Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread Forum
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 12:44 am
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
I wanna join!!! Where do I apply?!?! Do you offer fee waivers?
Hi. I'm 171/sub. 3.3.
Hi. I'm 171/sub. 3.3.
-
- Posts: 1645
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
Lady Heather wrote:I wanna join!!! Where do I apply?!?! Do you offer fee waivers?
Hi. I'm 171/sub. 3.3.



- DoctorNick189
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 7:21 pm
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
2.99/176. Let's do this.
- Philo38
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 10:21 am
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
Has anybody read Ivey's book on law school admissions? It is interesting, she claims that applying early in the cycle allows for the admisions people to fully consider all of the elements of your application (including a less than desirable transcript) but that later in the cycle they are more and more concerned with thier USNews rankings and the numbers game. Should we take this to mean that it may actually be better for someone with a great LSAT, a mediocre transcript, and mediocre softs, to apply later?
I know everyone will say apply as early as possible but anyway . . . interesting none the less.
I know everyone will say apply as early as possible but anyway . . . interesting none the less.
-
- Posts: 7445
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:47 am
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
Philo38 wrote:Has anybody read Ivey's book on law school admissions? It is interesting, she claims that applying early in the cycle allows for the admisions people to fully consider all of the elements of your application (including a less than desirable transcript) but that later in the cycle they are more and more concerned with thier USNews rankings and the numbers game. Should we take this to mean that it may actually be better for someone with a great LSAT, a mediocre transcript, and mediocre softs, to apply later?
I know everyone will say apply as early as possible but anyway . . . interesting none the less.
NO! A late app for splitters=admissions suicide. It's more important for splitters to apply early.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Philo38
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 10:21 am
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
I know this is right. But, it still intrigues me a bit, she paints the picture of admissions officers who have a picture of the numbers of that particular cycle later in the game so, it stands to reason, if there is a school that is later in the cycle and realizes that they need to get thier LSAT scores up they would start being more lenient on the GPAs. I guess this could go the other way as well though.Dwaterman86 wrote:Philo38 wrote:Has anybody read Ivey's book on law school admissions? It is interesting, she claims that applying early in the cycle allows for the admisions people to fully consider all of the elements of your application (including a less than desirable transcript) but that later in the cycle they are more and more concerned with thier USNews rankings and the numbers game. Should we take this to mean that it may actually be better for someone with a great LSAT, a mediocre transcript, and mediocre softs, to apply later?
I know everyone will say apply as early as possible but anyway . . . interesting none the less.
NO! A late app for splitters=admissions suicide. It's more important for splitters to apply early.
- nyyankees
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:50 am
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
empirical data > anna iveyPhilo38 wrote:I know this is right. But, it still intrigues me a bit, she paints the picture of admissions officers who have a picture of the numbers of that particular cycle later in the game so, it stands to reason, if there is a school that is later in the cycle and realizes that they need to get thier LSAT scores up they would start being more lenient on the GPAs. I guess this could go the other way as well though.Dwaterman86 wrote:Philo38 wrote:Has anybody read Ivey's book on law school admissions? It is interesting, she claims that applying early in the cycle allows for the admisions people to fully consider all of the elements of your application (including a less than desirable transcript) but that later in the cycle they are more and more concerned with thier USNews rankings and the numbers game. Should we take this to mean that it may actually be better for someone with a great LSAT, a mediocre transcript, and mediocre softs, to apply later?
I know everyone will say apply as early as possible but anyway . . . interesting none the less.
NO! A late app for splitters=admissions suicide. It's more important for splitters to apply early.
- Encyclopedia Brown
- Posts: 595
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 7:25 am
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
Speaking of applying early, when will you guys have everything submitted? Where (if anywhere) are you ED'ing?
- missvik218
- Posts: 1103
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 11:45 am
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
If the ad comms really fudge up their classes I suppose it COULD go both ways ... but since this is basically a support group I'm going to go ahead and suggest you not test this hypothesis. The earlier the better for us!Philo38 wrote: I know this is right. But, it still intrigues me a bit, she paints the picture of admissions officers who have a picture of the numbers of that particular cycle later in the game so, it stands to reason, if there is a school that is later in the cycle and realizes that they need to get thier LSAT scores up they would start being more lenient on the GPAs. I guess this could go the other way as well though.
- Splittsburgh
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 4:34 pm
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
I'm in: 176, 3.2.
Basically peppering the t20-YHSB with apps as early as possible. We'll see...
Basically peppering the t20-YHSB with apps as early as possible. We'll see...
- Encyclopedia Brown
- Posts: 595
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 7:25 am
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
Just wanted to say I love your username.Splittsburgh wrote:I'm in: 176, 3.2.
Basically peppering the t20-YHSB with apps as early as possible. We'll see...
- xanderdellus
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 11:58 am
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
169 and below 3 (in 1997). I have two graduate degrees (3.8 and 4.0) and have worked as a professional actor, director and acting teacher.
