yepyepyep wrote:I'll contribute to this missionned wrote:I think Dean Deal is waiting for us to break 100 pages. Then she'll open the gates.
Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- Tom Joad
- Posts: 4526
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
- brogoc
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:54 am
- ned
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 1:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
OMG that was better than sex.
- Tom Joad
- Posts: 4526
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Proof that I am prepared to contribute to the academic community at Stanford. Circle jerk, I can.brogoc wrote:Winner ^^
- yepyepyep
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 4:36 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Did you get the call?!?!ned wrote:OMG that was better than sex.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Bronck
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
ned wrote:OMG that was better than sex.

- ned
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 1:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Haha, no. Breaking 100. Been waiting for so long.yepyepyep wrote:Did you get the call?!?!ned wrote:OMG that was better than sex.
- yepyepyep
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 4:36 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Haha if that was better than sex, I wonder what it'll feel like when you get the callned wrote:Haha, no. Breaking 100. Been waiting for so long.yepyepyep wrote:Did you get the call?!?!ned wrote:OMG that was better than sex.
Maybe they're on a lunch break
- thelawschoolproject
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:58 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm scared to view my status checker...
- ned
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 1:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah I was thinking the same thing. Lunchtime. Or maybe Faye is pondering a new blog post.... Been awhile.yepyepyep wrote:Haha if that was better than sex, I wonder what it'll feel like when you get the callned wrote:Haha, no. Breaking 100. Been waiting for so long.yepyepyep wrote:Did you get the call?!?!ned wrote:OMG that was better than sex.
Maybe they're on a lunch break
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 3:50 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Does anybody else have a mini heart attack every time they check their status?
I don't even know why. I know I won't be getting in.
I don't even know why. I know I won't be getting in.
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 7:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Nobody has been rejected today though, right? Gotta imagine the mass bloodbath occurs next week, and that its just good news for at least a little while longer.hellothisisme wrote:Does anybody else have a mini heart attack every time they check their status?
I don't even know why. I know I won't be getting in.
*Really, really hoping the good news continues through Friday and today isn't the only day...
- JustE
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
No chance of getting in, but I really want this to be over with soon. Please end my misery.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 11:36 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Is it weird that I'm feeling the complete opposite? If I'm going to get rejected (which looks more and more likely each day), I wish they'd just do it already. Right now Stanford is stringing me along like a bad boyfriend.txl wrote:Nobody has been rejected today though, right? Gotta imagine the mass bloodbath occurs next week, and that its just good news for at least a little while longer.hellothisisme wrote:Does anybody else have a mini heart attack every time they check their status?
I don't even know why. I know I won't be getting in.
*Really, really hoping the good news continues through Friday and today isn't the only day...
- Bronck
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Agreed. I want to matriculate already.acappella wrote:Is it weird that I'm feeling the complete opposite? If I'm going to get rejected (which looks more and more likely each day), I wish they'd just do it already. Right now Stanford is stringing me along like a bad boyfriend.txl wrote:Nobody has been rejected today though, right? Gotta imagine the mass bloodbath occurs next week, and that its just good news for at least a little while longer.hellothisisme wrote:Does anybody else have a mini heart attack every time they check their status?
I don't even know why. I know I won't be getting in.
*Really, really hoping the good news continues through Friday and today isn't the only day...
- yepyepyep
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 4:36 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Lunch break should be over soon...
- ned
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 1:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
They're really into "slow food" in the bay area, so give it another hour.yepyepyep wrote:Lunch break should be over soon...
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Tom Joad
- Posts: 4526
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
--ImageRemoved--ned wrote:They're really into "slow food" in the bay area, so give it another hour.yepyepyep wrote:Lunch break should be over soon...
Somebody email this to the admissions office. I am too scared.
- ned
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 1:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Or just order the JJ Gargantuan and send it to admissions care of tls.Tom Joad wrote:--ImageRemoved--ned wrote:They're really into "slow food" in the bay area, so give it another hour.yepyepyep wrote:Lunch break should be over soon...
Somebody email this to the admissions office. I am too scared.
- Tom Joad
- Posts: 4526
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Does anybody have any inside info on Dean Deal's eating preferences? She might not be able to do pork, or any meat, and she might just be picky.
- yepyepyep
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 4:36 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
hahahahahahaha amazingTom Joad wrote:--ImageRemoved--ned wrote:They're really into "slow food" in the bay area, so give it another hour.yepyepyep wrote:Lunch break should be over soon...
Somebody email this to the admissions office. I am too scared.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:53 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
People been calling or emailing for deadline notifications? I want to call but don't want to break the trend.
- ned
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 1:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I bet she's tough as nails and would happily accept this gesture/challenge.Tom Joad wrote:Does anybody have any inside info on Dean Deal's eating preferences? She might not be able to do pork, or any meat, and she might just be picky.
- yepyepyep
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 4:36 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Looks like yesterday's peak was around now until about 6pm eastern
- Tom Joad
- Posts: 4526
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Tuna=autodingned wrote:I bet she's tough as nails and would happily accept this gesture/challenge.Tom Joad wrote:Does anybody have any inside info on Dean Deal's eating preferences? She might not be able to do pork, or any meat, and she might just be picky.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login