I'll posit an answer. Most derive meaning in their sad lives from the fact that they got a 170. They think this means they are somehow special and entitled to sheer awe. I go to a school where pretty much everyone scored around 170... we're not that special. Also, the ppl who didn't get a 170 but got into Cornell derive their pleasure from thinking that their school is better than X number of schools simply because USNEWS ranked it more highly. The whole thing is actually so sad and pathetic. Their bubble will almost certainly burst about mid-way through first semester.SoxyPirate wrote:Here on TLS
US News's Top 14
Is all that matters
Beyond T14
TLS'ers recommend
to go fist oneself
How could it be true
that so many smart people
are such f*cknuggets
thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help! Forum
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:33 pm
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
Of course I'm right about it being a matter of expectations. The usefulness of an investment is proportional to not just the expected benefit, but to available alternatives. My point is that for most law students, the alternative is not a $60k+ job with room for growth. 85% of most law students majored in something that doesn't involve math. Unless they went to an Ivy or graduated with a 4.0, their prospects are far closer to the $30k figure than the $60k one. Going to a strong Tier1, graduating with less than $90k in debt, and getting a $60k job is a perfectly sensible thing to do.LawandOrder wrote:You certainly are right about it being a case of difference of expectations and outlook on life. You consider $60k starting plus low debt as at least not failing, but if I am going to invest $150,000 in debt plus a similiar forgone amount in income from the three years spent in law school, I think I am fully justified in expecting a job paying deep in to the $100s starting.
I guess I don't get it. I am about a year out of undergrad with one of those "practical majors" making closer to 60 than to 30 and I certainly don't feel like I've succeeded. Why would I want to go to law school and end up in the same position I am now? That's a massive waste of time and money.
There is also something to be said about there being more to life than money. I made more than your median lawyer before I even got my BS. Law school will be a huge opportunity cost, but I'll consider myself successful if I just even make par with what my salary would've been if I had just stayed at my job. Because, frankly, I'd rather be a lawyer than an engineer, even if it is going to cost me almost $200k to make the transition.
- dresden doll
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:11 am
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
I heart rayiner for regularly injecting a dosage of sense into threads in dire need of such medicine.
- LawandOrder
- Posts: 591
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:36 pm
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
I don't know, I get flamed pretty hard when I talk about T14/Else. Good to know that at least some see it in the same way that I do.SoxyPirate wrote:Here on TLS
US News's Top 14
Is all that matters
Beyond T14
TLS'ers recommend
to go fist oneself
How could it be true
that so many smart people
are such f*cknuggets
- MissMaroon
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:01 am
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
Don't listen to these people. Like every other decision in life, choosing a law school is a personal one. If you have family and an affordable lifestyle enticing you to go to the Tier 4 school and if those are your priorities, then go there. Honestly, a JD is a JD, and if you truly want to be a lawyer, you just need that degree. I think that outside T-30 or so, you need to have a compelling interest in practicing in that region because otherwise, you probably won't be making big money. But then again, who says money and a soul-sucking corporate job is all everyone is looking for. Basically, if you know what you want to do and know that you can achieve it at the Tier 4 school, don't let any elitists here convince you its not good enough.
Good luck
Good luck
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- FrenchiePatootie
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:27 pm
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
Hmmm...sorta. Sure, you can have a JD but if it can't get you a job, then you're not really a lawyer.MissMaroon wrote:Honestly, a JD is a JD, and if you truly want to be a lawyer, you just need that degree.
- The Evil Genius
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 3:07 pm
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
+1LawandOrder wrote:You certainly are right about it being a case of difference of expectations and outlook on life. You consider $60k starting plus low debt as at least not failing, but if I am going to invest $150,000 in debt plus a similiar forgone amount in income from the three years spent in law school, I think I am fully justified in expecting a job paying deep in to the $100s starting.rayiner wrote:It's hardly Cravath or out.LawandOrder wrote:Because Cravath is just itching to get all the laterals from SmallLaw that couldn't make the cut the first time around?
Yes, if you miss the biglaw cut-off, biglaw is probably out for good, but $60k starting plus low debt is hardly failure at life.
