Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- soj

- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I don't know if they're done calling yet, but maybe yours are coming within the next two hours. I hope you two get good news.
-
snehpets

- Posts: 1164
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Ahhh. I knew the ones on LSP and TLS couldn't be right but I couldn't find the others. Thank you! That makes me way less freaked out about not hearing anything.soj wrote:Chicago's 25-50-75th percentiles for c/o 2014 were
3.71-3.87-3.94
167-171-173
Although I am still above one median and at one 75th. Argh. I bet my PS is annoying.
And nope, no HYS. I doubt I will, though last year I think everyone with my numbers got in off the waitlist. I'm right at both medians though, a little above GPA, so that's not good, plus I'm in UG with no work experience. I really love NYU though and am interested to hear from Columbia. To be honest, it would be hard for me to convince myself to take H (the only one of HYS I applied to) over either of the NYC schools (though I know this is horrifying to you
Last edited by snehpets on Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- PopTorts13

- Posts: 378
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:27 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Both my numbers are at/near their 75ths, an I'm a 1/9er so I dunno. Submitted early Nov too. It's stil 3:39 there folks so I'm not giving up hope until 5:30.[/quote]
Ditto. I'm in class and if my phone rings damn it I'm answering.[/quote]
If the 75ths on LSP and the TLS page are correct then I'm above both and still haven't heard. I'm 1/12 though.[/quote]
1/12 here too. And I'm probably above both. Not sure though.[/quote]
...you're not
Ditto. I'm in class and if my phone rings damn it I'm answering.[/quote]
If the 75ths on LSP and the TLS page are correct then I'm above both and still haven't heard. I'm 1/12 though.[/quote]
1/12 here too. And I'm probably above both. Not sure though.[/quote]
...you're not
- Boston_NYG2245

- Posts: 238
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Well now my lack of a call makes much more sense...
- Blessedassurance

- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Princeton Law hasn't started making decisions yet.Curious1 wrote:Yeah I know what you mean. Maybe it's subtle YPing? Not sure if we've talked but did you get into an HYP yet?
- soj

- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Not now, Chicago-Kent. I'm in the fuckin' zone.
-
snehpets

- Posts: 1164
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Blessedassurance wrote:Princeton Law hasn't started making decisions yet.Curious1 wrote:Yeah I know what you mean. Maybe it's subtle YPing? Not sure if we've talked but did you get into an HYP yet?
also I just got Chicago Kent too, haha. I was so relieved to finally get UChi over with and it wasn't them
Last edited by snehpets on Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Curious1

- Posts: 952
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
When you get in I will try very hard to convince you that that is a bad decisionsnehpets wrote:Ahhh. I knew the ones on LSP and TLS couldn't be right but I couldn't find the others. Thank you! That makes me way less freaked out about not hearing anything.soj wrote:Chicago's 25-50-75th percentiles for c/o 2014 were
3.71-3.87-3.94
167-171-173
Although I am still above one median and at one 75th. Argh. I bet my PS is annoying.
And nope, no HYS. I doubt I will, though last year I think everyone with my numbers got in off the waitlist. I'm right at both medians though, a little above GPA, so that's not good, plus I'm in UG with no work experience. I really love NYU though and am interested to hear from Columbia. To be honest, it would be hard for me to convince myself to take H (the only one of HYS I applied to) over either of the NYC schools (though I know this is horrifying to you)
- Genki

- Posts: 246
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:04 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
172/3.9 here with 1/12 UR date.snehpets wrote:If the 75ths on LSP and the TLS page are correct then I'm above both and still haven't heard. I'm 1/12 though.Curious1 wrote:Ditto. I'm in class and if my phone rings damn it I'm answering.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Both my numbers are at/near their 75ths, an I'm a 1/9er so I dunno. Submitted early Nov too. It's stil 3:39 there folks so I'm not giving up hope until 5:30.mijenks wrote:Don't mean to rain on any parades but perhaps 1/09 is an "auto-" date. 168/3.52 here and I have 1/09 as my last update. Auto-admits first, auto-dings second?
Any other 1/12 UR dates willing to share their numbers so we can get a better idea of what it might mean for us?
-
jpal13

- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 6:53 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I am a 1/9er and I see it as unlikely I will get inNelson wrote:I'm going to be the only 1/9 not to get in. This is what I deserve for ticking off the Chicago gods last night. I had a few beers OK? I take back what I said about your full tuition scholarship that I'm not eligible for anyway.
- MobyDick

