Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- Yukos
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I think holds are only for people who have heard literally nothing (ie no JS1s). Not sure what that means for people with a JS1 but no JS2 (a group that includes me now).
ETA: I should say "this wave of holds."
ETA: I should say "this wave of holds."
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Sigh.Yukos wrote:I think holds are only for people who have heard literally nothing (ie no JS1s). Not sure what that means for people with a JS1 but no JS2 (a group that includes me now).
ETA: I should say "this wave of holds."
- danitt
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:40 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
--ImageRemoved--
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
It's possible to be held after a JS1. But yeah, it looks like the first people who went KB1-->held last year were in the second wave of holds about two weeks after the first.Yukos wrote:I think holds are only for people who have heard literally nothing (ie no JS1s). Not sure what that means for people with a JS1 but no JS2 (a group that includes me now).
ETA: I should say "this wave of holds."
- helix23
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yeyee! As my dawg fscott said, Harvard men are sissies! (sorry bros)Lavitz wrote:Radio silence here. Was hoping for a hold for myself, but at least Helix got to fulfill his lifelong dream of starting the Held thread.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Yukos
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
My hope is that they were implicitly holding you to this point -- when they've seen the December LSATs and interviewed another big batch of people -- and now they're ready to accept you in the next wave of JS2sLavitz wrote:It's possible to be held after a JS1. But yeah, it looks like the first people who went KB1-->held last year were in the second wave of holds about two weeks after the first.Yukos wrote:I think holds are only for people who have heard literally nothing (ie no JS1s). Not sure what that means for people with a JS1 but no JS2 (a group that includes me now).
ETA: I should say "this wave of holds."

- digifly
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:28 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No hold, no rejection, no JS1. Applied 11/8, complete 11/18.
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks, that would be nice, but I'm not counting on it. I know TLS isn't representative, but I've seen a lot of strong candidates emerge after the December LSAT, and that should be enough to keep Harvard busy for a while before they would need to reconsider me.Yukos wrote:My hope is that they were implicitly holding you to this point -- when they've seen the December LSATs and interviewed another big batch of people -- and now they're ready to accept you in the next wave of JS2s
Of course, I wouldn't object to a JS2

- Jaqen
- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Applied two days earlier, otherwise +1. What does it meaaan...digifly wrote:No hold, no rejection, no JS1. Applied 11/8, complete 11/18.
... I see.Seems like they're going to do the same thing with the first holds / dings that they did with the first JS1s and JS2s: very little activity one day, followed by a large wave of activity soon afterward. I expect the real floodgates will open on Monday.
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Jaqen wrote:Applied two days earlier, otherwise +1. What does it meaaan...digifly wrote:No hold, no rejection, no JS1. Applied 11/8, complete 11/18.
... I see.Seems like they're going to do the same thing with the first holds / dings that they did with the first JS1s and JS2s: very little activity one day, followed by a large wave of activity soon afterward. I expect the real floodgates will open on Monday.
heck, i went complete 12/18ish and am expecting a ding on Monday. I would rather get this over with so I can focus on getting $ out of my top choices and preparing for the rest of my life

-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:35 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
dunno if i already posted this, but submitted mid dec, complete as of 1/10
- lsacqueen
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:03 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
In the same boat as a lot of people here - complete 10/16, no js1, no hold, no rejection (yet). Numbers in profile. Harvard have mercy on us and put us out of our misery...
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by one_by_one on Fri Jul 17, 2015 1:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- LSATSCORES2012
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Well, I'm not really early, but people with my dates have already gotten holds (but not rejections as far as I can tell), and I am late in the alphabet.one_by_one wrote:I wonder if they're sending out emails alphabetically. To the other early applicants who are still in limbo -- are your last names towards the end / in the second half of the alphabet too?
I don't understand, though, it's so easy to set up an email mail merge and send them out all at once from an excel spreadsheet. Takes a few seconds, why not just do them all at once?
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
LSATSCORES2012 wrote:Well, I'm not really early, but people with my dates have already gotten holds (but not rejections as far as I can tell), and I am late in the alphabet.one_by_one wrote:I wonder if they're sending out emails alphabetically. To the other early applicants who are still in limbo -- are your last names towards the end / in the second half of the alphabet too?
I don't understand, though, it's so easy to set up an email mail merge and send them out all at once from an excel spreadsheet. Takes a few seconds, why not just do them all at once?
"Holistic"? Who knows. Or it's tech-challenged people running the show.
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Some adcomms just want to watch the world burn.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:I don't understand, though, it's so easy to set up an email mail merge and send them out all at once from an excel spreadsheet. Takes a few seconds, why not just do them all at once?
- yarsten
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 11:28 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Lavitz wrote:Some adcomms just want to watch the world burn.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:I don't understand, though, it's so easy to set up an email mail merge and send them out all at once from an excel spreadsheet. Takes a few seconds, why not just do them all at once?

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Spritzpiggy
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:57 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Did KB also attend Harvard Law School (or law school in general)? I know JS did for both undergrad and ls, but I cant find the information on KB. Thx 

- Mr. Elshal
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:30 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm pretty sure I remember KB saying that she did not, in fact, attend HLS. Not sure about law school in generalSpritzpiggy wrote:Did KB also attend Harvard Law School (or law school in general)? I know JS did for both undergrad and ls, but I cant find the information on KB. Thx
- Spritzpiggy
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:57 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks. I usually consider myself a pretty adept googler, but KB has almost no online footprint of her education at all! All I have learned (outside of admissions stuff) is that she participated in an outdoor swim race a few years ago.
Now back to interview prep...
EDIT: I am a good googler after all!! Found it, finally. She did go to law school, just not at Harvard. Beautiful.
Now back to interview prep...
EDIT: I am a good googler after all!! Found it, finally. She did go to law school, just not at Harvard. Beautiful.
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Maybe don't bring up that swim race thing in the interview...
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Spritzpiggy
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:57 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Hahaha, definitely wont be
fyi, I am only looking this up to make sure I can ask KB law-school experience related Qs....not because I am intending to be creepy lol
fyi, I am only looking this up to make sure I can ask KB law-school experience related Qs....not because I am intending to be creepy lol
Last edited by Spritzpiggy on Sun Jan 13, 2013 12:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Random thing I've been thinking about for a long time: I'm pretty sure this is the reason she's not allowed to be Dean of Admissions.Spritzpiggy wrote:EDIT: I am a good googler after all!! Found it, finally. She did go to law school, just not at Harvard. Beautiful.
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Lavitz wrote:Random thing I've been thinking about for a long time: I'm pretty sure this is the reason she's not allowed to be Dean of Admissions.Spritzpiggy wrote:EDIT: I am a good googler after all!! Found it, finally. She did go to law school, just not at Harvard. Beautiful.
YOU CAN'T SIT WITH US
- Spritzpiggy
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:57 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yeah, that was my first thought too.
On another note, I finally have an avatar! I'm coming up in the world lol
On another note, I finally have an avatar! I'm coming up in the world lol
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login