Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle) Forum
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:08 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
It was supposed to be comic relief!
- callmemaybe84
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Oh I know. My comment still stands, and probably for me as well.socrates88 wrote:It was supposed to be comic relief!
- jselson
- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
The pic is a great touchsocrates88 wrote:It was supposed to be comic relief!
- applemaroon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
.
Last edited by applemaroon on Sat Sep 07, 2013 12:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
- jselson
- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Yeah, except NO ONE HAS UPDATED ITapplemaroon wrote:Absolutely flawless.socrates88 wrote:Just made a Tumblr http://ylsfb.tumblr.com
Any of our already admitted friends can send an email to obwdq4aud2qxu@tumblr.com (just put the number in the subject, your email address, etc won't be recorded) anytime there's a change and the new number will be reflected.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:08 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Paging edamame, carboncopy and friends, our loyal informants!
- callmemaybe84
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Why do I feel like we are going to see some 1am ding action tonight?
-
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 9:05 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
It's still at 213.
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:08 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Imagine all these law profs up at this hour scrambling to get their scores into Asha. Seeing this site would give them a good laugh.
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:25 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
LOL. I have a strong suspicion that they're still admitting 12s and Asha picks. Correct me if you think otherwise.socrates88 wrote:Imagine all these law profs up at this hour scrambling to get their scores into Asha. Seeing this site would give them a good laugh.
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:08 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Or they have too many 11s and are deciding their fate.
-
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:10 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Do they usually put 10s on the WL or is it limited pretty much to 11s? I'm by no means a statistician so I honestly wouldn't be surprised if what I'm about to say is 100% incorrect but:
Wouldn't 10 from faculty review mean 2 "3's" (i.e. 50th-75th percentile of applicants) and 1 "4" (75th-100th percentile of applicants) (this is assuming that if at least 1 professor is giving you a 4, that none are giving you a 2)?
If you take the upward bounds and weight them equally that'd be the 83rd percentile (10/12). We're talking about ~491 students based on last year's numbers. Seeing as how they only made 237 new offers (something like the top 8.1% of their applicants), that leaves a pretty enormous hole, especially considering that 11's and 12's are the top 8.4% of applicants. The 0.3% gap of their applicants from last year would constitute ~88. Does it make sense that, if they put ~100 on the wait list, that only 12 or fewer will be 10s?
And I also know that this is probably irrelevant because we'll never know if we are 11s, 10s, or something worse.
Wouldn't 10 from faculty review mean 2 "3's" (i.e. 50th-75th percentile of applicants) and 1 "4" (75th-100th percentile of applicants) (this is assuming that if at least 1 professor is giving you a 4, that none are giving you a 2)?
If you take the upward bounds and weight them equally that'd be the 83rd percentile (10/12). We're talking about ~491 students based on last year's numbers. Seeing as how they only made 237 new offers (something like the top 8.1% of their applicants), that leaves a pretty enormous hole, especially considering that 11's and 12's are the top 8.4% of applicants. The 0.3% gap of their applicants from last year would constitute ~88. Does it make sense that, if they put ~100 on the wait list, that only 12 or fewer will be 10s?
And I also know that this is probably irrelevant because we'll never know if we are 11s, 10s, or something worse.
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:08 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Asha only gives the profs 1000 applications, after she chooses 50-80 presumptive admits. So the profs are choosing the top 150-180(15%-18%) out if the top 1/3 of applicants which amounts to top 5-6% of applicants after Asha picks the top 2-3%.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:10 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
socrates88 wrote:Asha only gives the profs 1000 applications, after she chooses 50-80 presumptive admits. So the profs are choosing the top 150-180(15%-18%) out if the top 1/3 of applicants which amounts to top 5-6% of applicants after Asha picks the top 2-3%.
Ahhhhhh okay that makes so much more sense. I knew I had read SOMEWHERE that they put 10s on the wait list--I had no idea that she gave reviewers so few applications.
- sabanist
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:48 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
maybe I am up too late writing this paper, but I am dying at the tumblr. perfect.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:53 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
No reported dings? This is getting super frustrating.
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 4:10 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
There are zero other explanations at this point except that they are lazy or fucking with us.MannaMan wrote:No reported dings? This is getting super frustrating.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- callmemaybe84
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Pretty soon, Yale gonna be all:


-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
yeah at this point i think its clear we are going to be part of a massive wave given the way things have gone down, which means either WL or Ding. MOnday was their goal so we will probably hear today or tomorrow
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:08 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Still 213? The Tumblr hasn't been updated since 2 AM.
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
That's because it still hasn't changed since 2am.socrates88 wrote:Still 213? The Tumblr hasn't been updated since 2 AM.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:33 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I keep checking the count - will update if anything happens!socrates88 wrote:Still 213? The Tumblr hasn't been updated since 2 AM.
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
carboncopyx wrote:That's because it still hasn't changed since 2am.socrates88 wrote:Still 213? The Tumblr hasn't been updated since 2 AM.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:53 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
No movement on the Tumblr/Facebook front?
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:08 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Looks like the Tumblr was just refreshed 5 minutes ago with 213--no change.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login