Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle) Forum
-
socrates88

- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:08 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
It was supposed to be comic relief!
- callmemaybe84

- Posts: 147
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Oh I know. My comment still stands, and probably for me as well.socrates88 wrote:It was supposed to be comic relief!
- jselson

- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
The pic is a great touchsocrates88 wrote:It was supposed to be comic relief!
- applemaroon

- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
.
Last edited by applemaroon on Sat Sep 07, 2013 12:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
- jselson

- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Yeah, except NO ONE HAS UPDATED ITapplemaroon wrote:Absolutely flawless.socrates88 wrote:Just made a Tumblr http://ylsfb.tumblr.com
Any of our already admitted friends can send an email to [email protected] (just put the number in the subject, your email address, etc won't be recorded) anytime there's a change and the new number will be reflected.
-
socrates88

- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:08 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Paging edamame, carboncopy and friends, our loyal informants!
- callmemaybe84

- Posts: 147
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Why do I feel like we are going to see some 1am ding action tonight?
-
anela00

- Posts: 188
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 9:05 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
It's still at 213.
-
socrates88

- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:08 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Imagine all these law profs up at this hour scrambling to get their scores into Asha. Seeing this site would give them a good laugh.
-
edamame

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:25 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
LOL. I have a strong suspicion that they're still admitting 12s and Asha picks. Correct me if you think otherwise.socrates88 wrote:Imagine all these law profs up at this hour scrambling to get their scores into Asha. Seeing this site would give them a good laugh.
-
socrates88

- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:08 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Or they have too many 11s and are deciding their fate.
-
feelingood

- Posts: 88
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:10 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Do they usually put 10s on the WL or is it limited pretty much to 11s? I'm by no means a statistician so I honestly wouldn't be surprised if what I'm about to say is 100% incorrect but:
Wouldn't 10 from faculty review mean 2 "3's" (i.e. 50th-75th percentile of applicants) and 1 "4" (75th-100th percentile of applicants) (this is assuming that if at least 1 professor is giving you a 4, that none are giving you a 2)?
If you take the upward bounds and weight them equally that'd be the 83rd percentile (10/12). We're talking about ~491 students based on last year's numbers. Seeing as how they only made 237 new offers (something like the top 8.1% of their applicants), that leaves a pretty enormous hole, especially considering that 11's and 12's are the top 8.4% of applicants. The 0.3% gap of their applicants from last year would constitute ~88. Does it make sense that, if they put ~100 on the wait list, that only 12 or fewer will be 10s?
And I also know that this is probably irrelevant because we'll never know if we are 11s, 10s, or something worse.
Wouldn't 10 from faculty review mean 2 "3's" (i.e. 50th-75th percentile of applicants) and 1 "4" (75th-100th percentile of applicants) (this is assuming that if at least 1 professor is giving you a 4, that none are giving you a 2)?
If you take the upward bounds and weight them equally that'd be the 83rd percentile (10/12). We're talking about ~491 students based on last year's numbers. Seeing as how they only made 237 new offers (something like the top 8.1% of their applicants), that leaves a pretty enormous hole, especially considering that 11's and 12's are the top 8.4% of applicants. The 0.3% gap of their applicants from last year would constitute ~88. Does it make sense that, if they put ~100 on the wait list, that only 12 or fewer will be 10s?
And I also know that this is probably irrelevant because we'll never know if we are 11s, 10s, or something worse.
-
socrates88

- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:08 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Asha only gives the profs 1000 applications, after she chooses 50-80 presumptive admits. So the profs are choosing the top 150-180(15%-18%) out if the top 1/3 of applicants which amounts to top 5-6% of applicants after Asha picks the top 2-3%.
-
feelingood

- Posts: 88
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:10 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
socrates88 wrote:Asha only gives the profs 1000 applications, after she chooses 50-80 presumptive admits. So the profs are choosing the top 150-180(15%-18%) out if the top 1/3 of applicants which amounts to top 5-6% of applicants after Asha picks the top 2-3%.
Ahhhhhh okay that makes so much more sense. I knew I had read SOMEWHERE that they put 10s on the wait list--I had no idea that she gave reviewers so few applications.
- sabanist

- Posts: 574
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:48 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
maybe I am up too late writing this paper, but I am dying at the tumblr. perfect.
-
MannaMan

- Posts: 36
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:53 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
No reported dings? This is getting super frustrating.
-
test

- Posts: 60
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 4:10 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
There are zero other explanations at this point except that they are lazy or fucking with us.MannaMan wrote:No reported dings? This is getting super frustrating.
- callmemaybe84

- Posts: 147
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Pretty soon, Yale gonna be all:

-
az21833

- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
yeah at this point i think its clear we are going to be part of a massive wave given the way things have gone down, which means either WL or Ding. MOnday was their goal so we will probably hear today or tomorrow
-
socrates88

- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:08 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Still 213? The Tumblr hasn't been updated since 2 AM.
- carboncopyx

- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
That's because it still hasn't changed since 2am.socrates88 wrote:Still 213? The Tumblr hasn't been updated since 2 AM.
-
rocktower3

- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:33 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I keep checking the count - will update if anything happens!socrates88 wrote:Still 213? The Tumblr hasn't been updated since 2 AM.
-
az21833

- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
carboncopyx wrote:That's because it still hasn't changed since 2am.socrates88 wrote:Still 213? The Tumblr hasn't been updated since 2 AM.
-
MannaMan

- Posts: 36
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:53 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
No movement on the Tumblr/Facebook front?
-
socrates88

- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:08 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Looks like the Tumblr was just refreshed 5 minutes ago with 213--no change.