I just checked she never said midnight... So I believe Helmholtz.Helmholtz wrote:AFAIK, she only said that it updated once per day, didn't think she gave a specific time. I pulled a couple all-nighters last semester, I really seem to remember it switching over to the new day sometime around 8-9 in the morning (I am sad).rockchalk86 wrote:I thought dean z said midnight.
michigan 2010 applicants Forum
- Unitas
- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
- calicocat
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:29 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Damn, I wanna believe the happier theoryKakarot wrote:I just checked she never said midnight... So I believe Helmholtz.Helmholtz wrote:AFAIK, she only said that it updated once per day, didn't think she gave a specific time. I pulled a couple all-nighters last semester, I really seem to remember it switching over to the new day sometime around 8-9 in the morning (I am sad).rockchalk86 wrote:I thought dean z said midnight.
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:03 am
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
does admitted student site actually update on time? cuz for georgetown, it takes 2-3 weeks until i finally was able to access admitted site after being admitted. Is michigan like that too or wut. Anyone?
- Space_Cowboy
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:52 am
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Anyone willing to critique a Why Michigan? for me? If yes, please PM me. Thanks.
- Unitas
- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
In the past you could access admitted students site before you even went decision rendered. It may still be that way and we are all WL or rejected. Which is most likely. Just strange given how high our numbers are.jc1988 wrote:does admitted student site actually update on time? cuz for georgetown, it takes 2-3 weeks until i finally was able to access admitted site after being admitted. Is michigan like that too or wut. Anyone?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Most people have been able to log onto the AS site 2-3 days before the status checker changes to decision.jc1988 wrote:does admitted student site actually update on time? cuz for georgetown, it takes 2-3 weeks until i finally was able to access admitted site after being admitted. Is michigan like that too or wut. Anyone?
- Unitas
- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
And last year on this Monday in Jan it was a bloodbath for Michigan applicants... So chances are we are the bloody this year. Just strange.Helmholtz wrote:Most people have been able to log onto the AS site 2-3 days before the status checker changes to decision.jc1988 wrote:does admitted student site actually update on time? cuz for georgetown, it takes 2-3 weeks until i finally was able to access admitted site after being admitted. Is michigan like that too or wut. Anyone?
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:03 am
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
bye bye michigan....it's one of my fav programs actually cuz they have a supreb chinese legal program there.Helmholtz wrote:Most people have been able to log onto the AS site 2-3 days before the status checker changes to decision.jc1988 wrote:does admitted student site actually update on time? cuz for georgetown, it takes 2-3 weeks until i finally was able to access admitted site after being admitted. Is michigan like that too or wut. Anyone?

Last edited by jc1988 on Mon Jan 11, 2010 10:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:39 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Yeah, at least one person with the 1/11 decision date has been able to log in.Kakarot wrote:In the past you could access admitted students site before you even went decision rendered. It may still be that way and we are all WL or rejected. Which is most likely. Just strange given how high our numbers are.jc1988 wrote:does admitted student site actually update on time? cuz for georgetown, it takes 2-3 weeks until i finally was able to access admitted site after being admitted. Is michigan like that too or wut. Anyone?
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:03 am
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
this is depressing.dk8 wrote:Yeah, at least one person with the 1/11 decision date has been able to log in.Kakarot wrote:In the past you could access admitted students site before you even went decision rendered. It may still be that way and we are all WL or rejected. Which is most likely. Just strange given how high our numbers are.jc1988 wrote:does admitted student site actually update on time? cuz for georgetown, it takes 2-3 weeks until i finally was able to access admitted site after being admitted. Is michigan like that too or wut. Anyone?
- calicocat
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:29 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
I'm so scared. It's seriously eerie that I haven't heard from anyone. *goes to read "what if you are rejected everywhere* blog on TLS*
Last edited by calicocat on Mon Jan 11, 2010 10:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- los blancos
- Posts: 8397
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Surprisingly good nlj250 placement, though. Well, at least back before the world went down the shitter.Helmholtz wrote:ftfyrockchalk86 wrote: I think you are a shoe in at Duke which is practically equal to Michigan despite what most [strike]TLS'ers[/strike] lawyers, judges, law professors, and students think.
-
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:39 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
indeed. i've gotten over it though.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
I'll give you that sometimes they get overlooked on here, but it seems to me that Duke is to Michigan as Michigan is to Chicago. Maybe not a huge difference, but still a gap exists.boilercat wrote:Surprisingly good nlj250 placement, though. Well, at least back before the world went down the shitter.Helmholtz wrote:ftfyrockchalk86 wrote: I think you are a shoe in at Duke which is practically equal to Michigan despite what most [strike]TLS'ers[/strike] lawyers, judges, law professors, and students think.
- rockchalk86
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:16 am
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
I just think that people would kill for a Duke acceptance (Michigan too). The difference is rather minimal. In the end, it isn't the school that makes the lawyer, it's the person. Someone who graduates from Michigan with shitty work product will not fare better than someone who kills it with a Duke degree. We overlook this entirely too much on this site. NYU was my number 1 but I got deferred and now Michigan is looking very good. So is Duke. I'm a little upset, but I know that how I perform will ultimately dictate my future.
- los blancos
- Posts: 8397
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
No one is disagreeing with you. What Helm was saying is that someone who kills it at Michigan slightly > someone who kills it at Duke. And someone who is average at Michigan is slightly > someone who is average at Duke.rockchalk86 wrote:The difference is rather minimal. In the end, it isn't the school that makes the lawyer, it's the person. Someone who graduates from Michigan with shitty work product will not fare better than someone who kills it with a Duke degree. We overlook this entirely too much on this site.
- SanBun
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 10:19 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
yeah, that's assuming that the LSAT and UGPA actually do accurately predict how smart or competitive one will be as a law student (and human being in general LOOL)boilercat wrote:
No one is disagreeing with you. What Helm was saying is that someone who kills it at Michigan slightly > someone who kills it at Duke. And someone who is average at Michigan is slightly > someone who is average at Duke.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- rockchalk86
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:16 am
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
I would be willing to bet that if you kill it at either school your opportunities will be practically the same (as in level of prestige). If average, you may have better options at Duke considering the class size actually.boilercat wrote:No one is disagreeing with you. What Helm was saying is that someone who kills it at Michigan slightly > someone who kills it at Duke. And someone who is average at Michigan is slightly > someone who is average at Duke.rockchalk86 wrote:The difference is rather minimal. In the end, it isn't the school that makes the lawyer, it's the person. Someone who graduates from Michigan with shitty work product will not fare better than someone who kills it with a Duke degree. We overlook this entirely too much on this site.
- los blancos
- Posts: 8397
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
I would agree with this, especially since most seem to think that wrt to rankings Michigan is a bit underrated.Helmholtz wrote:I'll give you that sometimes they get overlooked on here, but it seems to me that Duke is to Michigan as Michigan is to Chicago. Maybe not a huge difference, but still a gap exists.boilercat wrote:Surprisingly good nlj250 placement, though. Well, at least back before the world went down the shitter.Helmholtz wrote:ftfyrockchalk86 wrote: I think you are a shoe in at Duke which is practically equal to Michigan despite what most [strike]TLS'ers[/strike] lawyers, judges, law professors, and students think.
If I hypothetically got into both, I'd probably choose Mich, primarily because it's a 3.5 hour drive from home and it places well on the West Coast. Duke is really high on my list though because of its class size, biglaw placement, temperate climate, and for me somewhere like Atlanta is a decent substitute for the West Coast. I'm also happy with them right now because they gave me priority track.

