+1. I'd expect this year's increase in apps to slow the review process down a bit, but I don't think it'd change the number of apps admitted & waitlisted. Davis takes its time with these decisions so there's less need for them to preemptively load these pools, unlike many other schools where all admit/WL decisions have been made already.missinglink wrote:... and so few answers.JDO wrote: Many questions...
Around these parts we trade in baseless speculation, so feel free to jump in.
UC Davis Forum
- drdolittle

- Posts: 627
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:15 am
Re: UC Davis
- quadsixm

- Posts: 390
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:52 pm
Re: UC Davis
I think this is right. I'm a typical splitter and it still says I'm awaiting eval.pegleg wrote:Are you both or one or the other? If you are below the GPA but above the LSAT they either haven't read your application yet or have and are holding you while they compare you against others. If you are above the gpa but below the LSAT similar story may apply, though in the latter case I see on LSN that many with lowish LSATs for Davis (sub 163) have been rejected by now, even with higher GPAs.Island Girl wrote:What about those who are above and below the GPA and LSAT extremes but who haven't been rejected or accepted by now?pegleg wrote:...Those below and above the extremes of thsoe GPAs and LSATs seem largely to have been rejected or accepted by now.
This is all nonsensical conjecture. Who really knows.
-
pegleg

- Posts: 139
- Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 1:29 am
Re: UC Davis
When did you go complete quad?quadsixm wrote:I think this is right. I'm a typical splitter and it still says I'm awaiting eval.pegleg wrote:Are you both or one or the other? If you are below the GPA but above the LSAT they either haven't read your application yet or have and are holding you while they compare you against others. If you are above the gpa but below the LSAT similar story may apply, though in the latter case I see on LSN that many with lowish LSATs for Davis (sub 163) have been rejected by now, even with higher GPAs.Island Girl wrote:What about those who are above and below the GPA and LSAT extremes but who haven't been rejected or accepted by now?pegleg wrote:...Those below and above the extremes of thsoe GPAs and LSATs seem largely to have been rejected or accepted by now.
This is all nonsensical conjecture. Who really knows.
- Island Girl

- Posts: 175
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:09 pm
Re: UC Davis
Oh I see. I'm a reverse splitter. Low LSAT, high GPA. Haven't heard anything since I went under eval in early January. I'm still keeping my hopes up though. I'd be very happy to stay close to the Bay Area.pegleg wrote:Are you both or one or the other? If you are below the GPA but above the LSAT they either haven't read your application yet or have and are holding you while they compare you against others. If you are above the gpa but below the LSAT similar story may apply, though in the latter case I see on LSN that many with lowish LSATs for Davis (sub 163) have been rejected by now, even with higher GPAs.Island Girl wrote:What about those who are above and below the GPA and LSAT extremes but who haven't been rejected or accepted by now?pegleg wrote:...Those below and above the extremes of thsoe GPAs and LSATs seem largely to have been rejected or accepted by now.
This is all nonsensical conjecture. Who really knows.
- quadsixm

- Posts: 390
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:52 pm
Re: UC Davis
Complete on 1/10. A little later than the rest of my apps, but UC Davis is the only school I haven't heard back from.pegleg wrote:
When did you go complete quad?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- NervousInKC

- Posts: 129
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:45 pm
Re: UC Davis
I hope there is massive movement before Friday. I'm feeling a good vibe for TODAY! -_-
-
pegleg

- Posts: 139
- Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 1:29 am
Re: UC Davis
I went complete later in January with numbers right in the mushy middle. Maybe both of us will hear this week.Island Girl wrote:Oh I see. I'm a reverse splitter. Low LSAT, high GPA. Haven't heard anything since I went under eval in early January. I'm still keeping my hopes up though. I'd be very happy to stay close to the Bay Area.pegleg wrote:Are you both or one or the other? If you are below the GPA but above the LSAT they either haven't read your application yet or have and are holding you while they compare you against others. If you are above the gpa but below the LSAT similar story may apply, though in the latter case I see on LSN that many with lowish LSATs for Davis (sub 163) have been rejected by now, even with higher GPAs.Island Girl wrote:What about those who are above and below the GPA and LSAT extremes but who haven't been rejected or accepted by now?pegleg wrote:...Those below and above the extremes of thsoe GPAs and LSATs seem largely to have been rejected or accepted by now.
This is all nonsensical conjecture. Who really knows.
I would love to be in the bay area and was status checking in a frothing craze every day, but now I have a healthy scholarship at So-Cal school so I will live even if Davis doesn't want my sweet and tender lovin'. I just, you know, WANT TO KNOW.
- Island Girl

- Posts: 175
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:09 pm
Re: UC Davis
God I'm so jealous of you right now. Haha. But with my LSAT score, there was no way the schools I was aiming for would've offered me scholarships. But I know exactly how you feel about ... just wanting to know.pegleg wrote:I went complete later in January with numbers right in the mushy middle. Maybe both of us will hear this week.
I would love to be in the bay area and was status checking in a frothing craze every day, but now I have a healthy scholarship at So-Cal school so I will live even if Davis doesn't want my sweet and tender lovin'. I just, you know, WANT TO KNOW.
Edit: deleted and edited for quote fail
-
pegleg

