Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- MKC
- Posts: 16246
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:18 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
My status date changed this morning for the first time since 12/12! I hope to hear back soon. My numbers (166/3.25) are subpar for Cornell to say the least, but the fact that I wasn't auto-dinged gives me a little bit of hope. How long did everyone have to wait after the latest update for a decision?
-
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 3:27 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just got an update today. Panic.
- Dream Weave
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:31 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Deferred back in December. No update here
- danitt
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:40 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
End of November, same boat. I'm wondering if a phone call might be appropriate right now because I've already sent in a LOCI.Dream Weave wrote:Deferred back in December. No update here
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Nodanitt wrote:End of November, same boat. I'm wondering if a phone call might be appropriate right now because I've already sent in a LOCI.Dream Weave wrote:Deferred back in December. No update here
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Dream Weave
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:31 pm
-
- Posts: 1869
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Pulling for you dude. Best of luck.MarkinKansasCity wrote:My status date changed this morning for the first time since 12/12! I hope to hear back soon. My numbers (166/3.25) are subpar for Cornell to say the least, but the fact that I wasn't auto-dinged gives me a little bit of hope. How long did everyone have to wait after the latest update for a decision?
-
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 12:04 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
My date changed too. 168/3.1
Expecting a wait list (my fourth) at best.
Expecting a wait list (my fourth) at best.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:19 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Was accepted on Friday with a 166, 3.75 and Cornell is the best school I've gotten into. Absolutely love the school, but assuming I will get absolutely nothing in terms of scholarship. Do you guys think Cornell is worth paying sticker (hopefully my parents can cover COL, crossing my fingers anyway)? Thanks!
- CMHCLT
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 9:48 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Put on reserve.
167/3.6
TFA
my cycle has been below average (even for my numbers)
dammit.
167/3.6
TFA
my cycle has been below average (even for my numbers)
dammit.
- MKC
- Posts: 16246
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:18 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
With a ~50% chance at biglaw @ ~160k a year, I think you can justify the debt. It still sucks, but I think it would make sense long term.tdense wrote:Was accepted on Friday with a 166, 3.75 and Cornell is the best school I've gotten into. Absolutely love the school, but assuming I will get absolutely nothing in terms of scholarship. Do you guys think Cornell is worth paying sticker (hopefully my parents can cover COL, crossing my fingers anyway)? Thanks!
- radar714
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 12:35 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
what the fuck does this even mean? Just got "reserved" today...I feel like a god damn restaurant. Is this a good or bad sign? If I have to wait til May just to get rejected or waitlisted I may go insaneCMHCLT wrote:Put on reserve.
167/3.6
TFA
my cycle has been below average (even for my numbers)
dammit.
edit: 3.6/166
- CMHCLT
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 9:48 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I know, man, it's beyond aggravating. Took them three months to tell me they need another three months to make a decision. Trying my best to remain a rational decision maker, but it is not easy. Best of luck to you and everyone else.radar714 wrote:what the fuck does this even mean? Just got "reserved" today...I feel like a god damn restaurant. Is this a good or bad sign? If I have to wait til May just to get rejected or waitlisted I may go insaneCMHCLT wrote:Put on reserve.
167/3.6
TFA
my cycle has been below average (even for my numbers)
dammit.
edit: 3.6/166
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- smdpnp
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:49 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Search the forums, and you'll find many 2Ls, 3Ls, and graduates who disagree.MarkinKansasCity wrote: With a ~50% chance at biglaw @ ~160k a year, I think you can justify the debt. It still sucks, but I think it would make sense long term.
-
- Posts: 1869
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I know this isn't the place to talk about it, but remember, 250k loans collecting interest when your take home is 95k in a very expensive city doesn't let you pay off loans super fast. That plus half of your big law class being out by their third year makes it even more daunting. It's a gamble every step of the way from betting on yourself to get big law to betting on yourself to last in big law to then betting on yourself to either become a mid level or senior associate (which few do) or securing a strong exit in a location where you want to settle down. Even if you were all but guaranteed big law, it's still incredibly risky.smdpnp wrote:Many 0Ls use this line to convince themselves that taking out huge loans is a good idea. Search the forums, and you'll find many 2Ls, 3Ls, and graduates who disagree.MarkinKansasCity wrote: With a ~50% chance at biglaw @ ~160k a year, I think you can justify the debt. It still sucks, but I think it would make sense long term.
Last edited by LRGhost on Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 12:04 am
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Those $150k and $120k schollies on LSN are all Dean's Scholarships, right?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- MKC
- Posts: 16246
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:18 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm coming back to Kansas City regardless. COL is stupid cheap here, although first year associates make ~110K instead of 160K. I get that it's still a huge risk, but I want to do corporate law, and not just for the money. I am looking forward to finding stupid loopholes in regulations so my clients can weasel out of trouble. It's a libertarian thing.LRGhost wrote:I know this isn't the place to talk about it, but remember, 250k loans collecting interest when your take home is 95k in a very expensive city doesn't let you pay off loans super fast. That plus half of your big law class being out by their third year makes it even more daunting. It's a gamble every step of the way from betting on yourself to get big law to betting on yourself to last in big law to then betting on yourself to either become a mid level or senior associate (which few do) or securing a strong exit in a location where you want to settle down. Even if you were all but guaranteed big law, it's still incredibly risky.smdpnp wrote:Many 0Ls use this line to convince themselves that taking out huge loans is a good idea. Search the forums, and you'll find many 2Ls, 3Ls, and graduates who disagree.MarkinKansasCity wrote: With a ~50% chance at biglaw @ ~160k a year, I think you can justify the debt. It still sucks, but I think it would make sense long term.
