Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle) Forum
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
.
Last edited by one_by_one on Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 10:09 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Should have clarified: There doesn't seem to be any binding language in the invite, the award, or the agreement.one_by_one wrote:Check the invite email, maybe (if there is one)?jym_dawg wrote:For reference, I cannot find anything about withdrawal in the Wilson materials. The only relevant section in the scholarship agreement is this: "I accept the Scholarship offer and intend to matriculate at the University of Pennsylvania Law School in fall of 2013."
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
UR2 today. Wooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
-
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:32 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Jumped to conclusions there and thought you were saying you had already heard back, risa.risa wrote:I did. There are several others on here who did as well, if you do a search. I am blanking on user names now. I don't think anyone has heard back yet.canarykb wrote:Anyone else submit an application to the Toll PI Scholars program? Heard back yet? They said by March 15 but I'm already getting antsy.
Congrats az!
So yea guess I am antsy as well

- Cobretti
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
UR1 2/7 crew may be SOL at this point
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- megagnarley
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:58 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Anyone from UR2 2/13 still standing? Are we toast? I had a good feeling about us.
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
If I have to wait a month for today's UR2 to become a decision I think my head will explode.
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
+1. no language at all in any wilson materials. very interesting.jym_dawg wrote:Should have clarified: There doesn't seem to be any binding language in the invite, the award, or the agreement.one_by_one wrote:Check the invite email, maybe (if there is one)?jym_dawg wrote:For reference, I cannot find anything about withdrawal in the Wilson materials. The only relevant section in the scholarship agreement is this: "I accept the Scholarship offer and intend to matriculate at the University of Pennsylvania Law School in fall of 2013."
- jubee
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 6:28 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Hi guys! A question--If we are going to accept our position on the waitlist, should the email reply be simple, just accepting the position, or should it be LOCI-like??
-
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:34 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
I did a small few sentence paragraph. I had done an LOCI already back in January.. so, like did not have huge amounts to continue to add.jubee wrote:Hi guys! A question--If we are going to accept our position on the waitlist, should the email reply be simple, just accepting the position, or should it be LOCI-like??
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Does anyone know how flexible Penn is with the Need Access deadline? My parents are taking their time giving me their info, and the website says that the deadline was 3/1. If I submit in like a week will they still consider me?
- smdpnp
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:49 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Nope.
Last edited by smdpnp on Wed Jun 26, 2013 6:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:34 pm
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Rlabo
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 4:18 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Smspnp- You read that wrong, jubee wasnt give a seat but given a spot on the waitlist I.E. jubee NEEDS to persuade them and it would not be overkill.smdpnp wrote:LOCIs are written to persuade. If you've been offered a seat, then writing a LOCI will be overkill.jubee wrote:Hi guys! A question--If we are going to accept our position on the waitlist, should the email reply be simple, just accepting the position, or should it be LOCI-like??
Jubee- I personally did a LOCI email for schools I've been waitlisted to, but I'm no expert on the subject. It made sense to me as the email asked me to let them know whether I wanted the spot on the wiatlist as well as asking me if I had any updates for admission etc.
- smdpnp
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:49 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Oh snap, you're right. On not off, my bad. In that case, LOCIs are good.Rlabo wrote:Smspnp- You read that wrong, jubee wasnt give a seat but given a spot on the waitlist I.E. jubee NEEDS to persuade them and it would not be overkill.smdpnp wrote:LOCIs are written to persuade. If you've been offered a seat, then writing a LOCI will be overkill.jubee wrote:Hi guys! A question--If we are going to accept our position on the waitlist, should the email reply be simple, just accepting the position, or should it be LOCI-like??
Jubee- I personally did a LOCI email for schools I've been waitlisted to, but I'm no expert on the subject. It made sense to me as the email asked me to let them know whether I wanted the spot on the wiatlist as well as asking me if I had any updates for admission etc.
- jubee
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 6:28 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
thanks for your responses! I ended up not really making it a LOCI and kept it brief. After rereading the email, they say they don't review wait list candidates until May, so I figured I'd like to save my LOCI content until closer to decision time and I also don't want to run out of things to say.Rlabo wrote:Smspnp- You read that wrong, jubee wasnt give a seat but given a spot on the waitlist I.E. jubee NEEDS to persuade them and it would not be overkill.smdpnp wrote:LOCIs are written to persuade. If you've been offered a seat, then writing a LOCI will be overkill.jubee wrote:Hi guys! A question--If we are going to accept our position on the waitlist, should the email reply be simple, just accepting the position, or should it be LOCI-like??
Jubee- I personally did a LOCI email for schools I've been waitlisted to, but I'm no expert on the subject. It made sense to me as the email asked me to let them know whether I wanted the spot on the wiatlist as well as asking me if I had any updates for admission etc.
- bob loblaw11
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:14 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
+1megagnarley wrote:Anyone from UR2 2/13 still standing? Are we toast? I had a good feeling about us.
I kinda feel like they lost our apps.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- megagnarley
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:58 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Or laughed at them and threw them in the evil furnace...bob loblaw11 wrote:+1megagnarley wrote:Anyone from UR2 2/13 still standing? Are we toast? I had a good feeling about us.
I kinda feel like they lost our apps.
Both plausible.
- Audeamus
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
imagine how those of us who are still at UR1 2/7 feel...bob loblaw11 wrote:+1megagnarley wrote:Anyone from UR2 2/13 still standing? Are we toast? I had a good feeling about us.
I kinda feel like they lost our apps.
- WokeUpInACar
- Posts: 5542
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:11 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Or those of us who submitted two months ago and haven't even had their apps glanced at.Audeamus wrote:imagine how those of us who are still at UR1 2/7 feel...bob loblaw11 wrote:+1megagnarley wrote:Anyone from UR2 2/13 still standing? Are we toast? I had a good feeling about us.
I kinda feel like they lost our apps.
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 7:42 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
still waiting at UR1 2/7 here....



Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Audeamus
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
true...though, on the bright side, at least you know youWokeUpInACar wrote:Or those of us who submitted two months ago and haven't even had their apps glanced at.Audeamus wrote:imagine how those of us who are still at UR1 2/7 feel...bob loblaw11 wrote:+1megagnarley wrote:Anyone from UR2 2/13 still standing? Are we toast? I had a good feeling about us.
I kinda feel like they lost our apps.
edit: meant to say aren't not are. possibly the worst typo in TLS history.
Last edited by Audeamus on Tue Mar 05, 2013 8:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Cobretti
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Come on now, so are weAudeamus wrote:true...though, on the bright side, at least you know you are rotting in a ding pileWokeUpInACar wrote:Or those of us who submitted two months ago and haven't even had their apps glanced at.Audeamus wrote: imagine how those of us who are still at UR1 2/7 feel...
- WokeUpInACar
- Posts: 5542
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:11 pm
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
That's nice. Your future classmates will be lucky to have you!Audeamus wrote:true...though, on the bright side, at least you know you are rotting in a ding pileWokeUpInACar wrote:Or those of us who submitted two months ago and haven't even had their apps glanced at.Audeamus wrote:
imagine how those of us who are still at UR1 2/7 feel...
-
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:31 am
Re: Penn C/O 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Well aren't you a doll!Audeamus wrote:
true...though, on the bright side, at least you know you are rotting in a ding pile
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login