Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle) Forum
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
.
Last edited by 03152016 on Tue Mar 15, 2016 6:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Yea I wouldn't "revoke" an ED offer. Still, there isnt all that much substantive difference between opportunities from the two schools. Its still a great outcome to get NYU.
- Audeamus
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
CLS 1L as well! Dropping in to join my comrades in wishing ya'll luck!
-
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 9:07 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Audeamus wrote:CLS 1L as well! Dropping in to join my comrades in wishing ya'll luck!
- drawstring
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Checking in.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Submitted my ED application last night
Should be good for lolz if nothing else.

Should be good for lolz if nothing else.
- phillywc
- Posts: 3448
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Using post 700 to wish y'all good luck.
ETA: Also me.
ETA: Also me.
- moopness
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
checking in. I'm thinking of EDing next week with my 3.4 175, but I also took the test three times with a 171 (1st) and 169 (2nd). Anyone think that it'll hurt?
- JWP1022
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 10:15 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Checking in! Thinking about ED with 3.7/171 and very good work experience.
- wtrc
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Checking in, but waiting to apply until 2 LoR's get in already. 3.8X/174 (3rd take)
- wtrc
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Is everyone doing the "supplemental statement," even if not a URM?
Also, seeing the $83,000 estimated cost of attendance per year in the instructions kinda was chilling
Also, seeing the $83,000 estimated cost of attendance per year in the instructions kinda was chilling
-
- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
wtrc wrote: seeing the $83,000 estimated cost of attendance per year in the instructions kinda was chilling


-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I did the supplemental and attached several addenda. Go big or gtfo.wtrc wrote:Is everyone doing the "supplemental statement," even if not a URM?
Also, seeing the $83,000 estimated cost of attendance per year in the instructions kinda was chilling
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 5:31 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
wtrc wrote:Is everyone doing the "supplemental statement," even if not a URM?
Also, seeing the $83,000 estimated cost of attendance per year in the instructions kinda was chilling
Yeah this is a good question. I really do not have anything too interesting about my background to write about so I don't want to write something just for the heck of it and waste the reader's time. Also writing a why essay for a top 5 school is pretty pointless, so I don't know what to do? I don't want to be the only one not adding a supplement but also don't have anything too meaningful to add compared to others.
- neprep
- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Checking in after getting my October score. Waiting on final edits on my résumé and still have to finish up my PS before applying with a 173.
- Nonconsecutive
- Posts: 2398
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:58 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Dittojk148706 wrote:wtrc wrote: seeing the $83,000 estimated cost of attendance per year in the instructions kinda was chilling![]()
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
don't let it freak you out. It's just because New York is insanely expensive. You don't notice it as a single hit, its a constant heightened expense for living in the city. NYC has its perks, though. You spend a little more, live a little better. If you really want to bum it out and live cheap, there are ways to cut down that $83K. Living in a cheap, small town with little culture, little cuisine ect. would be inevitably less expensive.Nonconsecutive wrote:Dittojk148706 wrote:wtrc wrote: seeing the $83,000 estimated cost of attendance per year in the instructions kinda was chilling![]()
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Checking in - went LSAC complete today.
- ph5354a
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
^ seconded. Depending on your housing needs, it's pretty easy to live below that. I've found it pretty doable to limit expenses, it just takes a little more work than it would in other areas (search out cheap happy hours, haul ass down to Trader Joe's, limit cab rides etc.). Just because you're in New York doesn't mean you have to live like Blair Waldorf.jbagelboy wrote:don't let it freak you out. It's just because New York is insanely expensive. You don't notice it as a single hit, its a constant heightened expense for living in the city. NYC has its perks, though. You spend a little more, live a little better. If you really want to bum it out and live cheap, there are ways to cut down that $83K. Living in a cheap, small town with little culture, little cuisine ect. would be inevitably less expensive.Nonconsecutive wrote:Dittojk148706 wrote:wtrc wrote: seeing the $83,000 estimated cost of attendance per year in the instructions kinda was chilling![]()
Also, don't freak out too much about the COA until you get your financial aid package and know how much you'll actually be taking out in loans. If you're around the medians, chances are you'll get something to take the edge off.
- drawstring
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
3.57 / 173 with 2 years WE as CPA - should I have done ED? I keep seeing some people w/ numbers similar or better who did ED. My goal is to be in DC, NYC, or Chicago Biglaw. I would be happy at other schools like UVA, NYU, Penn, UChi, Northwestern, etc. which is why I didn't ED.
Do I have a shot at Columbia RD?
Do I have a shot at Columbia RD?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- drawstring
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
MYLSN suggests you do, though the sample size is low.lawschool22 wrote:3.57 / 173 with 2 years WE as CPA - should I have done ED? I keep seeing some people w/ numbers similar or better who did ED. My goal is to be in DC, NYC, or Chicago Biglaw. I would be happy at other schools like UVA, NYU, Penn, UChi, Northwestern, etc. which is why I didn't ED.
Do I have a shot at Columbia RD?
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Thanks for checking. I'm always worried I'm not using MyLSN correctly. Do you use the automatic feature or custom ranges...and if so who do you determine an appropriate range? I'm sure there is a "best practice" on how to use that site, but I have not yet found info on that...drawstring wrote:MYLSN suggests you do, though the sample size is low.lawschool22 wrote:3.57 / 173 with 2 years WE as CPA - should I have done ED? I keep seeing some people w/ numbers similar or better who did ED. My goal is to be in DC, NYC, or Chicago Biglaw. I would be happy at other schools like UVA, NYU, Penn, UChi, Northwestern, etc. which is why I didn't ED.
Do I have a shot at Columbia RD?
- drawstring
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I try to keep the range fairly tight while maximizing sample size, which means a lot of playing around with numbers. I also try to be mindful of what the 25-50-75s are, as creating a range that includes below, at, and above median values can make the results seem more or less favorable than they really are. So, if you're a 169 and you do a range of 169-171 for a school with a 170 median, you may get back results that seem favorable when in reality everyone below median got dinged and everyone at or above median got in. Of course, you can always look at the users who compose the cases to see if that's the true.
I also think that including each of the past few cycles may lead to figures that underestimate your chances; Columbia's LSAT numbers have dropped, so your 173 is more valuable now than it was a few years ago.
I also think that including each of the past few cycles may lead to figures that underestimate your chances; Columbia's LSAT numbers have dropped, so your 173 is more valuable now than it was a few years ago.
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Where are my other EDers at?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login