Decisions have come very late in the afternoon previouslyjbagelboy wrote:so. is this happening?ht2988 wrote:OMG!!! My UR updated to 3/21... Interviewed/UR update on 3/11, invitation to interview/UR update on 3/8, first UR on 3/1, submitted on 11/16. I'm bracing myself for a decision (most likely waitlist) tomorrow.
Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
-
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:07 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Have they updated their twitter at all? (at Michigan's ASW and can't check twitter from my phone)
- cwid1391
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Nope. Not since 3/8.ht2988 wrote:Have they updated their twitter at all? (at Michigan's ASW and can't check twitter from my phone)
-
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:07 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Ugh nothing today... Hopefully next week?!
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:18 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I know a similar situation was discussed a couple of pages back, but mine is slightly different and I was wondering what you all thought.
I'm sitting at a 1/5 complete with a 171 LSAT and 3.9 GPA, so I don't think my numbers are preventing them from looking at my app. Should I call or would that just bother them?
Thanks.
I'm sitting at a 1/5 complete with a 171 LSAT and 3.9 GPA, so I don't think my numbers are preventing them from looking at my app. Should I call or would that just bother them?
Thanks.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No it's not. All snowflakes are special.I know a similar situation was discussed a couple of pages back, but mine is slightly different...
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Decided to withdraw. Good luck, all. Submitted 12/11, UR 3/8(I think), interview invite 3/21.
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 4:35 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
For those of us that were waitlisted earlier, has anyone sent in their essay? If so, was it a version of a 'why Chicago?' essay? On the same vein, any waitlisted candidates get called for interviews?
- txdude45
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 6:25 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Could someone shed some light on the interview for me? I have one coming up and don't know what to expect. Thanks!
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
there are entire threads devoted to this interview, look around first. See Regulus's chi interview thread and spreadsheet, its very helpful.txdude45 wrote:Could someone shed some light on the interview for me? I have one coming up and don't know what to expect. Thanks!
- bananapudding88
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 4:11 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Still complete 1/8 

-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 1:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I had my interview today and it went okay. All the questions were covered in Regulus' thread. The interviewer was warm and friendly, but I know I fumbled some of my responses.
I asked when it would be reasonable to receive a decision as I'm strongly interested in attending ASW and I was told most likely by the end of the week. She also said they are trying to power through as many interviews as possible to get most decisions out for the entire applicant pool by the end of March.
I asked when it would be reasonable to receive a decision as I'm strongly interested in attending ASW and I was told most likely by the end of the week. She also said they are trying to power through as many interviews as possible to get most decisions out for the entire applicant pool by the end of March.
-
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
If that is correct, then anyone not already interviewed will be WL'ed, rejected.She also said they are trying to power through as many interviews as possible to get most decisions out for the entire applicant pool by the end of March.

Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- porch
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:43 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2&t=200887txdude45 wrote:Could someone shed some light on the interview for me? I have one coming up and don't know what to expect. Thanks!
- beepboopbeep
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:36 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Big Dog wrote:
-
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:21 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Big Dog wrote:If that is correct, then anyone not already interviewed will be WL'ed, rejected.She also said they are trying to power through as many interviews as possible to get most decisions out for the entire applicant pool by the end of March.
There is hope for you yet. They said 'most.'
-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:58 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Big Dog wrote:If that is correct, then anyone not already interviewed will be WL'ed, rejected.She also said they are trying to power through as many interviews as possible to get most decisions out for the entire applicant pool by the end of March.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:25 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Ditto.MAHamlin wrote:Big Dog wrote:If that is correct, then anyone not already interviewed will be WL'ed, rejected.She also said they are trying to power through as many interviews as possible to get most decisions out for the entire applicant pool by the end of March.I've been complete since 12/20 and UR1 since 3/1 with no interview invite. Any chance of an acceptance is starting to look pretty bleak...
-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:58 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I wonder what UChi has against us 172+ 4.0+ applicants? I wouldn't imagine that's YP territory for Chicago... What gives, Chicago?edamame wrote:Ditto.MAHamlin wrote:Big Dog wrote:If that is correct, then anyone not already interviewed will be WL'ed, rejected.She also said they are trying to power through as many interviews as possible to get most decisions out for the entire applicant pool by the end of March.I've been complete since 12/20 and UR1 since 3/1 with no interview invite. Any chance of an acceptance is starting to look pretty bleak...
-
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
reading fail.
But still, the odds ain't looking to good....
But still, the odds ain't looking to good....
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Or they're just gonna accept you guys without an interview. You never know...
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:58 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Curse you for putting another fantasy in my head!Crowing wrote:Or they're just gonna accept you guys without an interview. You never know...

-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:25 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I asked my mom about this -- was thinking about withdrawing for a while -- and that's what she said, too. My response was, "NOOOO, noooo, noooo."MAHamlin wrote:Curse you for putting another fantasy in my head!Crowing wrote:Or they're just gonna accept you guys without an interview. You never know...
-
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Don't jinx it, (but do appreciate the positive vibes!).Or they're just gonna accept you guys without an interview. You never know...
- bluecouch
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 8:53 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
It would kind of make sense at this point. Accept folks with good numbers w/out interview given that it's near the end of the cycle; give folks on the bubble an interview to sort out WL vs. accepts vs. denials (*gulp*). Seems like a reasonable strategy since it appears that Chicago's process is moving a little more slowly this year.edamame wrote:I asked my mom about this -- was thinking about withdrawing for a while -- and that's what she said, too. My response was, "NOOOO, noooo, noooo."MAHamlin wrote:Curse you for putting another fantasy in my head!Crowing wrote:Or they're just gonna accept you guys without an interview. You never know...
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login