Most of my apps are in Berkley and Columbia (fee waiver) and a spattering all the way down to UTenn. Debating some lower ranked schools and hoping for $$. Also debating a retake to see if I can grab a point or two. Just sent in GWU for ED.
Most of my apps are in Berkley and Columbia (fee waiver) and a spattering all the way down to UTenn. Debating some lower ranked schools and hoping for $$. Also debating a retake to see if I can grab a point or two. Just sent in GWU for ED.
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
I myself applied to about 15 schools. Most of them in the top 15. Low chances with my 3.1/168 but what the hell.
ED to UCLA.
Hopefully working my ass off to become Director of IT, and my upward trending GPA while working throughout my entire collegiate life will pull through.
ED to UCLA.
Hopefully working my ass off to become Director of IT, and my upward trending GPA while working throughout my entire collegiate life will pull through.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1645
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
You're misunderstanding the point she was trying to make. How'd you do on the LSAT?Philo38 wrote:Has anybody read Ivey's book on law school admissions? It is interesting, she claims that applying early in the cycle allows for the admisions people to fully consider all of the elements of your application (including a less than desirable transcript) but that later in the cycle they are more and more concerned with thier USNews rankings and the numbers game. Should we take this to mean that it may actually be better for someone with a great LSAT, a mediocre transcript, and mediocre softs, to apply later?
I know everyone will say apply as early as possible but anyway . . . interesting none the less.

But seriously, she was trying to say that early in the application season school don't have to worry as much about medians, and are therefore more likely to accept splitters that they like via LORs, PS, etc. Later in the application season, school are extremely worried about medians and although they may like a splitter they come across and may be tempted by her 174 there will at best WL her bc they don't want their median GPA to drop from 3.76 to 3.69 because they admitted a 3.1.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:36 am
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
I honestly just don't see how a late app could be beneficial as a result of adcomms realizing late in the cycle that they need a couple more high LSAT scores. Based on past history, most of us will wind up on several waitlists. Maybe I'm not completely familiar with how the processes work in admissions offices, but if they did need some more high LSAT scores, why not just pull them off the waitlist? I suppose there is a possibility that a school that would've outright dinged you earlier could be scrambling for a high LSAT, but this seems extremely unlikely.Philo38 wrote:I know this is right. But, it still intrigues me a bit, she paints the picture of admissions officers who have a picture of the numbers of that particular cycle later in the game so, it stands to reason, if there is a school that is later in the cycle and realizes that they need to get thier LSAT scores up they would start being more lenient on the GPAs. I guess this could go the other way as well though.Dwaterman86 wrote:Philo38 wrote:Has anybody read Ivey's book on law school admissions? It is interesting, she claims that applying early in the cycle allows for the admisions people to fully consider all of the elements of your application (including a less than desirable transcript) but that later in the cycle they are more and more concerned with thier USNews rankings and the numbers game. Should we take this to mean that it may actually be better for someone with a great LSAT, a mediocre transcript, and mediocre softs, to apply later?
I know everyone will say apply as early as possible but anyway . . . interesting none the less.
NO! A late app for splitters=admissions suicide. It's more important for splitters to apply early.
- NancyBotwin
- Posts: 1084
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:43 pm
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
We have almost identical numbers!missvik218 wrote:YAY me too!! 3.02/169
I'm applying to 20 schools, mostly in the top 30 with a few lower ones because I'm afraid of not getting in anywhere. I've gotten 7 good (and several not-so-good) fee waivers so far - UVA, Minn, UCLA, BU, W&M, Colorado, and Northwestern (not using the UCLA one, though - I don't want to live in LA).
I also have 5 years of work experience both during/after undergrad, and a huge upward trend.
Woo splitters!
- Philo38
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 10:21 am
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
Yeah, I guess I'm focusing also on the fact that I have weak softs. I'm not going to apply late obviously but just because it's intesting, I figure if near the end of the cycle some schools need to improve thier GPA median, and other need to improve thier LSAT median, the schools that need to improve thier LSAT median are more likely to overlook my lack of softs and low GPA and hone in on the 171.hopefulundergrad wrote:You're misunderstanding the point she was trying to make. How'd you do on the LSAT?Philo38 wrote:Has anybody read Ivey's book on law school admissions? It is interesting, she claims that applying early in the cycle allows for the admisions people to fully consider all of the elements of your application (including a less than desirable transcript) but that later in the cycle they are more and more concerned with thier USNews rankings and the numbers game. Should we take this to mean that it may actually be better for someone with a great LSAT, a mediocre transcript, and mediocre softs, to apply later?
I know everyone will say apply as early as possible but anyway . . . interesting none the less.![]()
But seriously, she was trying to say that early in the application season school don't have to worry as much about medians, and are therefore more likely to accept splitters that they like via LORs, PS, etc. Later in the application season, school are extremely worried about medians and although they may like a splitter they come across and may be tempted by her 174 there will at best WL her bc they don't want their median GPA to drop from 3.76 to 3.69 because they admitted a 3.1.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:19 pm
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
2.8, then 9 years of engineering work, then a 175.
