Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017) Forum

[canafsa]

.

[texteach]

.

[Monday]

.

[curry1]

JS2 invite via phone. Non-URM. 3.8/174

First post in a year...I'm skeptical.

And he was talking about shooting for WUSTL and Vandy... another witch??

most likely an alt of 'fips tedora'. Real dedication to the troll.

[Smc1994]

JS2 invite via phone. Non-URM. 3.8/174

First post in a year...I'm skeptical.

And he was talking about shooting for WUSTL and Vandy... another witch??

As I suggested before, I think we need a good ol' fashioned witch test. That said, now that they know my plans as grand inquisitor for the first suspect, I think this one requires a different approach. Perhaps an interrogation, Giles Cory style.

[canafsa]

.

[Smc1994]

JS2 invite via phone. Non-URM. 3.8/174

First post in a year...I'm skeptical.

And he was talking about shooting for WUSTL and Vandy... another witch??

As I suggested before, I think we need a good ol' fashioned witch test. That said, now that they know my plans as grand inquisitor for the first suspect, I think this one requires a different approach. Perhaps an interrogation, Giles Cory style.

I like the first plan; Dunk the witch, oh you who are so wise in science.

Witch dunk it is!

[illini2016]

JS2 invite via phone. Non-URM. 3.8/174

First post in a year...I'm skeptical.

And he was talking about shooting for WUSTL and Vandy... another witch??

As I suggested before, I think we need a good ol' fashioned witch test. That said, now that they know my plans as grand inquisitor for the first suspect, I think this one requires a different approach. Perhaps an interrogation, Giles Cory style.

I like the first plan; Dunk the witch, oh you who are so wise in the art of science.

MORE WEIGHT

[unrelated]

JS2 invite via phone. Non-URM. 3.8/174

First post in a year...I'm skeptical.

And he was talking about shooting for WUSTL and Vandy... another witch??

As I suggested before, I think we need a good ol' fashioned witch test. That said, now that they know my plans as grand inquisitor for the first suspect, I think this one requires a different approach. Perhaps an interrogation, Giles Cory style.

I like the first plan; Dunk the witch, oh you who are so wise in science.

Witch dunk it is!

She turned me into a newt!

[texteach]

JS2 invite via phone. Non-URM. 3.8/174

First post in a year...I'm skeptical.

And he was talking about shooting for WUSTL and Vandy... another witch??

As I suggested before, I think we need a good ol' fashioned witch test. That said, now that they know my plans as grand inquisitor for the first suspect, I think this one requires a different approach. Perhaps an interrogation, Giles Cory style.

I like the first plan; Dunk the witch, oh you who are so wise in science.

Witch dunk it is!

She turned me into a newt!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yp_l5ntikaU

[Smc1994]

quote="texteach"]

JS2 invite via phone. Non-URM. 3.8/174

First post in a year...I'm skeptical.

And he was talking about shooting for WUSTL and Vandy... another witch??

As I suggested before, I think we need a good ol' fashioned witch test. That said, now that they know my plans as grand inquisitor for the first suspect, I think this one requires a different approach. Perhaps an interrogation, Giles Cory style.

I like the first plan; Dunk the witch, oh you who are so wise in science.

Witch dunk it is!

She turned me into a newt![/quote

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yp_l5ntikaU[/quote

Should Fips Tedora survive the test, he will have a choice: cake, or death?

[sigree]

So, are we going to get the banhammer out? Blood needs to be spilled.

Burn him!

He's a witch!

if we did a 10th of what he did, we'd be in jail

Guys Guys He's Tiffany! And Tiffany Gets in on a Wave that all belongs to her. One person wave.

Stop hating on her unless you know her. I personally don't but it seems wrong for people who want to promote justice to say comments such as that one.

[Saul Berenson]

So, are we going to get the banhammer out? Blood needs to be spilled.

Burn him!

He's a witch!

if we did a 10th of what he did, we'd be in jail

Guys Guys He's Tiffany! And Tiffany Gets in on a Wave that all belongs to her. One person wave.

Stop hating on her unless you know her. I personally don't but it seems wrong for people who want to promote justice to say comments such as that one.

Again I'm not hating on her! I'm just having fun with it!

[Future Ex-Engineer]

Guys Guys He's Tiffany! And Tiffany Gets in on a Wave that all belongs to her. One person wave.

Stop hating on her unless you know her. I personally don't but it seems wrong for people who want to promote justice to say comments such as that one.

Again I'm not hating on her! I'm just having fun with it!

Fantastic irony here. It's always 'just fun' as long as it's someone left-leaning. Guarantee you if someone made that sort of comment about Malia, Saul and a bunch of others here taking pot shots at TT would be all up in arms. It's both hilarious and sad to see the double standard.

Granted, I doubt you'd see anyone right-leaning rushing to the defense of Malia, but she's not the one being poked at ITT.

Disclaimer: I don't really care much about either party/leaning, just making some general observations here.

[ood's_brother]

Stop hating on her unless you know her. I personally don't but it seems wrong for people who want to promote justice to say comments such as that one.

