SMU 2010! Forum

da87 · Post by **da87** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:22 pm

texasforever wrote:who knows? I'm expecting W/L though

edit: wait, I guess it means accept or reject if people actually saw "waitlisted" on their status checker?

correct

da87 · Post by **da87** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:31 pm

I think it's good news for those of you changing today, I'm not sure about me changing yesterday though.

lawschoolhopeful189 · Post by **lawschoolhopeful189** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:32 pm

I have a feeling some FT acceptances are coming for those who had status checkers change today. It's been awhile since FT acceptances, so they should be due out soon!

da87 · Post by **da87** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:33 pm

lawschoolhopeful189 wrote:I have a feeling some FT acceptances are coming for those who had status checkers change today. It's been awhile since FT acceptances, so they should be due out soon!

lawschoolhopeful189 · Post by **lawschoolhopeful189** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:36 pm

da87 wrote:
lawschoolhopeful189 wrote:I have a feeling some FT acceptances are coming for those who had status checkers change today. It's been awhile since FT acceptances, so they should be due out soon!

Sorry, I'm really, really pulling for you!!! I hope it's good news for you, also, of course!

da87 · Post by **da87** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:41 pm

lawschoolhopeful189 wrote:
da87 wrote:
lawschoolhopeful189 wrote:I have a feeling some FT acceptances are coming for those who had status checkers change today. It's been awhile since FT acceptances, so they should be due out soon!

Sorry, I'm really, really pulling for you!!! I hope it's good news for you, also, of course!

Haha that's ok

da87 · Post by **da87** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:59 pm

Anyone else DR today?

keg411 · Post by **keg411** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:11 pm

Still sitting at Complete. I seriously think they haven't read my application. Plus, I wasn't complete by their deadline which means that they can probably tell me in June if they want.

jgrin · Post by **jgrin** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:21 pm

keg411 wrote:Still sitting at Complete. I seriously think they haven't read my application. Plus, I wasn't complete by their deadline which means that they can probably tell me in June if they want.

+1

Yellowcard · Post by **Yellowcard** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:29 pm

Wait Listed.
163/3.7

jgrin · Post by **jgrin** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:33 pm

Yellowcard wrote:Wait Listed.
163/3.7

Today or yesterday?

Ty Webb · Post by **Ty Webb** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:48 pm

Yellowcard wrote:Wait Listed.
163/3.7

Damn. That's kind of surprising, no?

DavidB · Post by **DavidB** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:51 pm

Ty Webb wrote:
Yellowcard wrote:Wait Listed.
163/3.7
Damn. That's kind of surprising, no?

I thought the same thing--those are great numbers to end up on a waitlist.

FB567 · Post by **FB567** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:58 pm

DavidB wrote:
Ty Webb wrote:
Yellowcard wrote:Wait Listed.
163/3.7
Damn. That's kind of surprising, no?
I thought the same thing--those are great numbers to end up on a waitlist.

+1
FT or PT?

Ty Webb · Post by **Ty Webb** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 2:03 pm

FB567 wrote:
DavidB wrote:
Ty Webb wrote:
Yellowcard wrote:Wait Listed.
163/3.7
Damn. That's kind of surprising, no?
I thought the same thing--those are great numbers to end up on a waitlist.
+1
FT or PT?

Gotta be full time. Only way he'd get WL'd PT with those numbers is if he wrote an addendum about the admission dean's fun bags.

wellington · Post by **wellington** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 2:03 pm

Had a friend get waitlisted. 161/3.6 FT

CmonSD · Post by **CmonSD** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 2:12 pm

Is there anyone who is strictly part time still waiting?

FB567 · Post by **FB567** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 2:14 pm

Ty Webb wrote: Gotta be full time. Only way he'd get WL'd PT with those numbers is if he wrote an addendum about the admission dean's fun bags.

LOL
Looks like they are waitlisting everyone with 161-163 for FT.

Ty Webb · Post by **Ty Webb** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 2:18 pm

FB567 wrote:
Ty Webb wrote: Gotta be full time. Only way he'd get WL'd PT with those numbers is if he wrote an addendum about the admission dean's fun bags.
LOL
Looks like they are waitlisting everyone with 161-163 for FT.

I'm nervous. Have a 166/sub-3.0, with a solid addendum for that GPA, but it's still ugly. Very curious to see the result. 165+ has traditionally done well at SMU even with a poor companion, but that doesn't stop me from

fathergoose · Post by **fathergoose** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 2:22 pm

Those are some very impressive numbers to get waitlisted. I hope this bodes well for the quality of the incoming class.

Thirteen · Post by **Thirteen** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 2:28 pm

Ty Webb wrote:
FB567 wrote:
Ty Webb wrote: Gotta be full time. Only way he'd get WL'd PT with those numbers is if he wrote an addendum about the admission dean's fun bags.
LOL
Looks like they are waitlisting everyone with 161-163 for FT.

I'm nervous. Have a 166/sub-3.0, with a solid addendum for that GPA, but it's still ugly. Very curious to see the result. 165+ has traditionally done well at SMU even with a poor companion, but that doesn't stop me from

You should be fine with that LSAT. My GPA is really low, and I didn't write an addendum (I'm sure saying that I'm a dumbass wouldn't help much, haha).

da87 · Post by **da87** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 2:30 pm

So no calls for anyone today yet?

Sangiovese · Post by **Sangiovese** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 2:33 pm

Ty Webb wrote:I'm nervous. Have a 166/sub-3.0, with a solid addendum for that GPA, but it's still ugly. Very curious to see the result. 165+ has traditionally done well at SMU even with a poor companion, but that doesn't stop me from

I think you're going to be in.

164 seems to be the big line in the sand... so it looks to me that being 2 points the the right of that line puts you in pretty safe territory.

Ty Webb · Post by **Ty Webb** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 2:36 pm

I hope so. After prepping an avg of 170, I pulled a giant chokejob with a 162 on my first try, which made me

when I looked at SMU's charts. I had hoped the 166 second score would be good enough.

These guys/gals really make you wait it out, huh?

I'm convinced that before too long, I'll try to log in to the status checker and it's going to say, "Leave me the fuck alone."

Sangiovese · Post by **Sangiovese** » Wed Apr 28, 2010 2:39 pm

Ty Webb wrote:I'm convinced that before too long, I'll try to log in to the status checker and it's going to say, "Leave me the fuck alone."

SMU 2010! Forum

Re: SMU 2010!

Re: SMU 2010!

Re: SMU 2010!

Re: SMU 2010!

Re: SMU 2010!

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: SMU 2010!

Re: SMU 2010!

Re: SMU 2010!

Re: SMU 2010!

Register for access!

Re: SMU 2010!

Re: SMU 2010!

Re: SMU 2010!

Re: SMU 2010!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: SMU 2010!

Re: SMU 2010!

Re: SMU 2010!

Re: SMU 2010!

Register now!

Re: SMU 2010!

Re: SMU 2010!

Re: SMU 2010!

Re: SMU 2010!

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: SMU 2010!

Re: SMU 2010!

Re: SMU 2010!

Re: SMU 2010!

Seriously? What are you waiting for?