not sure because this was around the time i applied last year lol. i got reserved in march iirc.spyke123 wrote:did they reserve anyone with 172 + this early last year though? I feel like HLS is the only school so far who have dinged people with median numbersCrowing wrote:Yeah, I remember last year all too well - loooots of reserves in March/April. I just think it's interesting if no 172+ got reserved today because it does seem to suggest some concern about the LSAT median.ChampagnePapi wrote:The reserves came out in waves last year and there was no rhyme or reason to them. If you haven't gotten one you are not out of the woods.
Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 10:09 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
This is probably premature (and likely wrong) but from what I can tell on LSN no 17Xs got reserved except for one with a <25th GPA. Dat LSAT 25/50 protection maybe?Crowing wrote:Yeah, I remember last year all too well - loooots of reserves in March/April. I just think it's interesting if no 172+ got reserved today because it does seem to suggest some concern about the LSAT median.ChampagnePapi wrote:The reserves came out in waves last year and there was no rhyme or reason to them. If you haven't gotten one you are not out of the woods.
Again, probably premature but interesting nonetheless
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
bailey said reserve a few posts up (3.7/171)jym_dawg wrote:This is probably premature (and likely wrong) but from what I can tell on LSN no 17Xs got reserved except for one with a <25th GPA. Dat LSAT 25/50 protection maybe?Crowing wrote:Yeah, I remember last year all too well - loooots of reserves in March/April. I just think it's interesting if no 172+ got reserved today because it does seem to suggest some concern about the LSAT median.ChampagnePapi wrote:The reserves came out in waves last year and there was no rhyme or reason to them. If you haven't gotten one you are not out of the woods.
Again, probably premature but interesting nonetheless
-
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:43 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No Reserve. No NCE.
Submit 11/19
Submit 11/19
-
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:11 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
?BSC wrote:Still waiting as well.
Quick question. My gpa just jumped to a 3.90 (3.88 when I applied). Can I tell them to hold my application until they receive the transcript update?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 599
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 10:56 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Reserved. Was fully expecting a rejection so this is okay with me. 3.69/167. Complete early December
Last edited by blueapple on Fri Jan 26, 2018 8:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- 02889
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:21 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So I'm clear, it is neither inherently a bad or good thing that I did not receive a reserve email today?
- ph5354a
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
According to last year, there's a big spike in WL around now, a steady but small trickle and then another big spike in April. Since you're a fall applicant I'd say you should be pleased to not be on today's WL. I would interpret it to mean you're still in the game. My guess would be the big April WL batch are January/February applicants. But, I really have no idea.02889 wrote:So I'm clear, it is neither inherently a bad or good thing that I did not receive a reserve email today?
-
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:41 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I actually don't think its about the submit dates. Rather, its more about the numbers. For example, it looks like most people reserved today had below median numbers. I bet the April wave will mostly contain people with median/above numbers who did not make the cut.ph5354a wrote:According to last year, there's a big spike in WL around now, a steady but small trickle and then another big spike in April. Since you're a fall applicant I'd say you should be pleased to not be on today's WL. I would interpret it to mean you're still in the game. My guess would be the big April WL batch are January/February applicants. But, I really have no idea.02889 wrote:So I'm clear, it is neither inherently a bad or good thing that I did not receive a reserve email today?
- ph5354a
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
That's a good point. Ill look on last years LSN later today to see if I can figure it out. Lord knows I have nothing better to do.spyke123 wrote:I actually don't think its about the submit dates. Rather, its more about the numbers. For example, it looks like most people reserved today had below median numbers. I bet the April wave will mostly contain people with median/above numbers who did not make the cut.ph5354a wrote:According to last year, there's a big spike in WL around now, a steady but small trickle and then another big spike in April. Since you're a fall applicant I'd say you should be pleased to not be on today's WL. I would interpret it to mean you're still in the game. My guess would be the big April WL batch are January/February applicants. But, I really have no idea.02889 wrote:So I'm clear, it is neither inherently a bad or good thing that I did not receive a reserve email today?
- LSATSCORES2012
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Based on this (LinkRemoved), it ssems like good news to not be reserved (unless you're set to be dinged in a few days)? a bunch of WL's come out in April, a few rejections, and a bunch of acceptances in between.
- djwjddl
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:50 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
From a very quick glance at lsn, it seems like those who were WL'd in the later April batch were those who submitted after December and/or had "competitive" numbers.
So if you didn't get WL'd this time around, it could mean you submitted later and/or are still in the running.
So if you didn't get WL'd this time around, it could mean you submitted later and/or are still in the running.
Last edited by djwjddl on Tue Feb 12, 2013 7:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- applemaroon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by applemaroon on Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- venus
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Have any of the people who were asked to send their fall grades heard anything back yet (acceptance/reserve)?
- venus
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I've been unsubscribing from those emails for months now, and it's gotten better, but I still get them sometimes and freak out for a second or two.applemaroon wrote:Ohhh my god. Just got an email from lawadmissions@liberty....
ALMOST HAD A HEART ATTACK.
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:19 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
First time posting here in this thread... reserved today (168 highest LSAT, 3.9 GPA). Complete a few weeks ago in January. Not liking the "sit tight til May" part of the email, but I guess I should be lucky I wasn't dinged?
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 2:38 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Reserved via email today at 1:16pm CA time
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Was does it mean that Columbia hasn't acknowledged my existence since September?
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1 to all of this.grapefruits wrote:Nothing yet for me either. Something about getting held at Harvard and out right dinged at Columbia feels wrong. I'm just going to assume they're thinking up a new name for the Hamilton + Butler, full tuition + stipend, scholarship they're giving me. Thanks Columbia.
Sorry for those who got reserved today.
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
This seems significant.clasico2012 wrote:First time posting here in this thread... reserved today (168 highest LSAT, 3.9 GPA). Complete a few weeks ago in January. Not liking the "sit tight til May" part of the email, but I guess I should be lucky I wasn't dinged?
-
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:41 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
oh snapohpobrecito wrote:This seems significant.clasico2012 wrote:First time posting here in this thread... reserved today (168 highest LSAT, 3.9 GPA). Complete a few weeks ago in January. Not liking the "sit tight til May" part of the email, but I guess I should be lucky I wasn't dinged?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- banjo
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Nothing here yet.
-
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:51 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So how many Reserved (waitlisted) people actually get off the waitlist?
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 2:38 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
http://www.top-law-schools.com/archives ... f=2&t=8051
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 7&t=113213
in case anyones interested...reserve threads from 2007 and 2010 - if anyone finds more recent info please post it
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 7&t=113213
in case anyones interested...reserve threads from 2007 and 2010 - if anyone finds more recent info please post it
- sinfiery
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Nothing here, Huzzah! Seems I am awarded with more waiting. Love you too, CLS.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login