i think it actually updates to "Waitlist" on the status checker.JJDancer wrote:No.BrightLine wrote:They have a "waitlist" status? And a DF status witha letter that says you are on the WL?TheOcho wrote:I never went DF and just got waitlisted via status checker. This cycle fucking sucks.
Waitlists don't go DF/get a letter.
They just get an EMAIL.
So if you are DF, you are either IN or OUT.
USC 2011 Forum
- glitter178
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:21 pm
Re: USC 2011
- BrightLine
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Re: USC 2011
glitter178 wrote:i think it actually updates to "Waitlist" on the status checker.JJDancer wrote:No.BrightLine wrote:They have a "waitlist" status? And a DF status witha letter that says you are on the WL?TheOcho wrote:I never went DF and just got waitlisted via status checker. This cycle fucking sucks.
Waitlists don't go DF/get a letter.
They just get an EMAIL.
So if you are DF, you are either IN or OUT.
Thank you for the information. Once they are updating the status check with Wait List I wonder why they dont do Accepted/Rejected
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:52 pm
Re: USC 2011
I posted yesterday, but want more feedback...what are you thoughts on LOCI and/or additional LORs before a decision...i was complete 11/18 and am finally IR today, 3/2....i was thinking of adding an ED clause of some sort to LOCI
- cmaas
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:33 pm
Re: USC 2011
RedItalus10 wrote:I posted yesterday, but want more feedback...what are you thoughts on LOCI and/or additional LORs before a decision...i was complete 11/18 and am finally IR today, 3/2....i was thinking of adding an ED clause of some sort to LOCI
What do you mean that you would add an ED clause? You would tell them that if they accept you, you would go there? I don't see why you would do that. It almost guarantees that you won't get $$. I'm not totally against a LOCI, though.
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:52 pm
Re: USC 2011
im not expecting money from usc, so im willing to put that incmaas wrote:RedItalus10 wrote:I posted yesterday, but want more feedback...what are you thoughts on LOCI and/or additional LORs before a decision...i was complete 11/18 and am finally IR today, 3/2....i was thinking of adding an ED clause of some sort to LOCI
What do you mean that you would add an ED clause? You would tell them that if they accept you, you would go there? I don't see why you would do that. It almost guarantees that you won't get $$. I'm not totally against a LOCI, though.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Cade McNown
- Posts: 550
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 10:54 pm
Re: USC 2011
Not exactly true. They did all WLs by status checker last year and then mailed out a WL letter asking your intent to remain on the WL. http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =7&t=92010. I was part of said group last year. It's about time for USC to start handing out some WLs this cycle so we'll see.JJDancer wrote:No.BrightLine wrote:They have a "waitlist" status? And a DF status witha letter that says you are on the WL?TheOcho wrote:I never went DF and just got waitlisted via status checker. This cycle fucking sucks.
Waitlists don't go DF/get a letter.
They just get an EMAIL.
So if you are DF, you are either IN or OUT.
- glitter178
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:21 pm
Re: USC 2011
i think general consensus is that it is unnecessary, unless (i guess) your stats are well above their 75's and you are worried about YP, which USC doesn't really do anyway.RedItalus10 wrote:I posted yesterday, but want more feedback...what are you thoughts on LOCI and/or additional LORs before a decision...i was complete 11/18 and am finally IR today, 3/2....i was thinking of adding an ED clause of some sort to LOCI
- BrightLine
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Re: USC 2011
Cade McNown wrote:Not exactly true. They did all WLs by status checker last year and then mailed out a WL letter asking your intent to remain on the WL. http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =7&t=92010. I was part of said group last year. It's about time for USC to start handing out some WLs this cycle so we'll see.JJDancer wrote:No.BrightLine wrote:They have a "waitlist" status? And a DF status witha letter that says you are on the WL?TheOcho wrote:I never went DF and just got waitlisted via status checker. This cycle fucking sucks.
Waitlists don't go DF/get a letter.
They just get an EMAIL.
So if you are DF, you are either IN or OUT.
But DF definitely means Accept or Reject?
- Magnolia
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:06 pm
Re: USC 2011
I don't see what it would get you at this stage. Before, a LOCI could have possibly prompted them to put you IR. But now you've made it to that stage. You've been IR for less than a day, which means they've just barely started looking at your file. Unless you think that your original app was really weak and you need to make up some sort of deficiency, I don't think a LOCI is needed or even helpful right now. If you're still IR in a few weeks/months when everyone else who went IR 3/2 is hearing back, then I would send one, but not yet. Just my $0.02.RedItalus10 wrote:im not expecting money from usc, so im willing to put that incmaas wrote:RedItalus10 wrote:I posted yesterday, but want more feedback...what are you thoughts on LOCI and/or additional LORs before a decision...i was complete 11/18 and am finally IR today, 3/2....i was thinking of adding an ED clause of some sort to LOCI
What do you mean that you would add an ED clause? You would tell them that if they accept you, you would go there? I don't see why you would do that. It almost guarantees that you won't get $$. I'm not totally against a LOCI, though.
- Cade McNown
- Posts: 550
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 10:54 pm
Re: USC 2011
Yes, at least based on past cycles and what we've seen with the decision batches this year. Also, as the cycle progresses DF groupings appear to become less homogeneous until the very end. Final batches came in around April 26/27 last year and were completely homogeneous from memory (i.e. if DF 4/26 in, if 4/27 out).BrightLine wrote: But DF definitely means Accept or Reject?
- BrightLine
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Re: USC 2011
Cade McNown wrote:Yes, at least based on past cycles and what we've seen with the decision batches this year. Also, as the cycle progresses DF groupings appear to become less homogeneous until the very end. Final batches came in around April 26/27 last year and were completely homogeneous from memory (i.e. if DF 4/26 in, if 4/27 out).BrightLine wrote: But DF definitely means Accept or Reject?
Thanks, I have been waitlisted by schools ranked lower than USC (YP? lack of softs?) but I cant imagine them rejecting me.

