No, no change at all. I think that calling this a hold email is misleading though, as I don't consider myself held at this point (denial perhaps?). I did get a hold email from Penn, and while they did ask for the same things that were in the email from Mich, there was no ambiguity as to whether or not I was held. This was more of a 'its a long process, so we are emailing you before you email us'. Kind of like a mid-cycle 'just a few more months left' email.jc1988 wrote:so for those who received hold emails, did your status change to decision too?
michigan 2010 applicants Forum
- Jericwithers
- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:03 am
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
tx for reassuring me that i have been dinged....just waiting for the dinged letter now.Jericwithers wrote:No, no change at all. I think that calling this a hold email is misleading though, as I don't consider myself held at this point (denial perhaps?). I did get a hold email from Penn, and while they did ask for the same things that were in the email from Mich, there was no ambiguity as to whether or not I was held. This was more of a 'its a long process, so we are emailing you before you email us'. Kind of like a mid-cycle 'just a few more months left' email.jc1988 wrote:so for those who received hold emails, did your status change to decision too?
- Snoopy1216
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 12:32 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Hmmm... So now this "hold" aka "hold your horses" email is a good thing??? What does that mean for the people who didn't get one
A rejection coming shortly? But, before I get ahead of myself, did most of you submit/go complete early (before December)?

- Jericwithers
- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
That wasn't my intent (though it is a nice side-effect). Look on the bright side; maybe your hold email has yet to comejc1988 wrote:tx for reassuring me that i have been dinged....just waiting for the dinged letter now.Jericwithers wrote:No, no change at all. I think that calling this a hold email is misleading though, as I don't consider myself held at this point (denial perhaps?). I did get a hold email from Penn, and while they did ask for the same things that were in the email from Mich, there was no ambiguity as to whether or not I was held. This was more of a 'its a long process, so we are emailing you before you email us'. Kind of like a mid-cycle 'just a few more months left' email.jc1988 wrote:so for those who received hold emails, did your status change to decision too?

