USC 2010! Forum
- J Burrito
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 5:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
Finally In Review today after going complete 1/16. I don't understand why it's taken so long. Best of luck to everyone!
- Xizenta
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:53 pm
Re: USC 2010!
How long has "in review" typically taken for you guys?
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
been about 2 months and 3 weeks for me without a decision...Xizenta wrote:How long has "in review" typically taken for you guys?
- J Burrito
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 5:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
Perfect, I should know by July!finalaspects wrote:been about 2 months and 3 weeks for me without a decision...Xizenta wrote:How long has "in review" typically taken for you guys?
- afghan007
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:15 pm
Re: USC 2010!
went complete 2/4.. not sure when "in review" showed up on status checker... got Decision Finalized 3/9Xizenta wrote:How long has "in review" typically taken for you guys?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Xizenta
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:53 pm
Re: USC 2010!
What the eff? You've been "in review" that whole time? or just complete?finalaspects wrote:been about 2 months and 3 weeks for me without a decision...Xizenta wrote:How long has "in review" typically taken for you guys?
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
i've been complete for over 5 months... 2 months and 3 weeks as in review... but that was my first in review date and i got a second in review date a month later...Xizenta wrote:What the eff? You've been "in review" that whole time? or just complete?finalaspects wrote:been about 2 months and 3 weeks for me without a decision...Xizenta wrote:How long has "in review" typically taken for you guys?
but i guess i'm a unique case. splitter with over 75% lsat and much lower than the 25% gpa. a lot of people with stats like mine and even better have been rejected already. they're just torturing me probably only to reject me so yea... i'm special like that
- LizBennet
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: USC 2010!
I was only "in review" for around 2 weeks after being complete for 2 months.Xizenta wrote:How long has "in review" typically taken for you guys?
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 1:01 am
Re: USC 2010!
So, has anybody committed to attend yet?
-
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 5:37 pm
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 12:29 am
Re: USC 2010!
I feel your pain. My status has been "complete" since early November and "in review" since 3/17. Like others who seem to be waiting in USC pergatory, I am a numerical fence-sitter (above median LSAT and below median GPA) who is likely compelling for other [non-URM] reasons.
-
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 5:37 pm
- rhapsodyinazul
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 8:16 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Withdrew today, sent $20k a year back in to the pot. Good luck all!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 12:29 am
Re: USC 2010!
Well stated. I should take care to look at the most current statistics before making such claims. "Wall-of-emptiness" indeed...I had the feeling when receiving my results that a sub-168 score was dangerously middle-of-the-road for USC. That being said, I didn't think that they would avoid 166 like it had lice. I wish the best for whomever makes it through this last wave of decisions though. I would guess that right now the USC admissions persons are going to great lengths to evaluate those who remain holistically and in totality to the best of their abilities. Strangely, as frustrating as this long wait is, it is precisely because it is taking so long to make a decision that I will be satisfied that the decision they do reach gave my application due consideration.jonnodotsg wrote:We're actually both below USC's median LSAT of 167. In fact, we're so close to that notorious "wall-of-emptiness" on LSN that it's almost like they built that fence in our faces.Speluncean X wrote:I feel your pain. My status has been "complete" since early November and "in review" since 3/17. Like others who seem to be waiting in USC pergatory, I am a numerical fence-sitter (above median LSAT and below median GPA) who is likely compelling for other [non-URM] reasons.
Edit: Correction, we ARE that "wall-of-emptiness." :'(
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
yea 166... one more question would have put you guys over the edge... to USC 166 is probably the same thing as a 164 since both are below medians... but good luck!Speluncean X wrote:Well stated. I should take care to look at the most current statistics before making such claims. "Wall-of-emptiness" indeed...I had the feeling when receiving my results that a sub-168 score was dangerously middle-of-the-road for USC. That being said, I didn't think that they would avoid 166 like it had lice. I wish the best for whomever makes it through this last wave of decisions though. I would guess that right now the USC admissions persons are going to great lengths to evaluate those who remain holistically and in totality to the best of their abilities. Strangely, as frustrating as this long wait is, it is precisely because it is taking so long to make a decision that I will be satisfied that the decision they do reach gave my application due consideration.jonnodotsg wrote:We're actually both below USC's median LSAT of 167. In fact, we're so close to that notorious "wall-of-emptiness" on LSN that it's almost like they built that fence in our faces.Speluncean X wrote:I feel your pain. My status has been "complete" since early November and "in review" since 3/17. Like others who seem to be waiting in USC pergatory, I am a numerical fence-sitter (above median LSAT and below median GPA) who is likely compelling for other [non-URM] reasons.
Edit: Correction, we ARE that "wall-of-emptiness." :'(
as for the time... we don't know that they're taking long because they're giving us consideration, as opposed to losing our file or just forgetting about us.... 5 months is a long time to wait... and i would like a decision now.
-
- Posts: 2983
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:38 pm
Re: USC 2010!
They don't seem to give a flying duck that we have deposits due the 1st, the 15th, etc.finalaspects wrote:yea 166... one more question would have put you guys over the edge... to USC 166 is probably the same thing as a 164 since both are below medians... but good luck!Speluncean X wrote:Well stated. I should take care to look at the most current statistics before making such claims. "Wall-of-emptiness" indeed...I had the feeling when receiving my results that a sub-168 score was dangerously middle-of-the-road for USC. That being said, I didn't think that they would avoid 166 like it had lice. I wish the best for whomever makes it through this last wave of decisions though. I would guess that right now the USC admissions persons are going to great lengths to evaluate those who remain holistically and in totality to the best of their abilities. Strangely, as frustrating as this long wait is, it is precisely because it is taking so long to make a decision that I will be satisfied that the decision they do reach gave my application due consideration.jonnodotsg wrote:We're actually both below USC's median LSAT of 167. In fact, we're so close to that notorious "wall-of-emptiness" on LSN that it's almost like they built that fence in our faces.Speluncean X wrote:I feel your pain. My status has been "complete" since early November and "in review" since 3/17. Like others who seem to be waiting in USC pergatory, I am a numerical fence-sitter (above median LSAT and below median GPA) who is likely compelling for other [non-URM] reasons.
