Georgetown 2013/ (2014) Forum
-
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:17 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
Can we stop "socializing" in these thread...I can't believe people post here just to have fun...get a (real) life!
-
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:05 am
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
This is a valuable life lesson: People are too quick to judge, passing decisions before they even get to know you.goodolgil wrote:So interviewed on Tuesday, and my status checker hasn't changed back to under review. I thought it changed right away for others...

Kidding aside, I didn't even get an interview, so I can't really say what's up. Sorry
- Foozle
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 12:04 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
Chillax.wootwootdc wrote:Can we stop "socializing" in these thread...I can't believe people post here just to have fun...get a (real) life!
Some people are at work and are putting off doing things (or have nothing substantial to do).
Also, welcome to the Internet.
- puppleberry finn
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
I wasn't sure if he was joking or not.Foozle wrote:Chillax.wootwootdc wrote:Can we stop "socializing" in these thread...I can't believe people post here just to have fun...get a (real) life!
Some people are at work and are putting off doing things (or have nothing substantial to do).
-
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 2:08 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
The 10% increase in applications means nothing without a correlating figure concerning the quality of those applications.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:38 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
.
Last edited by bowie8285 on Mon May 10, 2010 3:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Foozle
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 12:04 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
If you assume the quality of this year's applications (including the 10%) is similar or better than the quality in previous years, then it means something.Green Crayons wrote:The 10% increase in applications means nothing without a correlating figure concerning the quality of those applications.
I find it hard to believe that all of the 10% are auto-rejects, therefore it probably means something.
Last edited by Foozle on Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Whats an URM?
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 8:59 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
"Uh uh. I've changed, Ken, into a badass adult. I have a wolfdog, and I have two bad knees and I have a gun. That I lost!" -TJruleser wrote:Um, how does tracy relate to usc (I'm more confused than I am about gulc's dr)
A perfect Trojan.
- Whats an URM?
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 8:59 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
Ohhh this is perfect for this thread:
"The future is like a Japanese game show. You have no idea what's going on." -TJ
Good luck all my fellow 12/1 Dr's!
"The future is like a Japanese game show. You have no idea what's going on." -TJ
Good luck all my fellow 12/1 Dr's!
-
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 2:08 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
Yes, and if I assume that the quality of this year's applications (including the 10%) is similar or worse than the quality in previous years, then it means something.
So, I mistyped. The 10% increase in applications does mean something (that there are more applicants) - it just doesn't mean anything for us folks wondering about our chances of getting in, since it tells us nothing about the quality of competition relative to the previous years. Just the quantity.
After all, I would welcome a 50% increase in applications to any of the schools I'm applying for if they're, on average, filled with worse numbers than the previous cycle.
So, I mistyped. The 10% increase in applications does mean something (that there are more applicants) - it just doesn't mean anything for us folks wondering about our chances of getting in, since it tells us nothing about the quality of competition relative to the previous years. Just the quantity.
After all, I would welcome a 50% increase in applications to any of the schools I'm applying for if they're, on average, filled with worse numbers than the previous cycle.
- NayBoer
- Posts: 1013
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:24 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
In the absence of evidence either way, it's reasonable to assume that the extra 10% have qualifications comparable to students in previous years. The anecdotal evidence is that there are more experienced people who may have better applications. But it seems just as possible that it's a matter of underqualified applicants looking for a place to go.
And until the cycle progresses we'll have trouble telling how much is the rise in applications per applicant.
And until the cycle progresses we'll have trouble telling how much is the rise in applications per applicant.
-
- Posts: 382
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:27 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
This thread seriously exploded in the three hours I havne't checked it (which, by the way, is the longest I've been able to tear myself away from TLS in the last three months, I think)...and I'm feeling the 30 ROck.
ANYWAY.
I think if GULC really is just sitting around for three days before hitting send on our reject emails, there should be a mass demonstration.
ANYWAY.
I think if GULC really is just sitting around for three days before hitting send on our reject emails, there should be a mass demonstration.
- SanBun
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 10:19 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
statistically speaking, let's assume that the 10% new apps are the same strength as the pool last year for Gtown. Gtown accepts 21% of apps, so about 2/10 apps. Taking these two premises together, it means that we can likely expect that we have a 2% increase in highly qualified apps. A 4 % increase in qualified apps would already be a huge deviation statistically speaking, since it would mean that on average that 10% pool is twice as qualified as the normal pool, and in the absence of strong evidence we simply cannot assume such a thing. Obviously adcoms are gonna say "it's more competitive this year", they're not gonna say: We have a 10% increase but most of them would be rejected anyways. Just use your common sense and think about statistics- we're fine.NayBoer wrote:In the absence of evidence either way, it's reasonable to assume that the extra 10% have qualifications comparable to students in previous years. The anecdotal evidence is that there are more experienced people who may have better applications. But it seems just as possible that it's a matter of underqualified applicants looking for a place to go.
And until the cycle progresses we'll have trouble telling how much is the rise in applications per applicant.
Last edited by SanBun on Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 2:49 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
What do you propose?jk11287 wrote:This thread seriously exploded in the three hours I havne't checked it (which, by the way, is the longest I've been able to tear myself away from TLS in the last three months, I think)...and I'm feeling the 30 ROck.
ANYWAY.
I think if GULC really is just sitting around for three days before hitting send on our reject emails, there should be a mass demonstration.
