Seriously Wert, keep your shit up to dateporch wrote:I see 98 pages...
Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread Forum
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 3:07 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
I feel like almost no one has actually gotten in yet?
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
LSN is tracking 55 admits, and historically LSN only makes up 15-20% of the total admit pool for Stanford. Thus, roughly 250 of the ~380 admits are already admitted.lawschoolboundfuture wrote:I feel like almost no one has actually gotten in yet?
We're only due for about 10 more LSN admits to match past data.

-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 4:39 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
What do people think about sending my fourth and final LOR to SLS as a way to stay "engaged" with the application process?
I'm asking because a professor offered to write me a "beaming" LOR (
)
The LOR would be targeted specific to Stanford, and the professor has done some post-doctoral work at Stanford.
I sent my app in early January and was complete 1/22.
Thoughts?
I'm asking because a professor offered to write me a "beaming" LOR (

The LOR would be targeted specific to Stanford, and the professor has done some post-doctoral work at Stanford.
I sent my app in early January and was complete 1/22.
Thoughts?
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Fourth!? Since January? I haven't even sent one and I applied in November. I think this is stalkerish and a little much.TrustInMusic wrote:What do people think about sending my fourth and final LOR to SLS as a way to stay "engaged" with the application process?
I'm asking because a professor offered to write me a "beaming" LOR ()
The LOR would be targeted specific to Stanford, and the professor has done some post-doctoral work at Stanford.
I sent my app in early January and was complete 1/22.
Thoughts?
edit: no offense just my opinion based on what admissions people have relayed about correspondence with their offices
Last edited by jbagelboy on Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Go for it!TrustInMusic wrote:What do people think about sending my fourth and final LOR to SLS as a way to stay "engaged" with the application process?
I'm asking because a professor offered to write me a "beaming" LOR ()
The LOR would be targeted specific to Stanford, and the professor has done some post-doctoral work at Stanford.
I sent my app in early January and was complete 1/22.
Thoughts?
-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 4:39 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
I had 3 LORs in my original application, and my question was whether I should send in a fourth.jbagelboy wrote:Fourth!? Since January? I haven't even sent one and I applied in November. I think this is stalkerish and a little much.TrustInMusic wrote:What do people think about sending my fourth and final LOR to SLS as a way to stay "engaged" with the application process?
I'm asking because a professor offered to write me a "beaming" LOR ()
The LOR would be targeted specific to Stanford, and the professor has done some post-doctoral work at Stanford.
I sent my app in early January and was complete 1/22.
Thoughts?
edit: no offense just my opinion based on what admissions people have relayed about correspondence with their offices
- Audeamus
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
I concur. If is is specific to Stanford, send it.ManOfTheMinute wrote:Go for it!TrustInMusic wrote:What do people think about sending my fourth and final LOR to SLS as a way to stay "engaged" with the application process?
I'm asking because a professor offered to write me a "beaming" LOR ()
The LOR would be targeted specific to Stanford, and the professor has done some post-doctoral work at Stanford.
I sent my app in early January and was complete 1/22.
Thoughts?
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Truly, truly sorry -- I read 4th LOCI, and then you can imagine my response. 4th LOR perfectly sound, continue on please excuse my morning illiteracyTrustInMusic wrote:I had 3 LORs in my original application, and my question was whether I should send in a fourth.jbagelboy wrote:Fourth!? Since January? I haven't even sent one and I applied in November. I think this is stalkerish and a little much.TrustInMusic wrote:What do people think about sending my fourth and final LOR to SLS as a way to stay "engaged" with the application process?
I'm asking because a professor offered to write me a "beaming" LOR ()
The LOR would be targeted specific to Stanford, and the professor has done some post-doctoral work at Stanford.
I sent my app in early January and was complete 1/22.
Thoughts?
edit: no offense just my opinion based on what admissions people have relayed about correspondence with their offices
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 7:24 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
On this subject...does anyone know whether Recommenders receive any automated confirmation from LSAC when an applicant has their LOR sent to schools? I know they receive an email when LSAC initially receives their LOR, but the reason I ask is because I solicited an LOR from one professor, but ultimately did not have hers sent anywhere. I decided that 3 was enough for right then and that I wanted to save hers for later on, possibly for the event that I was waitlisted somewhere. However I want to send hers now; I just don't want her to know that I am only just now using it. Sorry if this is confusing. Does anyone know? Thanks!jbagelboy wrote:Truly, truly sorry -- I read 4th LOCI, and then you can imagine my response. 4th LOR perfectly sound, continue on please excuse my morning illiteracyTrustInMusic wrote:I had 3 LORs in my original application, and my question was whether I should send in a fourth.jbagelboy wrote:Fourth!? Since January? I haven't even sent one and I applied in November. I think this is stalkerish and a little much.TrustInMusic wrote:What do people think about sending my fourth and final LOR to SLS as a way to stay "engaged" with the application process?
I'm asking because a professor offered to write me a "beaming" LOR ()
The LOR would be targeted specific to Stanford, and the professor has done some post-doctoral work at Stanford.
I sent my app in early January and was complete 1/22.
Thoughts?
edit: no offense just my opinion based on what admissions people have relayed about correspondence with their offices
- dnptan
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 5:33 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
I think you mistook LoR for LOCI. I have 4 LoRs as well.jbagelboy wrote: Fourth!? Since January? I haven't even sent one and I applied in November. I think this is stalkerish and a little much.
edit: no offense just my opinion based on what admissions people have relayed about correspondence with their offices
You should submit it via LSAC as well just to cover your bases.
edit: oops late!
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Dang this is getting to be absurd. No TLSers got their fin aid offers today?
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
They don't. You're fine.testaker wrote: On this subject...does anyone know whether Recommenders receive any automated confirmation from LSAC when an applicant has their LOR sent to schools? I know they receive an email when LSAC initially receives their LOR, but the reason I ask is because I solicited an LOR from one professor, but ultimately did not have hers sent anywhere. I decided that 3 was enough for right then and that I wanted to save hers for later on, possibly for the event that I was waitlisted somewhere. However I want to send hers now; I just don't want her to know that I am only just now using it. Sorry if this is confusing. Does anyone know? Thanks!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
I imagine something must be happening over there that is busying them (maybe its the new implementation of that yellow ribbon program)... the day is still young though!bernaldiaz wrote:Dang this is getting to be absurd. No TLSers got their fin aid offers today?
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
.
Last edited by one_by_one on Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
From the Facebook group someone said they got their offer last Friday and that they were told all offers would be out this week.ManOfTheMinute wrote:I imagine something must be happening over there that is busying them (maybe its the new implementation of that yellow ribbon program)... the day is still young though!bernaldiaz wrote:Dang this is getting to be absurd. No TLSers got their fin aid offers today?
- yarsten
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 11:28 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
bernaldiaz wrote:
From the Facebook group someone said they got their offer last Friday and that they were told all offers would be out this week.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- cwid1391
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:41 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
If not, 180 trolling for sure.yarsten wrote:bernaldiaz wrote:
From the Facebook group someone said they got their offer last Friday and that they were told all offers would be out this week.Is this for realz?
- spicyyoda17
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:02 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
It's for financial aid, not for admission.cwid1391 wrote:If not, 180 trolling for sure.yarsten wrote:bernaldiaz wrote:
From the Facebook group someone said they got their offer last Friday and that they were told all offers would be out this week.Is this for realz?
- cwid1391
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:41 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
ahhh.. that makes way more sense.spicyyoda17 wrote:It's for financial aid, not for admission.cwid1391 wrote:If not, 180 trolling for sure.yarsten wrote:bernaldiaz wrote:
From the Facebook group someone said they got their offer last Friday and that they were told all offers would be out this week.Is this for realz?

