Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle) Forum
-
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 1:09 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Have any Held ED's heard anything?
- shifty_eyed
- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:09 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
They are probably too busy triple checking ScottRiqui's undergrad transcript to get to your app.grungy89 wrote:Wow, makes me wonder why I havent been dinged yet.yamsandmoreyams wrote:Got rejected today, it was my first. UTexas was kinda a reach, but I thought I'd apply anyway. Numbers are 166 3.4x. I applied around the end of September. Congrats to all who got in and good luck to everyone still waiting.
- TheJanitor6203
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
180shifty_eyed wrote:They are probably too busy triple checking ScottRiqui's undergrad transcript to get to your app.grungy89 wrote:Wow, makes me wonder why I havent been dinged yet.yamsandmoreyams wrote:Got rejected today, it was my first. UTexas was kinda a reach, but I thought I'd apply anyway. Numbers are 166 3.4x. I applied around the end of September. Congrats to all who got in and good luck to everyone still waiting.
- okok
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 6:07 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
are only in states or ED's getting scholly info ?
i hope this is the case
i hope this is the case
-
- Posts: 4075
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 11:49 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Did you get an acceptance packet?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 8:10 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I thought that UT's tuition was locked at a flat rate for 3 years and depended on your year of matriculation. E.g., Zuck will pay a lower tuition next year than those of us who begin next fall. Am I wrong?
- okok
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 6:07 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
yepcannibal ox wrote:Did you get an acceptance packet?
sans scholly
- shifty_eyed
- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:09 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I thought the same.HYSenberg wrote:I thought that UT's tuition was locked at a flat rate for 3 years and depended on your year of matriculation. E.g., Zuck will pay a lower tuition next year than those of us who begin next fall. Am I wrong?
-
- Posts: 4075
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 11:49 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Then I won't be racing home from work tomorrow to open mine. I didn't have a chance to speak to the Dean when I was accepted, otherwise I would have asked if the packet they were sending was going to have scholarship information in it.
Doesn't seem to be too many out-of-state acceptances so far either, so we can't really compare much.
Doesn't seem to be too many out-of-state acceptances so far either, so we can't really compare much.
- Mojosodope
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:33 am
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Scholarship usually comes week after acceptance lettercannibal ox wrote:Then I won't be racing home from work tomorrow to open mine. I didn't have a chance to speak to the Dean when I was accepted, otherwise I would have asked if the packet they were sending was going to have scholarship information in it.
Doesn't seem to be too many out-of-state acceptances so far either, so we can't really compare much.
-
- Posts: 4075
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 11:49 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Are you out-of-state with no mention of scholarship during the acceptance call or in the admission packet?
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I did too, but I couldn't find anything that says that on their website, nor could I get a straight answer from admissions. Maybe it's a "tuition is generally locked in but we reserve the right to raise it so we won't tell you that it is actually locked in so you don't get mad at us if we are broke and decide to squeeze you for more cash down the line" thing. 2Ls and 3Ls say its locked in so I guess we should just operate on that assumption.shifty_eyed wrote:I thought the same.HYSenberg wrote:I thought that UT's tuition was locked at a flat rate for 3 years and depended on your year of matriculation. E.g., Zuck will pay a lower tuition next year than those of us who begin next fall. Am I wrong?
For our class, they did not raise tuition from the year before (or, it was negligible if they did). Not sure what that means for the current crop of 0Ls. I wouldn't be surprised if it goes up because they seem to be more generous with "scholarships" lately, plus the class size is much smaller than it used to be. Hopefully not though.
- shifty_eyed
- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:09 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
http://www.utexas.edu/law/finaid/costs/ - it's a flat rate, so we're locked in.BigZuck wrote:I did too, but I couldn't find anything that says that on their website, nor could I get a straight answer from admissions. Maybe it's a "tuition is generally locked in but we reserve the right to raise it so we won't tell you that it is actually locked in so you don't get mad at us if we are broke and decide to squeeze you for more cash down the line" thing. 2Ls and 3Ls say its locked in so I guess we should just operate on that assumption.shifty_eyed wrote:I thought the same.HYSenberg wrote:I thought that UT's tuition was locked at a flat rate for 3 years and depended on your year of matriculation. E.g., Zuck will pay a lower tuition next year than those of us who begin next fall. Am I wrong?
For our class, they did not raise tuition from the year before (or, it was negligible if they did). Not sure what that means for the current crop of 0Ls. I wouldn't be surprised if it goes up because they seem to be more generous with "scholarships" lately, plus the class size is much smaller than it used to be. Hopefully not though.
From reading the Spivey thread, I wouldn't be surprised if UT decides to raise tuition while increasing scholarships so people think they're getting a better deal. It would have worked for me, I think lol.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 8:10 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I'm sitting at 3 weeks with no scholly letter yet and I'd be pretty surprised if they didn't offer me anything given that my LSAT is at their 75th.Mojosodope wrote:Scholarship usually comes week after acceptance lettercannibal ox wrote:Then I won't be racing home from work tomorrow to open mine. I didn't have a chance to speak to the Dean when I was accepted, otherwise I would have asked if the packet they were sending was going to have scholarship information in it.
Doesn't seem to be too many out-of-state acceptances so far either, so we can't really compare much.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I see the flat rate thing now. Don't remember seeing that before. I think I always keyed into the *subject to change and when I asked the question Dean Ingram gave me a confusing answer. But good to know.shifty_eyed wrote:http://www.utexas.edu/law/finaid/costs/ - it's a flat rate, so we're locked in.BigZuck wrote:I did too, but I couldn't find anything that says that on their website, nor could I get a straight answer from admissions. Maybe it's a "tuition is generally locked in but we reserve the right to raise it so we won't tell you that it is actually locked in so you don't get mad at us if we are broke and decide to squeeze you for more cash down the line" thing. 2Ls and 3Ls say its locked in so I guess we should just operate on that assumption.shifty_eyed wrote:I thought the same.HYSenberg wrote:I thought that UT's tuition was locked at a flat rate for 3 years and depended on your year of matriculation. E.g., Zuck will pay a lower tuition next year than those of us who begin next fall. Am I wrong?
