Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Status changed to "invited for interview" but no email. I'm assuming it's on the way. Very excited.
- applemaroon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by applemaroon on Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:07 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yay! Just got an invitation to interview... Thought they had passed over me after seeing others with my UR date receive invitations in the last batch.This invitation is a good sign, right?! 

Last edited by ht2988 on Thu Mar 07, 2013 10:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:22 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Status update yesterday after my interview and again today. Oh god, it's coming.
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I've been complete since 1/15. Getting nervous. Would an LOCI be premature at this point?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:18 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I received my interview invitation on Feb 22. Scheduled and had it done on March 5th. Just checked the status checker now and saw that the status is "application under review" but the date is Feb 26. ??? what does this mean? that I was thrown "back"? Must be a bad sign, right? does anybody know? I was told in the invitation email that the decision should come tomorrow.
-
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:22 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yep. I went complete in November, didn't go under review until January, and didn't get an interview invite until the last week of February. They are just running a little slow. Also, I think they explicitly say not to update your application (too lazy to cite).Goodman wrote:I've been complete since 1/15. Getting nervous. Would an LOCI be premature at this point?
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks. And back to waiting....Volforlife wrote:Yep. I went complete in November, didn't go under review until January, and didn't get an interview invite until the last week of February. They are just running a little slow. Also, I think they explicitly say not to update your application (too lazy to cite).Goodman wrote:I've been complete since 1/15. Getting nervous. Would an LOCI be premature at this point?
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Do we have a rough idea of admit rate after interviews?
edit:nevermind, saw OP data
edit:nevermind, saw OP data
- uconjak
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Has anyone got a missed phone call and had Unknown number from it and it turned out to be from Chicago? i have had 6 calls in the last 8 days all around Noon(+/- 1 hour) Midwest time.
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Chicago doesn't do phone calls as far as I know. (neither does Columbia to answer your question in the other thread)uconjak wrote:Has anyone got a missed phone call and had Unknown number from it and it turned out to be from Chicago? i have had 6 calls in the last 8 days all around Noon(+/- 1 hour) Midwest time.
- uconjak
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks, this is driving me nuts!!bernaldiaz wrote:Chicago doesn't do phone calls as far as I know. (neither does Columbia to answer your question in the other thread)uconjak wrote:Has anyone got a missed phone call and had Unknown number from it and it turned out to be from Chicago? i have had 6 calls in the last 8 days all around Noon(+/- 1 hour) Midwest time.
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Withdrew earlier today. Hope the spot and the money goes to one of you guys.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- davee817
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Interview invite today! 

-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:28 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Youre one of the good ones, sir.bernaldiaz wrote:Withdrew earlier today. Hope the spot and the money goes to one of you guys.
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
If they would just review my application, they would love me. I just know it!
Let me love you, Chicago.
Let me love you, Chicago.
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1ohpobrecito wrote:If they would just review my application, they would love me. I just know it!
Let me love you, Chicago.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Jaqen
- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Moneys! Grats all, but especially shntn and Eich.

Ty. Good luck wherever you end up.bernaldiaz wrote:Withdrew earlier today. Hope the spot and the money goes to one of you guys.
- Jaqen
- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
He probably just meant from the latest batch. ie Feb 15th-todayapplemaroon wrote:WUT. Why make that assumption?WalkingPlato wrote:Now that everyone should've had their interview, did anyone think she was cold and uninterested? I remember her yawning during mine.
-
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:51 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I meant all the ones from my cycle (Feb 22 - March 7th, with decisions coming out around tomorrow). I waited till it was over so I don't reveal when my interview was in case an ad com person is reading. So, again, for those who interviewed, did Dean Perry seem distant, bored, and uninterested?applemaroon wrote:WUT. Why make that assumption?WalkingPlato wrote:Now that everyone should've had their interview, did anyone think she was cold and uninterested? I remember her yawning during mine.
- applemaroon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by applemaroon on Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- applemaroon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by applemaroon on Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- LSATSCORES2012
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
She seemed the same way during mine and I got in. At NYU's ASW today, someone told me she did the same thing for them, and though the person didn't explicitly say so they seemed to have been admitted as well. I wouldn't worry about it, as long as you thought your answers were up to par.WalkingPlato wrote:I meant all the ones from my cycle (Feb 22 - March 7th, with decisions coming out around tomorrow). I waited till it was over so I don't reveal when my interview was in case an ad com person is reading. So, again, for those who interviewed, did Dean Perry seem distant, bored, and uninterested?applemaroon wrote:WUT. Why make that assumption?WalkingPlato wrote:Now that everyone should've had their interview, did anyone think she was cold and uninterested? I remember her yawning during mine.
Last edited by LSATSCORES2012 on Thu Mar 07, 2013 9:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:51 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Hmm.. That's weird. Mine went back under review at the date of the interview.BlackadderIn wrote:I received my interview invitation on Feb 22. Scheduled and had it done on March 5th. Just checked the status checker now and saw that the status is "application under review" but the date is Feb 26. ??? what does this mean? that I was thrown "back"? Must be a bad sign, right? does anybody know? I was told in the invitation email that the decision should come tomorrow.
- elterrible78
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:09 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Got my award letter from Chicago. $120k, which I am certainly pleased with. It does, however, make decision time a little harder.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login