Same! I've been under review for four weeks nowD2142 wrote:Hoping for some good news this week.

Same! I've been under review for four weeks nowD2142 wrote:Hoping for some good news this week.
Hoping for it.albertplawinski wrote:Friend of a friend says there has been some WL movement....
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
So they accidentally let in too many people* from the outset?Chardee_MacDennis wrote:Rumor has it around here that the incoming class is going to be a bit larger than expected. Not sure how much larger, though, but quite a bit.
They had more seat deposits than expectedBaby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:So they accidentally let in too many people* from the outset?Chardee_MacDennis wrote:Rumor has it around here that the incoming class is going to be a bit larger than expected. Not sure how much larger, though, but quite a bit.
* - people they didn't expect to commit
Where did you get this info from?Chardee_MacDennis wrote:They had more seat deposits than expectedBaby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:So they accidentally let in too many people* from the outset?Chardee_MacDennis wrote:Rumor has it around here that the incoming class is going to be a bit larger than expected. Not sure how much larger, though, but quite a bit.
* - people they didn't expect to commit
Shit. Is this going to negatively effect employment?Chardee_MacDennis wrote:They had more seat deposits than expectedBaby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:So they accidentally let in too many people* from the outset?Chardee_MacDennis wrote:Rumor has it around here that the incoming class is going to be a bit larger than expected. Not sure how much larger, though, but quite a bit.
* - people they didn't expect to commit
Why would it affect employment?isuperserial wrote:Shit. Is this going to negatively effect employment?Chardee_MacDennis wrote:They had more seat deposits than expectedBaby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:So they accidentally let in too many people* from the outset?Chardee_MacDennis wrote:Rumor has it around here that the incoming class is going to be a bit larger than expected. Not sure how much larger, though, but quite a bit.
* - people they didn't expect to commit
More people competing for jobs - doesn't mean you're going to be competing for the exact same jobs. And I'm sure they've got a few dozen more deposits than anticipated and not HUNDREDS.isuperserial wrote:Shit. Is this going to negatively effect employment?Chardee_MacDennis wrote:They had more seat deposits than expectedBaby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:So they accidentally let in too many people* from the outset?Chardee_MacDennis wrote:Rumor has it around here that the incoming class is going to be a bit larger than expected. Not sure how much larger, though, but quite a bit.
* - people they didn't expect to commit
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Directly from admissionsYanky91 wrote:Where did you get this info from?Chardee_MacDennis wrote:They had more seat deposits than expectedBaby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:So they accidentally let in too many people* from the outset?Chardee_MacDennis wrote:Rumor has it around here that the incoming class is going to be a bit larger than expected. Not sure how much larger, though, but quite a bit.
* - people they didn't expect to commit
Further saturation in the Chicago area job market. Hypothetically, say there's 500 jobs for 600 students, that's much better odds than 500 jobs for 800 students. I think I just answered my own question.Chardee_MacDennis wrote:Why would it affect employment?isuperserial wrote:Shit. Is this going to negatively effect employment?Chardee_MacDennis wrote:They had more seat deposits than expectedBaby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:
So they accidentally let in too many people* from the outset?
* - people they didn't expect to commit
I think you're significantly overestimating the effect a few dozen students will have on job prospects. Not all of the increased class size will be eligible for OCI, let alone get jobs. This will have a minuscule affect.isuperserial wrote:Further saturation in the Chicago area job market. Hypothetically, say there's 500 jobs for 600 students, that's much better odds than 500 jobs for 800 students. I think I just answered my own question.Chardee_MacDennis wrote:
Why would it affect employment?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Chardee_MacDennis wrote:Where did you get this info from?Yanky91 wrote:
They had more seat deposits than expected
Our class is 172. The incoming class had about 180ish seat deposits, not all of whom will attend, and was only projected to be about 140-150.Yanky91 wrote:What was last years entering class? About 170? So this year would be what, 180?
Chardee_MacDennis wrote:Our class is 172. The incoming class had about 180ish seat deposits, not all of whom will attend, and was only projected to be about 140-150.Yanky91 wrote:What was last years entering class? About 170? So this year would be what, 180?
What this means: there will likely be very little WL movement. If you have other offers, I suggest you seriously consider them. If you're set on UIUC for whatever reason and can afford to sit out this cycle, retake, bump up your LSAT and re-apply.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
My class, 2016, has 172. The incoming class, 2017, was projected to be a bit less, but the school received more seat deposits than expected, probably provoked in part by a lower deposit amount (ours was $500).bugsy33 wrote:Chardee_MacDennis wrote:Our class is 172. The incoming class had about 180ish seat deposits, not all of whom will attend, and was only projected to be about 140-150.Yanky91 wrote:What was last years entering class? About 170? So this year would be what, 180?
What this means: there will likely be very little WL movement. If you have other offers, I suggest you seriously consider them. If you're set on UIUC for whatever reason and can afford to sit out this cycle, retake, bump up your LSAT and re-apply.
Who's class was projected to be 150? 2016 or 2017? Did 2017 have 180 deposits? I really think the fact that the deposit was only $250 encouraged a lot of people to lock in while they negotiate elsewhere.
IIRC, it's the same. 250D2142 wrote:How much is the may 23rd seat deposit going to be?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login