This document explains it all: http://www.law.stanford.edu/program/tui ... 011-12.pdf. You start to get shielded from your parent's income/assets starting at age 26. From everything I've read, the need based aid is quite generous at Stanford compared to others.MumofCad wrote:@Schola - not Stanford, don't worry lol
@lawschoolproject - Unfortunately for us non-trads, I've heard that is the way all fin aid for law school's work. If you're going to need it most likely, you might as well get it now. I'm not up-to-date on these things, but I think my Harvard friend said it works on some sort of sliding scale based on your age and it isn't a non-factor until like 30+Not sure if that is accurate, but before you give up, you might want to find out if you are going to need the info anyhow later on KWIM? I thought she said at 28, they took into account 20% of her parent's income and it was a real pain because they were small business owners who aren't great about that sort of thing and it was just plain awkward.
Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
-
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 2:18 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
-
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
So looks like the government considers you independent if you haven't been claimed by anyone as a dependent since 2007 (assuming 2006's was last year) on a tax form AND haven't received more than 5k from them since 2007. Maybe you could recall Stanford or leave it blank, attach an addendum explaining that according to the FAFSA you are an independent because you meet both requirements?
Otherwise, hope you are 29.
Otherwise, hope you are 29.
- thelawschoolproject
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:58 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah, a couple years shy of 29. But that definitely helps. I shall try again tomorrow.
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
What's the latest on the status checkers? Anyone under review yet, or still just complete?
- curiouscat
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 9:57 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Under review here, submitted 10/27.jim-green wrote:What's the latest on the status checkers? Anyone under review yet, or still just complete?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Justdoingmybest
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 10:58 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Mine says 'submitted for review' submitted 10/30
not sure if 'submitted for review' = 'under review' though
not sure if 'submitted for review' = 'under review' though
- tamarind49
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 3:12 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Mine says "Your file has been submitted for review."jim-green wrote:What's the latest on the status checkers? Anyone under review yet, or still just complete?
- curiouscat
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 9:57 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
yeah, that's what mine says too, i just figured that was the same thing as being under review. does stanford give a separate status for that?Justdoingmybest wrote:Mine says 'submitted for review' submitted 10/30
not sure if 'submitted for review' = 'under review' though
- euskadi
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:02 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Perhaps this has been discussed on an earlier page, so I apologize beforehand if it has. But do you all suppose it's worth reworking my PS to include my motivation(s) for wanting to attend Stanford? I didn't manage to get any SLS-specific letters of recommendation, and I wasn't sure if a lack of anything directly related to the law school would hurt my chances significantly. Though my numbers are adequate, I'm feeling like I've got very little chance of admission, considering the genericness of my application (or what it would be were I to submit today).
Thanks for any and all help.
Thanks for any and all help.
-
- Posts: 670
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 6:49 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
3.37/167/ Mexican URM.
California resident, went to a UC. Would an app be a complete waste? I'm guessing so, but if a few people say it's worth a shot I might try.
California resident, went to a UC. Would an app be a complete waste? I'm guessing so, but if a few people say it's worth a shot I might try.
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
?
Last edited by jim-green on Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
- lrslayer
- Posts: 576
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:38 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
so i called their admissions last week and they told me that a department dean could send the cert form. i did just that. today i get an email that it has to be the dean of students so now i am scrambling to get that done. thanks to whoever gave me the bum info two weeks ago on the phone! arg
-
- Posts: 670
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 6:49 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by horrorbusiness on Mon Nov 21, 2011 3:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by jim-green on Sun Nov 20, 2011 10:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
- tamarind49
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 3:12 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Not a Stanford question, so sorry about that but can someone answer this question for me please? I'm not a US citizen, but I guess I'm not considered "international" really because I went to college in the US. I'm NOT from an under-represented country, but I grew up/live in an under-represented country. My family still lives there, and that's my permanent home. What does this make of me - am I considered URM or not? I have always been confused about this... and I just want to know. Any thoughts would be appreciated!