Okay, but she already has a boyfriend.

However, you're right. We really must protect the celebrity class. Unless I know him/her personally I will refrain from commenting on any public figure, for the sake of JUSTICE.

[Saul Berenson]

.

[pkalltheway]

Honestly I much prefer obsessing over JS1s/JS2s on this thread instead of arguing over whether or not we should or shouldn't bash or not bash Tiffany Trump.

[sigree]

Guys Guys He's Tiffany! And Tiffany Gets in on a Wave that all belongs to her. One person wave.

Stop hating on her unless you know her. I personally don't but it seems wrong for people who want to promote justice to say comments such as that one.

Again I'm not hating on her! I'm just having fun with it!

Fantastic irony here. It's always 'just fun' as long as it's someone left-leaning. Guarantee you if someone made that sort of comment about Malia, Saul and a bunch of others here taking pot shots at TT would be all up in arms. It's both hilarious and sad to see the double standard.

Granted, I doubt you'd see anyone right-leaning rushing to the defense of Malia, but she's not the one being poked at ITT.

Disclaimer: I don't really care much about either party/leaning, just making some general observations here.

Ok I didnt want to mention this yesterday or today but now I MUST! Quit making assumptions about who I am: I VOTED FOR HER DAD! There you go I said it. But I happen to agree with u that others would get pissed if this was about Malia. And I agree with u about the general double standard in this country which is part of the reason I VOTED FOR HER DAD in the first place. But don't assume anything about me just cuz I'm having fun thank u.

And I know Here comes all the hate on me. don't care.

Dear Saul Berenson. I have not made any assumptions about who you are and your political allegiances have no bearing on my view of you. However, as a part of the TLS community, I respectfully point out that making fun of any one individual in this forum may not be productive.

[Smc1994]

Stop hating on her unless you know her. I personally don't but it seems wrong for people who want to promote justice to say comments such as that one.

Okay, but she already has a boyfriend.

However, you're right. We really must protect the celebrity class. Unless I know him/her personally I will refrain from commenting on any public figure, for the sake of JUSTICE.

I know we're not in law school yet, but may I suggest reading the Supreme Court decision for Wolston v. Readers Digest? While her earlier attempts at fame--that is, her brief, but critically acclaimed? musical career-- suggest that she has not shied away from her status as a public figure, the higher libel standard does not necessarily apply to those who were brought into the public eye unwillingly.

[Saul Berenson]

Honestly I much prefer obsessing over JS1s/JS2s on this thread instead of arguing over whether or not we should or shouldn't bash or not bash Tiffany Trump.

+1. Let's get back to it. 4:30 people!

[Leliana]

I feel like this wait is driving us all insane

[ood's_brother]

I know we're not in law school yet, but may I suggest reading the Supreme Court decision for Wolston v. Readers Digest? While her earlier attempts at fame--that is, her brief, but critically acclaimed? musical career-- suggest that she has not shied away from her status as a public figure, the higher libel standard does not necessarily apply to those who were brought into the public eye unwillingly.

SMH +

Let's go back to speculation on JS2's and our witch hunt for the troll responsible for the JS2-Gate.

[Pozzo]

I know we're not in law school yet, but may I suggest reading the Supreme Court decision for Wolston v. Readers Digest? While her earlier attempts at fame--that is, her brief, but critically acclaimed? musical career-- suggest that she has not shied away from her status as a public figure, the higher libel standard does not necessarily apply to those who were brought into the public eye unwillingly.

SMH +

Let's go back to speculation on JS2's and our witch hunt for the troll responsible for the JS2-Gate.

Worth dropping this witch-related nugget here...

[+] Spoiler

[youtube]yI2oS2hoL0k[/youtube]

[Smc1994]

I know we're not in law school yet, but may I suggest reading the Supreme Court decision for Wolston v. Readers Digest? While her earlier attempts at fame--that is, her brief, but critically acclaimed? musical career-- suggest that she has not shied away from her status as a public figure, the higher libel standard does not necessarily apply to those who were brought into the public eye unwillingly.

SMH +

Let's go back to speculation on JS2's and our witch hunt for the troll responsible for the JS2-Gate.

I don't think bringing that up deserves an eye roll. That decision is tremendously important, especially for the children of public figures.

Also, fair enough. I will once again place on the cowl of Grand Inquisitor and begin making arrangements to dunk the accused.

[Smc1994]

I know we're not in law school yet, but may I suggest reading the Supreme Court decision for Wolston v. Readers Digest? While her earlier attempts at fame--that is, her brief, but critically acclaimed? musical career-- suggest that she has not shied away from her status as a public figure, the higher libel standard does not necessarily apply to those who were brought into the public eye unwillingly.

SMH +

Let's go back to speculation on JS2's and our witch hunt for the troll responsible for the JS2-Gate.

I don't think bringing that up deserves an eye roll. That decision is tremendously important, especially for the children of public figures.

Also, fair enough. I will once again place on the cowl of Grand Inquisitor and begin making arrangements to dunk the accused.

Conspiracy theory. SMC1994 is Tiffany Trump.