- Posts: 139
- Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 1:29 am
Re: UC Davis
I have a similar sort of pang because I really, really wanted to end up at a T-1... and I won't if Davis spurns me. However, we have to play the cards that we are dealt.Island Girl wrote:God I'm so jealous of you right now. Haha. But with my LSAT score, there was no way the schools I was aiming for would've offered me scholarships. But I know exactly how you feel about ... just wanting to know.pegleg wrote:I went complete later in January with numbers right in the mushy middle. Maybe both of us will hear this week.
I would love to be in the bay area and was status checking in a frothing craze every day, but now I have a healthy scholarship at So-Cal school so I will live even if Davis doesn't want my sweet and tender lovin'. I just, you know, WANT TO KNOW.It would be nice knowing where I'm going to end up living in the next three years.
Edit: deleted and edited for quote fail
Anyway enough with the negativity. It's not over till the fat lady issues an admissions' decision
-
primusux

- Posts: 297
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:02 pm
Re: UC Davis
Oh no, you didn't.....pegleg wrote: till the fat lady issues an admissions' decision!
-
pegleg

- Posts: 139
- Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 1:29 am
Re: UC Davis
Dean Pinkney, if you are reading this, I meant the Opera metaphor and not your fine selfprimusux wrote:Oh no, you didn't.....pegleg wrote: till the fat lady issues an admissions' decision!
- Island Girl

- Posts: 175
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:09 pm
Re: UC Davis
pegleg wrote:Dean Pinkney, if you are reading this, I meant the Opera metaphor and not your fine selfprimusux wrote:Oh no, you didn't.....pegleg wrote: till the fat lady issues an admissions' decision!
ILU BB
-
cyberPUNK

- Posts: 50
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:33 am
Re: UC Davis
163. 3.0 uc undergrad here...seems a lot of us that applied awhile back are being held up, i like to think that's a good thing.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
lawschoolliberal

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 1:26 pm
Re: UC Davis
Waitlisters- Question: How long do you plan on waiting this out? Or shall I say, what is your personal deadline?
-
finalaspects

- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: UC Davis
long as it takes. i want to attend davis so i'll wait until the last second.lawschoolliberal wrote:Waitlisters- Question: How long do you plan on waiting this out? Or shall I say, what is your personal deadline?
-
SpyderWishbone

- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 1:49 pm
Re: UC Davis
finalaspects wrote:long as it takes. i want to attend davis so i'll wait until the last second.lawschoolliberal wrote:Waitlisters- Question: How long do you plan on waiting this out? Or shall I say, what is your personal deadline?
Ditto, Hoping I hear something in June. Well, unless USC accepts me lol. Probably unlikely at this point. It was a long shot either way but there is hope. I went IR again yesterday. *Fingers Crossed*
-
cali gal

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:11 pm
Re: UC Davis
Davis is my first choice, so I will wait it out until the first day of classes.lawschoolliberal wrote:Waitlisters- Question: How long do you plan on waiting this out? Or shall I say, what is your personal deadline?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Bert

- Posts: 458
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:37 pm
Re: UC Davis
In a very similar boat to you. 2.9X, 163, years of great work experience, and killer LORs. Been complete since November.cyberPUNK wrote:163. 3.0 uc undergrad here...seems a lot of us that applied awhile back are being held up, i like to think that's a good thing.
- Great Satchmo

- Posts: 754
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 2:34 pm
Re: UC Davis
See, I'm going with a more hard-line approach:cali gal wrote:Davis is my first choice, so I will wait it out until the first day of classes.lawschoolliberal wrote:Waitlisters- Question: How long do you plan on waiting this out? Or shall I say, what is your personal deadline?
I'd attend Davis NO LATER than 2nd semester finals at another school.
-
lawschoolliberal

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 1:26 pm
Re: UC Davis
Davis is my first choice too, unfortunately though I can't wait past July for financial reasons....
- phoenix323

- Posts: 335
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:01 am
Re: UC Davis
Wouldn't it be lovely if they took a look at all of us faithful TLS Davis thread posters and said, "Hey, these people REALLY wanna go to Davis. Let's admit 'em all."
*Dreaming of King Hall...*
*Dreaming of King Hall...*
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Island Girl

- Posts: 175
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:09 pm
Re: UC Davis
Haha. I'd even sit on the floor to attend classes if they don't have enough space for lil' ol' me.phoenix323 wrote:Wouldn't it be lovely if they took a look at all of us faithful TLS Davis thread posters and said, "Hey, these people REALLY wanna go to Davis. Let's admit 'em all."
*Dreaming of King Hall...*
-
lawschoolliberal

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 1:26 pm
Re: UC Davis
They should admit us all! ...I guess that's why it's impt to send LOCI though, so they know which waitlisters are serious about attending if selected. ......Too bad they don't allow interviews, that's when you could bring out the charm and swagger
- phoenix323

- Posts: 335
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:01 am
Re: UC Davis
I am so with you on that. I go to UCD as an UG right now and sometimes I walk over to King Hall and stare at it longingly.Island Girl wrote:Haha. I'd even sit on the floor to attend classes if they don't have enough space for lil' ol' me.phoenix323 wrote:Wouldn't it be lovely if they took a look at all of us faithful TLS Davis thread posters and said, "Hey, these people REALLY wanna go to Davis. Let's admit 'em all."
*Dreaming of King Hall...*
- phoenix323

- Posts: 335
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:01 am
Re: UC Davis
I sent a preemptive LOCI. Hope I didn't hurt my chances.lawschoolliberal wrote:They should admit us all! ...I guess that's why it's impt to send LOCI though, so they know which waitlisters are serious about attending if selected. ......Too bad they don't allow interviews, that's when you could bring out the charm and swagger
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login