Good point. And to be honest, I think my softs might have aided in their decision. That said, I think a 3.5/163 with a decent app package can expect at least a WL/In.najumobi wrote:yeah it's pretty odd until you place it in context. if you were to attend indiana you wouldn't be hurting their lsat median. on the other hand, aschleic would, and as a result hurt them in rankings. i think that's why people call it the "rankings/numbers game." law school admissions is quite absurd.ccs1702 wrote:Najumobi, sorry, I meant page 9. I really have no idea, to be honest. I was surprised by that as well, but it seemed like a pretty credible report. Either way, it would seem odd to accept me w/ $$ and reject someone else outright when the difference is only one LSAT point.
Indiana 2013 Forum
- Zapatero
- Posts: 517
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:14 pm
Re: Indiana 2013
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:14 pm
Re: Indiana 2013
So - for the 50% of people that fall below the median line - are those spots generally filled with splitters, ie a person that helps them in one category but may hurt them in another?
- najumobi
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:36 pm
Re: Indiana 2013
yes, and urms with both stats below median.aschleic wrote:So - for the 50% of people that fall below the median line - are those spots generally filled with splitters, ie a person that helps them in one category but may hurt them in another?
- Vincent Vega
- Posts: 1182
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:36 pm
Re: Indiana 2013
The 6-8 week wait was pretty accurate for me. Submitted 10/30, accepted 12/16.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login