Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017) Forum
-
wheathins

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2017 5:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by wheathins on Mon Feb 20, 2017 6:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Pozzo

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
December takers were up. But as of last week, applicants were down 1.5%.wheathins wrote:That seems quite reasonable. But I thought Spivey said there was a big increase in the # of Dec. 2016 test-takers, and he also wrote in his blog that there will be greater number of applicants this year...ashrice13 wrote:Spivey said the decision process has been slower across the board this cycle. I believe this can be attributed (at least in in part) to the lower LSAT scores and lower number of applicantslatif wrote:I welcome speculation, I think that the drop in high LSAT scores is leading them to focus on their medians? Is there anyone who is above 75th and at least above 25th that hasn't gotten a JS1?canafsa wrote:ayylmao wrote:Any reason why they've made so few offers at this point? Is this abnormal or just how H rolls?
We've done something to offend Them.... Starting to wonder if a sacrifice isn't in order.
-
wheathins

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2017 5:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by wheathins on Mon Feb 20, 2017 6:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
curry1

- Posts: 884
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:41 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
The gross number of applicants being down 1.5% doesn't mean much for a school like HLS. All that really matters are the top few bands of LSAT scorers.Pozzo wrote:December takers were up. But as of last week, applicants were down 1.5%.wheathins wrote:That seems quite reasonable. But I thought Spivey said there was a big increase in the # of Dec. 2016 test-takers, and he also wrote in his blog that there will be greater number of applicants this year...ashrice13 wrote:Spivey said the decision process has been slower across the board this cycle. I believe this can be attributed (at least in in part) to the lower LSAT scores and lower number of applicantslatif wrote:I welcome speculation, I think that the drop in high LSAT scores is leading them to focus on their medians? Is there anyone who is above 75th and at least above 25th that hasn't gotten a JS1?canafsa wrote:ayylmao wrote:Any reason why they've made so few offers at this point? Is this abnormal or just how H rolls?
We've done something to offend Them.... Starting to wonder if a sacrifice isn't in order.
-
wheathins

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2017 5:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by wheathins on Mon Feb 20, 2017 7:10 pm, edited 4 times in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Pozzo

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Spivey put all the data up on his blog: http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/2016-2 ... -02-03-17/wheathins wrote:Anyone know whether there's an increase/decrease in the number of people who got 170 or above?
170+ is down 3%, but there was a big increase in 170s, up 43%. If you back those out, 171-180 is down over 17%.
-
goldenbear2020

- Posts: 631
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2016 11:47 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
173+ is down 15% and 172+ is down 17%, so I don't see how HLS gets back to a 173 median without lowering their GPA floor, taking more KJDs, placing less emphasis on softs, etc.Pozzo wrote:Spivey put all the data up on his blog: http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/2016-2 ... -02-03-17/wheathins wrote:Anyone know whether there's an increase/decrease in the number of people who got 170 or above?
170+ is down 3%, but there was a big increase in 170s, up 43%. If you back those out, 171-180 is down over 17%.
-
Monday

- Posts: 784
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:36 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by Monday on Thu May 11, 2017 12:01 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
canafsa

- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by canafsa on Sat Apr 15, 2017 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- poptart123

- Posts: 1157
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 5:31 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
But your corn wasn't grown in Iowa. It wouldn't even make a good tortilla. We are talking a golden-yellow corn, not brown, creamed corn.canafsa wrote:Not if production of corn is 2000 lbs and I get first dibs. I probably won't even notice the difference in quality, though everyone else certainly will.Monday wrote:We need around 50 lbs of corn to maintain current weight. Production of corn is down 17%. We will most likely lose weight.
-
Pozzo

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
But some other corn buyers give a lot of money to keep the best corn for themselves.canafsa wrote:Not if production of corn is 2000 lbs and I get first dibs. I probably won't even notice the difference in quality, though everyone else certainly will.Monday wrote:We need around 50 lbs of corn to maintain current weight. Production of corn is down 17%. We will most likely lose weight.
- Saul Berenson

- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2017 6:59 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Do other Schools know if you have been admitted to other Schools?
-
canafsa

- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by canafsa on Sat Apr 15, 2017 4:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Monday

- Posts: 784
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:36 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by Monday on Thu May 11, 2017 12:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Pozzo

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
True, but they may dip down to some of the corn they would have not historically given money to in past cycles.canafsa wrote:Will they give more? I was under the impression schools had a budget set ahead of time.Pozzo wrote:But some other corn buyers give a lot of money to keep the best corn for themselves.canafsa wrote:Not if production of corn is 2000 lbs and I get first dibs. I probably won't even notice the difference in quality, though everyone else certainly will.Monday wrote:We need around 50 lbs of corn to maintain current weight. Production of corn is down 17%. We will most likely lose weight.
-
canafsa

- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by canafsa on Sat Apr 15, 2017 4:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- gargleblaster

- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 6:05 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
You could also reduce activity levels, reducing caloric expenditure, reducing need for raw amounts of corn.Pozzo wrote:True, but they may dip down to some of the corn they would have not historically given money to in past cycles.canafsa wrote:Will they give more? I was under the impression schools had a budget set ahead of time.Pozzo wrote:But some other corn buyers give a lot of money to keep the best corn for themselves.canafsa wrote:Not if production of corn is 2000 lbs and I get first dibs. I probably won't even notice the difference in quality, though everyone else certainly will.Monday wrote:We need around 50 lbs of corn to maintain current weight. Production of corn is down 17%. We will most likely lose weight.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Monday

- Posts: 784
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:36 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by Monday on Thu May 11, 2017 12:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
- ood's_brother

- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:23 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
No, they used to be able to see all the other schools in your fafsa app, but I believe that was changed during the Obama administration.Saul Berenson wrote:Do other Schools know if you have been admitted to other Schools?
May need someone to double check.
-
wheathins

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2017 5:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by wheathins on Mon Feb 20, 2017 7:07 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
curry1

- Posts: 884
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:41 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
ignoring the fact that tons of 172+ers have gpas that preclude them from hys (3.5ish for h, 3.7 or below for ys, generously). Just run a search on LSN and you'll see this.wheathins wrote:It felt really great scrolling down, knowing that the # of 170+ scores are low...Monday wrote:There are way more 172+ scores than HYS collectively need.canafsa wrote:But isn't the point that those corn buyers are drawing kernels from the top buyers? In other words, that wouldn't affect the quality that the top buyers end up with.
But that kills it. If there ware way more 172+ than HYS collectively need, then I guess that means the fluctuation in the number of test-takers have absolutely no bearing on the weight/value of your 170+ score.
Sad.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
wheathins

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2017 5:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by wheathins on Mon Feb 20, 2017 7:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ood's_brother

- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:23 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
After JS1, I was told my file would be sent for faculty review.wheathins wrote:By the way, while we wait, does anyone know any link/articles that explain in greater detail how the files are read at HLS?
I ask because I see "a former voting member at ....XXXX admissions committee" in bios. This line alone makes it sound like there's an actual admissions "committee" and that they actually "vote" like they do in "Legally Blonde."
I've been Googling and my understanding of the HLS file reading process is that two people each read your application separately, gives a numerical rating based on (LSAT/GPA/Softs), and if both agree to admit, then that person is an admit. If the two disagree, then the Dean decides. Is this fairly accurate?
So it's not like there's a literally "committee" that debates your application and actually "vote," right?
I also heard that HLS professors might read the files. Does anyone know at what stages they read your files and whose files they read?
-
wheathins

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2017 5:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by wheathins on Mon Feb 20, 2017 7:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ood's_brother

- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:23 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
IDKwheathins wrote:
Oh wow... I guess professors are the final gatekeepers then?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login