- Posts: 51
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:58 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I just got an email from Chicago-Kent and almost shit my pants. Thought it was a rejection.
- franklyscarlet

- Posts: 2918
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:16 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
same. Chicago Kent, you dirty sons of bitches, do NOT email when Chi and NU are both doing decisions.MobyDick wrote:I just got an email from Chicago-Kent and almost shit my pants. Thought it was a rejection.
- AmandaPB

- Posts: 430
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:37 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Just speculation, but I think mijenks is wrong. I’d guess that the ad comm had made a final decision by 1/9 for the 1/9 people. For the ones with UR dates later than 1/9, maybe they were just discussing your applications more in-depth. I don’t think 1/9 means auto-anything, just that they had made a definitive decision by that date.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Both my numbers are at/near their 75ths, an I'm a 1/9er so I dunno. Submitted early Nov too. It's stil 3:39 there folks so I'm not giving up hope until 5:30.mijenks wrote:Don't mean to rain on any parades but perhaps 1/09 is an "auto-" date. 168/3.52 here and I have 1/09 as my last update. Auto-admits first, auto-dings second?
- WhiteGuy5

- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
CHICAGO-KENT COLLEGE CAN GO TO HELL.
- Boston_NYG2245

- Posts: 238
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I got that email, it made me want to break somethingsoj wrote:Not now, Chicago-Kent. I'm in the fuckin' zone.
-
sea15

- Posts: 129
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 2:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Honest to god I just got an email from Chicago kent. Ahhhhh
- catmo

- Posts: 107
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
THIS. It's so evil.soj wrote:Not now, Chicago-Kent. I'm in the fuckin' zone.
-
snehpets

- Posts: 1164
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
177/3.84Genki wrote: 172/3.9 here with 1/12 UR date.
Any other 1/12 UR dates willing to share their numbers so we can get a better idea of what it might mean for us?
173/3.88
172/3.9
177/3.7
I forget the others...
- Nelson

- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Chicago-Kent for TLS Troll of the Year.
- AmandaPB

- Posts: 430
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:37 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Jesus, maybe you all are just in the running for Rubensteins! I wouldn’t take the 1/12 as a bad sign with those numberssnehpets wrote:177/3.84Genki wrote: 172/3.9 here with 1/12 UR date.
Any other 1/12 UR dates willing to share their numbers so we can get a better idea of what it might mean for us?
173/3.88
172/3.9
177/3.7
I forget the others...
- WhiteGuy5

- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I don't think the dates mean ANYTHING. At all. They could've decided you're in on 1/9, or you're out. Alternatively, they could've decided to take another look on 1/11 or 1/12, and decided either way as well.AmandaPB wrote:Just speculation, but I think mijenks is wrong. I’d guess that the ad comm had made a final decision by 1/9 for the 1/9 people. For the ones with UR dates later than 1/9, maybe they were just discussing your applications more in-depth. I don’t think 1/9 means auto-anything, just that they had made a definitive decision by that date.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Both my numbers are at/near their 75ths, an I'm a 1/9er so I dunno. Submitted early Nov too. It's stil 3:39 there folks so I'm not giving up hope until 5:30.mijenks wrote:Don't mean to rain on any parades but perhaps 1/09 is an "auto-" date. 168/3.52 here and I have 1/09 as my last update. Auto-admits first, auto-dings second?
- Genki

- Posts: 246
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:04 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Thanks.snehpets wrote:177/3.84Genki wrote: 172/3.9 here with 1/12 UR date.
Any other 1/12 UR dates willing to share their numbers so we can get a better idea of what it might mean for us?
173/3.88
172/3.9
177/3.7
I forget the others...
Those numbers do make me feel a little better. I appear to be the weakest applicant of the group, but at least I'm in good company.
-
snehpets

- Posts: 1164
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
All right, final 1/12 list for all of your over-analyzing/freaking out pleasure
178/3.7
177/3.86
177/3.7
175+/3.8+ (Canadian)
173/3.88
173/3.8
172/3.9
171/3.7
170/3.89
178/3.7
177/3.86
177/3.7
175+/3.8+ (Canadian)
173/3.88
173/3.8
172/3.9
171/3.7
170/3.89
Last edited by snehpets on Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- Donny Crane

- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Chicago-Kent doesn't beat out whatever TTT posted the "LSAT SCORES" in the subject-line email when October LSATers were waiting for scores. That was epic trolling.
-
11-5000

- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 10:30 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
1/12, 4 updates
Last edited by 11-5000 on Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.