-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
have ANY of us gotten finaid?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- sinfiery
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
12/3 complete still waiting...2 Days too late from being part of the club.
It's somewhat silly how perfect of a fit Stanford is for me, I just want the DLS so I can stop dreaming.
It's somewhat silly how perfect of a fit Stanford is for me, I just want the DLS so I can stop dreaming.
- mickeysevenn
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:18 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
No DLS for me yet. SOMEBODY TAKE THE STRESS AWAY!!!
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:35 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
when did you go complete?mickeysevenn wrote:No DLS for me yet. SOMEBODY TAKE THE STRESS AWAY!!!
- domino
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Went to Stanford today because visiting a friend in the area. Holy shit the campus is ridiculous. When people said "it's beautiful," I didn't get it--I was just like, "Okay, so the buildings are pretty and the weather is nice." But there's way more. There's this long entrance road surrounded by greenery where graceful ibis-like birds are just stalking around, fountains all over the place. And the buildings are not just pretty but AWESOME.
I also liked the more spread out layout more than I expected. The campus really feels like a small city, very open but areas with different functions are clearly differentiated.
I thought I wanted to stay near home, but being here for the past few days has made me think that it might be exciting to go somewhere new, and it turns out there are plenty of people here that I know, too. Hm. Might try to un-withdraw my app.
I also liked the more spread out layout more than I expected. The campus really feels like a small city, very open but areas with different functions are clearly differentiated.
I thought I wanted to stay near home, but being here for the past few days has made me think that it might be exciting to go somewhere new, and it turns out there are plenty of people here that I know, too. Hm. Might try to un-withdraw my app.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login