Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- bizzybone1313
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:31 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Columbia seems to be pretty stingy with $. Is that the consesus view about Columbia on TLS? It seems like Columbia says to most people you can take it or leave it at sticker price.
- smaug_
- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:06 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No.bizzybone1313 wrote:Columbia seems to be pretty stingy with $. Is that the consesus view about Columbia on TLS? It seems like Columbia says to most people you can take it or leave it at sticker price.
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I say yes, but YMMV. It does seem like they take need into account more than most non-HYS schools though.hibiki wrote:No.bizzybone1313 wrote:Columbia seems to be pretty stingy with $. Is that the consesus view about Columbia on TLS? It seems like Columbia says to most people you can take it or leave it at sticker price.
- calidancer2
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:19 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
i have need. so much need.Tiago Splitter wrote:I say yes, but YMMV. It does seem like they take need into account more than most non-HYS schools though.hibiki wrote:No.bizzybone1313 wrote:Columbia seems to be pretty stingy with $. Is that the consesus view about Columbia on TLS? It seems like Columbia says to most people you can take it or leave it at sticker price.
for acceptance, but, hey, i'll take it.
- calidancer2
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:19 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
digifly wrote:Yeah, same here. I just cast a very wide net with my apps. Plus, many of the schools gave out fee waivers and I couldn't say no to that! Is Columbia your top choice?calidancer2 wrote:digifly wrote:Checking in! Anyone from CA here?
Me!! Concerned about Berkeley/UCLA/USC vs comin here for Cali placement
stanford/harvard/berkeley are my absolute tops, i've never been to NYC so unsure about columbia. i like the idea of it and had friends that loved it, but think i need to visit.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- digifly
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:28 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
If you weren't a girl I'd think you were my clone! That's pretty much the exact situation I'm in. Guess I'll wait and see how admissions goes and then worry about it from there.calidancer2 wrote:digifly wrote:Yeah, same here. I just cast a very wide net with my apps. Plus, many of the schools gave out fee waivers and I couldn't say no to that! Is Columbia your top choice?calidancer2 wrote:digifly wrote:Checking in! Anyone from CA here?
Me!! Concerned about Berkeley/UCLA/USC vs comin here for Cali placement
stanford/harvard/berkeley are my absolute tops, i've never been to NYC so unsure about columbia. i like the idea of it and had friends that loved it, but think i need to visit.
- calidancer2
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:19 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
digifly wrote:
If you weren't a girl I'd think you were my clone! That's pretty much the exact situation I'm in. Guess I'll wait and see how admissions goes and then worry about it from there.
We're flipped numbers wise too. You'll do great in CA with the higher GPA. I'd kill for those numbers! Higher LSAT and lower GPA feels much more unpredictable so I'm worried.
- digifly
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:28 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm sure you're fine! 99th percentile with your "lower" GPA will keep you on track. Did you apply to a lot of schools? What makes you say that CA schools favor GPAs?calidancer2 wrote:digifly wrote:
If you weren't a girl I'd think you were my clone! That's pretty much the exact situation I'm in. Guess I'll wait and see how admissions goes and then worry about it from there.
We're flipped numbers wise too. You'll do great in CA with the higher GPA. I'd kill for those numbers! Higher LSAT and lower GPA feels much more unpredictable so I'm worried.
- calidancer2
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:19 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
digifly wrote:I'm sure you're fine! 99th percentile with your "lower" GPA will keep you on track. Did you apply to a lot of schools? What makes you say that CA schools favor GPAs?calidancer2 wrote:digifly wrote:
If you weren't a girl I'd think you were my clone! That's pretty much the exact situation I'm in. Guess I'll wait and see how admissions goes and then worry about it from there.
We're flipped numbers wise too. You'll do great in CA with the higher GPA. I'd kill for those numbers! Higher LSAT and lower GPA feels much more unpredictable so I'm worried.
empirical evidence. Berk/Stanford/UCLA are GPA whores. i think all told i'll be applying to 15 (16 if i decide to waste my $ on yale). you?
- digifly
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:28 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So far I've turned in 12. At some point I just realized that, though I had fee waivers to them, there were just certain schools which I could never see myself attending. I figured the only reason for me to apply to those would be to see what kind of $$$ they doled out and then use that as a bargaining chip with other schools. Still debating on whether or not I'll do more.calidancer2 wrote:digifly wrote:calidancer2 wrote:digifly wrote:
empirical evidence. Berk/Stanford/UCLA are GPA whores. i think all told i'll be applying to 15 (16 if i decide to waste my $ on yale). you?
