Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- smokeylarue
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:55 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Wait does speeding ticket seriously count as a crime? I didn't include those. Something tells me its not the end of the world but...
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by jim-green on Sun Nov 20, 2011 10:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:00 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
That's a bit ridiculous. I'm sure a 2 sentence addendum for a parking ticket will suffice.
-
- Posts: 944
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 2:17 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Crap. I guess I should disclose tickets too.
- Cornelius
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 3:16 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Parking tickets? Ugh. I got 2 like 6 years ago. Do you just email admissions and ask them to update your file? Do you send a new word doc with the new C&F explanation?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:08 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I feel like even if a parking ticket/speeding ticket is a "crime" in PA, the matter of if it's a crime in the state in which it occurred is more important. But, I would disclose everything because it's not going to matter anyway.
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by jim-green on Sun Nov 20, 2011 10:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
AFAIK Penn does not need traffic violation addenda. None of the T14 do (supposedly). It's a civil offense, not a criminal one
-
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:13 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah, I doubt they want to read 5,000 addenda, all going something like, "This one time, five years ago, I forgot to put money in a parking meter." Really, disclosing parking tickets?
-
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:55 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
agreed. It probably varies by state, but to my knowledge in most states it is a civil infraction, not a misdemeanor. However, in some states it might become a misdemeanor in extreme cases, like 100mph in a 25mph school zone. you should see what the law is in your state.
It would seem to me that it could actually hurt you if you declare what is a civil infraction if they only ask for misdemeanors and felonies. It raises the question, "Were you just too lazy to google the law in your state?"
It would seem to me that it could actually hurt you if you declare what is a civil infraction if they only ask for misdemeanors and felonies. It raises the question, "Were you just too lazy to google the law in your state?"
-
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:55 pm
- Cornelius
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 3:16 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
A good number of schools ask for speeding type tickets. A huge number of people have those.anewaphorist wrote:Yeah, I doubt they want to read 5,000 addenda, all going something like, "This one time, five years ago, I forgot to put money in a parking meter." Really, disclosing parking tickets?
-
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:13 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Moving vs. non-moving violations makes a big difference. And, fair enough, my knowledge is admittedly restricted to the T-14 applications.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Cornelius
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 3:16 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Agreed, I'm just saying that I doubt the number of people who would need to include an addendum is a factor. It's not like it really makes a difference, I sent a quick update to schools that I originally sent a C&F addendum to for my moving violations updating it and saying something along the lines of "I was made aware parking tickets may need to be disclosed too, so to err on the side of caution and comply with full disclosure, I'm updating my C&F with these parking tickets."anewaphorist wrote:Moving vs. non-moving violations makes a big difference. And, fair enough, my knowledge is admittedly restricted to the T-14 applications.
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by jim-green on Sun Nov 20, 2011 10:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by jim-green on Sun Nov 20, 2011 10:04 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:13 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I guess the question is, do you think adcoms are going to take a lack of disclosure as evidence of mens rea or simply as oversight of what is by all accounts a minor, non-criminal offense? The kind of person who would intend to deceive an adcom by withholding parking and non-criminal moving violations is a weird one indeed.
EDIT: I suppose if you contributed to an accident or something, then that would be grounds for revealing the incident. But for those of us who were merely caught speeding 5 years ago at 20 over the limit, I doubt there'll be any issue at all.
EDIT: I suppose if you contributed to an accident or something, then that would be grounds for revealing the incident. But for those of us who were merely caught speeding 5 years ago at 20 over the limit, I doubt there'll be any issue at all.
Last edited by anewaphorist on Wed Nov 02, 2011 5:19 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by jim-green on Sun Nov 20, 2011 10:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I did not disclose any traffic tickets. Don't need to. You can call admissions and ask for peace of mind but you do not need to disclose summary traffic tickets. You can of course get more serious offenses from traffic (DUI, reckless endangerment, etc.).
Edit: Crimes are listed in PA code under Title 18. Traffic is under Title 75. The only one I would consider disclosing under Title 75 is §3802 DUI.
Edit: Crimes are listed in PA code under Title 18. Traffic is under Title 75. The only one I would consider disclosing under Title 75 is §3802 DUI.
Last edited by r6_philly on Wed Nov 02, 2011 9:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
!
Last edited by jim-green on Sun Nov 20, 2011 10:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
No problem. I think if you have been convicted of a crime, like the application asks, you would knowjim-green wrote:Whew, thanks!r6_philly wrote:I did not disclose any traffic tickets. Don't need to. You can call admissions and ask for peace of mind but you do not need to disclose summary traffic tickets. You can of course get more serious offenses from traffic (DUI, reckless endangerment, etc.). In PA statutes, crimes are under title 18 and traffic under title 75, so technically traffic violations are statutory violations, not crimes.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
wish I had gone back to this thread 10 minutes ago. I just sent an email to Penn asking if they want traffic tix addendar6_philly wrote:No problem. I think if you have been convicted of a crime, like the application asks, you would knowjim-green wrote:Whew, thanks!r6_philly wrote:I did not disclose any traffic tickets. Don't need to. You can call admissions and ask for peace of mind but you do not need to disclose summary traffic tickets. You can of course get more serious offenses from traffic (DUI, reckless endangerment, etc.). In PA statutes, crimes are under title 18 and traffic under title 75, so technically traffic violations are statutory violations, not crimes.

- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
never mind, I guess I sent it to an automated and unmonitered email address. That works. Thanks R6
-
- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
haha good timing!JamMasterJ wrote:never mind, I guess I sent it to an automated and unmonitered email address. That works. Thanks R6
BTW you guys should feel free to call the admin office with whatever questions you have. The ladies at the desk are very very nice. If you guys ever come in to visit you would see.
- 80eight
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:18 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Actually though, I did email Penn about this a few days ago, and their response was:
"In furtherance of full disclosure, we recommend briefly detailing any traffic violations, including speeding tickets."
"In furtherance of full disclosure, we recommend briefly detailing any traffic violations, including speeding tickets."
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login