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Are you Caucasian? If so, it doesn't matter where you grew up.tamarind49 wrote:Not a Stanford question, so sorry about that but can someone answer this question for me please? I'm not a US citizen, but I guess I'm not considered "international" really because I went to college in the US. I'm NOT from an under-represented country, but I grew up/live in an under-represented country. My family still lives there, and that's my permanent home. What does this make of me - am I considered URM or not? I have always been confused about this... and I just want to know. Any thoughts would be appreciated!
- tamarind49
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 3:12 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
No, I'm Asian who grew up in an under-represented country. Would that make it any different?Hawkeye Pierce wrote:Are you Caucasian? If so, it doesn't matter where you grew up.tamarind49 wrote:Not a Stanford question, so sorry about that but can someone answer this question for me please? I'm not a US citizen, but I guess I'm not considered "international" really because I went to college in the US. I'm NOT from an under-represented country, but I grew up/live in an under-represented country. My family still lives there, and that's my permanent home. What does this make of me - am I considered URM or not? I have always been confused about this... and I just want to know. Any thoughts would be appreciated!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Oh, no. Asian doesn't count either. You actually have to be of a particular race to get the boost.tamarind49 wrote:No, I'm Asian who grew up in an under-represented country. Would that make it any different?Hawkeye Pierce wrote:Are you Caucasian? If so, it doesn't matter where you grew up.tamarind49 wrote:Not a Stanford question, so sorry about that but can someone answer this question for me please? I'm not a US citizen, but I guess I'm not considered "international" really because I went to college in the US. I'm NOT from an under-represented country, but I grew up/live in an under-represented country. My family still lives there, and that's my permanent home. What does this make of me - am I considered URM or not? I have always been confused about this... and I just want to know. Any thoughts would be appreciated!
-
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 1:10 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
If it helps, you can get your dean's office to email the form to Stanford. That will definitely get it there faster than snail mail.lrslayer wrote:so i called their admissions last week and they told me that a department dean could send the cert form. i did just that. today i get an email that it has to be the dean of students so now i am scrambling to get that done. thanks to whoever gave me the bum info two weeks ago on the phone! arg
- tamarind49
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 3:12 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I see. Thanks for clarifying this for me!Hawkeye Pierce wrote:Oh, no. Asian doesn't count either. You actually have to be of a particular race to get the boost.tamarind49 wrote:No, I'm Asian who grew up in an under-represented country. Would that make it any different?Hawkeye Pierce wrote:Are you Caucasian? If so, it doesn't matter where you grew up.tamarind49 wrote:Not a Stanford question, so sorry about that but can someone answer this question for me please? I'm not a US citizen, but I guess I'm not considered "international" really because I went to college in the US. I'm NOT from an under-represented country, but I grew up/live in an under-represented country. My family still lives there, and that's my permanent home. What does this make of me - am I considered URM or not? I have always been confused about this... and I just want to know. Any thoughts would be appreciated!

- lrslayer
- Posts: 576
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:38 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
ya, the problem is i haven't been able to get the dean all day. phone or email. ugh.tamereth wrote:If it helps, you can get your dean's office to email the form to Stanford. That will definitely get it there faster than snail mail.lrslayer wrote:so i called their admissions last week and they told me that a department dean could send the cert form. i did just that. today i get an email that it has to be the dean of students so now i am scrambling to get that done. thanks to whoever gave me the bum info two weeks ago on the phone! arg
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- fingerscrossedxx
- Posts: 733
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:56 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Has anyone had any luck with a solicited/unsolicited merit fee waiver from Stanford at all?
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
YHS doesn't give merit fee waivers, so no.
- lrslayer
- Posts: 576
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:38 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Oh F'N spectacular! the dean finally emailed me back and is now arguing with me about whether she is the one who fills it out or not. For god's sake; it says DEANS CERTIFICATION!!! wtf?!
- sandwiches5000
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 11:54 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Omgah. Under review and someone from Stanford looked at my LinkedIn profile.


Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login