- helloperson
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:26 pm
Re: USC 2011
with your harvard-esque numbers that's straight YPBrightLine wrote:Cade McNown wrote:Yes, at least based on past cycles and what we've seen with the decision batches this year. Also, as the cycle progresses DF groupings appear to become less homogeneous until the very end. Final batches came in around April 26/27 last year and were completely homogeneous from memory (i.e. if DF 4/26 in, if 4/27 out).BrightLine wrote: But DF definitely means Accept or Reject?
Thanks, I have been waitlisted by schools ranked lower than USC (YP? lack of softs?) but I cant imagine them rejecting me.
- BrightLine
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Re: USC 2011
helloperson wrote:with your harvard-esque numbers that's straight YPBrightLine wrote:Cade McNown wrote:Yes, at least based on past cycles and what we've seen with the decision batches this year. Also, as the cycle progresses DF groupings appear to become less homogeneous until the very end. Final batches came in around April 26/27 last year and were completely homogeneous from memory (i.e. if DF 4/26 in, if 4/27 out).BrightLine wrote: But DF definitely means Accept or Reject?
Thanks, I have been waitlisted by schools ranked lower than USC (YP? lack of softs?) but I cant imagine them rejecting me.
People say that, but has it ever been confirmed that YP really exists?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Redsgomarchingon
- Posts: 457
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 7:42 pm
Re: USC 2011
There's a mountain of evidence suggesting it does. I don't know if any deans will straight out admit to it, but it's just like applying for a job you're overqualified for.BrightLine wrote:helloperson wrote:BrightLine wrote:BrightLine wrote: But DF definitely means Accept or Reject?
People say that, but has it ever been confirmed that YP really exists?
- Cade McNown
- Posts: 550
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 10:54 pm
Re: USC 2011
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2&t=148284Redsgomarchingon wrote: There's a mountain of evidence suggesting it does. I don't know if any deans will straight out admit to it, but it's just like applying for a job you're overqualified for.
TLSer made some interesting analysis of YP.
- glitter178
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:21 pm
Re: USC 2011
In @ USC... just got my letter. DF 2/28
- BrightLine
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Re: USC 2011
glitter178 wrote:In @ USC... just got my letter. DF 2/28
Congratulations, how big is the letter/package or whatever?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- glitter178
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:21 pm
Re: USC 2011
It's a single piece of paper informing you of your acceptance. they say a packet is forthcoming.BrightLine wrote:glitter178 wrote:In @ USC... just got my letter. DF 2/28
Congratulations, how big is the letter/package or whatever?
-
- Posts: 1564
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 7:41 pm
Re: USC 2011
Congrats! I had been waiting for this...glitter178 wrote:In @ USC... just got my letter. DF 2/28

- glitter178
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:21 pm
Re: USC 2011
me tooJJDancer wrote:Congrats! I had been waiting for this...glitter178 wrote:In @ USC... just got my letter. DF 2/28

-
- Posts: 1564
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 7:41 pm
Re: USC 2011
Awesome! How does this affect your decision-making process?glitter178 wrote:me tooJJDancer wrote:Congrats! I had been waiting for this...glitter178 wrote:In @ USC... just got my letter. DF 2/28i am at work but my boyfriend is home so i made him call me and read the letter as soon as the mail came. i figured i'd get it quickly b/c i was one of the first to get the rothman invite in the mail.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- dswimmer
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 8:50 pm
Re: USC 2011
5th IR date today...When is this going to end?!?!?
Also, for those who went IR today, could you post your stats?
Also, for those who went IR today, could you post your stats?
Last edited by dswimmer on Wed Mar 02, 2011 6:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- glitter178
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:21 pm
Re: USC 2011
I want to see if they'll give me any money--- if they do, it's almost guaranteed i'll attend.JJDancer wrote:Awesome! How does this affect your decision-making process?glitter178 wrote:me tooJJDancer wrote:Congrats! I had been waiting for this...glitter178 wrote:In @ USC... just got my letter. DF 2/28i am at work but my boyfriend is home so i made him call me and read the letter as soon as the mail came. i figured i'd get it quickly b/c i was one of the first to get the rothman invite in the mail.
- Redsgomarchingon
- Posts: 457
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 7:42 pm
Re: USC 2011
Ugh I hope I get accepted before the ASD
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 5:05 pm
Re: USC 2011
glitter178 wrote:In @ USC... just got my letter. DF 2/28
Congrats! I guess it's too much to hope for a solidly "accept" heavy mailing day, eh?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login