I'm same for both dates (UR1 3/17, UR2 3/27). I don't know whether to be happy that my ap seems to be moving with yours or very intimidated.ManOfTheMinute wrote:Hmmm, I think they only use that question to see how you view yourself as an applicant comparatively.jselson wrote:What I mean is, I listed all and only of them. Cause I'm honest. And stupid.cwid1391 wrote:I don't think that's necessarily verified. I listed a few schools - both above, same tier, and below in ranking - and I got in. Several people in this thread have had similar experiences.jselson wrote:Also UR2 3/27. Don't know what it means, but glad to hear MOTM got the same. But whatever it means, pro-tip for future applicants: don't just list the other schools in the t14 under the "To which other schools did you apply?" question.
And yeah I know it probably doesn't matter much.
But yeah, seems like a lot of movement to UR2 today, am I the only one of us who was UR1 on 3/17?
Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
hinakas

- Posts: 39
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:09 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Last edited by hinakas on Wed Mar 27, 2013 4:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- bluecouch

- Posts: 252
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 8:53 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yeah, I feel pretty dumb right now for honestly listing all of the schools to which I applied. But you do have to certify that all of the information is accurate, so...Scarlett66 wrote:jselson wrote:What I mean is, I listed all and only of them. Cause I'm honest. And stupid.cwid1391 wrote:I don't think that's necessarily verified. I listed a few schools - both above, same tier, and below in ranking - and I got in. Several people in this thread have had similar experiences.jselson wrote:Also UR2 3/27. Don't know what it means, but glad to hear MOTM got the same. But whatever it means, pro-tip for future applicants: don't just list the other schools in the t14 under the "To which other schools did you apply?" question.
And yeah I know it probably doesn't matter much.
I didn't list the schools for any of my applications. I thought if they thought you would go somewhere better they might not accept or may withhold good $$
- ManOfTheMinute

- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yeah, it wasn't really an optional question either. I doubt they believe that you only applied to chicagobluecouch wrote:Yeah, I feel pretty dumb right now for honestly listing all of the schools to which I applied. But you do have to certify that all of the information is accurate, so...Scarlett66 wrote:
I didn't list the schools for any of my applications. I thought if they thought you would go somewhere better they might not accept or may withhold good $$
-
one_by_one

- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by one_by_one on Fri Jul 17, 2015 12:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- pannekoeken

- Posts: 49
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:07 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Put me in the UR2 today boat too!manti5 wrote:UR2 today after UR1 in March
3.6 / 176
Never offered an interview.
Unsure of what to make of this.
- hohenheim

- Posts: 180
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 8:30 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Me too. No interview and no idea what this means. WL?pannekoeken wrote:Put me in the UR2 today boat too!manti5 wrote:UR2 today after UR1 in March
3.6 / 176
Never offered an interview.
Unsure of what to make of this.
- jbagelboy

- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I think the "other schools applied to" section would only YP you (which is the only negative impact I could imagine) if you said Yale/Harvard/Stanford/Columbia and had 3.9+, 174+
-
cslouisck

- Posts: 134
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:59 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Also UR2 today. So I guess it's worth asking, are there any March URs that didn't get UR2 today?
ETA: my numbers definitely aren't auto-admit either.
ETA: my numbers definitely aren't auto-admit either.
- Inconceivable!

- Posts: 105
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:35 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
cslouisck wrote:Also UR2 today. So I guess it's worth asking, are there any March URs that didn't get UR2 today?
ETA: my numbers definitely aren't auto-admit either.
UR1 on 3/8, nothing since
Although I'm an auto-reject probably.
- Audeamus

- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
When did you submit?Inconceivable! wrote:cslouisck wrote:Also UR2 today. So I guess it's worth asking, are there any March URs that didn't get UR2 today?
ETA: my numbers definitely aren't auto-admit either.
UR1 on 3/8, nothing since
Although I'm an auto-reject probably.
- jvincent11

- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I did not get UR2 today....
- cws277

- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:11 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Are all the UR updates today from people who didn't interview?
-
cslouisck

- Posts: 134
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:59 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Can't speak for anyone else, but I haven't interviewed.cws277 wrote:Are all the UR updates today from people who didn't interview?
- untar614

- Posts: 642
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:01 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just finished interview. Hope she took away a positive impression. Still under review, will see if/when that changes.
-
o0o0o0o

- Posts: 96
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:44 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by o0o0o0o on Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Inconceivable!

- Posts: 105
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:35 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Submit 12/10. Complete 12/21, UR 3/8, no interviews or changesAudeamus wrote:When did you submit?Inconceivable! wrote:cslouisck wrote:Also UR2 today. So I guess it's worth asking, are there any March URs that didn't get UR2 today?
ETA: my numbers definitely aren't auto-admit either.
UR1 on 3/8, nothing since
Although I'm an auto-reject probably.
LSAT below 25%, GPA at 25%
-
MAHamlin

- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:58 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I did not update to UR2 today and I went UR1 on 3/1.cslouisck wrote:Also UR2 today. So I guess it's worth asking, are there any March URs that didn't get UR2 today?
ETA: my numbers definitely aren't auto-admit either.
-
akaimogene

- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 3:19 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Also UR2 3/27. 173/3.7, which I would have though made me a marginal applicant...
-
edamame

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:25 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Also UR2 today -- 172+ / 4+.akaimogene wrote:Also UR2 3/27. 173/3.7, which I would have though made me a marginal applicant...
-
solucky

- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 1:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I don't see this mentioned anywhere else, but it looks like Chicago will start giving out Cafaros to replace the Ruby!!! 
Apparently a few will be given out THIS cycle, which is great news for those above the LSAT/GPA medians.
Apparently a few will be given out THIS cycle, which is great news for those above the LSAT/GPA medians.
- Emma.

- Posts: 2408
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
The Carafos scholarship is pretty different from the Rubenstein. It is for students with financial need, whereas the Rubenstein is a straight-up merit scholarship, and there will only be a few given out every year, unlike the 20 or so Rubenstein scholarships given out every year.solucky wrote:I don't see this mentioned anywhere else, but it looks like Chicago will start giving out Cafaros to replace the Ruby!!!
Apparently a few will be given out THIS cycle, which is great news for those above the LSAT/GPA medians.
- postard

- Posts: 154
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:39 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Awarded 15k total today. Surprised, given my low LSAT.
-
switchis32

- Posts: 117
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:35 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Awards are out… 30k
- you'rethemannowdawg

- Posts: 211
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:36 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Any other splitters ur2 today? I did. 3.25/177. Don't know what to think, but im excited about anything but a ding.
- TheMostDangerousLG

- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just submit my application today.. Went complete already. My stats aren't great and I know my application is CRAZY late, but I'm holding out for a miracle.