Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- Yukos

- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I think holds are only for people who have heard literally nothing (ie no JS1s). Not sure what that means for people with a JS1 but no JS2 (a group that includes me now).
ETA: I should say "this wave of holds."
ETA: I should say "this wave of holds."
-
shntn

- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Sigh.Yukos wrote:I think holds are only for people who have heard literally nothing (ie no JS1s). Not sure what that means for people with a JS1 but no JS2 (a group that includes me now).
ETA: I should say "this wave of holds."
- danitt

- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:40 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
--ImageRemoved--
- Lavitz

- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
It's possible to be held after a JS1. But yeah, it looks like the first people who went KB1-->held last year were in the second wave of holds about two weeks after the first.Yukos wrote:I think holds are only for people who have heard literally nothing (ie no JS1s). Not sure what that means for people with a JS1 but no JS2 (a group that includes me now).
ETA: I should say "this wave of holds."
- helix23

- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yeyee! As my dawg fscott said, Harvard men are sissies! (sorry bros)Lavitz wrote:Radio silence here. Was hoping for a hold for myself, but at least Helix got to fulfill his lifelong dream of starting the Held thread.
- Yukos

- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
My hope is that they were implicitly holding you to this point -- when they've seen the December LSATs and interviewed another big batch of people -- and now they're ready to accept you in the next wave of JS2sLavitz wrote:It's possible to be held after a JS1. But yeah, it looks like the first people who went KB1-->held last year were in the second wave of holds about two weeks after the first.Yukos wrote:I think holds are only for people who have heard literally nothing (ie no JS1s). Not sure what that means for people with a JS1 but no JS2 (a group that includes me now).
ETA: I should say "this wave of holds."
- digifly

- Posts: 652
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:28 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No hold, no rejection, no JS1. Applied 11/8, complete 11/18.
- Lavitz

- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks, that would be nice, but I'm not counting on it. I know TLS isn't representative, but I've seen a lot of strong candidates emerge after the December LSAT, and that should be enough to keep Harvard busy for a while before they would need to reconsider me.Yukos wrote:My hope is that they were implicitly holding you to this point -- when they've seen the December LSATs and interviewed another big batch of people -- and now they're ready to accept you in the next wave of JS2s
Of course, I wouldn't object to a JS2
- Jaqen

- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Applied two days earlier, otherwise +1. What does it meaaan...digifly wrote:No hold, no rejection, no JS1. Applied 11/8, complete 11/18.
... I see.Seems like they're going to do the same thing with the first holds / dings that they did with the first JS1s and JS2s: very little activity one day, followed by a large wave of activity soon afterward. I expect the real floodgates will open on Monday.
- twinkletoes16

- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Jaqen wrote:Applied two days earlier, otherwise +1. What does it meaaan...digifly wrote:No hold, no rejection, no JS1. Applied 11/8, complete 11/18.
... I see.Seems like they're going to do the same thing with the first holds / dings that they did with the first JS1s and JS2s: very little activity one day, followed by a large wave of activity soon afterward. I expect the real floodgates will open on Monday.
heck, i went complete 12/18ish and am expecting a ding on Monday. I would rather get this over with so I can focus on getting $ out of my top choices and preparing for the rest of my life
-
volp

- Posts: 98
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:35 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
dunno if i already posted this, but submitted mid dec, complete as of 1/10
- lsacqueen

- Posts: 255
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:03 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
In the same boat as a lot of people here - complete 10/16, no js1, no hold, no rejection (yet). Numbers in profile. Harvard have mercy on us and put us out of our misery...
-
one_by_one

- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by one_by_one on Fri Jul 17, 2015 1:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- LSATSCORES2012

- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Well, I'm not really early, but people with my dates have already gotten holds (but not rejections as far as I can tell), and I am late in the alphabet.one_by_one wrote:I wonder if they're sending out emails alphabetically. To the other early applicants who are still in limbo -- are your last names towards the end / in the second half of the alphabet too?
I don't understand, though, it's so easy to set up an email mail merge and send them out all at once from an excel spreadsheet. Takes a few seconds, why not just do them all at once?
- twinkletoes16

- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
LSATSCORES2012 wrote:Well, I'm not really early, but people with my dates have already gotten holds (but not rejections as far as I can tell), and I am late in the alphabet.one_by_one wrote:I wonder if they're sending out emails alphabetically. To the other early applicants who are still in limbo -- are your last names towards the end / in the second half of the alphabet too?
I don't understand, though, it's so easy to set up an email mail merge and send them out all at once from an excel spreadsheet. Takes a few seconds, why not just do them all at once?
"Holistic"? Who knows. Or it's tech-challenged people running the show.
- Lavitz

- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Some adcomms just want to watch the world burn.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:I don't understand, though, it's so easy to set up an email mail merge and send them out all at once from an excel spreadsheet. Takes a few seconds, why not just do them all at once?
- yarsten

- Posts: 184
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 11:28 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Lavitz wrote:Some adcomms just want to watch the world burn.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:I don't understand, though, it's so easy to set up an email mail merge and send them out all at once from an excel spreadsheet. Takes a few seconds, why not just do them all at once?

- Spritzpiggy

- Posts: 229
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:57 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Did KB also attend Harvard Law School (or law school in general)? I know JS did for both undergrad and ls, but I cant find the information on KB. Thx 
- Mr. Elshal

- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:30 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm pretty sure I remember KB saying that she did not, in fact, attend HLS. Not sure about law school in generalSpritzpiggy wrote:Did KB also attend Harvard Law School (or law school in general)? I know JS did for both undergrad and ls, but I cant find the information on KB. Thx
- Spritzpiggy

- Posts: 229
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:57 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks. I usually consider myself a pretty adept googler, but KB has almost no online footprint of her education at all! All I have learned (outside of admissions stuff) is that she participated in an outdoor swim race a few years ago.
Now back to interview prep...
EDIT: I am a good googler after all!! Found it, finally. She did go to law school, just not at Harvard. Beautiful.
Now back to interview prep...
EDIT: I am a good googler after all!! Found it, finally. She did go to law school, just not at Harvard. Beautiful.
- TripTrip

- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Maybe don't bring up that swim race thing in the interview...
- Spritzpiggy

- Posts: 229
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:57 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Hahaha, definitely wont be
fyi, I am only looking this up to make sure I can ask KB law-school experience related Qs....not because I am intending to be creepy lol
fyi, I am only looking this up to make sure I can ask KB law-school experience related Qs....not because I am intending to be creepy lol
Last edited by Spritzpiggy on Sun Jan 13, 2013 12:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Lavitz

- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Random thing I've been thinking about for a long time: I'm pretty sure this is the reason she's not allowed to be Dean of Admissions.Spritzpiggy wrote:EDIT: I am a good googler after all!! Found it, finally. She did go to law school, just not at Harvard. Beautiful.
- twinkletoes16

- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Lavitz wrote:Random thing I've been thinking about for a long time: I'm pretty sure this is the reason she's not allowed to be Dean of Admissions.Spritzpiggy wrote:EDIT: I am a good googler after all!! Found it, finally. She did go to law school, just not at Harvard. Beautiful.
YOU CAN'T SIT WITH US
- Spritzpiggy

- Posts: 229
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:57 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yeah, that was my first thought too.
On another note, I finally have an avatar! I'm coming up in the world lol
On another note, I finally have an avatar! I'm coming up in the world lol