NU Apps '11-'12 - Good Luck Hold Candidates!!!! <3 Forum
-
STLMizzou

- Posts: 385
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:45 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
For me, it cold cuts out Michigan, Minnesota. Not big on upper east coast cuts out Cornell, Penn, and both the Bostons. West coast cuts out all the Cals.
What's left for a splitter is not too much besides from schools that strictly train for their state.
But then again, Friday on my walk I found myself thinking the weather was really nice even though it was 35 out (just happened to not be super windy/cloudy for once), so maybe Chicago is changing me.
What's left for a splitter is not too much besides from schools that strictly train for their state.
But then again, Friday on my walk I found myself thinking the weather was really nice even though it was 35 out (just happened to not be super windy/cloudy for once), so maybe Chicago is changing me.
- AmandaPB

- Posts: 430
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:37 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
Hi Mizzou friend. I go there now! Good luck with Northwestern.STLMizzou wrote:For me, it cold cuts out Michigan, Minnesota. Not big on upper east coast cuts out Cornell, Penn, and both the Bostons. West coast cuts out all the Cals.
What's left for a splitter is not too much besides from schools that strictly train for their state.
But then again, Friday on my walk I found myself thinking the weather was really nice even though it was 35 out (just happened to not be super windy/cloudy for once), so maybe Chicago is changing me.
- Eugenie Danglars

- Posts: 2353
- Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:04 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
Question for pondering: If an unmarried lesbian couple in a civil union has children, are they illegitimate?
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
wouldn't the legitimacy be based on the relationship between the child-bearer and the donor/father?Eugenie Danglars wrote:Question for pondering: If an unmarried lesbian couple in a civil union has children, are they illegitimate?
- Eugenie Danglars

- Posts: 2353
- Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:04 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
Yeah, exactly. So a even a married lesbian couple could have bastard children together. Bizarre thought of the dayJamMasterJ wrote:wouldn't the legitimacy be based on the relationship between the child-bearer and the donor/father?Eugenie Danglars wrote:Question for pondering: If an unmarried lesbian couple in a civil union has children, are they illegitimate?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
addy11

- Posts: 479
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:01 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
The whole idea of legitimacy is about as antiquated and useless as the arguments against same sex marriage, IMHO.Eugenie Danglars wrote:Yeah, exactly. So a even a married lesbian couple could have bastard children together. Bizarre thought of the dayJamMasterJ wrote:wouldn't the legitimacy be based on the relationship between the child-bearer and the donor/father?Eugenie Danglars wrote:Question for pondering: If an unmarried lesbian couple in a civil union has children, are they illegitimate?
- Eugenie Danglars

- Posts: 2353
- Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:04 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
If only people who wrote law where as forward thinking as you. I mean, there are still some trusts and things that bar illegitimate descendants, etc.addy11 wrote:The whole idea of legitimacy is about as antiquated and useless as the arguments against same sex marriage, IMHO.Eugenie Danglars wrote:Yeah, exactly. So a even a married lesbian couple could have bastard children together. Bizarre thought of the dayJamMasterJ wrote:wouldn't the legitimacy be based on the relationship between the child-bearer and the donor/father?Eugenie Danglars wrote:Question for pondering: If an unmarried lesbian couple in a civil union has children, are they illegitimate?
-
bdubs

- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
Wouldn't the instrument define legitimacy? Sounds like an issue of interpretation rather than law.Eugenie Danglars wrote:If only people who wrote law where as forward thinking as you. I mean, there are still some trusts and things that bar illegitimate descendants, etc.
It's an interesting issue though. Are you covering it in one of your courses?
Last edited by bdubs on Tue Dec 06, 2011 12:09 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
addy11

- Posts: 479
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:01 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
Yeah, I guess it's the giver's prerogative to cling to such things when their money is in play. It seems like those people have the "concept" of legitimacy in mind more so than whatever the law says... I mean I can't imagine some crusty old scrooge assenting to his estate going to his lesbian daughter's child (via anonymous sperm donor) just because the law was amended.Eugenie Danglars wrote:
If only people who wrote law where as forward thinking as you. I mean, there are still some trusts and things that bar illegitimate descendants, etc.
Anyway, all of my relatives are poor, so none of my illegitimate kids will have anything to fret over
- Eugenie Danglars

- Posts: 2353
- Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:04 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
It's not for a class, but it sort of came up when I was talking with an older student taking family law. Kinda blew my mind a little.addy11 wrote:Yeah, I guess it's the giver's prerogative to cling to such things when their money is in play. It seems like those people have the "concept" of legitimacy in mind more so than whatever the law says... I mean I can't imagine some crusty old scrooge assenting to his estate going to his lesbian daughter's child (via anonymous sperm donor) just because the law was amended.Eugenie Danglars wrote:
If only people who wrote law where as forward thinking as you. I mean, there are still some trusts and things that bar illegitimate descendants, etc.
Anyway, all of my relatives are poor, so none of my illegitimate kids will have anything to fret over
-
STLMizzou