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:57 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Hey guys, did any of you make use of the "Supplemental Essay" section for something besides an adversity statement or addendum?
Would a "Why Columbia?" type essay be something I could do at all, or is that unnecessary and something they wouldn't read?
Would a "Why Columbia?" type essay be something I could do at all, or is that unnecessary and something they wouldn't read?
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Any reapplicants go complete yet? I'm sitting on 6 weeks incomplete now.
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:56 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I know there are still 3 days until the ED deadline, but do you think the # of Columbia ED apps so far on LSN as compared to last year will be any indication of how this cycle will go?
More than likely it's probably just LSN self-selection bias, but I just wanted to stir the pot.
More than likely it's probably just LSN self-selection bias, but I just wanted to stir the pot.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 7:36 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Crowing wrote:Any reapplicants go complete yet? I'm sitting on 6 weeks incomplete now.
I'm right there with you. When are you planning to email?
- moonman157
- Posts: 1040
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 10:26 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Is the number noticably lower? Sorry I'm lazyNDOMUKONGGGG wrote:I know there are still 3 days until the ED deadline, but do you think the # of Columbia ED apps so far on LSN as compared to last year will be any indication of how this cycle will go?
More than likely it's probably just LSN self-selection bias, but I just wanted to stir the pot.
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I e-mailed two weeks ago and got a generic response. I'm thinking about calling.bailey8078 wrote:Crowing wrote:Any reapplicants go complete yet? I'm sitting on 6 weeks incomplete now.
I'm right there with you. When are you planning to email?
- Elahrairah
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 3:07 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Even if you assume that two thirds of those who'd usually post on LSN are waiting until later to share their info, we have an unprecedentedly low number of ED applicants. It looks like 30-40 ED applicants is typical on LSN, about 10 of whom are accepted. Right now on LSN there are just seven EDers.moonman157 wrote:Is the number noticably lower? Sorry I'm lazyNDOMUKONGGGG wrote:I know there are still 3 days until the ED deadline, but do you think the # of Columbia ED apps so far on LSN as compared to last year will be any indication of how this cycle will go?
More than likely it's probably just LSN self-selection bias, but I just wanted to stir the pot.
I hope that's good news.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I hope so too! Although maybe the number of ED apps is lower bc people are less willing to commit knowing that this cycle might be more favorable / less predictable than others (in terms of $$$ and other acceptances on the line)Elahrairah wrote:
Even if you assume that two thirds of those who'd usually post on LSN are waiting until later to share their info, we have an unprecedentedly low number of ED applicants. It looks like 30-40 ED applicants is typical on LSN, about 10 of whom are accepted. Right now on LSN there are just seven EDers.
I hope that's good news.
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 2:50 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I haven't even gotten a status checker e-mail - applied about two weeks ago. Did this happen to anyone else? I'm wondering if I should maybe call them.
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 2:50 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
hm never mind... didn't realize Columbia did it differently. Good luck everyone!
-
- Posts: 571
- Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2011 2:36 pm
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- LSATSCORES2012
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
FWIW, this year the number of users who are registered on LSN for this cycle is 454. Last year, at this time there were 611 users registered who ended up marking applications for the 2011-2012 cycle (note that this might include applicants who were applying for this cycle but ended up making their application for last cycle before LSN updated). The only thing that should be excluded from this comparison are reapplicants who haven't yet updated their profile to reflect the fact that they're reapplying. I'll see if I can get numbers for Columbia later.
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Even then, that would have been an issue with last year's numbers. Yay for fewer applicants #pleasetakemecolumbiaLSATSCORES2012 wrote:The only thing that should be excluded from this comparison are reapplicants who haven't yet updated their profile to reflect the fact that they're reapplying.
- helix23
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks. I actually was curious about this.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:FWIW, this year the number of users who are registered on LSN for this cycle is 454. Last year, at this time there were 611 users registered who ended up marking applications for the 2011-2012 cycle (note that this might include applicants who were applying for this cycle but ended up making their application for last cycle before LSN updated). The only thing that should be excluded from this comparison are reapplicants who haven't yet updated their profile to reflect the fact that they're reapplying. I'll see if I can get numbers for Columbia later.
- kaf5250
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 6:27 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
This is something I am curious about, I am way below everything at Columbia but it is my absolute dream school and I just got a fee waiver (I think they are just mocking me though haha) would it be worth it for me to write a why columbia?joedf wrote:Hey guys, did any of you make use of the "Supplemental Essay" section for something besides an adversity statement or addendum?
Would a "Why Columbia?" type essay be something I could do at all, or is that unnecessary and something they wouldn't read?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login