For our class, they did not raise tuition from the year before (or, it was negligible if they did). Not sure what that means for the current crop of 0Ls. I wouldn't be surprised if it goes up because they seem to be more generous with "scholarships" lately, plus the class size is much smaller than it used to be. Hopefully not though.
From reading the Spivey thread, I wouldn't be surprised if UT decides to raise tuition while increasing scholarships so people think they're getting a better deal. It would have worked for me, I think lol.
For people considering UT, getting locked in to one tuition rate is pretty sweet. Lots of schools, especially the super expensive ones, go up a few percentage points every year and that can mean thousands of dollars. It's really getting out of hand.
Also, out of state tuition at UT is 50K? YIKES.
- grungy89
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 1:05 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Do you feel better?shifty_eyed wrote:They are probably too busy triple checking ScottRiqui's undergrad transcript to get to your app.grungy89 wrote:Wow, makes me wonder why I havent been dinged yet.yamsandmoreyams wrote:Got rejected today, it was my first. UTexas was kinda a reach, but I thought I'd apply anyway. Numbers are 166 3.4x. I applied around the end of September. Congrats to all who got in and good luck to everyone still waiting.
- ScottRiqui
- Posts: 3633
- Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:09 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Yeah, it's time to let this one die. It was a disruption to the thread in the first place, and grungy and I have been cool for a while now anyway.grungy89 wrote:Do you feel better?shifty_eyed wrote:They are probably too busy triple checking ScottRiqui's undergrad transcript to get to your app.grungy89 wrote:Wow, makes me wonder why I havent been dinged yet.yamsandmoreyams wrote:Got rejected today, it was my first. UTexas was kinda a reach, but I thought I'd apply anyway. Numbers are 166 3.4x. I applied around the end of September. Congrats to all who got in and good luck to everyone still waiting.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- TheJanitor6203
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
It was still funny.
Carry on.
Carry on.
- WokeUpInACar
- Posts: 5542
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:11 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
You guys are no fun.
- ScottRiqui
- Posts: 3633
- Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:09 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
(Yeah, it was)TheJanitor6203 wrote:It was still funny.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:59 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
hey guys, just checking in! Accepted yesterday afternoon via a really nice voicemail. Texas resident, non-URM. Just below 75th percentile on GPA and LSAT. I'm so excited! Hopefully I'll see a lot of y'all there 

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ScottRiqui
- Posts: 3633
- Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:09 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Congrats! Were you RD or ED?jmaul21 wrote:hey guys, just checking in! Accepted yesterday afternoon via a really nice voicemail. Texas resident, non-URM. Just below 75th percentile on GPA and LSAT. I'm so excited! Hopefully I'll see a lot of y'all there
- okok
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 6:07 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
yepcannibal ox wrote:Are you out-of-state with no mention of scholarship during the acceptance call or in the admission packet?
- Attax
- Posts: 3589
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Not sure if that's what it means for the law school/if they're related, but I can speak on the locked in for the Undergrad stuff at least as it may carry over. As an undergrad (so may be 100% unrelated), they set a flat rate for full time, any classes more than that and you don't pay extra, so I pay the same for 12 hours as an UG as I would for 18 hours. It has varied year to year as tuition increases are implemented, however.shifty_eyed wrote:http://www.utexas.edu/law/finaid/costs/ - it's a flat rate, so we're locked in.BigZuck wrote:I did too, but I couldn't find anything that says that on their website, nor could I get a straight answer from admissions. Maybe it's a "tuition is generally locked in but we reserve the right to raise it so we won't tell you that it is actually locked in so you don't get mad at us if we are broke and decide to squeeze you for more cash down the line" thing. 2Ls and 3Ls say its locked in so I guess we should just operate on that assumption.shifty_eyed wrote:I thought the same.HYSenberg wrote:I thought that UT's tuition was locked at a flat rate for 3 years and depended on your year of matriculation. E.g., Zuck will pay a lower tuition next year than those of us who begin next fall. Am I wrong?
For our class, they did not raise tuition from the year before (or, it was negligible if they did). Not sure what that means for the current crop of 0Ls. I wouldn't be surprised if it goes up because they seem to be more generous with "scholarships" lately, plus the class size is much smaller than it used to be. Hopefully not though.
From reading the Spivey thread, I wouldn't be surprised if UT decides to raise tuition while increasing scholarships so people think they're getting a better deal. It would have worked for me, I think lol.
- shifty_eyed
- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:09 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Just double checked, and it is different for law (and other grad programs).Attax wrote: Not sure if that's what it means for the law school/if they're related, but I can speak on the locked in for the Undergrad stuff at least as it may carry over. As an undergrad (so may be 100% unrelated), they set a flat rate for full time, any classes more than that and you don't pay extra, so I pay the same for 12 hours as an UG as I would for 18 hours. It has varied year to year as tuition increases are implemented, however.
http://www.utexas.edu/tuition/faq.html#6
http://www.utexas.edu/business/accounti ... fall13.pdfTuition Costs FAQ wrote:Graduate and professional program flat rate is based on the student's area of study, residency and the first semester the student was enrolled in the graduate or professional program. Graduate and professional program flat rate is indexed to the number of semester credit hours taken and does not have a cap.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login