-
- Posts: 382
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:27 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
I haven't gotten that far yet, but I think felling statues is in order.Philaw wrote:What do you propose?jk11287 wrote:This thread seriously exploded in the three hours I havne't checked it (which, by the way, is the longest I've been able to tear myself away from TLS in the last three months, I think)...and I'm feeling the 30 ROck.
ANYWAY.
I think if GULC really is just sitting around for three days before hitting send on our reject emails, there should be a mass demonstration.
- robin600
- Posts: 1634
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 3:07 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
I heart ms.lemon!!!! i bet mail didn't go out until yesterday, didn't the 11/20 (or maybe 10/20) people had to wait like 2 days just before GT but their letters in the mail?Philaw wrote:jk11287 wrote:This thread seriously exploded in the three hours I havne't checked it (which, by the way, is the longest I've been able to tear myself away from TLS in the last three months, I think)...and I'm feeling the 30 ROck.
ANYWAjk11287 wrote:This thread seriously exploded in the three hours I havne't checked it (which, by the way, is the longest I've been able to tear myself away from TLS in the last three months, I think)...and I'm feeling the 30 ROck.
ANYWAY.
I think if GULC really is just sitting around for three days before hitting send on our reject emails, there should be a mass demonstration.
-
- Posts: 382
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:27 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
Ugh I just had a thought. What if they wait until after business hours to email like LSAC so they don't have to deal with hysterical people flooding the office with phone calls?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- SanBun
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 10:19 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
In other words: I agree with NayBoer for reasons listed aboveSanBun wrote:statistically speaking, let's assume that the 10% new apps are the same strength as the pool last year for Gtown. Gtown accepts 21% of apps, so about 2/10 apps. Taking these two premises together, it means that we can likely expect that we have a 2% increase in highly qualified apps. A 4 % increase in qualified apps would already be a huge deviation statistically speaking, since it would mean that on average that 10% pool is twice as qualified as the normal pool, and in the absence of strong evidence we simply cannot assume such a thing. Obviously adcoms are gonna say "it's more competitive this year", they're not gonna say: We have a 10% increase but most of them would be rejected anyways. Just use your common sense and think about statistics- we're fine.NayBoer wrote:In the absence of evidence either way, it's reasonable to assume that the extra 10% have qualifications comparable to students in previous years. The anecdotal evidence is that there are more experienced people who may have better applications. But it seems just as possible that it's a matter of underqualified applicants looking for a place to go.
And until the cycle progresses we'll have trouble telling how much is the rise in applications per applicant.
- robin600
- Posts: 1634
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 3:07 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
They don't use an automated email system to send stuff like that. If they did I might go apeshit!jk11287 wrote:Ugh I just had a thought. What if they wait until after business hours to email like LSAC so they don't have to deal with hysterical people flooding the office with phone calls?
-
- Posts: 382
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:27 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
Haha I know but like, I'm seriously envisioning staff in the GULC admissions office poised with their fingers over the send key and getting ready to press it at 6 PM, and then running out of the office before the phones can start ringing.robin600 wrote:They don't use an automated email system to send stuff like that. If they did I might go apeshit!jk11287 wrote:Ugh I just had a thought. What if they wait until after business hours to email like LSAC so they don't have to deal with hysterical people flooding the office with phone calls?

Okay, I guess my imagination is getting a little ridiculous. This process had made me crazy. The saddest thing is, I'm 99% positive I'm getting a ding, so I should PROBABLY just get on with my life already.
- robin600
- Posts: 1634
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 3:07 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
F*** it, let's get drunk!jk11287 wrote:Haha I know but like, I'm seriously envisioning staff in the GULC admissions office poised with their fingers over the send key and getting ready to press it at 6 PM, and then running out of the office before the phones can start ringing.robin600 wrote:They don't use an automated email system to send stuff like that. If they did I might go apeshit!jk11287 wrote:Ugh I just had a thought. What if they wait until after business hours to email like LSAC so they don't have to deal with hysterical people flooding the office with phone calls?
Okay, I guess my imagination is getting a little ridiculous. This process had made me crazy. The saddest thing is, I'm 99% positive I'm getting a ding, so I should PROBABLY just get on with my life already.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- SanBun
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 10:19 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
Yeah, same here. Despite me being a polyglot from an exotic country who has tons of strong extracurricular aspects, I think Gtown doesn't give a tiny rats arse about me unless I can raise their median- which I CANNOT... I can feel it in my bones, I'm out.jk11287 wrote: Haha I know but like, I'm seriously envisioning staff in the GULC admissions office poised with their fingers over the send key and getting ready to press it at 6 PM, and then running out of the office before the phones can start ringing.
Okay, I guess my imagination is getting a little ridiculous. This process had made me crazy. The saddest thing is, I'm 99% positive I'm getting a ding, so I should PROBABLY just get on with my life already.
- Jackie O
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:34 am
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
Hooray! Accepted!
Sent: 11/10
UR: 11/18, 11/24
DR: 11/30
RD PT, Numbers 75% LSAT and median GPA for FT admissions
Good luck to everyone waiting to hear!
Sent: 11/10
UR: 11/18, 11/24
DR: 11/30
RD PT, Numbers 75% LSAT and median GPA for FT admissions
Good luck to everyone waiting to hear!
-
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:38 pm
Re: Georgetown 2013/ (2014)
.
Last edited by bowie8285 on Mon May 10, 2010 3:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login