoCrowing wrote:ASW starts tomorrow. I'd be surprised if there were any more decisions this week.
- SordidLSATHistory

- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 8:37 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
+1 X 10^24james.bungles wrote:good point. I guess they're waiting until post-ASW and for people to withdraw to finish up with decisions. Goddammit I don't want to double deposit hurry up chicagoCrowing wrote:ASW starts tomorrow. I'd be surprised if there were any more decisions this week.
-
jjking

- Posts: 39
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 5:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Not to be dense, but...the Chicago waitlist letter gives the option of sending in an extra essay, basically a "Why Chicago." Would it be considered not following directions if I send in a typical LOCI formatted as a letter?
-
Mal Reynolds

- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
No problem. Why listen to the directions of the people who have the power to admit you?jjking wrote:Not to be dense, but...the Chicago waitlist letter gives the option of sending in an extra essay, basically a "Why Chicago." Would it be considered not following directions if I send in a typical LOCI formatted as a letter?
-
jjking

- Posts: 39
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 5:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
deleted
Last edited by jjking on Fri Apr 25, 2014 8:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
BillsFan9907

- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Really? Chicago specifically acts not to send an LOCI?Mal Reynolds wrote:No problem. Why listen to the directions of the people who have the power to admit you?jjking wrote:Not to be dense, but...the Chicago waitlist letter gives the option of sending in an extra essay, basically a "Why Chicago." Would it be considered not following directions if I send in a typical LOCI formatted as a letter?
- SordidLSATHistory

- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 8:37 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Perhaps decisions this afternoon?
Maybe we should start a count of who is still waiting to hear back after interview. Because we've all seen the wonderful effects forum applicant counting can have on the emotional health of applicants
.
Maybe we should start a count of who is still waiting to hear back after interview. Because we've all seen the wonderful effects forum applicant counting can have on the emotional health of applicants
- Mack.Hambleton

- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
are you part of the 4/3 date change? There were ten or so people with late march interviews who all changed thenSordidLSATHistory wrote:Perhaps decisions this afternoon?
Maybe we should start a count of who is still waiting to hear back after interview. Because we've all seen the wonderful effects forum applicant counting can have on the emotional health of applicants.
- SordidLSATHistory

- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 8:37 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Yep. I also had a friend interview the day before me who had the same thing.james.bungles wrote:are you part of the 4/3 date change? There were ten or so people with late march interviews who all changed thenSordidLSATHistory wrote:Perhaps decisions this afternoon?
Maybe we should start a count of who is still waiting to hear back after interview. Because we've all seen the wonderful effects forum applicant counting can have on the emotional health of applicants.
Really hoping decisions come out soon before I get too wed to my other choices.
- Cocoblues

- Posts: 321
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 10:18 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
+1SordidLSATHistory wrote:Yep. I also had a friend interview the day before me who had the same thing.james.bungles wrote:are you part of the 4/3 date change? There were ten or so people with late march interviews who all changed thenSordidLSATHistory wrote:Perhaps decisions this afternoon?
Maybe we should start a count of who is still waiting to hear back after interview. Because we've all seen the wonderful effects forum applicant counting can have on the emotional health of applicants.
Really hoping decisions come out soon before I get too wed to my other choices.
With the April 21 deadline around the corner, I'm about to say "I do"!
-
BillsFan9907

- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Does anyone have some sense of how those who have interviewed late have historically fared? My understanding is that Chicago was one of the schools that was really big on playing a rolling admissions game - earlier actually meant better.