Pipe dreams of Berkeley/Stanford, but I'll apply anywhere I get a fee waiver, as well as schools in Canada. Not sure if I want to deal with getting a degree and then do the equivalency to come back to Canada.
Pipe dreams of Berkeley/Stanford, but I'll apply anywhere I get a fee waiver, as well as schools in Canada. Not sure if I want to deal with getting a degree and then do the equivalency to come back to Canada.
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 12:44 am
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
I hope to have all of my applications in this weekend. I keep waiting for [every one of] my LORs to get processed and hoping for a fee waiver (or five). I'm nauseous that I haven't applied already.Encyclopedia Brown wrote:Speaking of applying early, when will you guys have everything submitted? Where (if anywhere) are you ED'ing?

- ontologyfail
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:53 pm
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
174, 3.4 here, going with the over 75th/under 25th definition of splitter. 3 yrs WE, grad degree. Currently agonizing over my PS and additional essays, even though I know they rarely make a difference. The downside of turning everything in early is that it just makes our wait times that much longer. If last year was any indication, I'll be spending most of the spring and summer waiting to hear back from schools that waitlisted me 

-
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:17 pm
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
That's not [necessarily] how medians work; lucky for you, no math section on the LSAT.hopefulundergrad wrote:they don't want their median GPA to drop from 3.76 to 3.69 because they admitted a 3.1.
175/3.16 here.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 12:44 am
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
This. Median is not the same as mean. The median is defined as the middle value in a set or distribution. The mean is defined as the average of a numerical set. Example:oneforship wrote:That's not [necessarily] how medians work; lucky for you, no math section on the LSAT.hopefulundergrad wrote:they don't want their median GPA to drop from 3.76 to 3.69 because they admitted a 3.1.
Yale has a GPA median of 3.90. The middle 50% GPA of students attending Yale had a 3.81-3.97 UGPA. Yale could accept someone with a 2.0 GPA and it would not affect the median unless Yale accepted A LOT of people with 2.0 GPAs. As a matter of fact, so long as the GPA for the middle 50% of people attending Yale remained 3.81-3.97, 25% of people attending Yale could actually have a 2.0 UGPA without changing the median.
Does this make sense? There's a reason why I don't tutor anyone in anything: I am not a good teacher.
- Tangerine Gleam
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:50 pm
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
Despite OP's cutoffs, I definitely am a splitter at a lot of my targets using the 25/75 rule.
3.5x/172, applying to most of the T14.
Laboring over my PS all week...my personal app deadline is 5 or 6 days away!
Good luck everyone...
3.5x/172, applying to most of the T14.
Laboring over my PS all week...my personal app deadline is 5 or 6 days away!
Good luck everyone...
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:45 am
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
I'm in the same range as Desert Fox...
2.85/175 (starting off as a mech eng. major killed me, finished with a psych degree)
5 years work experience, mostly in pro-sports marketing.
I got a Columbia fee waiver, so why not. Hoping for GULC and applying to mostly T14. And what do ya'll consider "safety schools"?
No Yankees fans! GO PHILLIES!
2.85/175 (starting off as a mech eng. major killed me, finished with a psych degree)
5 years work experience, mostly in pro-sports marketing.
I got a Columbia fee waiver, so why not. Hoping for GULC and applying to mostly T14. And what do ya'll consider "safety schools"?
No Yankees fans! GO PHILLIES!
-
- Posts: 1645
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: Splitters Unite! - Official 2010 Splitter Thread
Does a 3.1 and 3.76 even average to a 3.69?Lady Heather wrote:This. Median is not the same as mean. The median is defined as the middle value in a set or distribution. The mean is defined as the average of a numerical set. Example:oneforship wrote:That's not [necessarily] how medians work; lucky for you, no math section on the LSAT.hopefulundergrad wrote:they don't want their median GPA to drop from 3.76 to 3.69 because they admitted a 3.1.
Yale has a GPA median of 3.90. The middle 50% GPA of students attending Yale had a 3.81-3.97 UGPA. Yale could accept someone with a 2.0 GPA and it would not affect the median unless Yale accepted A LOT of people with 2.0 GPAs. As a matter of fact, so long as the GPA for the middle 50% of people attending Yale remained 3.81-3.97, 25% of people attending Yale could actually have a 2.0 UGPA without changing the median.
Does this make sense? There's a reason why I don't tutor anyone in anything: I am not a good teacher.
If a school has admitted 50 students and then 26th highest GPA (roughly median, I don't know whether schools average the two middle GPAs if they have an even number of students) is 3.76 and then the school admits one more person with a 3.1 and now the 26th highest (and true median) GPA is a 3.69.
That was the point I was trying to make.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login