UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014) Forum

Serett · Post by **Serett** » Mon Dec 16, 2013 6:58 pm

CookieDough wrote:
Serett wrote:Accepted by phone today.
Stats?

PM'd you!

blink · Post by **blink** » Mon Dec 16, 2013 7:57 pm

In today via phone call with $$!!

joshringu · Post by **joshringu** » Mon Dec 16, 2013 8:25 pm

Congrats!!

gbelle · Post by **gbelle** » Tue Dec 17, 2013 1:28 pm

COMPLETE!!!

blink · Post by **blink** » Tue Dec 17, 2013 1:46 pm

joshringu wrote:Congrats!! What were your stats?

PM'd

052220151 · Post by **052220151** » Tue Dec 17, 2013 3:00 pm

blink wrote:
joshringu wrote:Congrats!! What were your stats?
PM'd

I'm also interested, would you mind pming me?

Mariposa28 · Post by **Mariposa28** » Tue Dec 17, 2013 4:08 pm

I was admitted last week, just got my letter today. I am kind of concerned I have not heard anything about scholarships. I did have a very fast admit time (about 10 days from when I submitted), so that is possibly the cause? Or it could be my stats. I'm at 165/4.1/URM...does anybody know if that would be strong enough to receive a merit scholarship?

blink · Post by **blink** » Tue Dec 17, 2013 4:16 pm

deputydog wrote:
blink wrote:
joshringu wrote:Congrats!! What were your stats?
PM'd
I'm also interested, would you mind pming me?

Done

tigress12 · Post by **tigress12** » Tue Dec 17, 2013 6:56 pm

nugnoy · Post by **nugnoy** » Tue Dec 17, 2013 6:58 pm

accepted some time ago. I'm the exemplary splitter. Feel free to PM me if you have any questions!

angels2fly · Post by **angels2fly** » Tue Dec 17, 2013 6:59 pm

Is it true that UCLA won't wait for a new score if they don't think you are borderline without a retake?

samoby · Post by **samoby** » Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:08 pm

angels2fly wrote:Is it true that UCLA won't wait for a new score if they don't think you are borderline without a retake?

I don't know, but it does say pretty explicitly in the application received email that, regardless of whether or not you have a score on file, if you are registered to take the exam again or have a pending score, they will not mark your file as complete or review it until they receive the new score. I'm assuming they aren't just saying that, but I don't know for sure. Has anyone received a decision while waiting on a pending score?

phillywc · Post by **phillywc** » Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:16 pm

Checking in, just applied. 173 LSAT, just over 25% GPA.

Kimikho · Post by **Kimikho** » Tue Dec 17, 2013 9:19 pm

phillywc wrote:Checking in, just applied. 173 LSAT, just over 25% GPA.

welcome.

phillywc · Post by **phillywc** » Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:06 am

scoobers wrote:
phillywc wrote:Checking in, just applied. 173 LSAT, just over 25% GPA.
welcome.

Ty, ty. I've heard UCLA has awesome an admissions office.

Kimikho · Post by **Kimikho** » Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:32 am

phillywc wrote:
scoobers wrote:
phillywc wrote:Checking in, just applied. 173 LSAT, just over 25% GPA.
welcome.
Ty, ty. I've heard UCLA has awesome an admissions office.

it is FANTASTIC. top two for sure, maybe even top one.

blink · Post by **blink** » Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:38 am

scoobers wrote:
phillywc wrote:
scoobers wrote:
phillywc wrote:Checking in, just applied. 173 LSAT, just over 25% GPA.
welcome.
Ty, ty. I've heard UCLA has awesome an admissions office.
it is FANTASTIC. top two for sure, maybe even top one.

2nd cycle?

kkdk · Post by **kkdk** » Wed Dec 18, 2013 2:27 am

Admitted w/ serious scholly on 12/12, went complete 11/20. Found out via e-mail because I don't have a reliable phone number. And to think, I was close to not even applying...

wowhio · Post by **wowhio** » Wed Dec 18, 2013 2:50 am

kkdk wrote:Admitted w/ serious scholly on 12/12, went complete 11/20. Found out via e-mail because I don't have a reliable phone number. And to think, I was close to not even applying...

Did they include money about your scholarship in the email?

kkdk · Post by **kkdk** » Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:57 am

wowhio wrote:
kkdk wrote:Admitted w/ serious scholly on 12/12, went complete 11/20. Found out via e-mail because I don't have a reliable phone number. And to think, I was close to not even applying...
Did they include money about your scholarship in the email?

Yup 105k. I was pleasantly, but extremely surprised.

Pishee77 · Post by **Pishee77** » Wed Dec 18, 2013 6:15 am

kkdk wrote:
wowhio wrote:
kkdk wrote:Admitted w/ serious scholly on 12/12, went complete 11/20. Found out via e-mail because I don't have a reliable phone number. And to think, I was close to not even applying...
Did they include money about your scholarship in the email?
Yup 105k. I was pleasantly, but extremely surprised.

Stats?

Pishee77 · Post by **Pishee77** » Wed Dec 18, 2013 6:16 am

Mariposa28 wrote:I was admitted last week, just got my letter today. I am kind of concerned I have not heard anything about scholarships. I did have a very fast admit time (about 10 days from when I submitted), so that is possibly the cause? Or it could be my stats. I'm at 165/4.1/URM...does anybody know if that would be strong enough to receive a merit scholarship?

My scholarship letter came with my admissions package. I would email them later once you have scholarship to peer schools and ask. You can ask now too.

akkirk · Post by **akkirk** » Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:50 pm

Denied today through email. Early Decision, 167 LSAT 3.6GPA (3.93 degree GPA). Also, multiple strong letters and strong softs. I am extremely disappointed and honestly a tad shocked. At a law school fair, I spoke with an admissions counselor from UCLA who said I "had nothing to worry about." Nonetheless, I guess you can never predict admissions!

phillywc · Post by **phillywc** » Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:56 pm

akkirk wrote:Denied today through email. Early Decision, 167 LSAT 3.6GPA (3.93 degree GPA). Also, multiple strong letters and strong softs. I am extremely disappointed and honestly a tad shocked. At a law school fair, I spoke with an admissions counselor from UCLA who said I "had nothing to worry about." Nonetheless, I guess you can never predict admissions!

That's.... surprising. Review your application, you may have a major error.

Serett · Post by **Serett** » Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:58 pm

Sorry to hear, I'm shocked with you , doubly so that they didn't at least roll you over or WL you

UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014) Forum

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Register for access!

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Register now!

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Seriously? What are you waiting for?