- los blancos
- Posts: 8397
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
SanBun wrote:yeah, that's assuming that the LSAT and UGPA actually do accurately predict how smart or competitive one will be as a law student (and human being in general LOOL)boilercat wrote:
No one is disagreeing with you. What Helm was saying is that someone who kills it at Michigan slightly > someone who kills it at Duke. And someone who is average at Michigan is slightly > someone who is average at Duke.
Who said anything about any of that? I was talking about perception (and, to a lesser degree, job placement).
Last edited by los blancos on Mon Jan 11, 2010 11:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Wait, what? Why do we have to assume that? I'm assuming boilercat's ">" was in reference to career prospects, not worth as a person.SanBun wrote:yeah, that's assuming that the LSAT and UGPA actually do accurately predict how smart or competitive one will be as a law student (and human being in general LOOL)boilercat wrote:
No one is disagreeing with you. What Helm was saying is that someone who kills it at Michigan slightly > someone who kills it at Duke. And someone who is average at Michigan is slightly > someone who is average at Duke.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- calicocat
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:29 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Law school admission = worth as a person...We all know that HelmHelmholtz wrote:Wait, what? Why do we have to assume that? I'm assuming boilercat's ">" was in reference to career prospects, not worth as a person.SanBun wrote:yeah, that's assuming that the LSAT and UGPA actually do accurately predict how smart or competitive one will be as a law student (and human being in general LOOL)boilercat wrote:
No one is disagreeing with you. What Helm was saying is that someone who kills it at Michigan slightly > someone who kills it at Duke. And someone who is average at Michigan is slightly > someone who is average at Duke.

- SanBun
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 10:19 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Oli wrote:Law school admission = worth as a person...We all know that HelmHelmholtz wrote:Wait, what? Why do we have to assume that? I'm assuming boilercat's ">" was in reference to career prospects, not worth as a person.SanBun wrote:yeah, that's assuming that the LSAT and UGPA actually do accurately predict how smart or competitive one will be as a law student (and human being in general LOOL)boilercat wrote:
No one is disagreeing with you. What Helm was saying is that someone who kills it at Michigan slightly > someone who kills it at Duke. And someone who is average at Michigan is slightly > someone who is average at Duke.
aaw ok thought you were talking about smartness/ quality of students.
whatever, we'll all die anyways. (just my way of dealing with the impending mich rejection)
and i was kidding as worth as a person- silliness, anyone?
- los blancos
- Posts: 8397
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
Hehe you never really know on this site.SanBun wrote: and i was kidding as worth as a person- silliness, anyone?

-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 8:53 pm
Re: michigan 2010 applicants
What does everyone's "Admissions Communications" list on the admitted students site? I was accepted previously, and it listed the two items mailed to me (admit packet and housing packet). However, it now shows nothing except my personal information.
Just curious if this is similar for others. Thanks!
Just curious if this is similar for others. Thanks!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login