- Posts: 385
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:45 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
AmandaPB wrote:Hi Mizzou friend. I go there now! Good luck with Northwestern.STLMizzou wrote:For me, it cold cuts out Michigan, Minnesota. Not big on upper east coast cuts out Cornell, Penn, and both the Bostons. West coast cuts out all the Cals.
What's left for a splitter is not too much besides from schools that strictly train for their state.
But then again, Friday on my walk I found myself thinking the weather was really nice even though it was 35 out (just happened to not be super windy/cloudy for once), so maybe Chicago is changing me.
Thanks! Enjoy your last semester in Columbia! Good luck to you as well (although with those splits I don't think you need any luck)
- elibrarian

- Posts: 336
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 11:49 am
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
I get nervous when I don't see this thread at the top of the page so...ahem.
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
have you not been constantly refreshing the NYU thread?elibrarian wrote:I get nervous when I don't see this thread at the top of the page so...ahem.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JustE

- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
Agreed. New twitter post from J this morning... Unfortunately no new info for us, though.elibrarian wrote:I get nervous when I don't see this thread at the top of the page so...ahem.
- D-hops

- Posts: 678
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:48 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
Technically, with the new civil union law, a child born to one of the married lesbians would be (legally) assumed to be the child of both the women because that is the way the law is structured.Eugenie Danglars wrote:Yeah, exactly. So a even a married lesbian couple could have bastard children together. Bizarre thought of the dayJamMasterJ wrote:wouldn't the legitimacy be based on the relationship between the child-bearer and the donor/father?Eugenie Danglars wrote:Question for pondering: If an unmarried lesbian couple in a civil union has children, are they illegitimate?
- JustE

- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
Michigan's getting too close... we need some activity in here, people!
- crumpetsandtea

- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
E, I like the name!!!!!!!!!!!! 
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
addy11

- Posts: 479
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:01 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
Are you sure? I thought you had to do a second parent adoption. It's great if that is the case, but it still doesn't make the child "legitimate"... I guess that unless a sex change is later involved, no same sex couple can have a legitimate child.D-hops wrote:Technically, with the new civil union law, a child born to one of the married lesbians would be (legally) assumed to be the child of both the women because that is the way the law is structured.Eugenie Danglars wrote:Yeah, exactly. So a even a married lesbian couple could have bastard children together. Bizarre thought of the dayJamMasterJ wrote:wouldn't the legitimacy be based on the relationship between the child-bearer and the donor/father?Eugenie Danglars wrote:Question for pondering: If an unmarried lesbian couple in a civil union has children, are they illegitimate?
This would probably annoy me if such things like legitimacy were very relevant at all in the modern world
- JustE

- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
crumpetsandtea wrote:E, I like the name!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks again!
- crumpetsandtea

- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
No problem.JustE wrote:crumpetsandtea wrote:E, I like the name!!!!!!!!!!!!I was hoping you'd like it!
Thanks again!
I'm so impatient. I'm like, sitting at work WILLING my email to deliver me some good news. I've been complete at WUSTL since 10/31 and then again on 12/2 and it's freaking me out that I'm not hearing back yet. Compound that witht he knowledge that NU won't be getting back to me till February and you have a very frustrated crumps
- D-hops

- Posts: 678
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:48 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
The civil union law makes anyone in a civil union treated identical to those in marriages under Illinois law. One presumption in IL law is that a child born to a married couple is the child of both the parents - so it holds that child would be the child of both parents in a civil union. Obviously second parent adoption is the recommended "belt and suspenders" approach but under the law it shouldn't be necessary.addy11 wrote:Are you sure? I thought you had to do a second parent adoption. It's great if that is the case, but it still doesn't make the child "legitimate"... I guess that unless a sex change is later involved, no same sex couple can have a legitimate child.D-hops wrote:
Technically, with the new civil union law, a child born to one of the married lesbians would be (legally) assumed to be the child of both the women because that is the way the law is structured.
This would probably annoy me if such things like legitimacy were very relevant at all in the modern world
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JustE

- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
How many TLS'ers are gonna make the cut for ED?
- emkay625

- Posts: 1988
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:31 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
Let's start an over/under:JustE wrote:How many TLS'ers are gonna make the cut for ED?
Over/under 3?
- franklyscarlet

- Posts: 2918
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:16 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
Let's not go thereJustE wrote:How many TLS'ers are gonna make the cut for ED?
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Northwestern Applicants '11-'12 (NOW WITH AWESOME POLL)
2. Unless they take splittersJustE wrote:How many TLS'ers are gonna make the cut for ED?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login