Edit: Correction, we ARE that "wall-of-emptiness." :'(
as for the time... we don't know that they're taking long because they're giving us consideration, as opposed to losing our file or just forgetting about us.... 5 months is a long time to wait... and i would like a decision now.
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
ironically i can't complain about this.... because well my cycle sucks.sibley wrote: They don't seem to give a flying duck that we have deposits due the 1st, the 15th, etc.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2983
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:38 pm
Re: USC 2010!
mine's been ridiculous as well. I'm sure you heard about my georgetown catastrophe... flat our reject, everyone else with my numbers in or special preferred waitlist... someone with my lsat and a worse gpa waitlisted today too. bs.finalaspects wrote:ironically i can't complain about this.... because well my cycle sucks.sibley wrote: They don't seem to give a flying duck that we have deposits due the 1st, the 15th, etc.
the rest of my oddness is due to being a splitter, though.
- philosoraptor
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 2:49 am
Re: USC 2010!
Um, yeah. This might be true for those who have been in review for months, but for those of us who have been complete since the beginning of the cycle, it implies the exact opposite: that they put us into the purgatory category based on our numbers alone. Presumably, they have no idea what we would bring to USC beyond data points. Granted, they know more than I about how to put together a class, but considering I've already gotten into a higher-ranked school where I was below both medians, instead of just one, I'd sure love the chance to be evaluated fairly. Instead, they've given me a de facto WL without even taking 15 damn minutes to read my file. To me, that doesn't exactly scream "holistic process."Speluncean X wrote:I would guess that right now the USC admissions persons are going to great lengths to evaluate those who remain holistically and in totality to the best of their abilities. Strangely, as frustrating as this long wait is, it is precisely because it is taking so long to make a decision that I will be satisfied that the decision they do reach gave my application due consideration.
Simple curiosity and the fact that I have nothing to lose are the only things keeping me from withdrawing.
-
- Posts: 2983
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:38 pm
Re: USC 2010!
+1. I want my deposit back. if they didn't review my application they don't need it. that was the deal. I give you some cash, you look at my app.philosoraptor wrote:Um, yeah. This might be true for those who have been in review for months, but for those of us who have been complete since the beginning of the cycle, it implies the exact opposite: that they put us into the purgatory category based on our numbers alone. Presumably, they have no idea what we would bring to USC beyond data points. Granted, they know more than I about how to put together a class, but considering I've already gotten into a higher-ranked school where I was below both medians, instead of just one, I'd sure love the chance to be evaluated fairly. Instead, they've given me a de facto WL without even taking 15 damn minutes to read my file. To me, that doesn't exactly scream "holistic process."Speluncean X wrote:I would guess that right now the USC admissions persons are going to great lengths to evaluate those who remain holistically and in totality to the best of their abilities. Strangely, as frustrating as this long wait is, it is precisely because it is taking so long to make a decision that I will be satisfied that the decision they do reach gave my application due consideration.
Simple curiosity and the fact that I have nothing to lose are the only things keeping me from withdrawing.
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
you have 166 which is where the wall is. otherwise im sure you would have gotten accepted.philosoraptor wrote:Um, yeah. This might be true for those who have been in review for months, but for those of us who have been complete since the beginning of the cycle, it implies the exact opposite: that they put us into the purgatory category based on our numbers alone. Presumably, they have no idea what we would bring to USC beyond data points. Granted, they know more than I about how to put together a class, but considering I've already gotten into a higher-ranked school where I was below both medians, instead of just one, I'd sure love the chance to be evaluated fairly. Instead, they've given me a de facto WL without even taking 15 damn minutes to read my file. To me, that doesn't exactly scream "holistic process."Speluncean X wrote:I would guess that right now the USC admissions persons are going to great lengths to evaluate those who remain holistically and in totality to the best of their abilities. Strangely, as frustrating as this long wait is, it is precisely because it is taking so long to make a decision that I will be satisfied that the decision they do reach gave my application due consideration.
Simple curiosity and the fact that I have nothing to lose are the only things keeping me from withdrawing.
and i have been in review for almost 2 months and 2-3 weeks but i absolutely do not think they are taking this long because they are "considering" me more. i have no idea what is causing the delay, but i will get rejected in time.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- david?
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:49 pm
Re: USC 2010!
3/9'er still no word on $$...But I called the Financial Aid office Friday of last week and was told the committee who will be making decisions on $$ would be meeting on Friday (march 26) and once a week in the coming weeks. The guy took my name and gave me specific information that I should receive something in the mail this week....as of yesterday nothing though.dcrlo3 wrote:Any 3/9ers here word on $??
- Dostoevsky
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 10:03 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Is anyone going to the alumni and new student reception in San Francisco tomorrow?
- foxyeconomist
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 6:53 pm
Re: USC 2010!
me three. no word here. my hastings scholarship is going to evaporate tomorrow, so i'd love to know today if usc is going to offer me anything.david? wrote:3/9'er still no word on $$...But I called the Financial Aid office Friday of last week and was told the committee who will be making decisions on $$ would be meeting on Friday (march 26) and once a week in the coming weeks. The guy took my name and gave me specific information that I should receive something in the mail this week....as of yesterday nothing though.dcrlo3 wrote:Any 3/9ers here word on $??
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login