Your contention that non-T14s aren't worth full ride is silly. Even if you're highly risk-averse, anything down to USC is at least worth sticker (unless you think you can't even place 2/3!). With some $$, the whole T50 is worth going to.
You seem to think that most law students have rosy prospects outside of the law with their UG degree. It's some major "grass is greener" mentality. If you have an Ivy degree or a practical major, you might be looking at $50k+ with just your UG. If you don't, then it's more like $30k. At that point, a $60k starting salary + little debt has gotta look pretty good.
I guess I don't get it. I am about a year out of undergrad with one of those "practical majors" making closer to 60 than to 30 and I certainly don't feel like I've succeeded. Why would I want to go to law school and end up in the same position I am now? That's a massive waste of time and money.
My base salary is in the low 60 region (on a 40 hour week) with no responsibiilty or stress, and I up my salary another 10-20k with overtime each year. Why would I invest in law school to get out making the same (or less) working more hours and with more responsibility. BigLaw or bust.
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:39 pm
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
I agree with Law and Order. In fact, I wouldn't even recommend attending a 7-14 without some kind of $$$ in this economy.
- apper123
- Posts: 981
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 11:50 pm
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
Many of the people on this thread, and on this board for that matter, talk about the law industry like biglaw is the only thing that exists. Sure, if you want to practice biglaw and biglaw only, then maybe going to a tier 2 isn't such a great idea. Thankfully, I'd say most people who go to law school don't go with biglaw aspirations. I know I'm not.
I'm going to law school because I want to be a lawyer, not because I want to get rich. If I just wanted to go to grad school to get rich, I'd go to med school.
I'm going to law school because I want to be a lawyer, not because I want to get rich. If I just wanted to go to grad school to get rich, I'd go to med school.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 10:17 am
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
Thank u for your positive perspective and using this topic to reply about the ?s I asked. Thanx!!MissMaroon wrote:Don't listen to these people. Like every other decision in life, choosing a law school is a personal one. If you have family and an affordable lifestyle enticing you to go to the Tier 4 school and if those are your priorities, then go there. Honestly, a JD is a JD, and if you truly want to be a lawyer, you just need that degree. I think that outside T-30 or so, you need to have a compelling interest in practicing in that region because otherwise, you probably won't be making big money. But then again, who says money and a soul-sucking corporate job is all everyone is looking for. Basically, if you know what you want to do and know that you can achieve it at the Tier 4 school, don't let any elitists here convince you its not good enough.
Good luck
- Cleareyes
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:59 pm
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
If you want to practice in the region then Widener might not be a bad choice, but I'd wait until all the results are in or the deadline arrives to actually make the decision to go there. At the very least you MIGHT get a scholarship offer elsewhere.
As for the stupid T14 or bust debate, I think it breaks down like this:
If you're going to law school in order to make a lot of money then ranking really does matter. To the extent that people are interested in the big bucks right out of law school it may NOT make sense to attend anything but a high T1. It's not that people don't get biglaw out of other schools, it's that you can't count on it in the same way.
If, on the other hand, you just want to be a lawyer, well, most schools will do that for you. The debt will be more of a burden, your options more limited (Likely to whatever region your school is in, at least at first.) But if practicing law is what you want to do, then it makes sense.
I think that the proper warning is that if you see law school as an investment that will pay high FINANCIAL returns, then paying sticker at something other than a high tier 1 may not make sense. If, on the other hand, you see it as an entry into a career you're interested in, well, you just have to have your eyes open.
As for the stupid T14 or bust debate, I think it breaks down like this:
If you're going to law school in order to make a lot of money then ranking really does matter. To the extent that people are interested in the big bucks right out of law school it may NOT make sense to attend anything but a high T1. It's not that people don't get biglaw out of other schools, it's that you can't count on it in the same way.
If, on the other hand, you just want to be a lawyer, well, most schools will do that for you. The debt will be more of a burden, your options more limited (Likely to whatever region your school is in, at least at first.) But if practicing law is what you want to do, then it makes sense.