-
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:21 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
MarkinKansasCity wrote:I'm coming back to Kansas City regardless. COL is stupid cheap here, although first year associates make ~110K instead of 160K. I get that it's still a huge risk, but I want to do corporate law, and not just for the money. I am looking forward to finding stupid loopholes in regulations so my clients can weasel out of trouble. It's a libertarian thing.LRGhost wrote:I know this isn't the place to talk about it, but remember, 250k loans collecting interest when your take home is 95k in a very expensive city doesn't let you pay off loans super fast. That plus half of your big law class being out by their third year makes it even more daunting. It's a gamble every step of the way from betting on yourself to get big law to betting on yourself to last in big law to then betting on yourself to either become a mid level or senior associate (which few do) or securing a strong exit in a location where you want to settle down. Even if you were all but guaranteed big law, it's still incredibly risky.smdpnp wrote:Many 0Ls use this line to convince themselves that taking out huge loans is a good idea. Search the forums, and you'll find many 2Ls, 3Ls, and graduates who disagree.MarkinKansasCity wrote: With a ~50% chance at biglaw @ ~160k a year, I think you can justify the debt. It still sucks, but I think it would make sense long term.



-
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:21 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
this is so depressingLRGhost wrote:I know this isn't the place to talk about it, but remember, 250k loans collecting interest when your take home is 95k in a very expensive city doesn't let you pay off loans super fast. That plus half of your big law class being out by their third year makes it even more daunting. It's a gamble every step of the way from betting on yourself to get big law to betting on yourself to last in big law to then betting on yourself to either become a mid level or senior associate (which few do) or securing a strong exit in a location where you want to settle down. Even if you were all but guaranteed big law, it's still incredibly risky.smdpnp wrote:Many 0Ls use this line to convince themselves that taking out huge loans is a good idea. Search the forums, and you'll find many 2Ls, 3Ls, and graduates who disagree.MarkinKansasCity wrote: With a ~50% chance at biglaw @ ~160k a year, I think you can justify the debt. It still sucks, but I think it would make sense long term.

-
- Posts: 1869
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
It doesn't have to be, though. If you are prepared for the grind, know what you're getting in to, and make the best decisions you can considering your desires, it's whatever. It's not a GOOD situation, but it's better than some alternatives.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I understand being risk-averse, but this.LRGhost wrote:It doesn't have to be, though. If you are prepared for the grind, know what you're getting in to, and make the best decisions you can considering your desires, it's whatever. It's not a GOOD situation, but it's better than some alternatives.
- MKC
- Posts: 16246
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:18 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1. We're all taking huge risks here. At the very least we're giving up three years of our lives to enter a profession that is incredibly overcrowded.shntn wrote:I understand being risk-averse, but this.LRGhost wrote:It doesn't have to be, though. If you are prepared for the grind, know what you're getting in to, and make the best decisions you can considering your desires, it's whatever. It's not a GOOD situation, but it's better than some alternatives.
I asked earlier, but after my status date going from 12/12 to 3/4 today, anyone care to guess how much longer it will be before they issue a decision? This shit is killing me, especially since one of the decision options is the waitlist; i.e. "We decided not to decide yet."
- VeeD101
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:49 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So after being complete since January, my status changed on 2/11 and 2/22 and I got the decision on March 1. If they keep up the same pace, I'd say 2.5-3 weeks?MarkinKansasCity wrote:+1. We're all taking huge risks here. At the very least we're giving up three years of our lives to enter a profession that is incredibly overcrowded.shntn wrote:I understand being risk-averse, but this.LRGhost wrote:It doesn't have to be, though. If you are prepared for the grind, know what you're getting in to, and make the best decisions you can considering your desires, it's whatever. It's not a GOOD situation, but it's better than some alternatives.
I asked earlier, but after my status date going from 12/12 to 3/4 today, anyone care to guess how much longer it will be before they issue a decision? This shit is killing me, especially since one of the decision options is the waitlist; i.e. "We decided not to decide yet."
- boblawlob
- Posts: 519
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:29 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
If you know you're in deep shit with loans, then realize you need to pay attention in class and study 24/7 (essentially if you are not the genius type). Don't gchat or facebook during class lectures. This won't make people sympathize with you when you complain in 3L about having no job offers.LRGhost wrote:It doesn't have to be, though. If you are prepared for the grind, know what you're getting in to, and make the best decisions you can considering your desires, it's whatever. It's not a GOOD situation, but it's better than some alternatives.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login