Oh, and I will now be returning to lurking the boards rather than posting. I do less damage that way.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 4:44 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Got the hold email today like everyone else. Abover 75 stats for both LSAT and GPA and wrote the Why Michigan essay. Kinda pissed I haven't gotten a decision yet but they are still my no. 1. I was encouraged by that LSN profile mentioned earlier.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Saya
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:33 am
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Add to the mix, why not. Got the [strike]hold[/strike] update email. But I was only compete 12/23, so I wasn't really expecting much at this point. GPA above 75th, not sure what their 25/median/75s for LSAT are. Anyway, stats in profile. And yes to a Why Michigan essay.
Edited
Edited
Last edited by Saya on Wed Jan 13, 2010 2:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:19 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
I agree that the email today was most certainly not a "hold" email. It was just a mailing explaining what is taking so long, and to pretty much tell us not to call them up whining about the wait. They were telling us to be patient, thats all.
- AngryAvocado
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:22 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
+1000. I'm about as pessimistic as they come, and even I don't see how this is a legitimate "hold" email.dakatz wrote:I agree that the email today was most certainly not a "hold" email. It was just an emailing explaining what is taking so long, and to pretty much tell us not to call them up whining about the wait. They were telling us to be patient, thats all.
1) It blatantly says "we are continuing to review your application file," which is the opposite of a hold email.
2) People asked Michigan, and they said flat out that it wasn't in any way a hold email.
3) It makes no sense to "hold" a huge chunk of your applicants (especially many with strong numbers) at this point in time.
4) People got a similar email last cycle and were admitted shortly thereafter.
I'm 99% sure it's just a move by Michigan to reassure people that they haven't just pushed our stuff aside. Michigan is known for being a bit more empathetic with applicants, and this is just another example of them trying to keep our hopes up (one that backfired, apparently). Unless someone can come up with some reasonable basis for calling it a "hold" email, I vote we stop calling it that so we can stop perpetuating unnecessary panic.
- tomhobbes
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:20 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
I still consider it a bad sign that they looked at my numbers, read the rest of my app, and decided they needed more time to think about it. They didn't do that for plenty of other people.
- Saya
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:33 am
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
But you're in YP territory.tomhobbes wrote:I still consider it a bad sign that they looked at my numbers, read the rest of my app, and decided they needed more time to think about it. They didn't do that for plenty of other people.
-
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:33 am
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
this was the point i made earlier. they looked at our apps, and for one reason or another decided to push them aside. hence, their decision will take longer than would be the case under a strictly rolling process. besides, if we were slated to hear back one way or the other within the near future, they probably would not have bothered sending an email.tomhobbes wrote:I still consider it a bad sign that they looked at my numbers, read the rest of my app, and decided they needed more time to think about it. They didn't do that for plenty of other people.
i also think it was a little hint for kids with yp numbers to prove their commitment to umich in some capacity.
- calicocat
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:29 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
I felt pretty good about that email till I read this. Michigan is a straight up target for me.talibkweli wrote:this was the point i made earlier. they looked at our apps, and for one reason or another decided to push them aside. hence, their decision will take longer than would be the case under a strictly rolling process. besides, if we were slated to hear back one way or the other within the near future, they probably would not have bothered sending an email.tomhobbes wrote:I still consider it a bad sign that they looked at my numbers, read the rest of my app, and decided they needed more time to think about it. They didn't do that for plenty of other people.
i also think it was a little hint for kids with yp numbers to prove their commitment to umich in some capacity.
- Reedie
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:46 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Don't listen to Talib, he's crazy yo.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- AngryAvocado
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:22 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Valid, but for most of us that was pretty obvious already. Being complete/under review for 2+ months means someone has probably looked at it and didn't admit you right off the bat.tomhobbes wrote:I still consider it a bad sign that they looked at my numbers, read the rest of my app, and decided they needed more time to think about it. They didn't do that for plenty of other people.
- Shaggier1
- Posts: 731
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:57 am
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
+1. Time to move on.I'm 99% sure it's just a move by Michigan to reassure people that they haven't just pushed our stuff aside. Michigan is known for being a bit more empathetic with applicants, and this is just another example of them trying to keep our hopes up (one that backfired, apparently). Unless someone can come up with some reasonable basis for calling it a "hold" email, I vote we stop calling it that so we can stop perpetuating unnecessary panic.
- parker09
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:15 am
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
As someone who was held at Harvard (and waitlisted at UVA and Penn)... I can say that this email:Shaggier1 wrote:+1. Time to move on.I'm 99% sure it's just a move by Michigan to reassure people that they haven't just pushed our stuff aside. Michigan is known for being a bit more empathetic with applicants, and this is just another example of them trying to keep our hopes up (one that backfired, apparently). Unless someone can come up with some reasonable basis for calling it a "hold" email, I vote we stop calling it that so we can stop perpetuating unnecessary panic.
...is definitely not like this one:Reedie wrote:Full text:
Thank you for your application to the University of Michigan Law School. Because you went to great lengths to apply early in our season, we understand that you may feel some disappointment at not having received your answer yet. We understand the anxiety that the law school admissions procedure can cause, and are therefore writing to update you on the status of your file in an effort to alleviate at least some of that stress.
Your file has been reviewed at least once by our staff and the admissions committee and we have found much to admire. We have not yet, however, been able to render a decision, and are continuing to review your application file in the context of the greater applicant pool [...] We take our responsibility of composing a top-notch class extremely seriously, and that is to your benefit; you can be assured your application materials are receiving a thorough review.
We are unfortunately unable to give personalized feedback on individual applications. We would, however, be happy to add items to your file for our readers' benefit, if you have new information you would like us to consider. But it certainly is not necessary to add anything and you should not interpret this email as a solicitation for more material. Indeed, because we make decisions on a rolling basis, it is possible that we will send a decision to you before we receive and review any new submissions.
Our goal is to have all decisions made by the end of April, but most applicants will hear well before that time. Please be assured that receiving this email does not mean you will not get an answer until then! It simply indicates that we recognize you have been waiting patiently, and we appreciate that.
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us at law.jd.admissions@umich.edu or 734.764.0537. I sincerely appreciate your interest in the University of Michigan Law School.
Harvard wrote:
The Admissions Committee has reviewed your application and has decided to hold it for further review. Although we regret the immediate uncertainty this entails, the purpose of holding applications is to ensure that each application receives thorough and fair consideration. Once a larger portion of the applicant pool has been reviewed, the Committee will be able to provide you with a decision to admit, deny, or wait-list your application.
These decisions may be made at any time between now and late spring. Unfortunately, it is not possible to predict the next decision on your application or the timing of that decision. If you are facing a deadline with another school, you may want to inform us, but we still may not be able to provide you with definitive information.
[blahblah about sending them more stuff and how if I want any confirmation of them receiving it, I have to send a self-addressed stamped postcard blahblah about how much they think I suck at life blahblah]
We will make final decisions as soon as possible. However, if you do not hear from us again before mid-April, you may want to reserve a place at another law school while awaiting Harvard's final decision. Thank you for your patience and your interest. We will contact you as soon as the next decision on your application has been made.
...which was a lot less warm-fuzzy-nice sounding.
- moonshine
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 10:35 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
so, if this pseudo-hold email isn't a hold at all, is it inappropriate to send a LOCI?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Unitas
- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Just got my mail, nothing from Michigan today. Guess my rejection will wait until tomorrow.
I am part of the DR 1/11/09.. Letter may have been sent on 1/11 or later, otherwise I would have it by now.
I am part of the DR 1/11/09.. Letter may have been sent on 1/11 or later, otherwise I would have it by now.
- kittenmittons
- Posts: 1453
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Michigan likes hearing from people. I saw it as an invitation for my materialmoonshine wrote:so, if this pseudo-hold email isn't a hold at all, is it inappropriate to send a LOCI?
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:20 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Dr 1/11. Just received an admissions packet today. So there is indeed hope for all you 1/11ers out there.
- NancyBotwin
- Posts: 1084
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:43 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Were you able to log into the admitted student site, though?stopscreaming wrote:Dr 1/11. Just received an admissions packet today. So there is indeed hope for all you 1/11ers out there.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
This means if we didn't get a package a day or two after DR, the rejection letters are just coming in more slowly right?...stopscreaming wrote:Dr 1/11. Just received an admissions packet today. So there is indeed hope for all you 1/11ers out there.
or at least the chances are this is true...

- poprox
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 9:58 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Same here to all of that. They claim to send out decision letters a few days before updating status checkers to alleviate the anxiety of waiting, but in this case they totally failed. Maybe someone else in the decision 1/11 pool will get lucky and receive a letter in postal mail today.Kakarot wrote:Just got my mail, nothing from Michigan today. Guess my rejection will wait until tomorrow.
I am part of the DR 1/11/09.. Letter may have been sent on 1/11 or later, otherwise I would have it by now.

- poprox
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 9:58 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
You must have been typing at the same time as me - can you login to Michigan's ASW?stopscreaming wrote:Dr 1/11. Just received an admissions packet today. So there is indeed hope for all you 1/11ers out there.
-
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 1:25 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Let's all pause for a moment and pray for the people in Haiti. For those that can, you can donate to a list of vetted organizations that are helping in Haiti:
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2007/impact/
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2007/impact/
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login