I think that the proper warning is that if you see law school as an investment that will pay high FINANCIAL returns, then paying sticker at something other than a high tier 1 may not make sense. If, on the other hand, you see it as an entry into a career you're interested in, well, you just have to have your eyes open.
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 2:18 pm
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
incorrect, a J.D. from a Teir 3/4 is worthless, get into a different professionMissMaroon wrote:Don't listen to these people. Like every other decision in life, choosing a law school is a personal one. If you have family and an affordable lifestyle enticing you to go to the Tier 4 school and if those are your priorities, then go there. Honestly, a JD is a JD, and if you truly want to be a lawyer, you just need that degree. I think that outside T-30 or so, you need to have a compelling interest in practicing in that region because otherwise, you probably won't be making big money. But then again, who says money and a soul-sucking corporate job is all everyone is looking for. Basically, if you know what you want to do and know that you can achieve it at the Tier 4 school, don't let any elitists here convince you its not good enough.
Good luck
the lsat is pretty easy, and getting a decent gpa is easy, if you can't do one/both these things, don't expect your personallity to get you into big law firms, they need intellegent motivated people, and not meeting one of these 2 standards means something,
go watch demitri martin's "If I"...that's intellegence, now go to a T3/4 law school, look at your median student, that's an ambulance chaser
it annoys me that people equate this so called elitism with discrimination, sorry your crappy career potential doesn't entice us T14/bust or T1/bust TLS'ers, check the website
Last edited by misbuble on Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:50 am, edited 8 times in total.
- The Evil Genius
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 3:07 pm
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
The problem is the ABA shouldn't be allowing all these bs law schools to be opened. Years ago doctors/lawyers were similar in respect, stature and salary. Now with all these bs law schools, any individuals believes he can be an attorney. No. You don't see people trying to pull the same shit with med school, because the AMA protected the integrity of their schools. Not everyone is meant to be a lawyer. If you're scoring below the average LSAT score, you shouldn't be in law school. You don't hear someone bombing an MCAT and deciding to go to med school anyway (because no school will accept them). TTTs like Cooley and so forth need to go. Legal education needs a very big reworking.Mase85 wrote:Thank u for your positive perspective and using this topic to reply about the ?s I asked. Thanx!!MissMaroon wrote:Don't listen to these people. Like every other decision in life, choosing a law school is a personal one. If you have family and an affordable lifestyle enticing you to go to the Tier 4 school and if those are your priorities, then go there. Honestly, a JD is a JD, and if you truly want to be a lawyer, you just need that degree. I think that outside T-30 or so, you need to have a compelling interest in practicing in that region because otherwise, you probably won't be making big money. But then again, who says money and a soul-sucking corporate job is all everyone is looking for. Basically, if you know what you want to do and know that you can achieve it at the Tier 4 school, don't let any elitists here convince you its not good enough.
Good luck
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:39 pm
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
apper123 wrote:Many of the people on this thread, and on this board for that matter, talk about the law industry like biglaw is the only thing that exists. Sure, if you want to practice biglaw and biglaw only, then maybe going to a tier 2 isn't such a great idea. Thankfully, I'd say most people who go to law school don't go with biglaw aspirations. I know I'm not.
I'm going to law school because I want to be a lawyer, not because I want to get rich. If I just wanted to go to grad school to get rich, I'd go to med school.
Paying off $200,000 in loans when you're making $40,000 is never easy regardless of how much you love your job.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:40 am
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
If you are asking a financial question, the only insight I (as someone who is not even in law school yet) can give is that an older friend of mine went to law school at Howard. He didn't get a job out of law school. He started his own firm and worked for himself his entire career. Now, he is worth millions.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:38 pm
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
You just said Vanderbilt generally isn't worth attending with a full scholarship. You might be the one who needs to explain their reasoning!LawandOrder wrote:Please share your reasoning with the group, Tommy.sweens005 wrote:Schools below the T14 aren't worth it to attend generally, even with a full scholarship, unless you plan to live and practice in that area forever, or have other circumstances. Rankings matter little once you've dropped so low, and region becomes important
You're an idiot.
