Just saying - if fips was WL'd at 7 other T14s, their likelihood of getting into H aren't great.texteach wrote:I think it might be if you look at that person's posting history...sphyrnidae13 wrote:+1dhbiv wrote:curry1 wrote:This better not be flame
It seems too quiet so far.
Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017) Forum
- Future Ex-Engineer

- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:20 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
-
pilfin

- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 2:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Why post a flame from an account with 4000+ posts, when that kind of stuff gets you banned? That's the only part that doesn't make sense to me.mrgstephe wrote:Just saying - if fips was WL'd at 7 other T14s, their likelihood of getting into H aren't great.texteach wrote:I think it might be if you look at that person's posting history...sphyrnidae13 wrote:+1dhbiv wrote:curry1 wrote:This better not be flame
It seems too quiet so far.
-
canafsa

- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by canafsa on Sat Apr 15, 2017 4:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Monday

- Posts: 784
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:36 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by Monday on Thu May 11, 2017 12:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
pilfin

- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 2:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Monday wrote:Whoa, I did not realize that a TLS account with 4000+ posts is something with actual value and something one ought to take precautions to not get banned.pilfin wrote:Why post a flame from an account with 4000+ posts, when that kind of stuff gets you banned? That's the only part that doesn't make sense to me.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Monday

- Posts: 784
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:36 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by Monday on Thu May 11, 2017 12:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
- gargleblaster

- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 6:05 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
So is HLS buying corn or what?
-
canafsa

- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by canafsa on Sat Apr 15, 2017 4:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Pozzo

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Gosh, wish I had thought to do that. Good call.canafsa wrote:I hope so, I already ordered my corn-based edible arrangementsgargleblaster wrote:So is HLS buying corn or what?
- ood's_brother

- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:23 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
We need to get to the bottom of this. Someone should go check in reddit. No trolls there.Monday wrote:He's a TLS lounge resident, which is basically another word for troll.pilfin wrote:Monday wrote:Whoa, I did not realize that a TLS account with 4000+ posts is something with actual value and something one ought to take precautions to not get banned.pilfin wrote:Why post a flame from an account with 4000+ posts, when that kind of stuff gets you banned? That's the only part that doesn't make sense to me.![]()
![]()
all I'm saying is that you typically see flames from accounts with just a couple of posts (like mine), rather than the hardcore TLSers. People ascribe a surprising amount of value to their online profiles.
- Saul Berenson

- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2017 6:59 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Pretty obvious he's full of Sh$tood's_brother wrote:We need to get to the bottom of this. Someone should go check in reddit. No trolls there.Monday wrote:He's a TLS lounge resident, which is basically another word for troll.pilfin wrote:Monday wrote:Whoa, I did not realize that a TLS account with 4000+ posts is something with actual value and something one ought to take precautions to not get banned.pilfin wrote:Why post a flame from an account with 4000+ posts, when that kind of stuff gets you banned? That's the only part that doesn't make sense to me.![]()
![]()
all I'm saying is that you typically see flames from accounts with just a couple of posts (like mine), rather than the hardcore TLSers. People ascribe a surprising amount of value to their online profiles.
-
dhbiv

- Posts: 110
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2014 2:14 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by dhbiv on Sun Mar 05, 2017 11:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Saul Berenson

- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2017 6:59 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Let me try this again:
Js2 Wave TODAY @ 4:30 PM. Good Luck!
Js2 Wave TODAY @ 4:30 PM. Good Luck!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
canafsa

- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by canafsa on Sat Apr 15, 2017 4:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Smc1994

- Posts: 681
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I appreciate your tenacity.Saul Berenson wrote:Let me try this again:
Js2 Wave TODAY @ 4:30 PM. Good Luck!
- texteach

- Posts: 161
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 11:49 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by texteach on Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Smc1994

- Posts: 681
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Woah, woah, woah. Let's not make baseless accusations. I propose that we tie him to a chair and toss him in a lake. If he floats, he's clearly a witch. If not, justice has been served.texteach wrote:He's a witch!canafsa wrote:Burn him!dhbiv wrote:So, are we going to get the banhammer out? Blood needs to be spilled.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
sigree

- Posts: 142
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 2:40 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Honestly, what was the point?texteach wrote:He's a witch!canafsa wrote:Burn him!dhbiv wrote:So, are we going to get the banhammer out? Blood needs to be spilled.
- hammy393

- Posts: 390
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:51 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
if we did a 10th of what he did, we'd be in jailtexteach wrote:He's a witch!canafsa wrote:Burn him!dhbiv wrote:So, are we going to get the banhammer out? Blood needs to be spilled.
- Saul Berenson

- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2017 6:59 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Guys Guys He's Tiffany! And Tiffany Gets in on a Wave that all belongs to her. One person wave.hammy393 wrote:if we did a 10th of what he did, we'd be in jailtexteach wrote:He's a witch!canafsa wrote:Burn him!dhbiv wrote:So, are we going to get the banhammer out? Blood needs to be spilled.
- lebeaudiable

- Posts: 31
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2015 4:07 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
JS2 invite via phone. Non-URM. 3.8/174
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
sphyrnidae13

- Posts: 103
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 10:19 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Could it be?lebeaudiable wrote:JS2 invite via phone. Non-URM. 3.8/174
Last edited by sphyrnidae13 on Wed Feb 15, 2017 3:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
canafsa

- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by canafsa on Sat Apr 15, 2017 4:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Smc1994

- Posts: 681
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
First post in a year...I'm skeptical.lebeaudiable wrote:JS2 invite via phone. Non-URM. 3.8/174
- Future Ex-Engineer

- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:20 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
lol @ their avatar thoughSmc1994 wrote:First post in a year...I'm skeptical.lebeaudiable wrote:JS2 invite via phone. Non-URM. 3.8/174
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login