I'm same for both dates (UR1 3/17, UR2 3/27). I don't know whether to be happy that my ap seems to be moving with yours or very intimidated.ManOfTheMinute wrote:Hmmm, I think they only use that question to see how you view yourself as an applicant comparatively.jselson wrote:What I mean is, I listed all and only of them. Cause I'm honest. And stupid.cwid1391 wrote:I don't think that's necessarily verified. I listed a few schools - both above, same tier, and below in ranking - and I got in. Several people in this thread have had similar experiences.jselson wrote:Also UR2 3/27. Don't know what it means, but glad to hear MOTM got the same. But whatever it means, pro-tip for future applicants: don't just list the other schools in the t14 under the "To which other schools did you apply?" question.
And yeah I know it probably doesn't matter much.
But yeah, seems like a lot of movement to UR2 today, am I the only one of us who was UR1 on 3/17?
Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
hinakas

- Posts: 39
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:09 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Last edited by hinakas on Wed Mar 27, 2013 4:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- bluecouch

- Posts: 252
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 8:53 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yeah, I feel pretty dumb right now for honestly listing all of the schools to which I applied. But you do have to certify that all of the information is accurate, so...Scarlett66 wrote:jselson wrote:What I mean is, I listed all and only of them. Cause I'm honest. And stupid.cwid1391 wrote:I don't think that's necessarily verified. I listed a few schools - both above, same tier, and below in ranking - and I got in. Several people in this thread have had similar experiences.jselson wrote:Also UR2 3/27. Don't know what it means, but glad to hear MOTM got the same. But whatever it means, pro-tip for future applicants: don't just list the other schools in the t14 under the "To which other schools did you apply?" question.
And yeah I know it probably doesn't matter much.
I didn't list the schools for any of my applications. I thought if they thought you would go somewhere better they might not accept or may withhold good $$
- ManOfTheMinute

- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yeah, it wasn't really an optional question either. I doubt they believe that you only applied to chicagobluecouch wrote:Yeah, I feel pretty dumb right now for honestly listing all of the schools to which I applied. But you do have to certify that all of the information is accurate, so...Scarlett66 wrote:
I didn't list the schools for any of my applications. I thought if they thought you would go somewhere better they might not accept or may withhold good $$
-
one_by_one

- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by one_by_one on Fri Jul 17, 2015 12:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- pannekoeken

- Posts: 49
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:07 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Put me in the UR2 today boat too!manti5 wrote:UR2 today after UR1 in March
3.6 / 176
Never offered an interview.
Unsure of what to make of this.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- hohenheim

- Posts: 180
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 8:30 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Me too. No interview and no idea what this means. WL?pannekoeken wrote:Put me in the UR2 today boat too!manti5 wrote:UR2 today after UR1 in March
3.6 / 176
Never offered an interview.
Unsure of what to make of this.
- jbagelboy

- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I think the "other schools applied to" section would only YP you (which is the only negative impact I could imagine) if you said Yale/Harvard/Stanford/Columbia and had 3.9+, 174+
-
cslouisck

- Posts: 134
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:59 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Also UR2 today. So I guess it's worth asking, are there any March URs that didn't get UR2 today?
ETA: my numbers definitely aren't auto-admit either.
ETA: my numbers definitely aren't auto-admit either.
- Inconceivable!

- Posts: 105
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:35 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
cslouisck wrote:Also UR2 today. So I guess it's worth asking, are there any March URs that didn't get UR2 today?
ETA: my numbers definitely aren't auto-admit either.
UR1 on 3/8, nothing since
Although I'm an auto-reject probably.
- Audeamus

- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
When did you submit?Inconceivable! wrote:cslouisck wrote:Also UR2 today. So I guess it's worth asking, are there any March URs that didn't get UR2 today?
ETA: my numbers definitely aren't auto-admit either.
UR1 on 3/8, nothing since
Although I'm an auto-reject probably.
- jvincent11

- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I did not get UR2 today....
- cws277

- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:11 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Are all the UR updates today from people who didn't interview?
-
cslouisck

- Posts: 134
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:59 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Can't speak for anyone else, but I haven't interviewed.cws277 wrote:Are all the UR updates today from people who didn't interview?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- untar614

- Posts: 642
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:01 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just finished interview. Hope she took away a positive impression. Still under review, will see if/when that changes.
-
o0o0o0o

- Posts: 96
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:44 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by o0o0o0o on Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Inconceivable!

- Posts: 105
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:35 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Submit 12/10. Complete 12/21, UR 3/8, no interviews or changesAudeamus wrote:When did you submit?Inconceivable! wrote:cslouisck wrote:Also UR2 today. So I guess it's worth asking, are there any March URs that didn't get UR2 today?
ETA: my numbers definitely aren't auto-admit either.
UR1 on 3/8, nothing since
Although I'm an auto-reject probably.
LSAT below 25%, GPA at 25%
-
MAHamlin

- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:58 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I did not update to UR2 today and I went UR1 on 3/1.cslouisck wrote:Also UR2 today. So I guess it's worth asking, are there any March URs that didn't get UR2 today?
ETA: my numbers definitely aren't auto-admit either.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
akaimogene

- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 3:19 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Also UR2 3/27. 173/3.7, which I would have though made me a marginal applicant...
-
edamame

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:25 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Also UR2 today -- 172+ / 4+.akaimogene wrote:Also UR2 3/27. 173/3.7, which I would have though made me a marginal applicant...
-
solucky

- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 1:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I don't see this mentioned anywhere else, but it looks like Chicago will start giving out Cafaros to replace the Ruby!!! 
Apparently a few will be given out THIS cycle, which is great news for those above the LSAT/GPA medians.
Apparently a few will be given out THIS cycle, which is great news for those above the LSAT/GPA medians.
- Emma.

- Posts: 2408
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
The Carafos scholarship is pretty different from the Rubenstein. It is for students with financial need, whereas the Rubenstein is a straight-up merit scholarship, and there will only be a few given out every year, unlike the 20 or so Rubenstein scholarships given out every year.solucky wrote:I don't see this mentioned anywhere else, but it looks like Chicago will start giving out Cafaros to replace the Ruby!!!
Apparently a few will be given out THIS cycle, which is great news for those above the LSAT/GPA medians.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- postard

- Posts: 154
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:39 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Awarded 15k total today. Surprised, given my low LSAT.
-
switchis32

- Posts: 117
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:35 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Awards are out… 30k
- you'rethemannowdawg

- Posts: 211
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:36 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Any other splitters ur2 today? I did. 3.25/177. Don't know what to think, but im excited about anything but a ding.
- TheMostDangerousLG

- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just submit my application today.. Went complete already. My stats aren't great and I know my application is CRAZY late, but I'm holding out for a miracle.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login