- LawandOrder
- Posts: 591
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:36 pm
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
I can't imagine it's even possible to pay off $200,000 on $40k/yr. For 30 years at a conservative 4.5% rate, that's still $1520/month.Mark71121 wrote:apper123 wrote:Many of the people on this thread, and on this board for that matter, talk about the law industry like biglaw is the only thing that exists. Sure, if you want to practice biglaw and biglaw only, then maybe going to a tier 2 isn't such a great idea. Thankfully, I'd say most people who go to law school don't go with biglaw aspirations. I know I'm not.
I'm going to law school because I want to be a lawyer, not because I want to get rich. If I just wanted to go to grad school to get rich, I'd go to med school.
Paying off $200,000 in loans when you're making $40,000 is never easy regardless of how much you love your job.
Figure after tax income on $40 is about $30k or so. And we're talking about spending $18,240 on loans leaving us with $11,000 a year to pay for EVERYTHING else. Just not possible.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 8:07 am
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
misbuble wrote:lol loser? in high school? are you one of those guys who fondly remembers his golden days as the 2nd string high school QB? seriously...high school?sweens005 wrote:It's never worth attending anything tier 3 or 4...but it does raise my self esteem when i meet these sods...or any sod who isn't T10 I'll pretend T6 doesn't exist though
I guarantee that you were a loser in high school.
ur mom said i was hung like a jury, and then i showed her the proof
Haha, thank you for confirming my suspicions with that terrible joke. I'm glad you're tough on an anonymous, online message board.
- Cleareyes
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:59 pm
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
Well you're assuming the salary stays static, which it doesn't, but yes. Someone making $40,000 a year should not take out $200,000 in debt. But that's the price of a private school at full price. T4 private at full price probably doesn't make sense. Go to a state school with good in state tuition, or a school with a scholarship, and graduate with $100,000 in debt and the debt burden becomes much more manageable, even if the first few years will be tight.LawandOrder wrote:
I can't imagine it's even possible to pay off $200,000 on $40k/yr. For 30 years at a conservative 4.5% rate, that's still $1520/month.
Figure after tax income on $40 is about $30k or so. And we're talking about spending $18,240 on loans leaving us with $11,000 a year to pay for EVERYTHING else. Just not possible.
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 2:18 pm
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
tell your mom it looked like roast beef, by the way, your t2/3/4 school is not quite as worthless as your comments, but closesweens005 wrote:misbuble wrote:lol loser? in high school? are you one of those guys who fondly remembers his golden days as the 2nd string high school QB? seriously...high school?sweens005 wrote:It's never worth attending anything tier 3 or 4...but it does raise my self esteem when i meet these sods...or any sod who isn't T10 I'll pretend T6 doesn't exist though
I guarantee that you were a loser in high school.
ur mom said i was hung like a jury, and then i showed her the proof
Haha, thank you for confirming my suspicions with that terrible joke. I'm glad you're tough on an anonymous, online message board.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 8:07 am
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
Haha, okay. Stop pretending like you've ever gotten laid.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- express01
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:17 pm
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
IMO, in this economy its HYSCCN or bust. If i weren't lucky enough to get into CCN, i would just go to UT Austin and stay in texas forever.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 8:07 am
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
express01 wrote:IMO, in this economy its HYSCCN or bust. If i weren't lucky enough to get into CCN, i would just go to UT Austin and stay in texas forever.
You're right. The economy will never turn around. If you can't get into one of six "acceptable" schools now, you should probably forgo a legal career forever.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 4:48 pm
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
+1 on you being an idiot.LawandOrder wrote:Schools below the T14 aren't worth it to attend generally, even with a full scholarship, unless you plan to live and practice in that area forever, or have other circumstances. Rankings matter little once you've dropped so low, and region becomes important.
- nightlight
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 12:20 pm
Re: thinking tier 4 when i could wait for tier 1?! help!
Because they're all 20-23 years old and think they've figured the world out already.SoxyPirate wrote:Here on TLS
US News's Top 14
Is all that matters
Beyond T14
TLS'ers recommend
to go fist oneself
How could it be true
that so many smart people
are such f*cknuggets
Intelligence =/= wisdom
Last edited by nightlight on Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login