Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 9:41 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Congrats to all JS1s!
Though I admit I am super jealous and trying not to lose hope that one day I will be among you chosen few!
Though I admit I am super jealous and trying not to lose hope that one day I will be among you chosen few!
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Checking in! 171/4.0.
Submitted today after the dec LSAT score.
Chances are very low with the late application and a prior 167, but I figure you only live once right? What the hell haha. A couple questions for those who know the ins and outs of this process..
1) Does everybody who gets in have a JS1 prior? Does everybody with a JS1 get in?
2) No merit $ at Harvard for anybody right?
3) What time of turn around are we seeing from complete - under review - JS1? 2/3 months? So March/April for me if I am selected?
4) How do we find out about JS1 and acceptance, are they both emails? I ask because I am still stranded by Sandy and essentially getting no snail mail - thanks to futile USPS mail forwarding
Submitted today after the dec LSAT score.
Chances are very low with the late application and a prior 167, but I figure you only live once right? What the hell haha. A couple questions for those who know the ins and outs of this process..
1) Does everybody who gets in have a JS1 prior? Does everybody with a JS1 get in?
2) No merit $ at Harvard for anybody right?
3) What time of turn around are we seeing from complete - under review - JS1? 2/3 months? So March/April for me if I am selected?
4) How do we find out about JS1 and acceptance, are they both emails? I ask because I am still stranded by Sandy and essentially getting no snail mail - thanks to futile USPS mail forwarding
- Yukos
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
1) Interviewing is necessary but not sufficient for an acceptance (conditional logic is probably the only thing I'll ever remember from my LSAT studying). ETA: It's been estimated that interviewing ≈70% chance of acceptance.az21833 wrote:Checking in! 171/4.0.
Submitted today after the dec LSAT score.
Chances are very low with the late application and a prior 167, but I figure you only live once right? What the hell haha. A couple questions for those who know the ins and outs of this process..
1) Does everybody who gets in have a JS1 prior? Does everybody with a JS1 get in?
2) No merit $ at Harvard for anybody right?
3) What time of turn around are we seeing from complete - under review - JS1? 2/3 months? So March/April for me if I am selected?
4) How do we find out about JS1 and acceptance, are they both emails? I ask because I am still stranded by Sandy and essentially getting no snail mail - thanks to futile USPS mail forwarding
2) No. They offer need-based aid, but even the largest need-based offers require you to take out some amount of loans.
3) Not sure about complete to under review, and UR->JS1 varies wildly. It took me three months to get a JS1 but others got one in less than a week (and I'm sure there's others who were early-October completes who will gets JS1 invites in the coming weeks). As far as I know, if you don't receive a JS2 within a few weeks of your JS1 it means you're being held (someone correct me if you got a JS2 well after your JS1).
4) JS1 invitation is an email, JS2 is, by definition, a phone call. I'm sure there's some snail mail package that arrives later but someone who's been accepted will have to confirm that.
Hope this helps and good luck!
-
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 8:40 pm
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
fhweailufnersiuglaerlufnaweliufaerlufbewausbflaewsrnbfo;aweishfuw]a'esg;w'heaz21833 wrote: 1) Does everybody who gets in have a JS1 prior? Does everybody with a JS1 get in?









Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bellagio
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:08 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Congrats to the news JS1's! My chances here were close to none anyways, so I'm just happy for those who are one step closer 

-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Eh
Last edited by Anonymous4444 on Thu Jan 03, 2013 8:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
do you guys think lsat median at hls will drop to 172 this year? if so, may have a shot.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 3:15 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
In today via phone call. No JS1. 178/3.72. 3rd generation Exeter>P>HLS, probably explains why I didn't have an interview. Good luck to everyone else.
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Uhlulz wrote:In today via phone call. No JS1. 178/3.72. 3rd generation Exeter>P>HLS, probably explains why I didn't have an interview. Good luck to everyone else.
- John_rizzy_rawls
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:44 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
141. Retake.lulz wrote:In today via phone call. No JS1. 178/3.72. 3rd generation Exeter>P>HLS, probably explains why I didn't have an interview. Good luck to everyone else.
- helix23
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
yeah that was weakJohn_rizzy_rawls wrote:141. Retake.lulz wrote:In today via phone call. No JS1. 178/3.72. 3rd generation Exeter>P>HLS, probably explains why I didn't have an interview. Good luck to everyone else.
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:39 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Well, I guess somebody’s got to keep the old coffers full; our need-based aid depends on it. Anyway, it’s not like s/he’s not a deserving candidate, at least by raw numbers. So, congrats!lulz wrote:In today via phone call. No JS1. 178/3.72. 3rd generation Exeter>P>HLS, probably explains why I didn't have an interview. Good luck to everyone else.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- John_rizzy_rawls
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:44 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Dude...questcertainty wrote:Well, I guess somebody’s got to keep the old coffers full; our need-based aid depends on it. Anyway, it’s not like s/he’s not a deserving candidate, at least by raw numbers. So, congrats!lulz wrote:In today via phone call. No JS1. 178/3.72. 3rd generation Exeter>P>HLS, probably explains why I didn't have an interview. Good luck to everyone else.

- domino
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
i get that this is not real but was still mildly depressinglulz wrote:In today via phone call. No JS1. 178/3.72. 3rd generation Exeter>P>HLS, probably explains why I didn't have an interview. Good luck to everyone else.
- sabanist
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:48 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yes, you get a snail mail package of admissions info and your certification form (and a bumper sticker to boot) after your JS2.Yukos wrote: 4) JS1 invitation is an email, JS2 is, by definition, a phone call. I'm sure there's some snail mail package that arrives later but someone who's been accepted will have to confirm that.
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:39 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yeah, I totally missed that (obviously).domino wrote:i get that this is not real but was still mildly depressinglulz wrote:In today via phone call. No JS1. 178/3.72. 3rd generation Exeter>P>HLS, probably explains why I didn't have an interview. Good luck to everyone else.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 3:15 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
domino wrote:i get that this is not real but was still mildly depressinglulz wrote:In today via phone call. No JS1. 178/3.72. 3rd generation Exeter>P>HLS, probably explains why I didn't have an interview. Good luck to everyone else.
I don't really get worried about skepticism over the internet. I'm guessing it's the lack of an interview that's suspect here. I realize the point of this forum is to give people an idea of what to expect etc., and I can give everyone my anonymous internet assurance that I'm not lying/have nothing to gain from doing so etc., but people will take that as they will.
If anyone cares, I know of three other people admitted without interviews. All of them were HLS legacy. An Exeter classmate of mine was admitted this cycle, sans interview, with a 172.
Obviously it's difficult to believe that anyone in my situation exists, let alone posts on TLS.
But, really, do what you can to take your mind off things. Sorry, I guess.
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'll have to hop on Facebook or the alumni directory and see if any of my Exeter classmates have had similar luck.lulz wrote:domino wrote:i get that this is not real but was still mildly depressinglulz wrote:In today via phone call. No JS1. 178/3.72. 3rd generation Exeter>P>HLS, probably explains why I didn't have an interview. Good luck to everyone else.
I don't really get worried about skepticism over the internet. I'm guessing it's the lack of an interview that's suspect here. I realize the point of this forum is to give people an idea of what to expect etc., and I can give everyone my anonymous internet assurance that I'm not lying/have nothing to gain from doing so etc., but people will take that as they will.
If anyone cares, I know of three other people admitted without interviews. All of them were HLS legacy. An Exeter classmate of mine was admitted this cycle, sans interview, with a 172.
Obviously it's difficult to believe that anyone in my situation exists, let alone posts on TLS.
But, really, do what you can to take your mind off things. Sorry, I guess.
- Mdenis1
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:06 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You're reading my thoughts. That's exactly what I was wondering. Especially since they slipped to no 3. on USNWR last year, I guess they hope to climb up to no.2 again and not keeping their medians would probably prevent them to do so.twinkletoes16 wrote:sinfiery wrote:~1/3th the class will be filled after Feb from applicants applying before Jan1st if LSN is an accurate depiction.facile princeps wrote:
I know these are exceptions but they give me hope. Thank you for this!
I'm interested to see if H will keep their giant class size or keep their medians. I feel like they can't do both this cycle.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 3:15 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Exeter '07shntn wrote:I'll have to hop on Facebook or the alumni directory and see if any of my Exeter classmates have had similar luck.lulz wrote:domino wrote:i get that this is not real but was still mildly depressinglulz wrote:In today via phone call. No JS1. 178/3.72. 3rd generation Exeter>P>HLS, probably explains why I didn't have an interview. Good luck to everyone else.
I don't really get worried about skepticism over the internet. I'm guessing it's the lack of an interview that's suspect here. I realize the point of this forum is to give people an idea of what to expect etc., and I can give everyone my anonymous internet assurance that I'm not lying/have nothing to gain from doing so etc., but people will take that as they will.
If anyone cares, I know of three other people admitted without interviews. All of them were HLS legacy. An Exeter classmate of mine was admitted this cycle, sans interview, with a 172.
Obviously it's difficult to believe that anyone in my situation exists, let alone posts on TLS.
But, really, do what you can to take your mind off things. Sorry, I guess.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
'06, which means we probably at least know of each other.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 3:15 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I boarded, so I'd have to agree. PM if you need to, but I'm off here for now.shntn wrote:'06, which means we probably at least know of each other.
- Yukos
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Public school '07 4 lyfe.
- danitt
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:40 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Outed as a poor.Yukos wrote:Public school '07 4 lyfe.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login